The Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (RBZ) is a publication dedicated to the broad field of Animal Science. We publish high-quality, original scientific research that spans across diverse areas within the discipline. The scope of RBZ encompasses a wide range of topics, including aquaculture, biometeorology and animal welfare, forage crops and grasslands, animal and forage plants breeding and genetics, animal reproduction, ruminant and non-ruminant nutrition, meat science and muscle biology, precision livestock, and animal production systems and agribusiness.
The Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (RBZ) is a publication dedicated to the broad field of Animal Science. We publish high-quality, original scientific research that spans across diverse areas within the discipline. The scope of RBZ encompasses a wide range of topics, including aquaculture, biometeorology and animal welfare, forage crops and grasslands, animal and forage plants breeding and genetics, animal reproduction, ruminant and non-ruminant nutrition, meat science and muscle biology, precision livestock, and animal production systems and agribusiness.
The Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia (RBZ) is a publication dedicated to the broad field of Animal Science. We publish high-quality, original scientific research that spans across diverse areas within the discipline. The scope of RBZ encompasses a wide range of topics, including aquaculture, biometeorology and animal welfare, forage crops and grasslands, animal and forage plants breeding and genetics, animal reproduction, ruminant and non-ruminant nutrition, meat science and muscle biology, precision livestock, and animal production systems and agribusiness.
A total of 292 animals from three breeds (Alpine and Saanen dairy breeds, and the Brazilian naturalized breed Moxotó) were genotyped, comprising 276 paternity cases. Statistical analyses were carried out by using TFPGA and CERVUS programs. Heterozygosis ranged from 0.542 (ILSTS005) to 0.825 (INRA006), with an average of 0.717 for all loci. Polymorphic information content (PIC) was 0.676 and 0.542, and combined exclusion probabilities (EP) were 0.999591 and 0.988375 for known and unknown maternal genotypes, respectively. The microsatellite system reveals 10% of paternity misidentification in evaluated registers.
Paternity in Brazilian goats through the use of DNA microsatellites
Araújo,Adriana Mello de and Guimarães,Simone Eliza Facioni and Pereira,Carmen Silva and Lopes,Paulo Sávio and Rodrigues,Marcelo Teixeira and Machado,Théa Mírian Medeiros. Paternity in Brazilian goats through the use of DNA microsatellites. R. Bras. Zootec. [online]. 2010, vol.39, 5, [cited 2026-04-24], pp.1011-1014. Available from: <https://rbz.org.br/article/paternity-in-brazilian-goats-through-the-use-of-dna-microsatellites/>. ISSN 1516-3598. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000500010.
Araújo,Adriana Mello de; Guimarães,Simone Eliza Facioni; Pereira,Carmen Silva; Lopes,Paulo Sávio; Rodrigues,Marcelo Teixeira; Machado,Théa Mírian Medeiros. Paternity in Brazilian goats through the use of DNA microsatellites. R. Bras. Zootec., v.39, 5, p. 1011-1014. May. 2010. Available from: <https://rbz.org.br/article/paternity-in-brazilian-goats-through-the-use-of-dna-microsatellites/>. acess on 24 Apr. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000500010.
Araújo,Adriana Mello de, & Guimarães,Simone Eliza Facioni, & Pereira,Carmen Silva, & Lopes,Paulo Sávio, & Rodrigues,Marcelo Teixeira, & Machado,Théa Mírian Medeiros. (2010). Paternity in Brazilian goats through the use of DNA microsatellites. R. Bras. Zootec., 39(5) , 1011-1014. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000500010.
AraújoAdriana Mello de, GuimarãesSimone Eliza Facioni, PereiraCarmen Silva, LopesPaulo Sávio, RodriguesMarcelo Teixeira, MachadoThéa Mírian Medeiros. Paternity in Brazilian goats through the use of DNA microsatellites. R. Bras. Zootec. [Internet]. 2010 May [cited 2026 Apr 24]; 39(5): 1011-1014. Available from: https://rbz.org.br/article/paternity-in-brazilian-goats-through-the-use-of-dna-microsatellites/. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000500010.
Figure 6
Differential abundance for the species Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (A) and Megamonas funiformis (B).
