R. Bras. Zootec.01/mar/2017;46(3):273.
ERRATUM
DOI: 10.1590/S1806-92902016001100010e
In the Invited Review ”, published in Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 45(11):709-728, 2016, on page 709, where it reads:
[…]
ERRATUM
Como citar este artigo
, . ERRATUM. R. Bras. Zootec. [online]. 2017, vol.46, 3, [cited 2026-05-14], pp.273-273. Available from: <https://rbz.org.br/pt-br/article/erratum-3/>. ISSN 1516-3598. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016001100010e.
, . ERRATUM. R. Bras. Zootec., v.46, 3, p. 273-273. mar. 2017. Available from: <https://rbz.org.br/pt-br/article/erratum-3/>. acess on 14 May. 2026. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016001100010e.
, . (2017). ERRATUM. R. Bras. Zootec., 46(3) , 273-273. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016001100010e.
. ERRATUM. R. Bras. Zootec. [Internet]. 2017 mar [cited 2026 May 14]; 46(3): 273-273. Available from: https://rbz.org.br/pt-br/article/erratum-3/. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016001100010e.
Figure 5
Dendrogram constructed using the UPGMA algorithm based on allele distances of each of the 74 individuals analyzed with five microsatellite markers. The individuals belong to four sampling zones: (1) dam zone, (2) Huaynamota River zone, (3) central reservoir zone, and (4) southern reservoir zone.