<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rbz</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">R. Bras. Zootec.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">1516-3598</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">1806-9290</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="other">01108</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37496/rbz5420240130</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Ruminants</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Licuri cake as an alternative feed for young Nellore bulls replacing soybean meal and ground corn</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0001-5763-6259</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Silva</surname>
						<given-names>Lucas Feitosa</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Data curation</role>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Methodology</role>
					<role>Writing – original draft</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0006-4068-9983</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Oliveira</surname>
						<given-names>Vinicius da Silva</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Funding acquisition</role>
					<role>Methodology</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-9095-776X</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Portela</surname>
						<given-names>Ricardo Wagner Dias</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Data curation</role>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0009-0001-9943-679X</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Gouvêa</surname>
						<given-names>Ana Alice Lima de</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Methodology</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-3350-0517</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Silva</surname>
						<given-names>Thadeu Mariniello</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Software</role>
					<role>Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-5613-8047</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Lima</surname>
						<given-names>Anny Graycy Vasconcelos de Oliveira</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Data curation</role>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Supervision</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-9569-3107</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Nascimento</surname>
						<given-names>Thiago Vinicius Costa</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Data curation</role>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Supervision</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-8815-3946</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Bezerra</surname>
						<given-names>Leilson Rocha</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Methodology</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c01"><sup>*</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-5887-4753</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Oliveira</surname>
						<given-names>Ronaldo Lopes</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Project administration</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-6001-2180</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Silva</surname>
						<given-names>Jarbas Miguel da</given-names>
						<suffix>Júnior</suffix>
					</name>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-7336-6623</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Barbosa</surname>
						<given-names>Analívia Martins</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Conceptualization</role>
					<role>Investigation</role>
					<role>Project administration</role>
					<role>Supervision</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal da Bahia</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Departamento de Zootecnia</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Salvador</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">BA</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Universidade Federal da Bahia, Departamento de Zootecnia, Salvador, BA, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal da Bahia</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Instituto de Ciências da Saúde</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Salvador</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">BA</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Universidade Federal da Bahia, Instituto de Ciências da Saúde, Salvador, BA, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff3">
				<label>3</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal da Bahia</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Produção Animal</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Salvador</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">BA</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Universidade Federal da Bahia, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária Preventiva e Produção Animal, Salvador, BA, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff4">
				<label>4</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Petrolina</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">PE</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina, PE, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff5">
				<label>5</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal de Sergipe</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Departamento de Medicina Veterinária</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Nossa Senhora da Glória</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">SE</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Nossa Senhora da Glória, SE, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff6">
				<label>6</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal de Campina Grande</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Centro de Saúde e Tecnologia Rural</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Patos</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">PB</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Centro de Saúde e Tecnologia Rural, Patos, PB, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff7">
				<label>7</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Marechal Cândido Rondon</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">PR</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Marechal Cândido Rondon, PR, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c01">
					<label>*Corresponding author:</label>
					<email>leilson@ufpi.edu.br</email>
				</corresp>
				<fn fn-type="edited-by">
					<label>Editors:</label>
					<p> Marcio de Souza Duarte </p>
					<p> Ana Clara Baião Menezes</p>
				</fn>
				<fn fn-type="conflict">
					<label>Conflict of interest:</label>
					<p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>13</day>
				<month>08</month>
				<year>2025</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<year>2025</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>54</volume>
			<elocation-id>e20240130</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>3</day>
					<month>09</month>
					<year>2024</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>25</day>
					<month>04</month>
					<year>2025</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p> This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. </license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of total replacement of soybean meal and partial replacement of ground corn with licuri cake (LC) in the diet of young Nellore bulls on feed intake, ingestive behavior, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen balance, microbial protein synthesis, animal performance, carcass traits and economic efficiency, including marginal costs and returns. Thirty-two 16-month-old Nellore bulls (346 ± 32.5 kg body weight) were individually evaluated in a completely randomized experimental design with four treatments (0, 7, 14, and 21% dry matter [DM]) and eight replications. The animals were feedlot-finished for 84 days, fed a diet consisting of 60% Tifton-85 hay as roughage and 40% concentrate mixture. The concentrate included ground corn, soybean meal, urea, ammonium sulfate, and mineral mixture. The inclusion of LC in the bulls’ diets linearly reduced (P&lt;0.05) the intake of DM, crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), total digestible nutrients (TDN), and nitrogen, as well as fecal N, urinary N excretion, and N retention. On the other hand, LC inclusion quadratically increased (P&lt;0.05) ether extract (EE) intake and microbial protein synthesis. In addition, there was a linear increase (P&lt;0.05) in the digestibility of CP, EE, and NDF, as well as in the percentage of bone, muscle, and muscle tissue:fat tissue ratio in the young bulls. In contrast, animal performance, hot and cold carcass weights, fat tissue content, diet cost, and financial returns linearly decreased (P&lt;0.05). Based on the levels tested, the inclusion of LC in bulls’ diets is not recommended, as it reduces feed intake, performance, and overall financial profitability of the activity.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Keywords</title>
				<kwd>alternative protein</kwd>
				<kwd>byproduct</kwd>
				<kwd>microbial efficiency</kwd>
				<kwd>Syagrus coronata</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="0"/>
				<table-count count="6"/>
				<equation-count count="3"/>
				<ref-count count="58"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>1. Introduction</title>
			<p>Byproducts generated from renewable energy production can be incorporated into ruminant diets, offering a sustainable solution for managing these compounds and reducing environmental waste (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Pinto et al., 2022</xref>), thereby reducing animal feed costs. One approach to lowering these expenses is to replace conventional feed ingredients with alternative, more affordable sources of protein and energy, while maintaining animal performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Drumond, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aemiro et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Nath et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
			<p>One such alternative feed for ruminant nutrition is licuri cake (LC), which derives from the oil extraction from licuri nuts. The licuri palm tree (<italic>Syagrus coronata</italic>) is native to the Caatinga biome and is characterized by its medium size. It typically starts fruiting at around six years of age, with an average production of 2,000 to 4,000 kg/ha/year of fruits (coconuts) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Drumond, 2007</xref>). The fruits contain liquid when green and become solid and produce nuts when ripe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Crepaldi et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Drumond, 2007</xref>). Licuri cake has been evaluated in ruminant diets by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Lima et al. (2015)</xref>, who found that it has a beneficial energy source for lactating cows on managed pastures. In that same study, the authors observed that providing 45 g of LC per kg of concentrate would lead to an increase in the digestibility of ether extract (EE) and dry matter intake (DMI).</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bagaldo et al. (2019)</xref> recommended the replacement of soybean meal in concentrate for grazing lambs with 17% LC in the DM because it increased the time spent eating, final weight, and average daily gain (ADG) of animals. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Oliveira et al. (2022)</xref> recommend the inclusion of up to 25.5% LC in the diet of feedlot steers fed high-concentrate diets because it improved performance and carcass traits. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Costa et al. (2019)</xref> observed that including LC up to the level of 24%, decreases operation costs, which in turn results in higher profitability.</p>
			<p>However, LC has a high protein content (222 g CP/kg DM), in comparison with other biodiesel byproducts, as well as high EE (61 g EE/kg DM) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bezerra et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bagaldo et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Oliveira et al., 2022</xref>). In terms of carbohydrate fractionation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Silva et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Van Soest, 1994</xref>), LC contains 520 g/kg of sugars (fraction A), starch, and soluble fiber compounds (fraction B1), which make it a potential substitute for commonly used protein and energy ingredients such as soybean meal and ground corn.</p>
			<p>Nevertheless, the high fat content in LC may hinder rumen microbiota efficiency and reduce fiber digestibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Behan et al., 2019</xref>), leading to decreased sheep performance. Therefore, we hypothesized the total replacement of soybean meal by LC (up to 21% of total mixed ration) and the partial replacement of ground corn in the diet of young bulls would reduce feed costs without negatively impacting animal performance. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate feed intake, ingestive behavior, nutrient digestibility, nitrogen balance, microbial protein synthesis and its efficiency, animal performance, carcass traits, and diet profitability in young Nellore bulls fed LC diets.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>2. Material and methods</title>
			<p>This study was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the National Council for the Control of Animal Experimentation. All procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experiments of the Federal University of Bahia (case number: 16/2014).</p>
			<sec>
				<title>2.1. Location, animals, and diets</title>
				<p>The study was conducted at the Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science Experimental Farm of the Universidade Federal da Bahia, in São Gonçalo dos Campos, Bahia, Brazil (Latitude: −2.351062023637267, Longitude: −38.88197356995201). Thirty-two 16-month-old Nellore bulls, initially weighing 346 ± 32.5 kg of body weight (BW) were individually housed in partially covered 2 × 4 m stalls with concrete flooring equipped with individual feeders and water troughs. The experimental phase lasted 84 days and was preceded by a 15-day adaptation period to allow the animals to adjust to their environment, management practices, and diets. During this adaptation period, the cattle were vaccinated (Ivomec Pour-On Parasiticide, São Paulo, Brazil) and dewormed (Zoetis Animal Health Bovi-Shield Gold IBR-BVD, São Paulo, Brazil). Diets containing LC were introduced gradually, with the respective treatment levels progressively increased until the final inclusion level was reached for each experimental group.</p>
				<p>Throughout the experiment, the bulls were provided a total mixed ration, offered twice daily at 09:00 and 16:00 h. Daily feed allowances were adjusted to ensure a 10% refusal rate, providing sufficient feed for <italic>ad libitum</italic> intake. Additionally, the bulls had unrestricted access to fresh water at all times.</p>
				<p>The diets were formulated to maintain iso-nitrogen levels and fulfill the nutritional requirements of the young bulls, targeting an estimated weight gain of 1.20 kg/d, as per the recommendations outlined by the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">NASEM (2016)</xref>. Tifton-85 hay served as the roughage component (40%, chopped to 2.00 cm in length), while the concentrate mixture (60%) contained ground corn, soybean meal, urea, ammonium sulfate, and mineral mix. Licuri cake was included in the diets at levels of 0, 7, 14, and 21% DM, replacing soybean meal and ground corn (Tables 1 and 2).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.2. Licuri cake production process</title>
				<p>The LC used was acquired directly from the company Lipe Indústria de Sabão e Velas Ltda. (Guanambi, Bahia, Brazil). It was obtained through a physical extraction process involving pressing and heating, in which the licuri nuts are macerated to facilitate oil extraction. The residual byproduct remaining after oil removal constituted the LC, which was mixed into the diet daily.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.3. Feed intake and ingestive behavior</title>
				<p>Throughout the experimental period, leftover feed was gathered and weighed daily to measure the animals’ daily intake. To assess the ingestive behavior of the animals, individual observations were conducted on three days (days 25, 46, and 60) at 10-minute intervals, aligning with the recommendation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Martin and Bateson (1993)</xref>. Each animal was subject to 864 observations. Trained observers recorded the specific behaviors of each animal, ensuring minimal interference. The recorded behavioral variables included the duration (in minutes per day) of eating, rumination, and idleness. Additionally, eating rate (DM) and rumination rates [DM and neutral detergent fiber (NDF)] were calculated as the ratio of DM or NDF intake (kg) to the time spent eating or ruminating (hours), following the methodology described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Bürger et al. (2000)</xref>.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.4. Digestibility trial, microbial protein efficiency, and nitrogen balance</title>
				<p>Feces were collected over seven consecutive days (from day 36 to 42 of the experimental period). Two samples were taken daily at 08:00 and 16:00 h, after the total mixed ration delivery, directly from the animals’ rectum. These samples were then combined into a composite sample, as recommended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Cavallini et al. (2023)</xref>. Fecal samples were promptly subjected to oven drying at 55 °C for 72 h and were ground using a Wiley-type mill (model 3, Arthur H. Thomas, Philadelphia, PA), through a 3-mm screen.</p>
				<p>Indigestible neutral detergent fiber (iNDF) was used as an indicator according to method outlined by Valente et al. (2011a). For this procedure, samples of the diet, feces, and refused feed (20 mg DM/cm<sup>2</sup>) were packed in nonwoven bags (pore size of 23 µm; Vivatex<sup>®</sup>, São Paulo, Brazil), and placed in the rumen of two young fistulated bulls (372 ± 35.1 kg and initial age of 23 months) for incubation over 288 h (Valente et al., 2011b). Subsequently, the residues from incubation were rinsed until the water ran clear and then dried under forced ventilation at 55 °C for 72 h. Then the iNDF content was determined (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Van Soest et al., 1991</xref>). Fecal production (kg DM/d) was estimated by dividing the total amount of ingested indicator by the concentration of the indicator in the feces.</p>
				<p>The apparent digestibility coefficients (DC) of DM, CP, EE, NDF, and non-fiber carbohydrates (NFC) were computed using the following equation: <inline-formula id="ii1">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mtext> DC = (kg of portion ingested - kg of portion excreted)/ </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>kg</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mtext> of the portion ingested </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>.</p>
				<p>The total digestible nutrient (TDN) intake was calculated according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Sniffen et al. (1992)</xref>. The concentrations of TDN in the diet were obtained by the equation: <inline-formula id="ii2">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mtext> TDN </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>kg</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mtext> intake of TDN)/ </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mtext> intake of DM </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>.</p>
				<p>Urine samples were collected over 4 h following the morning feeding. Special plastic collectors, tailored to fit the animals’ bodies, were utilized for urine collection. The collected urine underwent filtration, and a 10-mL aliquot was diluted with 40 mL of stock solution (0.018 mM H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) before being stored at −20 °C for subsequent analysis of creatinine, allantoin, and uric acid. Allantoin analysis was carried out using a colorimetric method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chen and Gomes, 1992</xref>), while uric acid was assessed following the procedure outlined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Fossati et al. (1980)</xref>. The creatinine concentration was determined using the alkaline picrate method, employing commercial kits (Labtest<sup>®</sup> Diagnostics SA, Minas Gerais, Brazil) and an Auto Analyzer II (In Vitro Diagnostics, Itabira, MG, Brazil).</p>
				<p>The daily urine volume excreted by each animal was estimated by multiplying its body weight (BW) by the amount of urinary creatinine excretion (UCE) and then dividing the product by the creatinine concentration (mg/L) in the spot sample (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chizzotti et al., 2008</xref>). The UCE in zebu cattle can be approximated using the shrunk body weight (SBW) through the equation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Costa e Silva et al., 2012</xref>): <inline-formula id="ii3">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>UCE</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mtext> </mml:mtext>
								<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>day</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>0.0345</mml:mn>
							<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
							<mml:msup>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mi>SBW</mml:mi>
								</mml:mrow>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mn>0.9491</mml:mn>
								</mml:mrow>
							</mml:msup>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>.</p>
				<p>The quantity of absorbed microbial purines (X, mmol/day) was calculated from the excretion of purine derivatives (Y, mmol/day) using the following equation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Verbic et al., 1990</xref>):<inline-formula id="ii4">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>0.85</mml:mn>
							<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>0.385</mml:mn>
							<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
							<mml:msup>
								<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mn>0.75</mml:mn>
								</mml:mrow>
							</mml:msup>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>, in which 0.85 is the recovery of purines absorbed as purine derivatives in urine and 0.385 × BW<sup>0</sup> represents the endogenous contribution to purine excretion. The intestinal flow of nitrogen microbial compounds (Y, g N/day) was calculated as a function of absorbed purines (X, mmol/day) using the equation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Verbic et al. (1990)</xref>:<inline-formula id="ii5">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>70</mml:mn>
							<mml:mi>X</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>0.83</mml:mn>
							<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>0.134</mml:mn>
							<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>1000</mml:mn>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>, in which 70 represents the N content in the purines (mg N/mmol), 0.83 represents the digestibility of microbial purines, and 0.134 represents the total N purine:N in bacteria ratio.</p>
				<p>Nitrogen balance was computed as:<inline-formula id="ii6">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mtext> retained </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
							<mml:mtext> intake - fecal </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
							<mml:mtext> excretion - urinary </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
							<mml:mtext> excretion. </mml:mtext>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>. The efficiency of microbial synthesis (g N/100 g TDN) was determined by dividing the microbial protein synthesis by the TDN intake.</p>
				<p>On the 35th day of the experiment, blood samples were obtained through jugular vein puncture and collected in Vacutainer tubes (Labtest<sup>®</sup> Diagnóstico SA, Minas Gerais, Brazil) containing the anticoagulant EDTA. These collections occurred 4 h after morning feeding. Immediately after collection, the samples were transported to the laboratory and centrifuged (model 80-2B DM, IonLab, PR, Araucária, Brazil) at 3000 × <italic>g</italic> for 15 min to obtain plasma. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) concentrations were determined by a commercial kit (Labtest<sup>®</sup> Diagnóstico SA, Minas Gerais, Brazil).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.5. Chemical analyses</title>
				<p>Laboratory analyses were conducted in triplicate to determine the chemical composition of the ingredients (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>), diets (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>), feed, leftovers, and feces, according to the guidelines outlined by the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">AOAC (2016)</xref>. The concentrations of DM (method 967.03), CP (method 981.10), EE (method 920.29), and ash (method 942.05) were determined. Acid detergent fiber (ADF) and NDF were determined following the methodology proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Van Soest et al. (1991)</xref>. For NDF analysis, three drops (50 μL) of thermostable α-amylase (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) were added per sample during washing with detergent and water. A portion of the NDF residue was incinerated in an oven at 600 °C for 4 h to correct for ash contamination, while another portion was used to correct for protein contamination (NDFap). The NFC content was determined according to Detmann and Valadares Filho (2010) as: <inline-formula id="ii7">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mtext> NFC </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
							<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
							<mml:mtext> CP </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
							<mml:mtext> NDFap </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
							<mml:mtext> EE </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
							<mml:mtext> ash </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>, using CP from urea.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t1">
						<label>Table 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Mean and standard deviation (±SD) of chemical composition of ingredients analyzed in experimental diets offered to Nellore bulls</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Item (%DM)</th>
									<th colspan="4" style="font-weight:normal">Ingredient of diets</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Ground corn</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Soybean meal</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Licuri cake</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Tifton 85 hay</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>Dry matter (% as fed)</td>
									<td align="center">89.2±1.32</td>
									<td align="center">93.0±1.45</td>
									<td align="center">92.7±1.33</td>
									<td align="center">91.2±1.68</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Crude protein</td>
									<td align="center">8.58±0.98</td>
									<td align="center">50.1±4.32</td>
									<td align="center">23.0±1.99</td>
									<td align="center">5.10±0.09</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ether extract</td>
									<td align="center">4.39±0.11</td>
									<td align="center">1.87±0.08</td>
									<td align="center">15.7±0.22</td>
									<td align="center">1.13±0.03</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Non-fiber carbohydrates</td>
									<td align="center">74.7±5.22</td>
									<td align="center">26.0±1.73</td>
									<td align="center">29.5±1.95</td>
									<td align="center">12.5±1.01</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Acid detergent fiber</td>
									<td align="center">3.73±0.09</td>
									<td align="center">7.72±0.83</td>
									<td align="center">29.1±1.75</td>
									<td align="center">38.0±2.22</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>NDFap</td>
									<td align="center">13.1±0.99</td>
									<td align="center">15.6±1.01</td>
									<td align="center">51.9±4.23</td>
									<td align="center">75.2±5.43</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ash</td>
									<td align="center">1.22±0.06</td>
									<td align="center">6.40±0.65</td>
									<td align="center">6.51±0.71</td>
									<td align="center">6.08±0.62</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Total digestible nutrients<sup>1</sup></td>
									<td align="center">80.1±7.43</td>
									<td align="center">81.1±6.78</td>
									<td align="center">65.0±7.34</td>
									<td align="center">54.7±6.66</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN1">
								<p>NDFap - neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN2">
								<p><sup>1</sup> Estimated from the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">NRC (2001)</xref> equation.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t2">
						<label>Table 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Mean and standard deviation (±SD) of ingredient proportions and composition of analyzed experimental diets offered to Nellore bulls</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal"> </th>
									<th colspan="4" style="font-weight:normal">Licuri cake (%)</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">7</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">14</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">21</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>Ingredient (%DM)</td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Tifton 85 hay</td>
									<td align="center">40.0</td>
									<td align="center">40.0</td>
									<td align="center">40.0</td>
									<td align="center">40.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Licuri cake</td>
									<td align="center">0.00</td>
									<td align="center">7.00</td>
									<td align="center">14.0</td>
									<td align="center">21.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Soybean meal</td>
									<td align="center">8.0</td>
									<td align="center">60.0</td>
									<td align="center">30.0</td>
									<td align="center">0.00</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ground corn</td>
									<td align="center">49.8</td>
									<td align="center">44.8</td>
									<td align="center">40.8</td>
									<td align="center">36.8</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Mineral mixture<sup>1</sup></td>
									<td align="center">1.0</td>
									<td align="center">1.0</td>
									<td align="center">1.0</td>
									<td align="center">1.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Urea + ammonium sulfate<sup>2</sup></td>
									<td align="center">1.2</td>
									<td align="center">1.2</td>
									<td align="center">1.2</td>
									<td align="center">1.2</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Chemical composition (%DM)</td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Dry matter (% as fed)</td>
									<td align="center">90.5±1.29</td>
									<td align="center">90.7±1.33</td>
									<td align="center">90.8±1.03</td>
									<td align="center">90.9±1.49</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Crude protein</td>
									<td align="center">12.8±1.20</td>
									<td align="center">12.8±1.23</td>
									<td align="center">12.8±1.17</td>
									<td align="center">12.8±1.15</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ether extract</td>
									<td align="center">2.79±0.61</td>
									<td align="center">3.62±0.46</td>
									<td align="center">4.48±1.50</td>
									<td align="center">5.35±1.67</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Non-fiber carbohydrates</td>
									<td align="center">44.3±4.09</td>
									<td align="center">40.2±5.56</td>
									<td align="center">36.7±6.95</td>
									<td align="center">33.1±7.54</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Acid detergent fiber</td>
									<td align="center">17.7±2.63</td>
									<td align="center">19.4±3.38</td>
									<td align="center">21.0±4.76</td>
									<td align="center">22.7±3.49</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>NDFap</td>
									<td align="center">37.9±5.07</td>
									<td align="center">40.5±8.16</td>
									<td align="center">43.2±9.45</td>
									<td align="center">45.8±9.34</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>iNDF</td>
									<td align="center">12.6±1.43</td>
									<td align="center">13.4±1.12</td>
									<td align="center">14.2±1.32</td>
									<td align="center">15.0±1.23</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ash</td>
									<td align="center">4.55±1.20</td>
									<td align="center">4.82±0.44</td>
									<td align="center">5.03±0.71</td>
									<td align="center">5.25±0.56</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Total digestible nutrients</td>
									<td align="center">68.3±5.34</td>
									<td align="center">67.2±5.87</td>
									<td align="center">66.1±5.88</td>
									<td align="center">65.0±6.01</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN3">
								<p>NDFap - neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein; iNDF - indigestible neutral detergent fiber.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN4">
								<p><sup>1</sup> The guaranteed levels of active elements per kilogram are as follows: calcium, 220.00 g (maximum) - 209.00 g (minimum); phosphorus, 163.00 g; sulfur, 12.00 g; magnesium, 12.50 g; copper, 3500.00 mg; cobalt, 310.00 mg; iron, 1960.00 mg; iodine, 280.00 mg; manganese, 3640.00 mg; selenium, 32.00 mg; zinc, 9000.00 mg; with a maximum fluoride content of 1630.00 mg.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN5">
								<p><sup>2</sup> The mixture contains urea and ammonium sulfate in a 9:1 ratio.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.6. Performance, slaughter, carcass traits, and tissue composition</title>
				<p>The bulls were weighed every 21 days throughout the experimental period, initially to determine their initial BW and at the end, after a 16-hour fasting period, to obtain the slaughter BW. The ADG was computed by dividing the total weight gain (final BW – initial BW) by the number of days in the experimental period (84 days). Feed efficiency was calculated by dividing ADG by DMI, with values expressed in kg/kg.</p>
				<p>Slaughter procedures followed the guidelines of the Federal Inspection Service, in compliance with the regulations of Normative no. 03/00, of the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Brasil, 2000</xref>). After skinning and evisceration, carcasses were weighed to determine the hot carcass weight (HCW) before being stored in the cold chamber for 24 h at 4 °C.</p>
				<p>Following cooling, carcasses were weighed again to obtain the cold carcass weight (CCW). Cooling losses (CL) were calculated as <inline-formula id="ii8">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>CL</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>HCW</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>CCW</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>HCW</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>. Hot carcass yield (HCY) was determined as a ratio of HCW to the body weight at slaughter (BWS) in percentage by the equation: <inline-formula id="ii9">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>HCY</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>HCW</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>BWS</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>; and the cold carcass yield (CCY) was calculated as <inline-formula id="ii10">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>. The gastrointestinal tract was weighed to determine the empty body weight (EBW) and the real yield (RY) from the equation of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Osório and Osório (2005)</xref>: <inline-formula id="ii11">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>%</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>.</p>
				<p>At the HH rib section, corresponding from the 9th to 11th ribs, carcasses were sectioned to facilitate measurement of subcutaneous fat thickness (SFT) and <italic>longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle area (loin eye area, LEA) using a digital caliper. Loin eye area was calculated according to the following equation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Osório and Osório, 2005</xref>): <inline-formula id="ii12">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mi>LEA</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
									<mml:mrow>
										<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
									</mml:mrow>
									<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
									<mml:msup>
										<mml:mrow>
											<mml:mi>La</mml:mi>
										</mml:mrow>
										<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
									</mml:msup>
									<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
								</mml:mrow>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mo>/</mml:mo>
								</mml:mrow>
								<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
								<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
							</mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>×</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>π</mml:mi>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>, in which C = maximum length, La = maximum width, and π ≈ 3.1415. Muscle, bone, and fat proportions in the carcass were predicted in the same anatomical region, applying the equation described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Hankins and Howe (1946)</xref>.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.7. Marginal costs and returns</title>
				<p>The analysis of marginal costs (related to diets) and returns from meat production involved a descriptive examination of the total cost of the diet over the 84-day experimental period, which was based on the current US dollar exchange rate (provided by Dairy Farm International Holdings LTDA.). Returns were calculated by determining the cold carcass weight (in kg) of the young Nellore bulls during the data collection period and scaling it to the total experimental duration, expressed as kg per animal over the 84-day period.</p>
				<p>The gross margin from meat sales (in US$ per bull per 84 days) was determined by subtracting the total feed cost (in US$ per 84 days) from the total amount received for the meat (in US$ per kg per 84 days). Economic returns (profit or loss) were expressed in US$ per bull per day.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.8. Experimental design and statistical analysis</title>
				<p>The experimental design was completely randomized with four treatments and eight experimental units (bulls) per treatment, respectively. The following statistical model was used:</p>
				<disp-formula id="e1">
					<mml:math>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>μ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
					</mml:math>
				</disp-formula>
				<p>in which <italic>Y</italic><sub><italic>ij</italic></sub> = observed value, <italic>μ</italic> = overall mean, <italic>s</italic><sub><italic>i</italic></sub> = effect of LC (0 for the control or 7, 14, and 21% of total DM), and <italic>e</italic><sub><italic>ij</italic></sub> = effect of the experimental error.</p>
				<p>Variables were analyzed using the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS (Statistical Analysis System, version 9.4). The animal was considered as the experimental unit, and the effect of LC replacement was tested using linear and quadratic polynomial orthogonal contrasts. The significance level was set at a probability of 5% (P≤0.05).</p>
				<p>To contribute to data homogeneity, when analyzing the growth performance and carcass trait data, the initial BW was used as a covariate for statistical analysis using the following model:</p>
				<disp-formula id="e2">
					<mml:math>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>μ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
							<mml:msub>
								<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
									<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
								</mml:mrow>
							</mml:msub>
							<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
						</mml:mrow>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:msup>
									<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
									<mml:mrow>
										<mml:mi>′</mml:mi>
									</mml:mrow>
								</mml:msup>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
					</mml:math>
				</disp-formula>
				<p>in which <italic>Y</italic><sub><italic>ij</italic></sub> = observed value of the dependent variable (performance and carcass) in animal <italic>j</italic> receiving treatment <italic>i</italic>, <italic>μ</italic> = general mean, <italic>T</italic><sub><italic>i</italic></sub> = fixed effect of treatment <italic>i</italic> (<italic>i</italic> = effect of the LC inclusion), <italic>β</italic> = linear regression coefficient relative to covariate <italic>W</italic><sub><italic>ij</italic></sub><italic>, W</italic><sub><italic>ij</italic></sub> = covariate effect (initial BW of animal <italic>j</italic> receiving treatment <italic>i</italic>), and <italic>e</italic><sub><italic>ij</italic></sub> = random effects in the experimental error.</p>
				<p>Variables with repeated measures over time (ingestive behavior, urine, feces, digestibility) were analyzed according to the following model:</p>
				<disp-formula id="e3">
					<mml:math>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>μ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
						<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
					</mml:math>
				</disp-formula>
				<p>in which <italic>Y</italic><sub><italic>ijkl</italic></sub> = observed value, <italic>μ</italic> = overall mean, <italic>D</italic><sub><italic>i</italic></sub> = effect of substitution of soybean meal with LC, <italic>a</italic><sub><italic>j</italic></sub> = period, <italic>T</italic><sub><italic>l</italic></sub> = time, and <italic>e</italic><sub><italic>ijkl</italic></sub> = effect of experimental error. Polynomial contrasts (linear and quadratic) were used to examine the effects of treatments and time on the response variables. For all data, statistical difference was significant when P≤0.05. Homogeneity of variances was tested for P = 0.05, and when significant, heterogeneity was adjusted in the model using the REPEATED command of PROC MIXED.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>3. Results</title>
			<sec>
				<title>3.1. Intake and ingestive behavior</title>
				<p>The replacement of soybean meal and ground corn by LC linearly and quadratically decreased (P&lt;0.001) the daily intake of DM expressed in kg and g/kg BW, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). However, a quadratic increase on the intake of NDFap g/kg BW was observed (Regression equation, <inline-formula id="ii13">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mtext> (Regression equation, </mml:mtext>
							<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>0.00704</mml:mn>
							<mml:msup>
								<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
								<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
							</mml:msup>
							<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>0.12386</mml:mn>
							<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>3.337</mml:mn>
							<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>), with maximum inclusion of 8.89% LC on DM basis.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t3">
						<label>Table 3</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Intake and ingestive behavior of young bulls fed diets containing licuri cake</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Variable</th>
									<th colspan="4" style="font-weight:normal">Licuri cake (%DM)</th>
									<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
									<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">7</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">14</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">21</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Linear</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Quadratic</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>Intake (kg DM/d)</td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Dry matter</td>
									<td align="center">10.1</td>
									<td align="center">9.80</td>
									<td align="center">9.15</td>
									<td align="center">6.29</td>
									<td align="center">0.27</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Crude protein</td>
									<td align="center">1.37</td>
									<td align="center">1.35</td>
									<td align="center">1.24</td>
									<td align="center">0.85</td>
									<td align="center">0.04</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ether extract</td>
									<td align="center">0.32</td>
									<td align="center">0.39</td>
									<td align="center">0.44</td>
									<td align="center">0.36</td>
									<td align="center">0.01</td>
									<td align="center">0.005</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Non-fiber carbohydrates</td>
									<td align="center">4.88</td>
									<td align="center">4.15</td>
									<td align="center">3.40</td>
									<td align="center">2.12</td>
									<td align="center">0.19</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.005</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>NDFap</td>
									<td align="center">3.39</td>
									<td align="center">3.70</td>
									<td align="center">3.85</td>
									<td align="center">2.78</td>
									<td align="center">0.09</td>
									<td align="center">0.003</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Total digestible nutrients</td>
									<td align="center">7.14</td>
									<td align="center">6.68</td>
									<td align="center">6.65</td>
									<td align="center">4.95</td>
									<td align="center">0.19</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.002</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Intake (g/kg final BW/d)</td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Dry matter</td>
									<td align="center">20.0</td>
									<td align="center">20.5</td>
									<td align="center">20.4</td>
									<td align="center">14.6</td>
									<td align="center">0.50</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>NDFap</td>
									<td align="center">0.67</td>
									<td align="center">0.77</td>
									<td align="center">0.85</td>
									<td align="center">0.65</td>
									<td align="center">0.02</td>
									<td align="center">0.869</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ingestive behavior (min/d)</td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Eating</td>
									<td align="center">205</td>
									<td align="center">199</td>
									<td align="center">266</td>
									<td align="center">218</td>
									<td align="center">9.13</td>
									<td align="center">0.160</td>
									<td align="center">0.208</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ruminating</td>
									<td align="center">388</td>
									<td align="center">375</td>
									<td align="center">347</td>
									<td align="center">399</td>
									<td align="center">13.0</td>
									<td align="center">0.965</td>
									<td align="center">0.233</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Idling</td>
									<td align="center">847</td>
									<td align="center">866</td>
									<td align="center">827</td>
									<td align="center">823</td>
									<td align="center">17.6</td>
									<td align="center">0.502</td>
									<td align="center">0.765</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Rate</td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Intake (kg DM/h)</td>
									<td align="center">3.30</td>
									<td align="center">3.18</td>
									<td align="center">2.01</td>
									<td align="center">1.74</td>
									<td align="center">0.18</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.761</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Rumination (kg DM/h)</td>
									<td align="center">1.77</td>
									<td align="center">1.74</td>
									<td align="center">1.50</td>
									<td align="center">0.95</td>
									<td align="center">0.11</td>
									<td align="center">0.004</td>
									<td align="center">0.175</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Rumination (kg NDF/h)</td>
									<td align="center">0.85</td>
									<td align="center">0.83</td>
									<td align="center">0.72</td>
									<td align="center">0.45</td>
									<td align="center">0.03</td>
									<td align="center">0.007</td>
									<td align="center">0.257</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN6">
								<p>SEM - standard error of the mean; NDFap - neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>Licuri cake inclusion did not affect the eating, ruminating or idling time (min/day). However, the inclusion of LC promoted a linear reduction in the eating efficiency (kg/h) of DM (P&lt;0.001) and in the ruminating efficiency (kg/h) of DM (P = 0.004) and NDFap (P = 0.007).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>3.2. Digestibility, N balance, microbial protein synthesis and efficiency, and BUN</title>
				<p>A linear increase was observed for the digestibility of CP (P = 0.003), EE (P&lt;0.001), and NDFap (P&lt;0.001) with the replacement of ground corn and soybean meal by LC (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). The digestibility of DM and NFC was not affected. The replacement of soybean meal and ground corn by LC in the diets of the young bulls promoted a linear reduction in N intake, fecal N, urinary N, and total loss as g/d (P&lt;0.001), retained N as g/d and as % of N intake, and BUN (P = 0.039). However, a linear increase effect (P&lt;0.001) was observed for urinary N excretion as % of N intake. Microbial protein synthesis (P = 0.002) and microbial protein synthesis efficiency increased quadratically.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t4">
						<label>Table 4</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Digestibility and nitrogen balance of young bulls fed diets containing licuri cake</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Variable</th>
									<th colspan="4" style="font-weight:normal">Licuri cake (%DM)</th>
									<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
									<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">7</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">14</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">21</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Linear</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Quadratic</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestibility (g/100 g ingested)</td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Dry matter</td>
									<td align="center">64.9</td>
									<td align="center">63.9</td>
									<td align="center">64.1</td>
									<td align="center">66.9</td>
									<td align="center">5.19</td>
									<td align="center">0.171</td>
									<td align="center">0.071</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Crude protein</td>
									<td align="center">72.3</td>
									<td align="center">70.5</td>
									<td align="center">76.3</td>
									<td align="center">77.2</td>
									<td align="center">8.29</td>
									<td align="center">0.003</td>
									<td align="center">0.332</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ether extract</td>
									<td align="center">82.3</td>
									<td align="center">83.4</td>
									<td align="center">90.7</td>
									<td align="center">94.9</td>
									<td align="center">10.3</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.099</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Non-fiber carbohydrates</td>
									<td align="center">79.1</td>
									<td align="center">79.5</td>
									<td align="center">77.9</td>
									<td align="center">80.4</td>
									<td align="center">7.76</td>
									<td align="center">0.759</td>
									<td align="center">0.519</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>NDFap</td>
									<td align="center">45.0</td>
									<td align="center">46.9</td>
									<td align="center">49.8</td>
									<td align="center">54.6</td>
									<td align="center">10.6</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.414</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Nitrogen balance</td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>N intake (g/d)</td>
									<td align="center">220</td>
									<td align="center">216</td>
									<td align="center">198</td>
									<td align="center">135</td>
									<td align="center">8.72</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.232</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Total N excretion (g/d)</td>
									<td align="center">125</td>
									<td align="center">117</td>
									<td align="center">108</td>
									<td align="center">94.5</td>
									<td align="center">7.34</td>
									<td align="center">0.033</td>
									<td align="center">0.465</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Fecal N excretion (g/d)</td>
									<td align="center">59.8</td>
									<td align="center">54.1</td>
									<td align="center">47.2</td>
									<td align="center">37.1</td>
									<td align="center">4.96</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.523</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Urinary N excretion (g/d)</td>
									<td align="center">65.6</td>
									<td align="center">62.5</td>
									<td align="center">60.8</td>
									<td align="center">57.4</td>
									<td align="center">3.22</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.228</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Fecal N excretion (% of N intake)</td>
									<td align="center">27.2</td>
									<td align="center">25.0</td>
									<td align="center">23.8</td>
									<td align="center">27.5</td>
									<td align="center">2.45</td>
									<td align="center">0.324</td>
									<td align="center">0.674</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Urinary N excretion (% of N intake)</td>
									<td align="center">29.8</td>
									<td align="center">28.9</td>
									<td align="center">30.7</td>
									<td align="center">42.5</td>
									<td align="center">3.09</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.156</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Retained N (g/d)</td>
									<td align="center">94.6</td>
									<td align="center">99.4</td>
									<td align="center">90.0</td>
									<td align="center">40.5</td>
									<td align="center">6.44</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.054</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Retained N (% of N intake)</td>
									<td align="center">43.0</td>
									<td align="center">46.0</td>
									<td align="center">45.5</td>
									<td align="center">30.0</td>
									<td align="center">4.12</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Microbial protein production (g/d)</td>
									<td align="center">73.5</td>
									<td align="center">103.5</td>
									<td align="center">99.1</td>
									<td align="center">52.9</td>
									<td align="center">1.12</td>
									<td align="center">0.072</td>
									<td align="center">0.002</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Microbial synthesis efficiency (g N/100 g TDN)</td>
									<td align="center">10.3</td>
									<td align="center">15.5</td>
									<td align="center">14.9</td>
									<td align="center">10.7</td>
									<td align="center">2.27</td>
									<td align="center">0.126</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Blood urea nitrogen (mg/dL)</td>
									<td align="center">20.5</td>
									<td align="center">22.6</td>
									<td align="center">18.6</td>
									<td align="center">17.9</td>
									<td align="center">0.37</td>
									<td align="center">0.039</td>
									<td align="center">0.121</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN7">
								<p>SEM - standard error of the mean; NDFap - neutral detergent fiber corrected for ash and protein; TDN - total digestible nutrients.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>3.3. Performance, carcass traits, tissue composition and diet profitability</title>
				<p>The replacement of soybean meal and ground corn by LC in the diets of the young bulls resulted in linear decreases in total weight gain (P&lt;0.001), ADG (P = 0.011), and BWS (P&lt;0.001; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>). Feed efficiency did not change with the inclusion of LC, presenting a similar mean of 0.155 (kg/kg).</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t5">
						<label>Table 5</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Performance, carcass traits, and tissue composition of young bulls fed diets containing licuri cake</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Variable</th>
									<th colspan="4" style="font-weight:normal">Licuri cake (%DM)</th>
									<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
									<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">7</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">14</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">21</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Linear</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Quadratic</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>Initial body weight (kg)</td>
									<td align="center">352</td>
									<td align="center">349</td>
									<td align="center">343</td>
									<td align="center">340</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Final body weight (kg)</td>
									<td align="center">509</td>
									<td align="center">480</td>
									<td align="center">451</td>
									<td align="center">431</td>
									<td align="center">7.72</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.612</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Total weight gain (kg)</td>
									<td align="center">157</td>
									<td align="center">131</td>
									<td align="center">108</td>
									<td align="center">91.0</td>
									<td align="center">5.93</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.292</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Average daily gain (kg)</td>
									<td align="center">1.59</td>
									<td align="center">1.32</td>
									<td align="center">1.09</td>
									<td align="center">0.92</td>
									<td align="center">0.061</td>
									<td align="center">0.011</td>
									<td align="center">0.353</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Feed efficiency<sup>1</sup> (kg/kg)</td>
									<td align="center">0.13</td>
									<td align="center">0.16</td>
									<td align="center">0.14</td>
									<td align="center">0.15</td>
									<td align="center">0.014</td>
									<td align="center">0.422</td>
									<td align="center">0.382</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Hot carcass weight (kg)</td>
									<td align="center">278</td>
									<td align="center">269</td>
									<td align="center">249</td>
									<td align="center">215</td>
									<td align="center">5.69</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Cold carcass yield (g/kg)</td>
									<td align="center">539</td>
									<td align="center">557</td>
									<td align="center">551</td>
									<td align="center">496</td>
									<td align="center">4.09</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.071</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Empty body weight (kg)</td>
									<td align="center">455</td>
									<td align="center">429</td>
									<td align="center">404</td>
									<td align="center">386</td>
									<td align="center">6.91</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Real yield (g/kg)</td>
									<td align="center">609</td>
									<td align="center">627</td>
									<td align="center">620</td>
									<td align="center">558</td>
									<td align="center">6.83</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Loin eye area (cm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
									<td align="center">65.5</td>
									<td align="center">70.6</td>
									<td align="center">69.6</td>
									<td align="center">60.5</td>
									<td align="center">1.10</td>
									<td align="center">0.060</td>
									<td align="center">0.030</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Subcutaneous fat thickness (mm)</td>
									<td align="center">5.94</td>
									<td align="center">5.88</td>
									<td align="center">4.56</td>
									<td align="center">3.63</td>
									<td align="center">0.35</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.060</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>g/kg of carcass composition<sup>2</sup></td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Bone</td>
									<td align="center">184</td>
									<td align="center">182</td>
									<td align="center">192</td>
									<td align="center">218</td>
									<td align="center">5.32</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.191</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Muscle</td>
									<td align="center">534</td>
									<td align="center">562</td>
									<td align="center">582</td>
									<td align="center">590</td>
									<td align="center">6.44</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.351</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Fat</td>
									<td align="center">282</td>
									<td align="center">252</td>
									<td align="center">224</td>
									<td align="center">192</td>
									<td align="center">8.23</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.811</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ratios</td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Muscle:bone</td>
									<td align="center">2.93</td>
									<td align="center">3.17</td>
									<td align="center">3.04</td>
									<td align="center">2.77</td>
									<td align="center">0.08</td>
									<td align="center">0.413</td>
									<td align="center">0.131</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Muscle:fat</td>
									<td align="center">1.92</td>
									<td align="center">2.22</td>
									<td align="center">2.69</td>
									<td align="center">3.16</td>
									<td align="center">0.12</td>
									<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.642</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN8">
								<p>SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN9">
								<p><sup>1</sup> Average daily gain: dry matter intake ratio.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN10">
								<p><sup>2</sup> Estimated using HH section calculated according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Hankins and Howe (1946)</xref>.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>A quadratic effect was observed for HCW (P&lt;0.001), RY (P&lt;0.001), and SFT (P&lt;0.001) as the levels of LC increased. A linear decrease was observed for EBW (P&lt;0.001). The inclusion of LC resulted in a quadratic effect (P = 0.030) on LEA. Based on the polynomial equation <inline-formula id="ii14">
						<mml:math>
							<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:mo>−</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>0.0007</mml:mn>
							<mml:msup>
								<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
								<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
							</mml:msup>
							<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>0.1293</mml:mn>
							<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
							<mml:mn>65.4</mml:mn>
						</mml:math>
					</inline-formula>, the maximum LEA of 71.2 cm<sup>2</sup> was estimated at an LC inclusion level of 89.3 g/kg.</p>
				<p>The inclusion of LC increased the g/kg of bone (P&lt;0.001), g/kg of muscle (P&lt;0.001), and muscle:fat ratio (P&lt;0.001), while reduced the g/kg of fat (P&lt;0.001), and did not affect the muscle:bone ratio.</p>
				<p>The use of LC replacing ground corn and soybean meal decreased the diet cost, which ranged from US$ 254.78/ton (diet with soybean meal) to US$ 219.18/ton (LC inclusion at 21% of total DM) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>). However, at the end of 84 days, the weight of carcass of the animals fed the diet without LC made US$ 197.44 more per bull, and the gross margin of meat sales per animal for 84 days was US$ 97.08 greater when the bulls were fed the diet without LC compared with the 21% LC inclusion. The financial return showed a linear decrease due to LC inclusion, and young bulls fed soybean meal and ground corn (US$ 8.02 animal/d) presented a return 16% greater compared with animals receiving 21% LC (US$ 6.78 animal/d).</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t6">
						<label>Table 6</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Marginal costs and returns of diets with licuri cake for young bulls and their meat yield</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Variable<sup>1</sup></th>
									<th colspan="4" style="font-weight:normal">Licuri cake (%DM)</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">0</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">7</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">14</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">21</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>Diet cost (US$/ton)</td>
									<td align="center">254.78</td>
									<td align="center">245.18</td>
									<td align="center">232.18</td>
									<td align="center">219.18</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Diet cost (US$/kg)</td>
									<td align="center">0.25</td>
									<td align="center">0.25</td>
									<td align="center">0.23</td>
									<td align="center">0.22</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Dry matter intake (kg/d)</td>
									<td align="center">10.1</td>
									<td align="center">9.8</td>
									<td align="center">9.15</td>
									<td align="center">6.29</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Diet cost (US$/bull/84 d)</td>
									<td align="center">216.16</td>
									<td align="center">201.83</td>
									<td align="center">178.45</td>
									<td align="center">115.81</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Meat weight (@)</td>
									<td align="center">18.33</td>
									<td align="center">17.80</td>
									<td align="center">16.47</td>
									<td align="center">14.27</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Sales price of @ of meat (US$)</td>
									<td align="center">48.55</td>
									<td align="center">48.55</td>
									<td align="center">48.55</td>
									<td align="center">48.55</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Returns (US$/animal/d)</td>
									<td align="center">8.02</td>
									<td align="center">7.89</td>
									<td align="center">7.39</td>
									<td align="center">6.87</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN11">
								<p><sup>1</sup> Price in dollar quoted at R$ 5.40.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="discussion">
			<title>4. Discussion</title>
			<p>The inclusion of LC at 21% of the total dietary DM, entirely replacing soybean meal and partially replacing ground corn, resulted in a reduction of DMI by approximately 40%. This decrease is likely attributable to the lower fiber quality of the LC residue, which contains a significantly higher concentration of ADF (29.1% DM) compared with ground corn (3.73% of ADF) and soybean meal (7.72% of ADF). This observation is further supported by the increased iNDF content in diets with higher levels of LC inclusion, which accounts for approximately 50% of the dry weight of LC with very few calories (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Sánchez et al., 2023</xref>). This energy associated with decreased CP intake may explain the reduction in DMI and animal performance. Another factor contributing to low energy intake was the decreased NDF intake and TDN. In addition, the substantial increase in EE content (approximately 100%) can alter the rumen fermentation pattern (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Behan et al., 2019</xref>). Animals receiving 140 g/d LC in their diet should ideally ingest an average of 430 g/d fat, based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">NASEM (2016)</xref> recommendations, which suggest that total fat intake should not exceed 0.96 g fat/kg BW. Another factor contributing to decrease DMI, and subsequent nutrient intake could be the fatty acid profile of LC that has a high concentration of medium-chain fatty acids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bauer et al., 2013</xref>), which have a lower melting point, affecting microbial cell membrane stability, and impacting feed acceptability, thus reducing DMI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Hristov et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Palmquist and Mattos, 2011</xref>).</p>
			<p>Rumen degradable protein (RDP) is a protein that is available for use by rumen microorganisms. Most of the RDP is transformed into ammonia in the rumen, with a small part being proteolyzed to amino acids and small polypeptides used by microorganisms in the rumen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bach et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Putri et al., 2021</xref>). The reduction in CP and energy intake, even with the same proportion of protein in the diet, can cause rumen bacteria to present protein deficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Brooks et al., 2012</xref>). This situation may occur if the sources have low protein degradability, and this may have occurred due to the higher concentration of protein bound to unavailable fiber in the LC, since the fiber quality of LC is worse (&gt;iNDF) compared with corn grain and soybean meal, making N unavailable for rumen bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bach et al., 2005</xref>). As bacteria are mainly responsible for fiber degradation, the result is a reduction in the passage rate, an increase in rumen filling, and a consequent reduction in DMI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Das et al., 2014)</xref>.</p>
			<p>The reduced efficiency of feeding and rumination of DM and NDF when LC increased in the bulls’ diet also occurred due the quality of dietary fiber, as evidenced in previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Oliveira et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Conceição Santos et al., 2024</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bagaldo et al. (2019)</xref> noted that fatty acids associate with hydrophobic surfaces of feed particles, explaining low-fat microbial toxicity when animals are fed roughage-rich rations, thus elucidating the reduction in DMI and rumination efficiency of DM and NDF. The lignification of cellulose and hemicellulose makes it difficult for rumen microorganisms to attack these components. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Van Soest (1994)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Forbes (1995)</xref>, ingestive behavior and digesta passage rate can modify nutrient digestibility.</p>
			<p>The addition of LC into the bulls’ diets led to a reduction in N intake, excretion, and retention. The nitrogen values observed in this study fell within the range reported for growing beef cattle fed grass silage-based diets (20 to 101 g/day; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yan et al., 2007</xref>) and for those offered diverse feed compositions (30 to 89 g/day; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Salah et al., 2015</xref>). Nitrogen retention serves as an indicator of ADG in cattle, as noted in previous research. With approximately 750 g/kg of meat composed of water and 250 g/kg consisting of protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Sánchez Chopa et al., 2016</xref>), and applying a nitrogen-to-crude protein conversion factor of 6.25, the estimated ADG for steers in this experiment varied from 920 to 1,590 g.</p>
			<p>While the control group (0% LC) had higher N intake, animals consuming higher levels of LC showed an increase in urinary N excretion relative to nitrogen intake. This increase likely reflects the greater urine volume required to eliminate excess nitrogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Knowlton et al., 2010</xref>). Using an estimated CP digestibility of 72% for grass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Orskov, 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Owens et al., 2008</xref>) and assuming an ADG of 1,250 g, the calculated CP requirements for maintenance and growth were approximately 770 g/day (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">NASEM, 2016</xref>). The CP supply in the diets ranged from 850 g/day in the 21% LC group to 1,370 g/day in the control group, exceeding the predicted requirements by 11 and 56%, respectively.</p>
			<p>Nitrogen excretion through urine was notably higher than through feces, aligning with prior findings. In our study, urinary N excretion was 10 to 20% greater than fecal N excretion. These results suggest that dietary CP levels could be reduced to approximately 100 g CP/kg DM without negatively affecting animal growth, thereby substantially lowering nitrogen excretion, particularly through urine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Fanchone et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
			<p>The urinary N excretion observed in this study ranged from 29.8 to 42.5% of N intake, which is consistent with previously reported values for beef cattle. Animals receiving 21% LC showed N excretion levels within the higher range, comparable to other studies testing similar conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Valadares et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bezerra et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
			<p>When calculating ADG based on N retention, it is estimated that 30 g of N retention corresponds to 1 kg of ADG. Diets containing LC from 7 to 14% inclusion achieved an average microbial protein synthesis efficiency of 15 g N/100 g TDN, whereas the control and 21% LC diets averaged only 10.5 g N/100 g TDN. This efficiency falls below the recommended level of 13 g N/100 g TDN, as outlined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">NASEM (2016)</xref>.</p>
			<p>Additionally, the decrease in BUN is beneficial as it can prevent economic losses resulting from excessive dietary protein supply and potential production and environmental losses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Yang et al., 2016</xref>). However, the BUN reduction observed may have been due to the increase in N bound to insoluble NDF (iNDF) with the addition of LC in the concentrate. Changes in BUN concentrations are correlated with rumen ammonia content, which depends on rumen microorganism metabolic activity converting N to ammonia into bacterial proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Rhoads et al., 2006</xref>).</p>
			<p>The decrease in DMI and retained N led to decreased animal performance and carcass weights. These reductions in weight gain could represent economic losses since slaughterhouses typically compensate producers based on slaughter BW or carcass weight (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Scholz et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
			<p>The inclusion of LC up to 7% of total DM replacing soybean meal and ground corn in the diet of young bulls increased LEA that ranged from 65.5 (0% LC) to 70.6 (7% LC) cm<sup>2</sup>, which is desirable as this variable directly relates to body composition, tissue development, and commercial meat cut yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Silva et al., 2019</xref>). These LEA results are associated with increased CP digestibility, microbial protein synthesis, microbial protein synthesis efficiency, and retained N (g/100 g of N), which can enhance N compound availability for animal muscle deposition metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Sniffen et al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Dewhurst et al., 2000</xref>). The average LEA (66.6 cm<sup>2</sup>) was similar to that reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Eiras et al. (2014)</xref> in bulls and greater than the minimum recommendation (64 cm<sup>2</sup>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yan et al., 2007</xref>), except in animals fed 21% LC inclusion (60.5 cm<sup>2</sup>). The average fat thickness was 5.0 mm, falling within the standard range for beef cattle (between 3.0 and 5.0 mm), with carcasses outside this range receiving penalties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Osório and Osório, 2005</xref>). However, it is noteworthy that the treatment with 21% LC inclusion showed the lowest average fat thickness (3.62 mm), approaching the acceptable limit for subcutaneous fat deposition, demonstrating a linear decrease in fat thickness deposition due to LC inclusion, which is directly linked to DMI, dietary energy content, and nutrient digestibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Valadares et al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Silva et al., 2019</xref>), since more nutrients available for animal metabolism result in greater tissue deposition.</p>
			<p>Our results revealed a significant reduction on the cost of feed consumed when the bulls were fed LC. As diet ingredient values indicated, lower marginal costs lead to higher returns and the best benefit-cost ratio with higher LC inclusion levels (US$ 115.81/bull/84 d) than the control diets or soybean meal (US$ 216.16/bull/84 d). However, the decreased DMI and performance reduced total meat profit (at 84 d), which ranged from 890.08 to 692.65 g/d. Although there were more significant savings in diet spending, the lower growth performance did not allow for a better financial return for animals fed LC. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Salami et al. (2019)</xref>, there is improved economic performance with increased integration of higher inclusion levels of byproducts (cake and waste) in cattle diets, which demonstrates sustainability and viability of byproducts as a promising alternative protein source to fill the nutrient gap in the animal feed industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Malenica et al., 2023</xref>).</p>
			<p>It is necessary to emphasize two key points: the first is that the LC used in the diets exhibited a distinct composition from what is typically reported in the literature. This disparity underscores the variability in byproducts and highlights the challenge of their consistent utilization in animal nutrition. While previous literature (Lima et al, 2015; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Silva et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Oliveira et al., 2022</xref>) depicts LC as a source of NFC, our analysis revealed a higher concentration of unavailable fiber (52% iNDF), when compared with ground corn (13.1% iNDF) and soybean meal (15.6% iNDF), and moderate fat content (15.7% EE), when compared with ground corn (4.39% EE) and soybean meal (1.87% EE), respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). The second point highlights the impact of LC inclusion on CP utilization, as previously discussed. This alteration manifests through reduced N intake, fecal N, and retained N, coupled with increased urinary N excretion. Such shifts significantly influenced the animal performance and consequently the financial return. These results highlight the importance of thorough analysis prior to incorporating byproducts into animal diets.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>5. Conclusions</title>
			<p>Replacing corn grain and soybean meal with LC at levels up to 21% of total DM in the diets of young Nellore bulls is not recommended, as it adversely affects feed intake, animal performance, and overall financial returns. Nevertheless, the lower cost of LC compared with traditional, more expensive feed ingredients could make it a practical alternative in situations where high feeding costs threaten the viability of livestock operations.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p>The authors would like to thank the continued support received from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brazil, and the Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA).</p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>Aemiro, A.; Watanabe, S.; Suzuki, K.; Hanada, M.; Umetsu, K. and Nishida, T. 2018. Effect of substituting soybean meal with euglena ( Euglena gracilis ) on methane emission and nitrogen efficiency in sheep. Animal Science Journal 90:71-80. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13121">https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13121</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Aemiro</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Watanabe</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Suzuki</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hanada</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Umetsu</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nishida</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Effect of substituting soybean meal with euglena ( Euglena gracilis ) on methane emission and nitrogen efficiency in sheep</article-title>
					<source>Animal Science Journal</source>
					<volume>90</volume>
					<fpage>71</fpage>
					<lpage>80</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13121">https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13121</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2016. Official methods of analysis. 20th ed. AOAC International, Rockville, MD.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<source>Official methods of analysis</source>
					<edition>20th</edition>
					<publisher-name>AOAC International</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Rockville, MD</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>Bach, A.; Calsamiglia, S. and Stern, M. D. 2005. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 88:E9-E21. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73133-7">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (05)73133-7</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bach</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Calsamiglia</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stern</surname>
							<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
					<volume>88</volume>
					<fpage>E9</fpage>
					<lpage>E21</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73133-7">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302 (05)73133-7</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>Bagaldo, A. R.; Miranda, G. S.; Soares Júnior, M. S. F.; Araújo, F. L.; Matoso, R. V. M.; Chizzotti, M. L.; Bezerra, L. R. and Oliveira, R. L. 2019. Effect of Licuri cake supplementation on performance, digestibility, ingestive behavior, carcass traits and meat quality of grazing lambs. Small Ruminant Research 177:18-24. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.05.020">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.05.020</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bagaldo</surname>
							<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Miranda</surname>
							<given-names>G. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soares</surname>
							<given-names>M. S. F.</given-names>
							<suffix>Júnior</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Araújo</surname>
							<given-names>F. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Matoso</surname>
							<given-names>R. V. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chizzotti</surname>
							<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bezerra</surname>
							<given-names>L. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Effect of Licuri cake supplementation on performance, digestibility, ingestive behavior, carcass traits and meat quality of grazing lambs</article-title>
					<source>Small Ruminant Research</source>
					<volume>177</volume>
					<fpage>18</fpage>
					<lpage>24</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.05.020">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2019.05.020</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Bauer, L. C.; Damásio, J. M. A.; Silva, M. V.; Santana, D. A.; Gualberto, S. A. and Simionato, J. I. 2013. Chemical characterization of pressed and refined licuri ( <italic>Syagrus coronata</italic> ) oils. Acta Scientiarum. Technology 35:771-776. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v35i4.20251">https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v35i4.20251</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bauer</surname>
							<given-names>L. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Damásio</surname>
							<given-names>J. M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>M. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Santana</surname>
							<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gualberto</surname>
							<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Simionato</surname>
							<given-names>J. I.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Chemical characterization of pressed and refined licuri ( Syagrus coronata ) oils</article-title>
					<source>Acta Scientiarum. Technology</source>
					<volume>35</volume>
					<fpage>771</fpage>
					<lpage>776</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v35i4.20251">https://doi.org/10.4025/actascitechnol.v35i4.20251</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Behan, A. A.; Loh, T. C.; Fakurazi, S.; Kaka, U.; Kaka, A. and Samsudin, A. A. 2019. Effects of supplementation of rumen protected fats on rumen ecology and digestibility of nutrients in sheep. Animals 9:400. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070400">https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070400</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Behan</surname>
							<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Loh</surname>
							<given-names>T. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fakurazi</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kaka</surname>
							<given-names>U.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kaka</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Samsudin</surname>
							<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Effects of supplementation of rumen protected fats on rumen ecology and digestibility of nutrients in sheep</article-title>
					<source>Animals</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<size units="pages">400</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070400">https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9070400</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Bezerra, L. R.; Gonzaga Neto, S.; Medeiros A. N.; Mariz, T. M. A.; Oliveira, R. L.; Cândido, E. P. and Silva, A. M. A. 2013. Feed restriction followed by realimentation in prepubescent Zebu females. Tropical Animal Health and Production 45:1161-1169. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0341-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0341-8</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bezerra</surname>
							<given-names>L. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gonzaga</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
							<suffix>Neto</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Medeiros</surname>
							<given-names>A. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mariz</surname>
							<given-names>T. M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cândido</surname>
							<given-names>E. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>A. M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Feed restriction followed by realimentation in prepubescent Zebu females</article-title>
					<source>Tropical Animal Health and Production</source>
					<volume>45</volume>
					<fpage>1161</fpage>
					<lpage>1169</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0341-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0341-8</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Brasil. 2000. Ministério de Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa nº 3, de 17 de janeiro de 2000. Aprova o Regulamento Técnico de Métodos de Insensibilização para o Abate Humanitário de Animais de Açougue. Diário Oficial da União, 24 jan. 2000.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="legal-doc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>Brasil</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Ministério de Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento. Instrução Normativa nº 3, de 17 de janeiro de 2000. Aprova o Regulamento Técnico de Métodos de Insensibilização para o Abate Humanitário de Animais de Açougue</article-title>
					<source>Diário Oficial da União</source>
					<day>24</day>
					<month>01</month>
					<comment>2000</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Brooks, M. A.; Harvey, R. M.; Johnson, N. F. and Kerley, M. S. 2012. Rumen degradable protein supply affects microbial efficiency in continuous culture and growth in steers. Journal of Animal Science 90:4985-4994. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4107">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4107</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Brooks</surname>
							<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Harvey</surname>
							<given-names>R. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Johnson</surname>
							<given-names>N. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kerley</surname>
							<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Rumen degradable protein supply affects microbial efficiency in continuous culture and growth in steers</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>90</volume>
					<fpage>4985</fpage>
					<lpage>4994</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4107">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4107</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Bürger, P. J.; Pereira, J. C.; Queiroz, A. C.; Silva, J. F. C.; Valadares Filho, S. C.; Cecon, P. R. and Casali, A. D. P. 2000. Comportamento ingestivo em bezerros holandeses alimentados com dietas contendo diferentes níveis de concentrado. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 29:236-242. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982000000100031">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982000000100031</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bürger</surname>
							<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pereira</surname>
							<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Queiroz</surname>
							<given-names>A. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>J. F. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valadares</surname>
							<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
							<suffix>Filho</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cecon</surname>
							<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Casali</surname>
							<given-names>A. D. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Comportamento ingestivo em bezerros holandeses alimentados com dietas contendo diferentes níveis de concentrado</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>29</volume>
					<fpage>236</fpage>
					<lpage>242</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982000000100031">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982000000100031</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Cavallini, D.; Palmonari, A.; Mammi, L. M. E.; Ghiaccio, F.; Canestrari, G. and Formigoni, A. 2023. Evaluation of fecal sampling time points to estimate apparent nutrient digestibility in lactating Holstein dairy cows. Frontiers in Veterinary Science 9:1065258. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1065258">https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1065258</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Cavallini</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Palmonari</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mammi</surname>
							<given-names>L. M. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ghiaccio</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Canestrari</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Formigoni</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2023</year>
					<article-title>Evaluation of fecal sampling time points to estimate apparent nutrient digestibility in lactating Holstein dairy cows</article-title>
					<source>Frontiers in Veterinary Science</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<size units="pages">1065258</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1065258">https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2022.1065258</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Chen, X. B. and Gomes, M. J. 1992. Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives - an overview of technical details. International Feed Research Unit. Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen. (Occasional Publication). 21p.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>X. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gomes</surname>
							<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1992</year>
					<source>Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives - an overview of technical details</source>
					<publisher-name>International Feed Research Unit. Rowett Research Institute</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Bucksburn, Aberdeen</publisher-loc>
					<comment>Occasional Publication</comment>
					<size units="pages">21</size>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Chizzotti, M. L.; Valadares Filho, S. C.; Valadares, R. F. D.; Chizzotti, F. H. M. and Tedeschi, L. O. 2008. Determination of creatinine excretion and evaluation of spot urine sampling in Holstein cattle. Livestock Science 113:218-225. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.03.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.03.013</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chizzotti</surname>
							<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valadares</surname>
							<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
							<suffix>Filho</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valadares</surname>
							<given-names>R. F. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chizzotti</surname>
							<given-names>F. H. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tedeschi</surname>
							<given-names>L. O.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Determination of creatinine excretion and evaluation of spot urine sampling in Holstein cattle</article-title>
					<source>Livestock Science</source>
					<volume>113</volume>
					<fpage>218</fpage>
					<lpage>225</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.03.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2007.03.013</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Conceição Santos, M.; Silva, F. F.; Santos, L. V.; Paixão, T. R.; Gomes da Silva, A. P.; Dias Silva, J. W.; Sanchez Duenez, W. Y.; Lima Júnior, D. M. and Silva, R. R. 2024. Moderate inclusion of licuri cake ( Syagrus coronate ) in the diet improves the quality of meat from cull cows finished in the feedlot. South African Journal of Animal Science 54:2019-225. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v54i2.08">https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v54i2.08</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Conceição Santos</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>F. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Santos</surname>
							<given-names>L. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Paixão</surname>
							<given-names>T. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gomes da Silva</surname>
							<given-names>A. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dias Silva</surname>
							<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sanchez Duenez</surname>
							<given-names>W. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lima</surname>
							<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
							<suffix>Júnior</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>R. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2024</year>
					<article-title>Moderate inclusion of licuri cake ( Syagrus coronate ) in the diet improves the quality of meat from cull cows finished in the feedlot</article-title>
					<source>South African Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>54</volume>
					<fpage>2019</fpage>
					<lpage>2225</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v54i2.08">https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v54i2.08</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Costa, J. B.; Oliveira, R. L.; Silva, T. M.; Ribeiro, O. L.; Ribeiro, R. D. X.; Pinto, L. F. B. and Nascimento, T. V. C. 2019. Economic analysis of the finishing of lambs under confinement conditions using licuri cake ( Syagrus coronata Mart. Becc.). Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal 20:e0252019. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-9940200252019">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-9940200252019</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Costa</surname>
							<given-names>J. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>T. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
							<given-names>O. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
							<given-names>R. D. X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pinto</surname>
							<given-names>L. F. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nascimento</surname>
							<given-names>T. V. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Economic analysis of the finishing of lambs under confinement conditions using licuri cake ( Syagrus coronata Mart. Becc.)</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal</source>
					<volume>20</volume>
					<elocation-id>e0252019</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-9940200252019">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-9940200252019</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Costa e Silva, L. F.; Valadares Filho, S. C.; Chizzotti, M. L.; Rotta, P. P.; Prados, L. F.; Valadares, R. F. D.; Zanetti, D. and Braga, J. M. S. 2012. Creatinine excretion and relationship with body weight of Nellore cattle. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 41:807-810. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000300046">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000300046</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Costa e Silva</surname>
							<given-names>L. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valadares</surname>
							<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
							<suffix>Filho</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chizzotti</surname>
							<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rotta</surname>
							<given-names>P. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Prados</surname>
							<given-names>L. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valadares</surname>
							<given-names>R. F. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zanetti</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Braga</surname>
							<given-names>J. M. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Creatinine excretion and relationship with body weight of Nellore cattle</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>41</volume>
					<fpage>807</fpage>
					<lpage>810</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000300046">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000300046</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Crepaldi, I. C.; Almeida-Muradian, L. B.; Rios, M. D. G.; Penteando, M. V. C. and Salatino, A. 2001. Composição nutricional do fruto de licuri ( <italic>Syagrus coronata</italic> (Martius) Beccari). Revista Brasileira de Botânica 24:155-159.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Crepaldi</surname>
							<given-names>I. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Almeida-Muradian</surname>
							<given-names>L. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rios</surname>
							<given-names>M. D. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Penteando</surname>
							<given-names>M. V. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Salatino</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2001</year>
					<article-title>Composição nutricional do fruto de licuri ( Syagrus coronata (Martius) Beccari)</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Botânica</source>
					<volume>24</volume>
					<fpage>155</fpage>
					<lpage>159</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Das, L. K.; Kundu, S. S.; Kumar, D. and Datt, C. 2014. Metabolizable protein systems in ruminant nutrition: A review. Veterinary World 7:622-629. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014.622-629">https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014.622-629</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Das</surname>
							<given-names>L. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kundu</surname>
							<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kumar</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Datt</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Metabolizable protein systems in ruminant nutrition: A review</article-title>
					<source>Veterinary World</source>
					<volume>7</volume>
					<fpage>622</fpage>
					<lpage>629</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014.622-629">https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2014.622-629</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>Dewhurst, R. J.; Davies, D. R. and Merry, R. J. 2000. Microbial protein supply from the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 85:1-21. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401 (00)00139-5">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401 (00)00139-5</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Dewhurst</surname>
							<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Davies</surname>
							<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Merry</surname>
							<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Microbial protein supply from the rumen</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>85</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>21</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401 (00)00139-5">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401 (00)00139-5</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Detmann, E. and Valadares Filho, S. C. 2010. On the estimation of non-fibrous carbohydrates in feeds and diets. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 62:980-984. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352010000400030">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352010000400030</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Detmann</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valadares</surname>
							<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
							<suffix>Filho</suffix>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>On the estimation of non-fibrous carbohydrates in feeds and diets</article-title>
					<source>Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>62</volume>
					<fpage>980</fpage>
					<lpage>984</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352010000400030">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352010000400030</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>Drumond, M. A. 2007. Licuri Syagrus coronata (Mart.) Becc. Embrapa Semi Árido, Petrolina.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Drumond</surname>
							<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<source>Licuri Syagrus coronata (Mart.) Becc</source>
					<publisher-name>Embrapa Semi Árido</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Petrolina</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation>Eiras, C. E.; Marques, J. A.; Prado, R. M.; Valero, M. V.; Bonafé, E. G.; Zawadzki, F.; Perotto, D. and Prado, I. N. 2014. Glycerine levels in the diets of crossbred bulls finished in feedlot: carcass characteristics and meat quality. Meat Science 96:930-936. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.10.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.10.002</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Eiras</surname>
							<given-names>C. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Marques</surname>
							<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Prado</surname>
							<given-names>R. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valero</surname>
							<given-names>M. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bonafé</surname>
							<given-names>E. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zawadzki</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Perotto</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Prado</surname>
							<given-names>I. N.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Glycerine levels in the diets of crossbred bulls finished in feedlot: carcass characteristics and meat quality</article-title>
					<source>Meat Science</source>
					<volume>96</volume>
					<fpage>930</fpage>
					<lpage>936</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.10.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.10.002</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation>Fanchone, A.; Nozière, P.; Portelli, J.; Duriot, B.; Largeau, V. and Doreau, M. 2013. Effects of nitrogen underfeeding and energy source on nitrogen ruminal metabolism, digestion, and nitrogen partitioning in dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 91:895-906. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5296">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5296</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Fanchone</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nozière</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Portelli</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Duriot</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Largeau</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Doreau</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Effects of nitrogen underfeeding and energy source on nitrogen ruminal metabolism, digestion, and nitrogen partitioning in dairy cows</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>91</volume>
					<fpage>895</fpage>
					<lpage>906</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5296">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2012-5296</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation>Forbes, J. M. 1995. Voluntary food intake and diet selection in farm animals. CAB International, Wallingford.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Forbes</surname>
							<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1995</year>
					<source>Voluntary food intake and diet selection in farm animals</source>
					<publisher-name>CAB International</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Wallingford</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation>Fossati, P.; Prencipe, L. and Berti, G. 1980. Use of 3,5-dichloro-2-hydroxybenzenesulfonic acid/4-aminophenazone chromogenic system in direct enzymic assay of uric acid in serum and urine. Clinical Chemistry 26:227-231. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/26.2.227">https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/26.2.227</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Fossati</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Prencipe</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Berti</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1980</year>
					<article-title>Use of 3,5-dichloro-2-hydroxybenzenesulfonic acid/4-aminophenazone chromogenic system in direct enzymic assay of uric acid in serum and urine</article-title>
					<source>Clinical Chemistry</source>
					<volume>26</volume>
					<fpage>227</fpage>
					<lpage>231</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/26.2.227">https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/26.2.227</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation>Hankins, O. G. and Howe, P. E. 1946. Estimation of the composition of beef carcasses and cuts. Technical Bulletin No. 926. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hankins</surname>
							<given-names>O. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Howe</surname>
							<given-names>P. E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1946</year>
					<source>Estimation of the composition of beef carcasses and cuts</source>
					<comment>Technical Bulletin No. 926</comment>
					<publisher-name>U.S. Department of Agriculture</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation>Hristov, A. N.; Lee, C.; Cassidy, T.; Long, M.; Heyler, K.; Corl, B. and Forster, R. 2011. Effects of lauric and myristic acids on ruminal fermentation, production, and milk fatty acid composition in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 94:382-395. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3508">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3508</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hristov</surname>
							<given-names>A. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cassidy</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Long</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Heyler</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Corl</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Forster</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Effects of lauric and myristic acids on ruminal fermentation, production, and milk fatty acid composition in lactating dairy cows</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
					<volume>94</volume>
					<fpage>382</fpage>
					<lpage>395</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3508">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3508</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation>Knowlton, K. F.; McGilliard, M. L.; Zhao, Z.; Hall, K. G.; Mims, W. and Hanigan, M. D. 2010. Effective nitrogen preservation during urine collection from Holstein heifers fed diets with high or low protein content. Journal of Dairy Science 93:323-329. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2600">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2600</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Knowlton</surname>
							<given-names>K. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McGilliard</surname>
							<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhao</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hall</surname>
							<given-names>K. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mims</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hanigan</surname>
							<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Effective nitrogen preservation during urine collection from Holstein heifers fed diets with high or low protein content</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
					<volume>93</volume>
					<fpage>323</fpage>
					<lpage>329</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2600">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2600</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation>Lima, L. S.; Oliveira, R. L.; Garcez Neto, A. F.; Bagaldo, A. R.; Abreu, C. L.; Silva, T. M.; Carvalho, S. T. and Bezerra L. R. 2015. Licuri oil supplements for lactating cows on pasture. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 95:617-624. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas-2014-165">https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas-2014-165</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lima</surname>
							<given-names>L. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Garcez</surname>
							<given-names>A. F.</given-names>
							<suffix>Neto</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bagaldo</surname>
							<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Abreu</surname>
							<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>T. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Carvalho</surname>
							<given-names>S. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bezerra</surname>
							<given-names>L. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Licuri oil supplements for lactating cows on pasture</article-title>
					<source>Canadian Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>95</volume>
					<fpage>617</fpage>
					<lpage>624</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas-2014-165">https://doi.org/10.4141/cjas-2014-165</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<mixed-citation>Malenica, D.; Kass, M. and Bhat, R. 2023. Sustainable management and valorization of agri-food industrial wastes and by-products as animal feed: For ruminants, non-ruminants and as poultry feed. Sustainability 15:117. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010117">https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010117</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Malenica</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kass</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bhat</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2023</year>
					<article-title>Sustainable management and valorization of agri-food industrial wastes and by-products as animal feed: For ruminants, non-ruminants and as poultry feed</article-title>
					<source>Sustainability</source>
					<volume>15</volume>
					<size units="pages">117</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010117">https://doi.org/10.3390/su15010117</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation>Martin, P. and Bateson, P. 1993. Measuring behaviour: An introductory guide. 2nd. ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Martin</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bateson</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1993</year>
					<source>Measuring behaviour: An introductory guide</source>
					<edition>2nd</edition>
					<publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<mixed-citation>NASEM - National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 8th rev. ed. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17226/19014">https://doi.org/10.17226/19014</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>NASEM - National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<source>Nutrient requirements of beef cattle</source>
					<edition>8th rev</edition>
					<publisher-name>The National Academies Press</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17226/19014">https://doi.org/10.17226/19014</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation>Nath, P. C.; Ojha, A.; Debnath, S.; Sharma, M.; Nayak, P. K.; Sridhar, K. and Inbaraj, B. S. 2023. Valorization of food waste as animal feed: A step towards sustainable food waste management and circular bioeconomy. Animals 13:1366. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081366">https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081366</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Nath</surname>
							<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ojha</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Debnath</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sharma</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nayak</surname>
							<given-names>P. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sridhar</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Inbaraj</surname>
							<given-names>B. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2023</year>
					<article-title>Valorization of food waste as animal feed: A step towards sustainable food waste management and circular bioeconomy</article-title>
					<source>Animals</source>
					<volume>13</volume>
					<size units="pages">1366</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081366">https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13081366</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation>NRC - Nacional Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>NRC - Nacional Research Council</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2001</year>
					<source>Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle</source>
					<edition>7th</edition>
					<publisher-name>National Academy Press</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, D.C</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B35">
				<mixed-citation>Oliveira, A. B.; Silva, F. F.; Silva, J. W. D.; Carvalho, G. G. P.; Santos, L. V.; Paixão, T. R.; Silva, A. P. G.; Souza, S. O.; Soares, C.; Lima Júnior, D. M. and Silva, R. R. 2022. Inclusion of licuri cake in high-grain diets for steers: Intake, digestibility, carcass characteristics, and meat quality. South African Journal of Animal Science 52:603-610. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v52i5.04">https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v52i5.04</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>A. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>F. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>J. W. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Carvalho</surname>
							<given-names>G. G. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Santos</surname>
							<given-names>L. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Paixão</surname>
							<given-names>T. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>A. P. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Souza</surname>
							<given-names>S. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soares</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lima</surname>
							<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
							<suffix>Júnior</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>R. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<article-title>Inclusion of licuri cake in high-grain diets for steers: Intake, digestibility, carcass characteristics, and meat quality</article-title>
					<source>South African Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>52</volume>
					<fpage>603</fpage>
					<lpage>610</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v52i5.04">https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v52i5.04</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B36">
				<mixed-citation>Orskov, E. R. 1988. Nutrición proteica de los rumiantes. Acribia, Zaragoza.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Orskov</surname>
							<given-names>E. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1988</year>
					<source>Nutrición proteica de los rumiantes</source>
					<publisher-name>Acribia</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Zaragoza</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B37">
				<mixed-citation>Osório, J. C. S. and Osório, M. T. M. 2005. Produção de carne ovina: Técnicas de avaliação &quot;in vivo&quot; e na carcaça. 2.ed. Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Osório</surname>
							<given-names>J. C. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Osório</surname>
							<given-names>M. T. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<source>Produção de carne ovina: Técnicas de avaliação &quot;in vivo&quot; e na carcaça</source>
					<edition>2</edition>
					<publisher-name>Universidade Federal de Pelotas</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Pelotas</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B38">
				<mixed-citation>Owens, D.; McGee, M. and Boland, T. 2008. Effect of grass regrowth interval on intake, rumen digestion and nutrient flow to the omasum in beef cattle. Animal Feed Science and Technology 146:21-41. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.11.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.11.012</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Owens</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McGee</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Boland</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Effect of grass regrowth interval on intake, rumen digestion and nutrient flow to the omasum in beef cattle</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>146</volume>
					<fpage>21</fpage>
					<lpage>41</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.11.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.11.012</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B39">
				<mixed-citation>Palmquist, D. L. and Mattos, W. R. S. 2011. Metabolismo de lipídeos. In: Berchielli, T. T.; Pires, A. V. and Oliveira, S. G. Nutrição de ruminantes. 2.ed. Funep, Jaboticabal.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Palmquist</surname>
							<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mattos</surname>
							<given-names>W. R. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<chapter-title>Metabolismo de lipídeos</chapter-title>
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Berchielli</surname>
							<given-names>T. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pires</surname>
							<given-names>A. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>S. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<source>Nutrição de ruminantes</source>
					<edition>2</edition>
					<publisher-name>Funep</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Jaboticabal</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B40">
				<mixed-citation>Pinto, J.; Boavida-Dias, R.; Matos, H. A. and Azevedo, J. 2022. Analysis of the food loss and waste valorisation of animal by-products from the retail sector. Sustainability 14:2830. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052830">https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052830</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pinto</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Boavida-Dias</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Matos</surname>
							<given-names>H. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Azevedo</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<article-title>Analysis of the food loss and waste valorisation of animal by-products from the retail sector</article-title>
					<source>Sustainability</source>
					<volume>14</volume>
					<size units="pages">2830</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052830">https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052830</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B41">
				<mixed-citation>Putri, E. M.; Zain, M.; Warly, L. and Hermon, H. 2021. Effects of rumen-degradable-to-undegradable protein ratio in ruminant diet on in vitro digestibility, rumen fermentation, and microbial protein synthesis. Veterinary World 14:640-648. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.640-648">https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.640-648</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Putri</surname>
							<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zain</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Warly</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hermon</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Effects of rumen-degradable-to-undegradable protein ratio in ruminant diet on in vitro digestibility, rumen fermentation, and microbial protein synthesis</article-title>
					<source>Veterinary World</source>
					<volume>14</volume>
					<fpage>640</fpage>
					<lpage>648</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.640-648">https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2021.640-648</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B42">
				<mixed-citation>Rhoads, M. L.; Rhoads, R. P.; Gilbert, R. O.; Toole, R. and Butler, W. R. 2006 Detrimental effects of high plasma urea nitrogen levels on viability of embryos from lactating dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 91:1-10. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.02.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.02.009</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rhoads</surname>
							<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rhoads</surname>
							<given-names>R. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gilbert</surname>
							<given-names>R. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Toole</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Butler</surname>
							<given-names>W. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Detrimental effects of high plasma urea nitrogen levels on viability of embryos from lactating dairy cows</article-title>
					<source>Animal Reproduction Science</source>
					<volume>91</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>10</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.02.009">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2005.02.009</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B43">
				<mixed-citation>Salah, N.; Sauvant, D. and Archimède, H. 2015. Response of growing ruminants to diet in warm climates: a meta-analysis. Animal 9:822-830. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111400322X">https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111400322X</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Salah</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sauvant</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Archimède</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Response of growing ruminants to diet in warm climates: a meta-analysis</article-title>
					<source>Animal</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<fpage>822</fpage>
					<lpage>830</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111400322X">https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111400322X</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B44">
				<mixed-citation>Salami, S. A.; Luciano, G.; O'Grady, M. N.; Biondi, L.; Newbold, C. J.; Kerry, J. P.; Priolo, A. 2019. Sustainability of feeding plant by-products: A review of the implications for ruminant meat production. Animal Feed Science and Technology 251:37-55. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.02.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.02.006</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Salami</surname>
							<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Luciano</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>O'Grady</surname>
							<given-names>M. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Biondi</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Newbold</surname>
							<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kerry</surname>
							<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Priolo</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Sustainability of feeding plant by-products: A review of the implications for ruminant meat production</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>251</volume>
					<fpage>37</fpage>
					<lpage>55</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.02.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.02.006</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B45">
				<mixed-citation>Sánchez Chopa, F.; Nadin, L. B.; Agnelli, L.; Trindade, J. K. and Gonda, H. L. 2016. Nitrogen balance in Holstein steers grazing winter oats: effect of nitrogen fertilisation. Animal Production Science 56:2039-2046. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/AN141007">https://doi.org/10.1071/AN141007</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sánchez Chopa</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nadin</surname>
							<given-names>L. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Agnelli</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Trindade</surname>
							<given-names>J. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gonda</surname>
							<given-names>H. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Nitrogen balance in Holstein steers grazing winter oats: effect of nitrogen fertilisation</article-title>
					<source>Animal Production Science</source>
					<volume>56</volume>
					<fpage>2039</fpage>
					<lpage>2046</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/AN141007">https://doi.org/10.1071/AN141007</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B46">
				<mixed-citation>Sánchez, M.; Laca, A.; Laca, A. and Díaz, M. 2023. Cocoa bean shell: A by-product with high potential for nutritional and biotechnological applications. Antioxidants 12:1028. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051028">https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051028</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sánchez</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Laca</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Laca</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Díaz</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2023</year>
					<article-title>Cocoa bean shell: A by-product with high potential for nutritional and biotechnological applications</article-title>
					<source>Antioxidants</source>
					<volume>12</volume>
					<size units="pages">1028</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051028">https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12051028</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B47">
				<mixed-citation>Scholz, A. M.; Bünger, L.; Kongsro, J.; Baulain, U. and Mitchell, A. D. 2015. Non-invasive methods for the determination of body and carcass composition in livestock: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound: invited review. Animal 9:1250-1264. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000336">https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000336</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Scholz</surname>
							<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bünger</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kongsro</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Baulain</surname>
							<given-names>U.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mitchell</surname>
							<given-names>A. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Non-invasive methods for the determination of body and carcass composition in livestock: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound: invited review</article-title>
					<source>Animal</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<fpage>1250</fpage>
					<lpage>1264</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000336">https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731115000336</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B48">
				<mixed-citation>Silva, L. H. P.; Assis, D. E. F.; Estrada, M. M.; Assis, G. J. F.; Zamudio, G. D. R.; Carneiro, G. B.; Valadares Filho, S. C.; Paulino, M. F. and Chizzotti, M. L. 2019. Carcass and meat quality traits of Nellore young bulls and steers throughout fattening. Livestock Science 229:28-36. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.09.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.09.012</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>L. H. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Assis</surname>
							<given-names>D. E. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Estrada</surname>
							<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Assis</surname>
							<given-names>G. J. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zamudio</surname>
							<given-names>G. D. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Carneiro</surname>
							<given-names>G. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valadares</surname>
							<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
							<suffix>Filho</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Paulino</surname>
							<given-names>M. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chizzotti</surname>
							<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Carcass and meat quality traits of Nellore young bulls and steers throughout fattening</article-title>
					<source>Livestock Science</source>
					<volume>229</volume>
					<fpage>28</fpage>
					<lpage>36</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.09.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.09.012</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B49">
				<mixed-citation>Silva, W. P.; Santos, S. A.; Cirne, L. G. A.; Pina, D. S.; Alba, H. D. R.; Rodrigues, T. C. G. C.; Araújo, M. L. G. M. L.; Lima, V. G. O.; Galvão, J. M.; Nascimento, C. O.; Rodrigues, C. S. and Carvalho, G. G. P. 2021. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of feedlot goat kids fed high-concentrate diets with licury cake. Livestock Science 244:104391. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104391">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104391</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>W. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Santos</surname>
							<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cirne</surname>
							<given-names>L. G. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pina</surname>
							<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Alba</surname>
							<given-names>H. D. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rodrigues</surname>
							<given-names>T. C. G. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Araújo</surname>
							<given-names>M. L. G. M. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lima</surname>
							<given-names>V. G. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Galvão</surname>
							<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nascimento</surname>
							<given-names>C. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rodrigues</surname>
							<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Carvalho</surname>
							<given-names>G. G. P</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Carcass characteristics and meat quality of feedlot goat kids fed high-concentrate diets with licury cake</article-title>
					<source>Livestock Science</source>
					<volume>244</volume>
					<size units="pages">104391</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104391">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104391</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B50">
				<mixed-citation>Sniffen, C. J.; O'Connor, J. D.; Van Soest, P. J.; Fox, D. G. and Russell, J. B. 1992. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science 70:3562-3577. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x">https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sniffen</surname>
							<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>O'Connor</surname>
							<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Van Soest</surname>
							<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fox</surname>
							<given-names>D. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Russell</surname>
							<given-names>J. B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1992</year>
					<article-title>A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>70</volume>
					<fpage>3562</fpage>
					<lpage>3577</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x">https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B51">
				<mixed-citation>Valadares, R. F. D.; Gonçalves, L. C.; Sampaio, I. B.; Rodriguez, N. M. and Coelho da Silva, J. F. 1997. Níveis de proteína em dietas de bovinos. 2. Consumo, digestibilidades e balanço de compostos nitrogenados. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 26:1259-263.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Valadares</surname>
							<given-names>R. F. D</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gonçalves</surname>
							<given-names>L. C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sampaio</surname>
							<given-names>I. B</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rodriguez</surname>
							<given-names>N. M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Coelho da Silva</surname>
							<given-names>J. F</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<article-title>Níveis de proteína em dietas de bovinos. 2. Consumo, digestibilidades e balanço de compostos nitrogenados</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>26</volume>
					<issue>1259-263</issue>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B52">
				<mixed-citation>Valente, T. N. P.; Detmann, E.; Valadares Filho, S. C.; Cunha, M.; Queiroz, A. C. and Sampaio, C. B. 2011a. In situ estimation of indigestible compounds contents in cattle feed and feces using bags made from different textiles. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40:666-675. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000300027">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000300027</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Valente</surname>
							<given-names>T. N. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Detmann</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valadares</surname>
							<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
							<suffix>Filho</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cunha</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Queiroz</surname>
							<given-names>A. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sampaio</surname>
							<given-names>C. B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011a</year>
					<article-title>In situ estimation of indigestible compounds contents in cattle feed and feces using bags made from different textiles</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>40</volume>
					<fpage>666</fpage>
					<lpage>675</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000300027">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000300027</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B53">
				<mixed-citation>Valente, T. N. P.; Detmann, E.; Queiroz, A. C.; Valadares Filho, S. C.; Gomes, D. I. and Figueiras, J. F. 2011b. Evaluation of ruminal degradation profiles of forages using bags made from different textiles. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40:2565-2573. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011001100039">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011001100039</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Valente</surname>
							<given-names>T. N. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Detmann</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Queiroz</surname>
							<given-names>A. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valadares</surname>
							<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
							<suffix>Filho</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gomes</surname>
							<given-names>D. I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Figueiras</surname>
							<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011b</year>
					<article-title>Evaluation of ruminal degradation profiles of forages using bags made from different textiles</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>40</volume>
					<fpage>2565</fpage>
					<lpage>2573</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011001100039">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011001100039</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B54">
				<mixed-citation>Van Soest, P. J. 1994. <italic>Nutritional ecology of the ruminant</italic>. 2nd ed. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Van Soest</surname>
							<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1994</year>
					<source>Nutritional ecology of the ruminant</source>
					<edition>2nd</edition>
					<publisher-name>Cornell University Press</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Ithaca, NY</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B55">
				<mixed-citation>Van Soest, P. J.; Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74:3583-3597.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Van Soest</surname>
							<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Robertson</surname>
							<given-names>J. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lewis</surname>
							<given-names>B. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1991</year>
					<article-title>Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
					<volume>74</volume>
					<fpage>3583</fpage>
					<lpage>3597</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B56">
				<mixed-citation>Verbic, J.; Chen, X. B.; Macleod, N. A. and Ørskov, E. R. 1990. Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants. Effect of microbial nucleic acid infusion on purine derivative excretion by steers. Journal of Agricultural Science 114:243-248. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600072610">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600072610</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Verbic</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>X. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Macleod</surname>
							<given-names>N. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ørskov</surname>
							<given-names>E. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1990</year>
					<article-title>Excretion of purine derivatives by ruminants. Effect of microbial nucleic acid infusion on purine derivative excretion by steers</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Agricultural Science</source>
					<volume>114</volume>
					<fpage>243</fpage>
					<lpage>248</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600072610">https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600072610</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B57">
				<mixed-citation>Yan, T.; Frost, J. P.; Keady, T. W. J.; Agnew, R. E. and Mayne, C. S. 2007. Prediction of nitrogen excretion in feces and urine of beef cattle offered diets containing grass silage. Journal of Animal Science 85:1982-1989. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-408">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-408</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Yan</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Frost</surname>
							<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Keady</surname>
							<given-names>T. W. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Agnew</surname>
							<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mayne</surname>
							<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Prediction of nitrogen excretion in feces and urine of beef cattle offered diets containing grass silage</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>85</volume>
					<fpage>1982</fpage>
					<lpage>1989</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-408">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-408</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B58">
				<mixed-citation>Yang, K.; Wei, C.; Zhao, G.; Xu, Z. and Lin, S. 2016. Dietary supplementation of tannic acid modulates nitrogen excretion pattern and urinary nitrogenous constituents of beef cattle. Livestock Science 191:148-152. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.07.020">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.07.020</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Yang</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wei</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhao</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Xu</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lin</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Dietary supplementation of tannic acid modulates nitrogen excretion pattern and urinary nitrogenous constituents of beef cattle</article-title>
					<source>Livestock Science</source>
					<volume>191</volume>
					<fpage>148</fpage>
					<lpage>152</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.07.020">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.07.020</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
		<fn-group>
			<fn fn-type="data-availability" specific-use="data-available-upon-request">
				<label>Data availability:</label>
				<p> The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.</p>
			</fn>
		</fn-group>
	</back>
</article>