R. Bras. Zootec.01/Jul/2008;37(special issue):253-9.
Technologies to mitigate enviromental impact of swine production
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-35982008001300029
Technologies to mitigate enviromental impact of swine production
How to cite this article
Williams, C.M.. Technologies to mitigate enviromental impact of swine production. R. Bras. Zootec. [online]. 2008, vol.37, special issue, [cited 2026-05-14], pp.253-259. Available from: <https://rbz.org.br/article/technologies-to-mitigate-enviromental-impact-of-swine-production/>. ISSN 1516-3598. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001300029.
Williams, C.M.. Technologies to mitigate enviromental impact of swine production. R. Bras. Zootec., v.37, special issue, p. 253-259. Jul. 2008. Available from: <https://rbz.org.br/article/technologies-to-mitigate-enviromental-impact-of-swine-production/>. acess on 14 May. 2026. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001300029.
Williams, C.M.. (2008). Technologies to mitigate enviromental impact of swine production. R. Bras. Zootec., 37(special issue) , 253-259. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001300029.
Williams C.M.. Technologies to mitigate enviromental impact of swine production. R. Bras. Zootec. [Internet]. 2008 Jul [cited 2026 May 14]; 37(special issue): 253-259. Available from: https://rbz.org.br/article/technologies-to-mitigate-enviromental-impact-of-swine-production/. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008001300029.
Figure 5
Dendrogram constructed using the UPGMA algorithm based on allele distances of each of the 74 individuals analyzed with five microsatellite markers. The individuals belong to four sampling zones: (1) dam zone, (2) Huaynamota River zone, (3) central reservoir zone, and (4) southern reservoir zone.