<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rbz</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">R. Bras. Zootec.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">1516-3598</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">1806-9290</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="other">01802</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37496/rbz5520250160</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Forage crops</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Effects of calcium oxide, sugarcane molasses and corn heavy steep water on the storage and nutritional composition of corn husks</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0002-1459-1625</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Carvalho</surname>
						<given-names>Matheus Guilherme Moreira de</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Data curation</role>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Investigation</role>
					<role>Methodology</role>
					<role>Validation</role>
					<role>Visualization</role>
					<role>Writing – original draft</role>
					<role>Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0004-7355-073X</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Oliveira</surname>
						<given-names>Bruna Caroline da Silva</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Investigation</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-1589-2892</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Bragatto</surname>
						<given-names>Janaina Macieiro</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Visualization</role>
					<role>Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-7335-1712</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Gomes</surname>
						<given-names>Ana Luiza Mendonça</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Investigation</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0006-2883-4340</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Silva</surname>
						<given-names>Matheus Custódio da</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Conceptualization</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-0569-899X</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Daniel</surname>
						<given-names>João Luiz Pratti</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Conceptualization</role>
					<role>Data curation</role>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Funding acquisition</role>
					<role>Project administration</role>
					<role>Resources</role>
					<role>Software</role>
					<role>Supervision</role>
					<role>Methodology</role>
					<role>Validation</role>
					<role>Visualization</role>
					<role>Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c01"><sup>*</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Estadual de Maringá</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Departamento de Zootecnia</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Maringá</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">PR</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Universidade Estadual de Maringá, Departamento de Zootecnia, Maringá, PR, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Cargill Wetfeed</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Uberlândia</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">MG</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Cargill Wetfeed, Uberlândia, MG, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c01">
					<label>*Corresponding author:</label>
					<email>jlpdaniel@uem.br</email>
				</corresp>
				<fn fn-type="edited-by">
					<label>Editors:</label>
					<p>Gustavo José Braga</p>
					<p>Luiz Felipe Ferraretto</p>
				</fn>
				<fn fn-type="coi-statement">
					<label>Conflict of interest:</label>
					<p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>04</day>
				<month>03</month>
				<year>2026</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<year>2026</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>55</volume>
			<elocation-id>e20250160</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>17</day>
					<month>08</month>
					<year>2025</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>14</day>
					<month>11</month>
					<year>2025</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>Copyright: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p>The objective was to evaluate the effects of calcium oxide (CaO) and a mixture of corn heavy steep water and sugarcane molasses (HM) on the fermentation, aerobic stability, and ruminal disappearance of corn husk silage. Three doses of CaO (0, 20, and 40 g/kg of fresh matter (FM)) and three doses of HM (0, 100, and 200 g/kg of FM) were arranged factorially and applied to rehydrated corn husk (500 g/kg moisture) in a completely randomized design, with four replicates per treatment. Treated corn husk was placed in nylon-polyethylene bags (33 cm × 45 cm, 160 μm thick), vacuum sealed, and stored for 66 d. Significant HM × CaO interaction (P&lt;0.05) were observed for chemical composition, including crude protein (CP) and ash-free neutral detergent fiber (aNDFom), as well as for key fermentative parameters, notably lactic, acetic, and n-butyric acids. CaO increased silage pH, with the highest dose exceeding pH 7 after 66 d of storage, indicating a high buffering capacity. Aerobic spore-forming bacteria and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) counts increased with HM and CaO, respectively, while molds decreased with CaO. Clostridia counts tended to increase with CaO, and n-butyric acid increased with both additives, suggesting reduced hygienic quality of the silage. Dry matter (DM) loss was reduced, and aerobic stability was extended by CaO, indicating inhibition of microbial metabolism. However, HM alone increased aerobic spoilage. Both additives enhanced ruminal DM disappearance, while CaO slightly improved in situ disappearance of aNDFom. Corn husk ensiled without additives already exhibited considerable ruminal DM and aNDFom disappearance, as well as good preservation. In conclusion, corn husk (500 g/kg moisture) may be ensiled without additives or, if convenient, added with up to 100 g/kg of HM.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Keywords</title>
				<kwd>aerobic stability</kwd>
				<kwd>alkalage</kwd>
				<kwd>byproduct</kwd>
				<kwd>fermentation</kwd>
				<kwd>fiber digestibility</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="3"/>
				<table-count count="3"/>
				<equation-count count="2"/>
				<ref-count count="41"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>1. Introduction</title>
			<p>Large-scale industrial food processing generates large amounts of byproducts. These residues can have negative consequences for the environment, such as soil and water pollution when compounds are leached if disposed of incorrectly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Rosa et al., 2011</xref>). At the same time, agro-industrial byproducts have the potential to be used as animal feed and thus converted into human-edible food. Currently, most agro-industries depend on the sale of byproducts to make their final products economically viable. Additionally, the use of co-products or byproducts in animal production, especially for feeding ruminants, reduces the demand for arable land and competition with edible foods such as corn and soybean, thereby reducing feed costs and increasing environmental sustainability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Wilkinson and Lee, 2018</xref>).</p>
			<p>Corn husk is a bulky feed with moderate nutritional value, containing 50 to 90 g/kg of crude protein (CP) and 640 to 820 g/kg of neutral detergent fiber (NDF) on dry matter (DM) basis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Gao et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Petzel et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Xu et al., 2025</xref>) and can serve as a roughage source in ruminant diets. However, its conservation poses challenges due to the wide variability in moisture content (100 to 750 g/kg; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Gao et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Petzel et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Tong et al., 2023</xref>), which may hinder proper storage and increase the risk of spoilage. Therefore, ensiling can be a feasible alternative to preserve this feedstuff and potentially improve its nutritional value.</p>
			<p>In some agro-industries, calcium oxide (CaO) has been used as an additive for ensiling fibrous feedstuffs, aiming to improve fiber digestibility by increasing cell wall solubilization and disrupting lignocellulosic bonds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Schmidt et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Daniel et al., 2013</xref>). However, it may negatively impact the fermentation pattern due to an increase in buffering capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Custódio et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Jacovaci et al., 2017</xref>). Meanwhile, corn heavy steep water, a liquid byproduct derived from the wet extraction of starch from corn grains, is rich in non-fiber carbohydrates (~300 g/kg DM) and crude protein (~500 g/kg of DM), widely available at corn agro-industries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Silva et al., 2008</xref>). This byproduct is often mixed with sugarcane molasses and used as a ruminant feedstuff. Due to the high availability of soluble carbohydrates in the mixture of corn heavy steep water with sugarcane molasses (HM), this liquid viscous byproduct could be used to improve the fermentation of ensiled crops or byproducts with lower concentrations of soluble carbohydrates, which are essential substrates for lactic fermentation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">McDonald et al., 1991</xref>). The mixture also has the potential to enhance silage fermentation and nutritive feed value through the supply of soluble nutrients, whereas corn heavy steep water may contribute to increasing the buffering capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Woolford, 1984</xref>). Further investigations are therefore needed to determine the optimal inclusion level of this mixture. However, no studies have evaluated the combined use of CaO and HM during the ensiling of corn husk.</p>
			<p>Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the impact of increased doses of HM combined with different doses of CaO on the conservation and nutritional composition of ensiled corn husks. We hypothesized that HM would enhance silage fermentation by providing readily fermentable substrates, while CaO would improve fiber digestibility. Their combined application of both additives was expected to improve both silage fermentation and ruminal disappearance.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>2. Material and methods</title>
			<p>Prior to the beginning of the study, all animal care and handling procedures were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Use of Universidade Estadual de Maringá (protocol number 8208090218 – CEUA/UEM). The experiment was carried out in Maringá, PR, Brazil (23° 25' S, 51° 57' W, 550 m elevation).</p>
			<sec>
				<title>2.1. Ensiling process</title>
				<p>Chopped corn husks [Dry matter (DM) 843 g/kg as fed; ash 28.9 g/kg DM; CP 62.1 g/kg DM; ash-free neutral detergent fiber (aNDFom) 687 g/kg DM; ash-free acid detergent fiber (ADFom) 349 g/kg DM] and HM (i.e., a mixture containing 500 g/kg of corn heavy steep water and 500 g/kg of sugarcane molasses; DM 564 g/kg; ash 120 g/kg; CP 250 g/kg) were provided by an agroindustry (Cargill, Castro, PR, Brazil), which also defined the 1:1 ratio of corn heavy steep water to sugarcane molasses based on product availability and prior industrial blending practices. Corn husk was divided into nine piles (one for each treatment) and treated with three doses of HM (0, 100, and 200 g/kg on a fresh matter [FM] basis) in factorial combination with three doses of CaO (0, 20, and 40 g/kg of FM; Colombocal, Colombo, PR, Brazil). Water was added to all treatments to adjust DM content to 500 g/kg FM. CaO was applied as a powder, and HM was poured over the chopped corn husks and homogenized. Approximately 1 kg of treated material from each pile was placed in nylon-polyethylene bags (33 cm × 45 cm, 160 µm thick) and vacuum sealed (Bench-Top Vacuum Sealer TM 250 – TecMaq, São Paulo, Brazil). Each bag (mini silo) was considered an experimental unit (n = 4 per treatment). The bags were weighted and stored within the laboratory at room temperature (18 to 27 °C).</p>
				<p>After 66 d of storage, the silos were weighed, and samples were collected for analysis of chemical composition, aerobic stability, and ruminal in situ disappearance. The DM loss was calculated as the difference between the amount of DM ensiled and DM recovered, expressed as a proportion of DM ensiled.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.2. Aerobic stability test</title>
				<p>Silage samples (700 g) were collected and placed in 3.6-L plastic buckets with temperature sensors (RC-5 USB, Elitech, Niterói, Brazil; accuracy ± 0.5 °C) positioned at the center of the silage sample. Subsequently, the buckets were covered with perforated aluminum foil to prevent contamination and avoid dehydration. The buckets were stored in a temperature-controlled room (25 ± 1.8 °C). The temperature was recorded every 15 min for 10 d. Aerobic spoilage was defined as the time elapsed until silage temperature increased by 2 °C above ambient temperature (O’Kiely, 1993). Additionally, silage pH was measured daily during the aerobic exposure period. A silage sample was collected approximately 5 cm below the surface and mixed with 90 mL of distilled water (10 g of silage + 90 mL water) to prepare an aqueous extract. The mixture was blended for 2 min and filtered through four layers of sterilized gauze before pH determination.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.3. Ruminal disappearance <italic>in situ</italic></title>
				<p>Two rumen-cannulated, non-lactating, multiparous Holstein cows (595 ± 57 kg of body weight) housed in a tie-stall barn were used for the <italic>in situ</italic> incubation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Nocek, 1988</xref>). Cows were fed <italic>ad libitum</italic> a diet containing 650 g/kg DM corn silage and 350 g/kg DM of commercial concentrate, and had free access to water.</p>
				<p>Fresh and ensiled corn husk samples were dried and ground using a Wiley mill (model MA340, Marconi, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil) fitted with a 5-mm screen. Subsequently, 5 g of each sample was weighed into nylon bags (10 cm × 20 cm, 50 μm pore size; Ankom Technology, Macedon, NY, USA). Each treatment was incubated in triplicate per cow. Before incubation, the bags were soaked in warm water (39 °C) for 10 min to pre-hydrate the samples and simulate ruminal conditions. Two blank bags (without sample) were included to correct for bag weight loss.</p>
				<p>One set of bags was incubated in the rumen ventral sac for 24 h to evaluate DM disappearance, whereas another set of bags was incubated for 30 h to determine aNDFom disappearance. After removal, bags were submerged in ice-cold water for 10 min. Subsenquetly, bags were rinsed under running water until the water was clear, and then dried in a forced-air oven at 55 °C for 72 h, and weighed. The dried residues were ground through a 1-mm screen and analyzed for DM and aNDFom to calculate DM disappearance at 24 h and aNDFom disappearance at 30 h, respectively.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.4. Laboratory analysis</title>
				<p>Samples of fresh and ensiled corn husks and residues from ruminal <italic>in situ</italic> incubation were dried in a forced-air oven at 55 °C for 72 h and ground in a Wiley mill (1-mm screen) for chemical composition analysis. Samples were analyzed for DM, ash, and CP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">AOAC, 1990</xref>), aNDFom (assayed with heat-stable amylase, sodium sulfite, and expressed exclusive of residual ash; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Mertens, 2002</xref>), and ADFom (assayed sequentially and expressed exclusive of residual ash). Organic matter (OM) was computed as 100 – ash. The CP, aNDFom and ADFom concentrations were also expressed on an OM basis (g/kg of OM) to avoid bias caused by the addition of CaO, which increases ash content and could artificially lower nutrient concentrations on a DM basis. Reporting results on an OM basis allowed a more accurate comparison among treatments. Dry samples of treated corn husks before ensiling were also analyzed for buffering capacity (BC, g lactic acid/kg DM) according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Weissbach (1967)</xref>.</p>
				<p>Aqueous extracts of fresh silage samples were prepared by homogenizing 25 g of silage with 225 mL of distilled water for 2 min in a blender, followed by filtration through four layers of sterilized gauze for microbial counts, fermentation product analysis, and pH measurement, which was recorded (model Tec5, Tecnal<sup>®</sup>, Piracicaba, Brazil). An aliquot was diluted (10<sup>1</sup> to 10<sup>7</sup>) in sterile peptone water (1 g/L) for microbial counts using the pour-plate technique on selective media. Molds and yeasts were enumerated on malt extract agar (M137, Himedia<sup>®</sup>, Mumbai, India) acidified to pH 3.5 with lactic acid. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) were enumerated on De Man, Rogosa, and Sharpe agar (7543A, Acumedia<sup>®</sup>, Michigan, USA) supplemented with nystatin (400,000 IU/L). All plates were prepared in duplicate and incubated aerobically at 30 °C for 2, 3, and 4 d before enumeration of LAB, yeasts, and molds, respectively. Additionally, an aliquot of the aqueous extract was pasteurized (80 °C for 10 min) and serially diluted (10<sup>1</sup> to 10<sup>3</sup>) for enumeration of bacillus and clostridia. Aerobic spore-forming bacteria were counted after pour-plating on plate count agar (M091A, Himedia<sup>®</sup>, Mumbai, India) incubated aerobically at 34 °C for 2 d. Clostridia were enumerated on reinforced clostridial agar (M154, Himedia<sup>®</sup>, Mumbai, India) supplemented with neutral red and D-cycloserine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Jonsson, 1990</xref>) incubated in anaerobic jars with an anaerobic generator (Anaerobac<sup>®</sup>, Probac<sup>®</sup>, São Paulo, Brazil) at 37 °C for 5 d. Microorganisms were counted as colony-forming units (CFU) and expressed as log<sub>10</sub>.</p>
				<p>A portion of the undiluted aqueous extract was centrifuged at 10,000 × <italic>g</italic> for 15 min to obtain the supernatant for analysis of fermentation products. Ammonia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chaney and Marbach, 1962</xref>) and lactic acid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Pryce, 1969</xref>) were determined by colorimetry. Ethanol, acetic acid, 2,3-butanediol, 1,2-propanediol, n-propanol, propionic acid, n-butyric acid, n-valeric acid, i-butyric acid, and i-valeric acid concentrations were determined by gas chromatography (Nexis GC-2030, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) and an autoinjector (AOC-20i Plus, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), using a Stabilwax capillary column (Restek, Bellefonte, PA; 60 m, 0.25 mm ø, 0.25 μm polyethylene glycol cross bond carbowax). Identification of the compounds was performed according to their retention times and quantification was carried out using external standards (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Lazzari et al., 2021</xref>). Silage DM content was adjusted to account for volatile losses during oven drying, as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Weissbach and Strubelt (2008)</xref>.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.5. Statistical analysis</title>
				<p>The experimental design was completely randomized in a 3 × 3 factorial arrangement, consisting of three doses of HM (0, 100, and 200 g/kg of FM) and three doses of CaO (0, 20, and 40 g/kg of FM), with four replicates per treatment. For silage characteristics (chemical composition, microbial counts, fermentation profile, losses, and aerobic stability) data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS, with a model (Eq. 1) including the fixed effects of HM, CaO, and their interaction (HM × CaO).</p>
				<disp-formula id="e1">
					<mml:math>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>μ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>ε</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
					</mml:math>
				</disp-formula>
				<p>in which <italic>Y</italic><sub><italic>ijk</italic></sub> represents the response variable for the levels of HM (<italic>i</italic>), CaO (<italic>j</italic>), and replication (<italic>k</italic>); <italic>μ</italic> is the overall mean; <italic>α</italic><sub><italic>i</italic></sub> and <italic>β</italic><sub><italic>j</italic></sub> are the fixed effects of HM (0, 100, and 200 g/kg FM) and CaO (0, 20, and 40 g/kg FM) levels, respectively; (<italic>αβ</italic>)<sub><italic>ij</italic></sub> is the HM × CaO interaction; and <italic>ɛ</italic><sub><italic>ijk</italic></sub> is the residual error. Orthogonal polynomial contrasts were used to assess linear and quadratic effects of HM and CaO levels. Statistical significance was declared at P≤0.05. When a significant HM × CaO interaction was detected (P≤0.05), least squares means were compared using Tukey-Kramer test (α = 0.05).</p>
				<p>For the ruminal <italic>in situ</italic> disappearance, the same factorial structure was adopted, but including a fixed effect of ensiling and a random effect of cow to account for inter-animal variability. The following model was used (Eq. 2):</p>
				<disp-formula id="e2">
					<mml:math>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>μ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>γ</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>γ</mml:mi>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>γ</mml:mi>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>γ</mml:mi>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>δ</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>ε</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
					</mml:math>
				</disp-formula>
				<p>in which <italic>Y</italic><sub><italic>ijklm</italic></sub> represents the variable response for the levels of HM (<italic>i</italic>), CaO (<italic>j</italic>), ensiling (<italic>k</italic>), cow (<italic>l</italic>), and replication (<italic>m</italic>); <italic>μ</italic> is the overall mean; <italic>α</italic><sub><italic>i</italic></sub>, <italic>β</italic><sub><italic>j</italic></sub> , and <italic>γ</italic><sub><italic>k</italic></sub> are the fixed effects of HM (0, 100, and 200 g/kg FM), CaO (0, 20, and 40 g/kg FM) levels, and ensiling (fresh or silage), respectively; (<italic>αβ</italic>)<sub><italic>ij</italic></sub> is the interaction HM × CaO; (<italic>αγ</italic>)<sub><italic>ik</italic></sub> is the interaction HM × ensiling; (<italic>βγ</italic>)<sub><italic>jk</italic></sub> is the interaction CaO × ensiling; (<italic>αβγ</italic>)<sub><italic>ijk</italic></sub> is the interaction HM × CaO × ensiling; <italic>δ</italic><sub><italic>l</italic></sub> is the random effect of cow; and <italic>ε</italic><sub><italic>ijklm</italic></sub> is the residual error.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>3. Results</title>
			<sec>
				<title>3.1. Fresh corn husks</title>
				<p>There was an interaction HM × CaO for DM, ADFom, pH, BC (P&lt;0.001), CP (P = 0.008), and aNDFom (P = 0.015; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). At 100 g/kg of HM, DM remained similar values regardless of CaO addition. However, at 200 g/kg of HM, DM was reduced, with the lowest value observed at 40 g/kg of CaO. At 0 and 100 g/kg HM, CP fluctuated slightly with CaO addition, whereas at 200 g/kg HM, CP remained consistently higher regardless of CaO addition (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). In the absence of HM, CaO addition did not affect aNDFom concentration (P = 0.12). However, at 100 g/kg and 200 g/kg HM, the addition of CaO led to a decrease in aNDFom concentration (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). Without HM, the addition of 40 g/kg of CaO increased ADFom concentration. At 100 g/kg of HM, ADFom concentration increased with the addition of CaO, reaching the highest value at 40 g/kg of CaO. At 200 g/kg of HM, ADFom values were generally lower than those at 100 g/kg HM, and the effect of CaO was less pronounced (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). While CaO increased pH in all treatments, the magnitude of this increase was influenced by the presence of HM, with HM slightly mitigating the pH increase caused by CaO. The presence of HM enhanced the BC, suggesting that both CaO and HM increased the resistance to pH decline (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). The ash content significantly increased with the addition of both CaO and HM (P&lt;0.001), indicating their direct contribution to increasing the mineral content (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t1">
						<label>Table 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Characteristics of corn husks before ensiling (n = 4)</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">Item</th>
									<th colspan="9" style="font-weight:normal">Treatment<sup>1</sup></th>
									<th colspan="1" rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
									<th align="left" colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal"> </th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">0 HM</th>
									<th colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">100 HM</th>
									<th colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">200 HM</th>
									<th colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">P-value<sup>2</sup></th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">20 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">40 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">20 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">40 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">20 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">40 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">HM</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">HM × CaO</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>Dry matter (g/kg)</td>
									<td align="center">528ab</td>
									<td align="center">550a</td>
									<td align="center">549a</td>
									<td align="center">525ab</td>
									<td align="center">532ab</td>
									<td align="center">530ab</td>
									<td align="center">497c</td>
									<td align="center">514bc</td>
									<td align="center">467d</td>
									<td align="center">2.35</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ash (g/kg DM)</td>
									<td align="center">29.1</td>
									<td align="center">51.0</td>
									<td align="center">104</td>
									<td align="center">36.7</td>
									<td align="center">65.3</td>
									<td align="center">109</td>
									<td align="center">48.6</td>
									<td align="center">84.0</td>
									<td align="center">136</td>
									<td align="center">4.06</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.29</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>CP (g/kg OM)</td>
									<td align="center">56.9de</td>
									<td align="center">59.4cd</td>
									<td align="center">51.1e</td>
									<td align="center">67.9b</td>
									<td align="center">62.1bcd</td>
									<td align="center">64.5bc</td>
									<td align="center">82.6a</td>
									<td align="center">82.8a</td>
									<td align="center">82.5a</td>
									<td align="center">1.55</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.058</td>
									<td align="center">0.008</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>aNDFom<sup>3</sup> (g/kg OM)</td>
									<td align="center">645abc</td>
									<td align="center">655ab</td>
									<td align="center">663a</td>
									<td align="center">609bcd</td>
									<td align="center">598cd</td>
									<td align="center">567de</td>
									<td align="center">534ef</td>
									<td align="center">480f</td>
									<td align="center">509f</td>
									<td align="center">11.9</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.12</td>
									<td align="center">0.015</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>ADFom<sup>4</sup> (g/kg OM)</td>
									<td align="center">229de</td>
									<td align="center">228e</td>
									<td align="center">295abc</td>
									<td align="center">283abc</td>
									<td align="center">290abc</td>
									<td align="center">312a</td>
									<td align="center">264c</td>
									<td align="center">279abc</td>
									<td align="center">273bc</td>
									<td align="center">7.47</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>pH</td>
									<td align="center">6.12g</td>
									<td align="center">10.4d</td>
									<td align="center">11.5a</td>
									<td align="center">4.83h</td>
									<td align="center">10.2e</td>
									<td align="center">10.9c</td>
									<td align="center">4.46i</td>
									<td align="center">10.0f</td>
									<td align="center">11.2b</td>
									<td align="center">0.365</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>BC (g lactic acid/kg DM)</td>
									<td align="center">24.9f</td>
									<td align="center">84.1e</td>
									<td align="center">150c</td>
									<td align="center">24.6f</td>
									<td align="center">155c</td>
									<td align="center">269b</td>
									<td align="center">24.8f</td>
									<td align="center">122d</td>
									<td align="center">370a</td>
									<td align="center">2.70</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN1">
								<p>CP - crude protein; BC - buffering capacity; SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN2">
								<p><sup>1</sup> HM - mixture (1:1, fresh matter basis) of corn heavy steep water + sugarcane molasses, applied at 0, 100, and 200 g/kg fresh matter; CaO - calcium oxide, applied at 0, 20, and 40 g/kg fresh matter.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN3">
								<p><sup>2</sup> HM - effect of the addition of corn heavy steep water + sugarcane molasses; CaO - effect of the addition of calcium oxide; HM × CaO - interaction effect.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN4">
								<p><sup>3</sup> aNDFom - neutral detergent fiber assayed with sodium sulfite, heat-stable amylase and expressed excluded of residual ash.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN5">
								<p><sup>4</sup> ADFom - acid detergent fiber assayed sequentially and expressed excluded of residual ash.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN6">
								<p>Means with different letters in the rows differ statistically (Tukey test α = 0.05).</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>3.2. Silage fermentation, dry matter loss and aerobic stability</title>
				<p>The CaO increased LAB counts (P&lt;0.001), regardless of HM, and tended to increase <italic>Clostridium</italic> counts (P = 0.065), especially in the 100HM20CaO and 200HM20CaO treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). Aerobic spore-forming bacteria counts increased with HM addition (P = 0.015), but were not affected by CaO (P = 0.23; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). The CaO increased yeast counts (P = 0.019), particularly in the 0HM40CaO and 100HM40CaO treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). Mold counts decreased with CaO addition (P = 0.049; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t2">
						<label>Table 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Microbial counts, fermentation profile, aerobic stability and DM loss of corn husk silages treated with calcium oxide (CaO) and a mixture of corn heavy steep water and sugarcane molasses (HM) stored for 66 days (n = 4)</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">Item</th>
									<th colspan="9" style="font-weight:normal">Treatment<sup>1</sup></th>
									<th colspan="1" rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
									<th align="left" colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal"> </th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">0 HM</th>
									<th colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">100 HM</th>
									<th colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">200 HM</th>
									<th colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">P-value<sup>2</sup></th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">20 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">40 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">20 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">40 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">20 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">40 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">HM</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">HM × CaO</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>LAB (log cfu/g)</td>
									<td align="center">6.19</td>
									<td align="center">6.72</td>
									<td align="center">7.96</td>
									<td align="center">6.28</td>
									<td align="center">5.22</td>
									<td align="center">8.17</td>
									<td align="center">6.61</td>
									<td align="center">5.26</td>
									<td align="center">7.88</td>
									<td align="center">0.417</td>
									<td align="center">0.44</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.14</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Clostridia (log cfu/g)</td>
									<td align="center">3.12</td>
									<td align="center">3.06</td>
									<td align="center">2.90</td>
									<td align="center">3.37</td>
									<td align="center">3.60</td>
									<td align="center">3.09</td>
									<td align="center">3.14</td>
									<td align="center">3.77</td>
									<td align="center">3.15</td>
									<td align="center">0.213</td>
									<td align="center">0.11</td>
									<td align="center">0.065</td>
									<td align="center">0.57</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Aerobic spore-forming bacteria (log cfu/g)</td>
									<td align="center">3.25</td>
									<td align="center">3.68</td>
									<td align="center">3.55</td>
									<td align="center">3.68</td>
									<td align="center">3.86</td>
									<td align="center">3.83</td>
									<td align="center">3.57</td>
									<td align="center">3.54</td>
									<td align="center">3.37</td>
									<td align="center">0.133</td>
									<td align="center">0.015</td>
									<td align="center">0.23</td>
									<td align="center">0.33</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Yeasts (log cfu/g)</td>
									<td align="center">4.60</td>
									<td align="center">4.61</td>
									<td align="center">5.52</td>
									<td align="center">5.18</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">5.49</td>
									<td align="center">4.73</td>
									<td align="center">3.33</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">0.549</td>
									<td align="center">0.54</td>
									<td align="center">0.019</td>
									<td align="center">0.32</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Molds (log cfu/g)</td>
									<td align="center">5.62</td>
									<td align="center">4.77</td>
									<td align="center">3.50</td>
									<td align="center">4.51</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">4.03</td>
									<td align="center">4.00</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">0.703</td>
									<td align="center">0.11</td>
									<td align="center">0.049</td>
									<td align="center">0.80</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>pH</td>
									<td align="center">3.74d</td>
									<td align="center">5.14b</td>
									<td align="center">8.51a</td>
									<td align="center">3.91d</td>
									<td align="center">4.74bc</td>
									<td align="center">7.91a</td>
									<td align="center">4.21cd</td>
									<td align="center">4.51c</td>
									<td align="center">8.20a</td>
									<td align="center">0.151</td>
									<td align="center">0.09</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>NH<sub>3</sub>-N (g/kg N)</td>
									<td align="center">260a</td>
									<td align="center">206abc</td>
									<td align="center">141cd</td>
									<td align="center">177bcd</td>
									<td align="center">221ab</td>
									<td align="center">126d</td>
									<td align="center">142cd</td>
									<td align="center">172bcd</td>
									<td align="center">150bcd</td>
									<td align="center">17.4</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Lactic acid (g/kg DM)</td>
									<td align="center">22.9c</td>
									<td align="center">21.8c</td>
									<td align="center">18.8d</td>
									<td align="center">25.4b</td>
									<td align="center">26.7b</td>
									<td align="center">21.9c</td>
									<td align="center">26.5b</td>
									<td align="center">40.4a</td>
									<td align="center">21.5c</td>
									<td align="center">0.55</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Acetic acid (g/kg DM)</td>
									<td align="center">4.65d</td>
									<td align="center">8.61ab</td>
									<td align="center">5.05d</td>
									<td align="center">10.2a</td>
									<td align="center">7.53bc</td>
									<td align="center">5.55cd</td>
									<td align="center">8.72ab</td>
									<td align="center">10.8a</td>
									<td align="center">4.42d</td>
									<td align="center">0.052</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>n-Butyric acid (g/kg DM)</td>
									<td align="center">0.62f</td>
									<td align="center">6.73b</td>
									<td align="center">1.85ef</td>
									<td align="center">3.19def</td>
									<td align="center">11.0a</td>
									<td align="center">4.59bcd</td>
									<td align="center">5.90bc</td>
									<td align="center">3.86cde</td>
									<td align="center">6.27bc</td>
									<td align="center">0.57</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ethanol (g/kg DM)</td>
									<td align="center">0.385c</td>
									<td align="center">1.24bc</td>
									<td align="center">1.67bc</td>
									<td align="center">4.15b</td>
									<td align="center">0.58c</td>
									<td align="center">2.24bc</td>
									<td align="center">17.9a</td>
									<td align="center">0.62c</td>
									<td align="center">1.37bc</td>
									<td align="center">0.073</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>2,3-butanediol (g/kg DM)</td>
									<td align="center">0.205e</td>
									<td align="center">3.93a</td>
									<td align="center">0.853de</td>
									<td align="center">1.63bcd</td>
									<td align="center">1.71bc</td>
									<td align="center">1.28bcd</td>
									<td align="center">1.27bcd</td>
									<td align="center">0.913cde</td>
									<td align="center">1.92b</td>
									<td align="center">0.018</td>
									<td align="center">0.15</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Propionic acid (g/kg DM)</td>
									<td align="center">0.090e</td>
									<td align="center">3.49a</td>
									<td align="center">0.733cd</td>
									<td align="center">1.18bc</td>
									<td align="center">1.40b</td>
									<td align="center">0.540de</td>
									<td align="center">0.685cd</td>
									<td align="center">0.368de</td>
									<td align="center">1.30b</td>
									<td align="center">0.012</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Aerobic stability (h)</td>
									<td align="center">240a</td>
									<td align="center">240a</td>
									<td align="center">240a</td>
									<td align="center">73.9b</td>
									<td align="center">240a</td>
									<td align="center">240a</td>
									<td align="center">46.3b</td>
									<td align="center">240a</td>
									<td align="center">240a</td>
									<td align="center">9.06</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>DM loss (g/kg DM)</td>
									<td align="center">123b</td>
									<td align="center">174a</td>
									<td align="center">68.1c</td>
									<td align="center">125b</td>
									<td align="center">113b</td>
									<td align="center">89.4c</td>
									<td align="center">152a</td>
									<td align="center">124b</td>
									<td align="center">37.7d</td>
									<td align="center">4.95</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN7">
								<p>LAB - lactic acid bacteria; cfu - colony-forming unit; SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN8">
								<p><sup>1</sup> HM - mixture (1:1, fresh matter basis) of corn heavy steep water + sugarcane molasses, applied at 0, 100, and 200 g/kg fresh matter; CaO - calcium oxide, applied at 0, 20, and 40 g/kg fresh matter.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN9">
								<p><sup>2</sup> HM - effect of the addition of corn heavy steep water + sugarcane molasses; CaO - effect of the addition of calcium oxide; HM × CaO - interaction effect.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN10">
								<p>i-Butyric, i-valeric and n-valeric acids, n-propanol and 1,2-propanediol concentrations were &lt;0.1 g/kg DM.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN11">
								<p>Means with different letters in the rows differ statistically (Tukey test α = 0.05).</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>There was an interaction HM × CaO for silage pH (P&lt;0.001; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). In silages without CaO, pH values were lower, particularly in the 0HM0CaO, 100HM0CaO, and 200HM0CaO treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). The inclusion of 20 g/kg CaO increased the pH to values above 4.5, regardless of the HM dose (P&lt;0.05). However, when 40 g/kg CaO was added, pH values exceeded 8 in both 0HM40CaO and 200HM40CaO treatments, even after 66 d of fermentation (P&lt;0.05; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
				<p>An interaction HM × CaO (P&lt;0.001) was observed for all fermentation products (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). The ammonia nitrogen (NH<sub>3</sub>-N) was reduced with CaO and HM added separately (P&lt;0.001); however, when both were combined, particularly in silages with 20 g/kg of CaO, NH₃-N values were increased, as observed for the 100HM20CaO treatment (P&lt;0.05; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). The lactic acid concentration was reduced by CaO, but increased by HM addition (P&lt;0.001). The highest lactic acid content was observed for the 200HM20CaO treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
				<p>Acetic acid concentration increased with HM and CaO addition (P&lt;0.001 for interaction HM × CaO; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). This effect was more pronounced at 20 g/kg CaO. The n-butyric acid concentration increased with CaO addition, especially at 20 g/kg (P&lt;0.001), and this increase was intensified by HM inclusion (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). The highest value of n-butyric acid was observed in the 100HM20CaO treatment, evidencing a synergistic interaction between HM and CaO (P&lt;0.001). Ethanol concentration was increased by both HM and CaO (P&lt;0.001), with the highest value observed in the 200HM0CaO treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). Both CaO and HM increased the 2,3-butanediol and propionic acid concentrations, but the effect size was dependent on the specific combination (P&lt;0.001 for the interaction HM × CaO). Without HM, the highest concentrations of 2,3-butanediol and propionic acid were observed for 20 g/kg of CaO. At 100 g/kg HM, the propionic acid decreased with 40 g/kg CaO. At 200 g/kg HM the greatest concentrations of 2,3-butanediol and propionic acid were observed in silage treated with 40 g/kg CaO (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
				<p>The inclusion of 40 g/kg of CaO reduced the DM loss during fermentation (P&lt;0.001; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). When HM was added, the DM loss was also reduced (P&lt;0.001). Then the combination of CaO and HM resulted in the lowest DM loss among treatments (P&lt;0.001; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
				<p>Only 100HM0CaO and 200HM0CaO silages heated up during the aerobic stability test, after 74 and 46 h, respectively (P&lt;0.01). Parallelly, an increase of pH occurred for those treatments after 2 and 3 d of aerobic exposure, respectively (P&lt;0.001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f01">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f01">
						<label>Figure 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>pH of corn husk silages treated with calcium oxide (CaO) and a mixture of corn heavy steep water and sugarcane molasses (HM) throughout the aerobic exposure period.</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="1806-9290-rbz-55-e20250160-gf01.tif"/>
						<attrib>Effect of HM (P&lt;0.001); effect of CaO (P&lt;0.001); effect of day of exposure (P&lt;0.001); effect of interaction HM × CaO (P&lt;0.001); HM × day (P&lt;0.001); CaO × day (P&lt;0.001), and HM × CaO × day (P&lt;0.001). Standard error of the mean = 0.135.</attrib>
					</fig>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>3.3. Chemical composition of corn husks silages</title>
				<p>There was an interaction HM × CaO (P&lt;0.001) for DM, ash, CP, aNDFom, and ADFom concentrations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). Overall, DM decreased with HM (P&lt;0.001) but increased with CaO addition (P&lt;0.001). Ash concentration increased with both CaO and HM, with the highest ash concentration observed in the 200HM40CaO treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). Overall, CP decreased with CaO, but increased with HM (P&lt;0.001), reaching the highest values in the 200 HM treatments and the lowest in the 0HM treatments with 20 or 40 g/kg of CaO (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). The aNDFom concentration decreased with both CaO and HM, with the lowest value observed for 200HM40CaO treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). The ADFom concentration varied with CaO addition depending on the HM level (P&lt;0.001). At 100 g/kg HM, CaO increased ADFom, whereas CaO did not affect ADFom concentration at 200 g/kg HM (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t3">
						<label>Table 3</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Chemical composition of corn husk silages treated with calcium oxide (CaO) and a mixture of corn heavy steep water and sugarcane molasses (HM) (n = 4)</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">Item</th>
									<th colspan="9" style="font-weight:normal">Treatment<sup>1</sup></th>
									<th colspan="1" rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
									<th align="left" colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal"> </th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">0 HM</th>
									<th colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">100 HM</th>
									<th colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">200 HM</th>
									<th colspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">P-value<sup>2</sup></th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">20 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">40 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">20 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">40 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">20 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">40 CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">HM</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">CaO</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">HM × CaO</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>Dry matter (g/kg)</td>
									<td align="center">456ab</td>
									<td align="center">448bc</td>
									<td align="center">469a</td>
									<td align="center">437cd</td>
									<td align="center">432d</td>
									<td align="center">449bc</td>
									<td align="center">403e</td>
									<td align="center">439cd</td>
									<td align="center">426d</td>
									<td align="center">3.81</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ash (g/kg DM)</td>
									<td align="center">27.9h</td>
									<td align="center">71.4e</td>
									<td align="center">108c</td>
									<td align="center">38.0g</td>
									<td align="center">90.8d</td>
									<td align="center">124b</td>
									<td align="center">54.9f</td>
									<td align="center">93.1d</td>
									<td align="center">145a</td>
									<td align="center">2.19</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>CP (g/kg OM)</td>
									<td align="center">50.8d</td>
									<td align="center">40.2e</td>
									<td align="center">41.2e</td>
									<td align="center">68.9c</td>
									<td align="center">71.4c</td>
									<td align="center">65.5c</td>
									<td align="center">96.9a</td>
									<td align="center">81.3b</td>
									<td align="center">81.7b</td>
									<td align="center">1.49</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>aNDFom<sup>3</sup> (g/kg OM)</td>
									<td align="center">615ab</td>
									<td align="center">636a</td>
									<td align="center">566c</td>
									<td align="center">578bc</td>
									<td align="center">539c</td>
									<td align="center">476d</td>
									<td align="center">552c</td>
									<td align="center">491d</td>
									<td align="center">421e</td>
									<td align="center">10.4</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>ADFom<sup>4</sup> (g/kg OM)</td>
									<td align="center">248d</td>
									<td align="center">248d</td>
									<td align="center">342a</td>
									<td align="center">264cd</td>
									<td align="center">339a</td>
									<td align="center">337a</td>
									<td align="center">291bc</td>
									<td align="center">298b</td>
									<td align="center">283bc</td>
									<td align="center">6.08</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN12">
								<p>CP - crude protein; SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN13">
								<p><sup>1</sup> HM - mixture (1:1, fresh matter basis) of corn heavy steep water + sugarcane molasses, applied at 0, 100, and 200 g/kg fresh matter; CaO - calcium oxide, applied at 0, 20, and 40 g/kg fresh matter.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN14">
								<p><sup>2</sup> HM - effect of the addition of corn heavy steep water + sugarcane molasses; CaO - effect of the addition of calcium oxide; HM × CaO - interaction effect.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN15">
								<p><sup>3</sup> aNDFom - neutral detergent fiber assayed with sodium sulfite, heat-stable amylase and expressed excluded of residual ash.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN16">
								<p><sup>4</sup> ADFom - acid detergent fiber expressed excluded of residual ash.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN17">
								<p>Means with different letters in the rows differ statistically (Tukey test α = 0.05).</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>3.4. <italic>In situ</italic> ruminal disappearance</title>
				<p>Both CaO and HM induced an increase of DM disappearance (P&lt;0.001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f02">Figure 2</xref>). Furthermore, ensiling induced an increase of DM disappearance in comparison with fresh husks (P&lt;0.001). The addition of HM (P = 0.64) and the ensiling (P = 0.40) did not change the ruminal disappearance of aNDFom at 30 h of incubation. The addition of CaO, however, had a positive linear effect (P&lt;0.001) effect on the ruminal degradability of aNDFom (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f03">Figure 3</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f02">
						<label>Figure 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Ruminal disappearance of dry matter (DM) at 24 h of <italic>in situ</italic> incubation in corn husks (fresh and silage) treated with calcium oxide (CaO) and a mixture of corn heavy steep water and sugarcane molasses (HM).</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="1806-9290-rbz-55-e20250160-gf02.tif"/>
						<attrib>HM effect (P&lt;0.001); CaO effect (P&lt;0.001); HM × CaO interaction (P = 0.99); ensiling effect (P&lt;0.001); ensiling × HM interaction (P = 0.78); ensiling × CaO interaction (P&lt;0.001); ensiling × CaO × HM interaction (P = 0.59); linear contrast for HM effect (P&lt;0.001); quadratic contrast for HM effect (P = 0.65); linear contrast for CaO effect (P&lt;0.001); quadratic contrast for CaO effect (P = 0.75). SEM<sub>Fresh</sub> = 0.016; SEM<sub>Silage</sub> = 0.014.</attrib>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f03">
						<label>Figure 3</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Ruminal disappearance of ash-free neutral detergent fiber (aNDFom) at 30 h of <italic>in situ</italic> incubation in corn husks (fresh and ensiled) treated with calcium oxide (CaO) and a mixture of corn heavy steep water and sugarcane molasses (HM).</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="1806-9290-rbz-55-e20250160-gf03.tif"/>
						<attrib>HM effect (P = 0.64); CaO effect (P&lt;0.001); HM × CaO interaction (P = 0.19); ensiling effect (P = 0.40); ensiling × HM interaction (P = 0.12); ensiling × CaO interaction (P = 0.089); ensiling × CaO × HM interaction (P = 0.37); linear contrast for HM effect (P = 0.43); quadratic contrast for HM effect (P = 0.56); linear contrast for CaO effect (P&lt;0.001); quadratic contrast for CaO effect (P = 0.005). SEM<sub>Fresh</sub> = 0.036; SEM<sub>Silage</sub> = 0.030.</attrib>
					</fig>
				</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="discussion">
			<title>4. Discussion</title>
			<p>The conservation and feeding value are the main issues driving the efficiency of utilization of wet fibrous byproducts. This study demonstrated for the first time that wet corn husks can be conserved efficiently by ensiling, while presenting a reasonable aNDFom and DM digestibility. This experiment also provides insights into the positive and negative effects of CaO and HM additives on the fermentation pattern, aerobic stability, composition, and digestibility of corn husk silage.</p>
			<p>As an indication of successful acidification, pH values of the 0HM0CaO, 100HM0CaO, and 200HM0CaO silages were 3.74, 3.91, and 4.21, respectively. The critical pH to avoid clostridia fermentation is directly linked to DM content, as the susceptibility of clostridia to organic acids increases with decreasing water activity. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Weissbach (1968)</xref> reported that silages with DM content close to 500 g/kg must have a pH below 5.0 to stabilize anaerobically and guarantee good conservation. In contrast, in silages treated with 40 g/kg of CaO, the pH was higher than 7.9, whereas in silages treated with 20 g/kg of CaO, the pH was higher than 4.5 even after 66 d of ensiling. The addition of CaO increased the buffering capacity, thus preventing an efficient acidification and conservation of the corn husks. Even with a high concentration of soluble sugars resulting from the addition of HM, the excessive release of hydroxyls ions from the hydration of CaO and the formation of calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)<sub>2</sub>] neutralized, nullified the protons from the acids produced during fermentation. This higher pH environment likely favored the growth of undesirable microorganisms such as <italic>Clostridium</italic>, particularly in silages treated with CaO alone, as also evidenced by the higher concentration of n-butyric acid detected in these treatments.</p>
			<p>The increase in LAB count due to the presence of CaO may be associated with the increase in buffering capacity, which prolongs the period during which the pH remains high without inhibiting the growth of these microorganisms. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Cavali et al. (2006)</xref> also reported an increase in LAB population in sugarcane silage treated with 15 g/kg of CaO. However, CaO may have decreased lactic acid formation or, more likely, induced its degradation. The reduction in mold counts by CaO may have been caused by hydroxyl ions released by calcium hydroxide, which can cause damage to cytoplasmic membranes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Siqueira and Lopes, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Jacovaci et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
			<p>The increase in yeasts observed in the 0HM40CaO and 100HM40CaO treatments indicates that the CaO doses may not have been sufficient to inhibit yeast growth, which is typically suppressed by the hydroxyl ions released during Ca(OH)₂ formation, which can damage cytoplasmic membranes, as discussed previously. The small increase in aerobic spore-forming bacteria counts in the presence of HM may have occurred due to the corn heavy steep water containing considerable amounts of these microorganisms (i.e., <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp.), due to spontaneous fermentation in the agroindustry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Vecino et al., 2014</xref>). The increase of <italic>Clostridium</italic> counts in CaO treatments may have been due to the high pH of these silages, as these microorganisms frequently develop in crops with high buffering capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Woolford, 1984</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Custódio et al. (2016)</xref> also observed <italic>Clostridium</italic> development in sugarcane silages treated with 15 g/kg of calcium oxide, regardless the high fermentability coefficient (&gt;45) of sugarcane crop. The authors reported that the amount of lactic acid necessary to reduce the pH to inhibit clostridia development increased by 7.7-fold when the crop was treated with CaO.</p>
			<p>The NH<sub>3</sub>-N content was reduced with the addition of CaO, probably due to the restriction of microbial activity. The lactic acid content also decreased with the addition of CaO, suggesting a reduction in the metabolism of LAB during fermentation or, alternatively, a degradation of lactic acid by clostridia, as those silages had higher concentration of n-butyric acid compared with the control (0HM0CaO). The increased acetic acid concentration in silages treated with CaO and HM addition also suggest greater activity of undesirable bacteria in these silages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">McDonald et al., 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Pahlow et al., 2003</xref>). n-Butyric, propionic, and acetic acids are typically associated with the development of undesirable microorganisms, such as clostridia and bacilli (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">McDonald et al., 1991</xref>). The higher buffering capacity caused by CaO addition may have improved the conditions for the greater activity of these microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Woolford, 1984</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Custódio et al. (2016)</xref> found higher concentrations of n-butyric acid in sugarcane silages treated with CaO, indicating that the higher buffering capacity due to CaO addition prolongs the time in during which the silage pH remains high, allowing the development of clostridia. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Kaiser et al. (2002)</xref> established a threshold for butyric acid concentration of 3 g/kg DM, silages with concentration greater than this threshold can be consider their fermentation dominated by clostridia. Even though the treatment with 40 g/kg of CaO had low n-butyric acid concentration, the high pH value of 8.51 indicates that CaO might have strongly restricted microbial activity, preventing good conservation. High ethanol concentrations are often associated with yeast activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Kung et al., 2018</xref>); however, other microorganisms can also contribute to its production. Heterofermentative bacteria can produce small amounts of ethanol, but its accumulation may also be associated with <italic>Clostridium</italic> development, as certain species are able to metabolize carbohydrates and amino acids into ethanol and other undesirable compounds, as previously discussed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Pahlow et al., 2003</xref>).</p>
			<p>Beyond the negative impacts of CaO on the silage fermentation pattern, such as impaired acidification, increased pH, and proliferation of undesirable microorganisms, the treatments with CaO, especially at 40 g/kg, resulted in lower values of DM loss. This outcome suggests that the strong alkalizing effect of CaO may have limited overall fermentative activity by inhibiting certain microbial groups, but other undesirable microorganisms, such as <italic>Clostridium</italic>, were less affected, particularly at the doses used. Moreover, the greater ash content for CaO-treated silages contributes mathematically to lower DM loss, as the mineral fraction is not degraded during fermentation. Similar findings were reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Santos et al. (2008)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Xavier et al. (2015)</xref>, who also attributed the reduced DM loss to CaO-treated silages.</p>
			<p>Aerobic stability was lower in silages that did not receive any dose of CaO and received doses of HM (100 and 200 g/kg). This was likely due to the higher availability of sugars and fermentation products, which served as substrates for microorganisms associated with aerobic spoilage. As expected, well-preserved silages are more susceptible to aerobic spoilage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">McDonald et al., 1991</xref>), as molds and, in particular, yeasts consume sugars and lactic acid, leading to a rise in pH. This was observed in the current study, where only the treatments with HM addition but without CaO (100HM0CaO; 200HM0CaO) had lower aerobic stability. On the other hand, silages treated with CaO showed greater resistance to aerobic deterioration. This may be related to their fermentative pattern as a result of the buffering action of CaO, which promoted the production of weak organic acids such as acetic acid and n-butyric acid, resulting in greater aerobic stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Amaral et al., 2009</xref>). Additionally, the CaO addition promoted the inhibition of molds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Jacovaci et al., 2017</xref>), due to the dissociation of calcium hydroxide into hydroxyl ions, which may damage the cell structures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Siqueira and Lopes, 1999</xref>). Other aerobic spoilage microorganisms, such as acetic acid bacteria and <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., may have been involved in aerobic deterioration. Although silages with high acetic acid concentrations are generally more aerobically stable due to inhibition of yeasts and molds, the presence of acetic acid bacteria can oxidize ethanol under aerobic conditions, generating heat and promoting spoilage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Spoelstra et al., 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Nishino et al., 2009</xref>). Furthermore, <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., as facultative anaerobic bacteria, could have contributed to aerobic deterioration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">McDonald et al., 1991</xref>). Considering that CaO induced poorer fermentation in corn husk silage (as observed previously in other silages treated with alkali), other silage additives would be more appropriate to curtail aerobic deterioration. For instance, <italic>Lentilactobacillus buchneri</italic> and chemical additives based on the salts of weak acids (e.g., sorbate, benzoate, propionate) have consistently been reported to improve the aerobic stability of various silages, without negative effects on the fermentation profile (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Kung et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arriola et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
			<p>Both CaO and HM caused changes in the chemical composition of corn husks. The increase of ash concentration with HM and CaO in fresh and ensiled husks was due to the relatively high mineral content in both ingredients, especially CaO, which contains a high proportion of ash in its composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Oliveira et al., 2008</xref>). Corn heavy steep water is also rich in nitrogen, with approximately 480 g/kg of CP (DM basis), therefore, the CP content in treatments containing HM was higher. On the other hand, there was a decrease in the percentage of CP concentration with the addition of CaO to the silages.</p>
			<p>The aNDFom content was not changed in fresh husks treated with CaO, indicating that the fiber hydrolysis does not occur instantly. On the other hand, a reduction of aNDFom concentration in silages confirmed the hydrolytic effect of CaO on the cell wall, with the dose of 40 g/kg of CaO being more efficient. Swelling and hydrolysis of the cell wall may have occurred due to the alkaline nature of CaO, resulting in its expansion and disruption of the intermolecular hydrogen bonds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Jackson, 1977</xref>). Additionally, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Coombre et al. (1979)</xref> reported that alkaline treatment causes partial solubilization of hemicellulose and delignification of cellulose, making it more accessible to rumen fibrolytic microorganisms. However, the alkaline nature of CaO might have also affected the results of the neutral detergent fiber analysis, as CaO may have changed the pH of the neutral detergent solution, causing partial solubilization of the hemicellulose and lignin fractions. On the other hand, the ADFom value increased in some treatments in which HM and CaO were combined, suggesting that HM may have reduced the CaO hydrolysis efficiency. Additionally, the CaO likely increased the pH of the acid detergent solution, reducing its efficiency in removing hemicellulose during the ADF analysis.</p>
			<p>Ruminal DM disappearance in situ at 24 h was increased by both HM and CaO. Corn husk silage treated with CaO also showed greater aNDFom disappearance at 30 h of ruminal incubation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Merchen and Bourquin (1994)</xref> reported that treating forage with hydrolytic additives, such as calcium hydroxide, resulted in changes in the cell wall, such as hemicellulose solubilization and increased fiber degradation. However, increased DM degradability may not necessarily be due to hemicellulose solubilization. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Jacovaci et al. (2017)</xref>, who conducted a meta-analysis of sugarcane silages treated with CaO, observed an increase in fiber digestibility, attributed to the hydroxyl groups promoting fiber swelling and facilitating the action of fibrolytic bacteria in the rumen. Furthermore, the additives used are soluble, especially HM, which may also have contributed to this increase in DM degradation.</p>
			<p>Ensiling provided greater DM degradability when compared with fresh husks. However, the hydration of corn husks particles caused by ensiling may also have accelerated the process of colonization and degradation by ruminal microorganisms. The linear effect observed with the addition of CaO on DM degradability was likely due to the alkalizing effect of the additive (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Jackson, 1977</xref>).</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>5. Conclusions</title>
			<p>Although silages treated with CaO showed lower DM loss, higher aerobic stability and slightly greater <italic>in situ</italic> disappearance of DM and aNDFom, silage treated with CaO had poorer hygienic quality, as indicated by greater <italic>Clostridium</italic> counts and n-butyric acid concentration. Therefore, under practical conditions, corn husks might be ensiled without additives or, if convenient, added with up to 100 g/kg of HM as they showed good conservation pattern and satisfactory ruminal disappearance of DM and aNDFom.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p>We thank all students of the GESF-UEM team – Brazil, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Brasília-DF, Brazil, for the scholarship provided to the authors and the Cargill Wetfeed, Uberlândia, Brazil, for providing the feedstuffs used in the current study.</p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>Amaral, R. C.; Pires, A. V.; Susin, I.; Nussio, L. G.; Ferreira, E. M. and Gentil, R. S. 2009. Cana-de-açúcar in natura ou ensilada com e sem aditivos químicos: estabilidade aeróbia dos volumosos e das rações. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38:1857-1864. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009001000001">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009001000001</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Amaral</surname>
							<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pires</surname>
							<given-names>A. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Susin</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nussio</surname>
							<given-names>L. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ferreira</surname>
							<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gentil</surname>
							<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Cana-de-açúcar in natura ou ensilada com e sem aditivos químicos: estabilidade aeróbia dos volumosos e das rações</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>38</volume>
					<fpage>1857</fpage>
					<lpage>1864</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009001000001">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982009001000001</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. AOAC, Arlington, VA.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1990</year>
					<source>Official methods of analysis</source>
					<edition>15th</edition>
					<publisher-name>AOAC</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Arlington, VA</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>Arriola, K. G.; Oliveira, A. S.; Jiang, Y.; Kim, D.; Silva, H. M.; Kim, S. C.; Amaro, F. X.; Ogunade, I. M.; Sultana, H.; Pech Cervantes, A. A.; Ferraretto, L. F.; Vyas, D. and Adesogan, A. T. 2021. Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with <italic>Lactobacillus buchneri</italic>, with or without other bacteria, on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 104:7653-7670. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19647">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19647</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Arriola</surname>
							<given-names>K. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>A. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jiang</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>H. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Amaro</surname>
							<given-names>F. X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ogunade</surname>
							<given-names>I. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sultana</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pech Cervantes</surname>
							<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ferraretto</surname>
							<given-names>L. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vyas</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Adesogan</surname>
							<given-names>A. T.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Meta-analysis of effects of inoculation with Lactobacillus buchneri, with or without other bacteria, on silage fermentation, aerobic stability, and performance of dairy cows</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
					<volume>104</volume>
					<fpage>7653</fpage>
					<lpage>7670</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19647">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19647</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>Cavali, J.; Pereira, O. G.; Sousa, L. O.; Borges, I.; Cecon, P. R. and Caravana, E. L. 2006. Silagem de cana-de-açúcar tratada com óxido de cálcio: composição bromatológica e perdas. In: Anais da 43ª Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia, João Pessoa.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Cavali</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pereira</surname>
							<given-names>O. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sousa</surname>
							<given-names>L. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Borges</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cecon</surname>
							<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Caravana</surname>
							<given-names>E. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<source>Silagem de cana-de-açúcar tratada com óxido de cálcio: composição bromatológica e perdas</source>
					<conf-name>Anais da 43ª Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</conf-name>
					<conf-loc>João Pessoa</conf-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Chaney, A. L. and Marbach, E. P. 1962. Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia. Clinical Chemistry 8:130-132. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/8.2.130">https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/8.2.130</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chaney</surname>
							<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Marbach</surname>
							<given-names>E. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1962</year>
					<article-title>Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia</article-title>
					<source>Clinical Chemistry</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<fpage>130</fpage>
					<lpage>132</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/8.2.130">https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/8.2.130</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Coombre, J. B.; Dinius, D. A. and Wheeler, W. E. 1979. Effect of alkali treatment on intake and digestion of barley husks by steers. Journal of Animal Science 49:169-176. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1979.491169x">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1979.491169x</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Coombre</surname>
							<given-names>J. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dinius</surname>
							<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wheeler</surname>
							<given-names>W. E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1979</year>
					<article-title>Effect of alkali treatment on intake and digestion of barley husks by steers</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>49</volume>
					<fpage>169</fpage>
					<lpage>176</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1979.491169x">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1979.491169x</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Custódio, L.; Morais, G.; Daniel, J. L. P.; Pauly, T. and Nussio, L. G. 2016. Effects of chemical and microbial additives on <italic>Clostridium</italic> development in sugarcane ( <italic>Saccharum officinarum</italic> L .) ensiled with lime. Grassland Science 62:135-143. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12124">https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12124</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Custódio</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Morais</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Daniel</surname>
							<given-names>J. L. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pauly</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nussio</surname>
							<given-names>L. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Effects of chemical and microbial additives on Clostridium development in sugarcane ( Saccharum officinarum L .) ensiled with lime</article-title>
					<source>Grassland Science</source>
					<volume>62</volume>
					<fpage>135</fpage>
					<lpage>143</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12124">https://doi.org/10.1111/grs.12124</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Daniel, J. L. P.; Santos, M. C.; Zopollatto, M.; Huhtanen, P. and Nussio, L. G. 2013. A data analysis of lime addition on the nutritive value of sugarcane in Brazil. Animal Feed Science and Technology 184:17-23. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.05.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.05.009</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Daniel</surname>
							<given-names>J. L. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Santos</surname>
							<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zopollatto</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Huhtanen</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nussio</surname>
							<given-names>L. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>A data analysis of lime addition on the nutritive value of sugarcane in Brazil</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>184</volume>
					<fpage>17</fpage>
					<lpage>23</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.05.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.05.009</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Gao, J. L.; Wang, P.; Zhou, C. H.; Li, P.; Tang, H. Y.; Zhang, J. B. and Cai, Y. 2019. Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of corn stover during field exposure and the fermentation characteristics of silage prepared with microbial additives. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 32:1854-1863. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0886">https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0886</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Gao</surname>
							<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhou</surname>
							<given-names>C. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tang</surname>
							<given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>J. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cai</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of corn stover during field exposure and the fermentation characteristics of silage prepared with microbial additives</article-title>
					<source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences</source>
					<volume>32</volume>
					<fpage>1854</fpage>
					<lpage>1863</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0886">https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.18.0886</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Jackson, M. G. 1977. Review article. The alkali treatment of straws. Animal Feed Science and Technology 2:105-130. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401 (77)90013-X">https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401 (77)90013-X</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Jackson</surname>
							<given-names>M. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1977</year>
					<article-title>Review article. The alkali treatment of straws</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>2</volume>
					<fpage>105</fpage>
					<lpage>130</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401 (77)90013-X">https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401 (77)90013-X</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Jacovaci, F. A.; Jobim, C. C.; Schmidt, P.; Nussio, L. G. and Daniel, J. L. P. 2017. A data-analysis on the conservation and nutritive value of sugarcane silage treated with calcium oxide. Animal Feed Science and Technology 225:1-7. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.01.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.01.005</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Jacovaci</surname>
							<given-names> F. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jobim</surname>
							<given-names> C. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Schmidt</surname>
							<given-names> P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nussio</surname>
							<given-names> L. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Daniel</surname>
							<given-names> J. L. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>A data-analysis on the conservation and nutritive value of sugarcane silage treated with calcium oxide</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>225</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>7</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.01.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.01.005</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Jonsson, A. 1990. Enumeration and confirmation of <italic>Clostridium tyrobutyricum</italic> in silages using neutral red, D-cycloserine, and lactate dehydrogenase activity. Journal of Dairy Science 73:719-725. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (90)78725-5">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (90)78725-5</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Jonsson</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1990</year>
					<article-title>Enumeration and confirmation of Clostridium tyrobutyricum in silages using neutral red, D-cycloserine, and lactate dehydrogenase activity</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
					<volume>73</volume>
					<fpage>719</fpage>
					<lpage>725</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (90)78725-5">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (90)78725-5</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Kaiser, E.; Weiß, K. and Polip, I. 2002. A new concept for the estimation of ensiling potential of forages. p.344-358. In: Proceedings of the XIII International Silage Conference. Auchincruive, Scotland, UK.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kaiser</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Weiß</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Polip</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2002</year>
					<source>A new concept for the estimation of ensiling potential of forages</source>
					<fpage>344</fpage>
					<lpage>358</lpage>
					<comment>Proceedings of the</comment>
					<conf-name>XIII International Silage Conference</conf-name>
					<conf-loc>Auchincruive, Scotland, UK</conf-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Kung, L. Jr.; Stokes, M. R. and Lin, C. J. 2003. Silage additives. p.305-360. In: Silage science and technology. Buxton, D. R.; Muck, R. E. and Harrison, J. H., eds. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kung</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
							<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stokes</surname>
							<given-names>M. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lin</surname>
							<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<chapter-title>Silage additives</chapter-title>
					<fpage>305</fpage>
					<lpage>360</lpage>
					<source>Silage science and technology</source>
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Buxton</surname>
							<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Muck</surname>
							<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Harrison</surname>
							<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<role>eds</role>
					</person-group>
					<publisher-name>ASA, CSSA, SSSA</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Madison</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Kung, L. Jr.; Shaver, R. D.; Grant, R. J. and Schmidt, R. J. 2018. Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of Dairy Science 101:4020-4033. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13909">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13909</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kung</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
							<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Shaver</surname>
							<given-names>R. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Grant</surname>
							<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Schmidt</surname>
							<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
					<volume>101</volume>
					<fpage>4020</fpage>
					<lpage>4033</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13909">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13909</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Lazzari, G.; Poppi, A. C. O.; Machado, J.; Bueno, A. V. I.; Gomes, A. L. M.; Jobim, C. C. and Daniel, J. L. P. 2021. Effects of protein source and lipid supplementation on conservation and feed value of total mixed ration silages for finishing beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 99:skab032. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab032">https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab032</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lazzari</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Poppi</surname>
							<given-names>A. C. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Machado</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bueno</surname>
							<given-names>A. V. I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gomes</surname>
							<given-names>A. L. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jobim</surname>
							<given-names>C. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Daniel</surname>
							<given-names>J. L. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Effects of protein source and lipid supplementation on conservation and feed value of total mixed ration silages for finishing beef cattle</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>99</volume>
					<size units="pages">skab032</size>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab032">https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skab032</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>McDonald, P.; Henderson, A. R. and Heron, S. J. 1991. The biochemistry of silage. 2nd ed. Chalcomb Publications, Marlow.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>McDonald</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Henderson</surname>
							<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Heron</surname>
							<given-names>S. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1991</year>
					<source>The biochemistry of silage</source>
					<edition>2nd</edition>
					<publisher-name>Chalcomb Publications</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Marlow</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Merchen, N. R. and Bourquin, L. D. 1994. Processes of digestion and factors influencing digestion of forage-based diets by ruminants. p.564-612. In: Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization. Fahey Jr., G. C., ed. American Society of Agronomy, Madison.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Merchen</surname>
							<given-names>N. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bourquin</surname>
							<given-names>L. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1994</year>
					<chapter-title>Processes of digestion and factors influencing digestion of forage-based diets by ruminants</chapter-title>
					<fpage>564</fpage>
					<lpage>612</lpage>
					<source>Forage quality, evaluation, and utilization</source>
					<person-group person-group-type="editor">
						<name>
							<surname>Fahey</surname>
							<given-names>G. C.</given-names>
							<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
						</name>
						<role>ed</role>
					</person-group>
					<publisher-name>American Society of Agronomy</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Madison</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>Mertens, D. R. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beaker or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 85:1217-1240.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Mertens</surname>
							<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2002</year>
					<article-title>Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beaker or crucibles: collaborative study</article-title>
					<source>Journal of AOAC International</source>
					<volume>85</volume>
					<fpage>1217</fpage>
					<lpage>1240</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Nishino, N.; Wang, C.; Parvin, S. and Kan, K. 2009. Occurrence and survival in whole crop corn silage of Acetobacter pasteurianus. p.165-166. In: Proceedings XV International Silage Conference. U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-ARS, Madison.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Nishino</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Parvin</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kan</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<source>Occurrence and survival in whole crop corn silage of Acetobacter pasteurianus</source>
					<fpage>165</fpage>
					<lpage>166</lpage>
					<conf-name>Proceedings XV International Silage Conference</conf-name>
					<comment>U.S. Dairy Forage Research Center, USDA-ARS</comment>
					<conf-loc>Madison</conf-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>Nocek, J. E. 1988. In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility: A review. Journal of Dairy Science 71:2051-2069. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (88)79781-7">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (88)79781-7</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Nocek</surname>
							<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1988</year>
					<article-title>In situ and other methods to estimate ruminal protein and energy digestibility: A review</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
					<volume>71</volume>
					<fpage>2051</fpage>
					<lpage>2069</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (88)79781-7">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (88)79781-7</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation>O'Kiely, P. 1993. Influence of a partially neutralized blend of aliphatic organic acids on fermentation effluent production and aerobic stability of autumn grass silage. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 32:13-26.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>O'Kiely</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1993</year>
					<article-title>Influence of a partially neutralized blend of aliphatic organic acids on fermentation effluent production and aerobic stability of autumn grass silage</article-title>
					<source>Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research</source>
					<volume>32</volume>
					<fpage>13</fpage>
					<lpage>26</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation>Oliveira, M. D. S.; Barbosa, J. C.; Mota, D. A. and Andrade, A. T. 2008. Efeito da hidrólise com cal virgem sobre a composição bromatológica da cana-de-açúcar. Veterinária Notícias 14:19-27.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>M. D. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barbosa</surname>
							<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mota</surname>
							<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Andrade</surname>
							<given-names>A. T.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Efeito da hidrólise com cal virgem sobre a composição bromatológica da cana-de-açúcar</article-title>
					<source>Veterinária Notícias</source>
					<volume>14</volume>
					<fpage>19</fpage>
					<lpage>27</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation>Pahlow, G.; Muck, R. E.; Driehuis, F.; Oude Elferink, S. J. W. H. and Spoelstra, S. F. 2003. Microbiology of ensiling. p.31-93. In: Silage science and technology. Buxton, D. R.; Muck, R. E. and Harrison, J. H., eds. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pahlow</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Muck</surname>
							<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Driehuis</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oude Elferink</surname>
							<given-names>S. J. W. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Spoelstra</surname>
							<given-names>S. F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<chapter-title>Microbiology of ensiling</chapter-title>
					<fpage>31</fpage>
					<lpage>93</lpage>
					<source>Silage science and technology</source>
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Buxton</surname>
							<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Muck</surname>
							<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Harrison</surname>
							<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<role>eds</role>
					</person-group>
					<publisher-name>ASA, CSSA, SSSA</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Madison</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation>Petzel, E. A.; Titgemeyer, E. C.; Smart, A. J.; Hales, K. E.; Foote, A. P.; Acharya, S.; Bailey, E. A.; Held, J. E. and Brake, D. W. 2019. What is the digestibility and caloric value of different botanical parts in corn residue to cattle? Journal of Animal Science 97:3056-3070. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz137">https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz137</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Petzel</surname>
							<given-names>E. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Titgemeyer</surname>
							<given-names>E. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Smart</surname>
							<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hales</surname>
							<given-names>K. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Foote</surname>
							<given-names>A. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Acharya</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bailey</surname>
							<given-names>E. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Held</surname>
							<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brake</surname>
							<given-names>D. W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>What is the digestibility and caloric value of different botanical parts in corn residue to cattle?</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>97</volume>
					<fpage>3056</fpage>
					<lpage>3070</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz137">https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skz137</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation>Pryce, J. D. A. 1969. A modification of the Barker-Summerson method for the determination of lactic acid. Analyst 94:1151-1152. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/AN9699401151">https://doi.org/10.1039/AN9699401151</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pryce</surname>
							<given-names>J. D. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1969</year>
					<article-title>A modification of the Barker-Summerson method for the determination of lactic acid</article-title>
					<source>Analyst</source>
					<volume>94</volume>
					<fpage>1151</fpage>
					<lpage>1152</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/AN9699401151">https://doi.org/10.1039/AN9699401151</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation>Rosa, M. F.; Souza Filho, M. S. M.; Figueiredo, M. C. B.; Morais, J. P. S.; Santaella, S. T. and Leitão, R. C. 2011. Valorização de resíduos da agroindústria. p.98-105. In: II Simpósio Internacional sobre Gerenciamento de Resíduos Agropecuários e Agroindustriais. Foz do Iguaçu.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rosa</surname>
							<given-names>M. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Souza</surname>
							<given-names>M. S. M.</given-names>
							<suffix>Filho</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Figueiredo</surname>
							<given-names>M. C. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Morais</surname>
							<given-names>J. P. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Santaella</surname>
							<given-names>S. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leitão</surname>
							<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<chapter-title>Valorização de resíduos da agroindústria</chapter-title>
					<fpage>98</fpage>
					<lpage>105</lpage>
					<source>II Simpósio Internacional sobre Gerenciamento de Resíduos Agropecuários e Agroindustriais</source>
					<publisher-loc>Foz do Iguaçu</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation>Santos, M. C.; Nussio, L. G.; Mourão, G. B.; Schmidt, P.; Mari, L. J. and Ribeiro, J. L. 2008. Influência da utilização de aditivos químicos no perfil de fermentação, no valor nutritivo e nas perdas de silagens de cana-de-açúcar. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37:1555-1563. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008000900006">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008000900006</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Santos</surname>
							<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nussio</surname>
							<given-names>L. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mourão</surname>
							<given-names>G. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Schmidt</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mari</surname>
							<given-names>L. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
							<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Influência da utilização de aditivos químicos no perfil de fermentação, no valor nutritivo e nas perdas de silagens de cana-de-açúcar</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>37</volume>
					<fpage>1555</fpage>
					<lpage>1563</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008000900006">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008000900006</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation>Schmidt, P.; Rossi Junior, P.; Toledo, L. M.; Nussio, L. G.; Albuquerque, D. S. and Meduri, B. 2010. Perdas fermentativas e composição bromatológica da entrecasca de palmito pupunha ensilada com aditivos químicos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 39:262-267. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000200005">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000200005</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Schmidt</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rossi</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
							<suffix>Junior</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Toledo</surname>
							<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nussio</surname>
							<given-names>L. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Albuquerque</surname>
							<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Meduri</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Perdas fermentativas e composição bromatológica da entrecasca de palmito pupunha ensilada com aditivos químicos</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>39</volume>
					<fpage>262</fpage>
					<lpage>267</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000200005">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000200005</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<mixed-citation>Silva, M. J. M. S.; Ferreira, M. A.; Melo, A. A. S.; Monteiro, M. C. C.; Ferreira, B. F. and Ribeiro, V. L. 2008. Níveis de inclusão do resíduo de milho (mazoferm), em substituição ao farelo de soja para vacas em lactação. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences 30:51-57.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>M. J. M. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ferreira</surname>
							<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Melo</surname>
							<given-names>A. A. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Monteiro</surname>
							<given-names>M. C. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ferreira</surname>
							<given-names>B. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
							<given-names>V. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Níveis de inclusão do resíduo de milho (mazoferm), em substituição ao farelo de soja para vacas em lactação</article-title>
					<source>Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences</source>
					<volume>30</volume>
					<fpage>51</fpage>
					<lpage>57</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation>Siqueira, J. F. and Lopes, H. P. 1999. Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review. International Endodontic Journal 32:361-369. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00275.x">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00275.x</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Siqueira</surname>
							<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lopes</surname>
							<given-names>H. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1999</year>
					<article-title>Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review</article-title>
					<source>International Endodontic Journal</source>
					<volume>32</volume>
					<fpage>361</fpage>
					<lpage>369</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00275.x">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.1999.00275.x</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<mixed-citation>Spoelstra, S. F.; Courtin, M. G. and van Beers, J. A. C. 1988. Acetic acid bacteria can initiate aerobic deterioration of whole crop maize silage. Journal of Agricultural Science 111:127-132. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600082915">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600082915</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Spoelstra</surname>
							<given-names>S. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Courtin</surname>
							<given-names>M. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>van Beers</surname>
							<given-names>J. A. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1988</year>
					<article-title>Acetic acid bacteria can initiate aerobic deterioration of whole crop maize silage</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Agricultural Science</source>
					<volume>111</volume>
					<fpage>127</fpage>
					<lpage>132</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600082915">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600082915</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation>Tong, Y.; Wu, J.; Guo, W.; Yang, Z.; Wang, H.; Liu, H.; Gao, Y.; Sun, M. and Yue, C. 2023. The effect of combining millet and corn straw as source forage for beef cattle diets on ruminal degradability and fungal community. Animals 13:548. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040548">https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040548</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Tong</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wu</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Guo</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yang</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gao</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sun</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yue</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2023</year>
					<article-title>The effect of combining millet and corn straw as source forage for beef cattle diets on ruminal degradability and fungal community</article-title>
					<source>Animals</source>
					<volume>13</volume>
					<size units="pages">548</size>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040548">https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040548</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation>Vecino, X.; Barbosa-Pereira, L.; Devesa-Rey, R.; Cruz, J. M. and Moldes, A. B. 2014. Study of the surfactant properties of aqueous stream from the corn milling industry. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 62:5451-5457. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jf501386h">https://doi.org/10.1021/jf501386h</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Vecino</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barbosa-Pereira</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Devesa-Rey</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cruz</surname>
							<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Moldes</surname>
							<given-names>A. B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Study of the surfactant properties of aqueous stream from the corn milling industry</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry</source>
					<volume>62</volume>
					<fpage>5451</fpage>
					<lpage>5457</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jf501386h">https://doi.org/10.1021/jf501386h</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B35">
				<mixed-citation>Weissbach, F. 1967. Determination of buffering capacity of forage plants and its importance to the assessment of fermentability. p.211-220. In: Proceedings of an International Symposium. Rostock, Germany. Deutsche Akademie Landwirtschaftswiss, Tagungsber 92.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Weissbach</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1967</year>
					<source>Determination of buffering capacity of forage plants and its importance to the assessment of fermentability</source>
					<fpage>211</fpage>
					<lpage>220</lpage>
					<comment>Proceedings of an International Symposium</comment>
					<publisher-loc>Rostock, Germany</publisher-loc>
					<publisher-name>Deutsche Akademie Landwirtschaftswiss, Tagungsber 92</publisher-name>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B36">
				<mixed-citation>Weissbach, F. 1968. Relations between the herbage and the course of fermentation in ensiling green fodder. Habilitation thesis, University of Rostock, Germany.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="thesis">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Weissbach</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1968</year>
					<source>Relations between the herbage and the course of fermentation in ensiling green fodder</source>
					<comment>Habilitation thesis</comment>
					<publisher-name>University of Rostock</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Germany</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B37">
				<mixed-citation>Weissbach, F. and Strubelt, C. 2008. Correcting the dry matter content of grass silages as a substrate for biogas production. Landtechnik 63:210-211.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Weissbach</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Strubelt</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Correcting the dry matter content of grass silages as a substrate for biogas production</article-title>
					<source>Landtechnik</source>
					<volume>63</volume>
					<fpage>210</fpage>
					<lpage>211</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B38">
				<mixed-citation>Wilkinson, J. M. and Lee, M. R. F. 2018. Review: Use of human-edible animal feeds by ruminant livestock. Animal 12:1735-1743. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111700218X">https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111700218X</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wilkinson</surname>
							<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>M. R. F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Review: Use of human-edible animal feeds by ruminant livestock</article-title>
					<source>Animal</source>
					<volume>12</volume>
					<fpage>1735</fpage>
					<lpage>1743</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111700218X">https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111700218X</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B39">
				<mixed-citation>Woolford, M. K. 1984. The silage fermentation. Microbiology series 14. Marcel Dekker, New York.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Woolford</surname>
							<given-names>M. K.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1984</year>
					<source>The silage fermentation. Microbiology series 14</source>
					<publisher-name>Marcel Dekker</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B40">
				<mixed-citation>Xavier, I. M.; Pereira, D. H.; Pina, D. S.; Bolson, D. C.; Pedreira, B. C.; Garcia, L. F.; Sedano, A. D. B. and Soares, S. R. 2015. Chemical composition of sugarcane silage with different levels of calcium oxide and crude glycerin. p.438-439. In: Proceedings of the XVII International Silage Conference. ESALQ, Piracicaba.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Xavier</surname>
							<given-names>I. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pereira</surname>
							<given-names>D. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pina</surname>
							<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bolson</surname>
							<given-names>D. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pedreira</surname>
							<given-names>B. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Garcia</surname>
							<given-names>L. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sedano</surname>
							<given-names>A. D. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soares</surname>
							<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<source>Chemical composition of sugarcane silage with different levels of calcium oxide and crude glycerin</source>
					<fpage>438</fpage>
					<lpage>439</lpage>
					<conf-name>Proceedings of the XVII International Silage Conference</conf-name>
					<publisher-name>ESALQ</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Piracicaba</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B41">
				<mixed-citation>Xu, J.; Wang, X. and Niu, H. 2025. Effects of corn straw-based fermented total mixed rations supplemented with exogenous cellulase on growth performance, digestibility, and rumen fermentation in growing beef cattle. Animal Bioscience 38:293-302. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0246">https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0246</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Xu</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Niu</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2025</year>
					<article-title>Effects of corn straw-based fermented total mixed rations supplemented with exogenous cellulase on growth performance, digestibility, and rumen fermentation in growing beef cattle</article-title>
					<source>Animal Bioscience</source>
					<volume>38</volume>
					<fpage>293</fpage>
					<lpage>302</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0246">https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.24.0246</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
		<fn-group>
			<fn fn-type="data-availability" specific-use="data-available-upon-request">
				<label>Data availability:</label>
				<p> The datasets supporting the results of this study is available upon request to João Daniel <email>(jlpdaniel@uem.br).</email>
				</p>
			</fn>
		</fn-group>
	</back>
</article>