<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rbz</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">R. Bras. Zootec.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">1516-3598</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">1806-9290</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="other">00801</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37496/rbz5420220158</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Non-ruminants</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Emulsifier in broiler diets containing deactived full-fat soybean</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-0142-9629</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Tenório</surname>
						<given-names>Karine Isabela</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Investigation</role>
					<role>Writing – original draft</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-8839-3758</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Eyng</surname>
						<given-names>Cinthia</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Conceptualization</role>
					<role>Methodology</role>
					<role>Supervision</role>
					<role>Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c01"><sup>*</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-9376-2826</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Nunes</surname>
						<given-names>Ricardo Vianna</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Conceptualization</role>
					<role>Supervision</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-3209-3814</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Duarte</surname>
						<given-names>Cristiane Regina do Amaral</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Conceptualization</role>
					<role>Methodology</role>
					<role>Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-5379-2759</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Souza</surname>
						<given-names>Cleison de</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Investigation</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-7146-7295</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Rohloff</surname>
						<given-names>Nilton</given-names>
						<suffix>Junior</suffix>
					</name>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Investigation</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-1916-4801</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Köhler</surname>
						<given-names>Tânia Luiza</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Investigation</role>
					<role>Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-0187-0027</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Tesser</surname>
						<given-names>Guilherme Luis Silva</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Investigation</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Departamento de Zootecnia</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Marechal Cândido Rondon</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">PR</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná, Departamento de Zootecnia, Marechal Cândido Rondon, PR, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Departamento de Ciências Biológicas</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Tangará da Serra</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">MT</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Universidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Tangará da Serra, MT, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c01">
					<label>*Corresponding author:</label>
					<email>cinthiaeyng@hotmail.com</email>
				</corresp>
				<fn fn-type="edited-by">
					<label>Editors:</label>
					<p>Mateus Pies Gionbelli Heder José D’Avila Lima</p>
				</fn>
				<fn fn-type="conflict">
					<label>Conflict of interest:</label>
					<p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>21</day>
				<month>05</month>
				<year>2025</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<year>2025</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>54</volume>
			<elocation-id>e20220158</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>15</day>
					<month>12</month>
					<year>2022</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>10</day>
					<month>04</month>
					<year>2025</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p>This study aimed to evaluate effects of an emulsifier based on glyceryl polyethyleneglycol ricinoleate in diets containing deactivated full-fat soybean (DFFS) on performance, relative weight of pancreas, pancreatic lipase activity, intestinal morphometry, serum lipid concentration, nutrient digestibility, carcass yield, and meat quality of broiler chickens. Three hundred fifty-two male broilers (one-day-old) were randomly assigned to two dietary treatments including a diet containing DFFS without the emulsifier and a diet containing DFFS with emulsifier (350 g ton<sup>−1</sup>). Each treatment had eight replicates with 22 birds each. The metabolizable energy level was reduced by 40 kcal kg<sup>−1</sup> from 1 to 21 d and 50 kcal kg<sup>−1</sup> from 22 to 49 d in diets containing the emulsifier. Birds fed diets without emulsifier showed higher weight gain (P = 0.014) and feed intake (P = 0.048) from 1 to 7 d and greater feed conversion ratio (P = 0.044) from 1 to 35 d. On days 14 and 21, the inclusion of emulsifier in the diet did not affect (P&gt;0.05) the intestinal morphometry, relative weight of pancreas, and pancreatic lipase activity. Serum lipid levels measured at 14, 21, and 29 d were also not affected by the emulsifier (P&gt;0.05). At 49 d, broilers fed diets without emulsifier had decreased energy utilization (P&lt;0.0001) and ileal digestibility of dry matter (P = 0.0001), gross energy (P&lt;0.0001), and crude protein (P = 0.038). A higher breast yield (P = 0.039) was observed for birds fed diets without emulsifier. Meat quality parameters were not altered (P&gt;0.05). The inclusion of the emulsifier in energy-restricted diets containing DFFS does not improve performance of broiler chickens, reduces the ileal digestibility of nutrients, without changes in morphophysiological parameters or meat quality of broilers.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<kwd>digestibility</kwd>
				<kwd>glyceryl polyethyleneglycol ricinoleate</kwd>
				<kwd>meat quality</kwd>
				<kwd>pancreatic lipase</kwd>
				<kwd>serum lipids</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="0"/>
				<table-count count="7"/>
				<equation-count count="0"/>
				<ref-count count="37"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>1. Introduction</title>
			<p>Full-fat soybean is an ingredient with a high lipid content (186−212 g kg<sup>1</sup>) as its lipid portion is not extracted from the grain, and it is also a source of protein (373−394 g kg<sup>1</sup>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Rostagno et al., 2024</xref>). Its use <italic>in natura</italic> in poultry diets is not recommended due to antinutritional factors such as protease inhibitors, lectins, and allergenic proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Rocha et al., 2014</xref>). As these compounds are thermolabile, the grains can be steamed under pressure and vacuum, obtaining the deactivated full-fat soybean (DFFS).</p>
			<p>However, in the extrusion process, the cell wall breaks, leaving lipids readily available for digestion, which is not observed in steamed process, and a lower apparent metabolizable energy is observed for DFFS than for extruded full-fat soybeans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Freitas et al., 2005</xref>). Considering the lower availability of lipids and the physiological limitations regarding lipid digestion by chickens in the early stage of life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Noy and Sklan, 1995</xref>), the use of emulsifiers is proposed to better use of the lipid portion of DFFS. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Tenório et al. (2022)</xref> found that the inclusion of emulsifier in energy-restricted diets with acid soybean oil, which is considered a lower-quality lipid source than degummed soybean oil, increased the digestible energy of the diet by 6.2%.</p>
			<p>Emulsifiers can increase the digestion and absorption of lipids, reducing the surface tension of the lipid droplets, allowing physical agitation of the gastrointestinal tract to break the droplets into smaller particles and promoting the formation of micelles. The emulsifiers can positively impact performance, digestibility, and even serum biochemical parameters of broiler chickens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Saleh et al., 2020</xref>). In this context, the use of different additives in animal nutrition, such as exogenous enzymes and emulsifiers, has been widely studied to improve feed efficiency and intestinal health of animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Fortes et al., 2024</xref>).</p>
			<p>Therefore, we hypothesize that the inclusion of emulsifier can favor the digestion of lipids for broilers fed diets containing DFFS, allowing an energy reduction of the diets without impaired performance, morphophysiological characteristics, and meat quality. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated the performance, serum lipids, relative weight of pancreas, pancreatic lipase activity, intestinal morphometry, nutrient digestibility, carcass yield, and meat quality of broiler chickens fed diets containing DFFS with or without the inclusion of glyceryl polyethyleneglycol ricinoleate-based emulsifier.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>2. Material and methods</title>
			<p>The experiment was conducted in Marechal Cândido Rondon, Paraná State, Brazil (24°55'13&quot; S, 54°02'30&quot; W, and altitude of 420 m asl). Research on animals was conducted according to the institutional committee on animal use (case number 55/19).</p>
			<sec>
				<title>2.1. Housing, birds, and treatments</title>
				<p>The experimental poultry house was composed of 1.76-m<sup>2</sup>boxes provided with clean wood shaving litter, a tubular feeder, and a nipple drinker. Lighting was continuous for the first three days, followed by a lighting program of 18 h light and 6 h dark until the end of the experiment. The rearing temperature was maintained at 33±1.0 °C for the first week of the experiment and then reduced by 2 °C per week until reaching 23 °C. If necessary, the environment was cooled using exhaust fans and evaporative cooling pads.</p>
				<p>Three hundred fifty-two one-day-old Ross 308 AP male broiler chicks were distributed in a completely randomized design with two treatments, eight replicates, and 22 birds per experimental unit. The experimental diets contained DFFS with or without the inclusion of emulsifier. The DFFS (containing 360 g kg<sup>1</sup> of crude protein, 200 g kg<sup>1</sup> of lipids, and 55 g kg<sup>1</sup> of mineral matter) provided approximately 30% of the lipid fraction of the diets during the initial phase and 40% on the remain phases. The solubility of DFFS protein in potassium hydroxide solution was 80%, and the urease activity ranged from 0.03 to 0.20 units pH rise (values provided by the supplier). The glyceryl polyethyleneglycol ricinoleate-based emulsifier was added to diets at 350 g ton<sup>1</sup>, and the metabolizable energy level was reduced by 40 kcal kg<sup>1</sup> from 1 to 21 d and 50 kcal kg<sup>1</sup> from 22 to 49 d in diets containing the emulsifying agent. The inclusion level of the emulsifier and the energetic matrix of the additive was according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The experimental diets were provided in mash form, and the formulation of the diets was based on the chemical composition of feed ingredients and the nutritional requirements as proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Rostagno et al. (2017)</xref> for intermediate-performance male broilers from 1 to 7, 8 to 21, 22 to 33, 34 to 42, and 43 to 49 d (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t1">
						<label>Table 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Percentage and calculated composition of experimental diets containing deactivated full-fat soybean (DFFS) as a lipid source, with or without inclusion of emulsifier for broilers</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">Ingredient (%)</th>
									<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">1−7 d</th>
									<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">8−21 d</th>
									<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">22−33 d</th>
									<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">34−42 d</th>
									<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">43−49 d</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th colspan="10" style="font-weight:normal">Emulsifier</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">With</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Without</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">With</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Without</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">With</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Without</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">With</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Without</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">With</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Without</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>Corn</td>
									<td align="center">57.32</td>
									<td align="center">56.29</td>
									<td align="center">58.79</td>
									<td align="center">57.76</td>
									<td align="center">65.56</td>
									<td align="center">64.33</td>
									<td align="center">71.25</td>
									<td align="center">70.01</td>
									<td align="center">71.60</td>
									<td align="center">70.37</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Soybean meal (46%)</td>
									<td align="center">28.60</td>
									<td align="center">28.80</td>
									<td align="center">22.60</td>
									<td align="center">22.80</td>
									<td align="center">16.10</td>
									<td align="center">16.30</td>
									<td align="center">11.30</td>
									<td align="center">11.50</td>
									<td align="center">9.10</td>
									<td align="center">9.30</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Meat and bone meal (45%)</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
									<td align="center">3.00</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>DFFS</td>
									<td align="center">7.00</td>
									<td align="center">7.00</td>
									<td align="center">12.00</td>
									<td align="center">12.00</td>
									<td align="center">12.00</td>
									<td align="center">12.00</td>
									<td align="center">12.00</td>
									<td align="center">12.00</td>
									<td align="center">12.00</td>
									<td align="center">12.00</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Poultry fat</td>
									<td align="center">0.64</td>
									<td align="center">1.44</td>
									<td align="center">0.51</td>
									<td align="center">1.31</td>
									<td align="center">0.62</td>
									<td align="center">1.62</td>
									<td align="center">0.23</td>
									<td align="center">1.24</td>
									<td align="center">1.28</td>
									<td align="center">2.28</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Dicalcium phosphate</td>
									<td align="center">1.087</td>
									<td align="center">1.088</td>
									<td align="center">0.861</td>
									<td align="center">0.862</td>
									<td align="center">0.670</td>
									<td align="center">0.671</td>
									<td align="center">0.284</td>
									<td align="center">0.286</td>
									<td align="center">0.173</td>
									<td align="center">0.175</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Limestone</td>
									<td align="center">0.615</td>
									<td align="center">0.613</td>
									<td align="center">0.539</td>
									<td align="center">0.537</td>
									<td align="center">0.402</td>
									<td align="center">0.400</td>
									<td align="center">0.365</td>
									<td align="center">0.363</td>
									<td align="center">0.317</td>
									<td align="center">0.315</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>NaCl</td>
									<td align="center">0.480</td>
									<td align="center">0.480</td>
									<td align="center">0.464</td>
									<td align="center">0.464</td>
									<td align="center">0.440</td>
									<td align="center">0.440</td>
									<td align="center">0.413</td>
									<td align="center">0.414</td>
									<td align="center">0.402</td>
									<td align="center">0.402</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Mineral supplement<sup>1</sup></td>
									<td align="center">0.050</td>
									<td align="center">0.050</td>
									<td align="center">0.050</td>
									<td align="center">0.050</td>
									<td align="center">0.050</td>
									<td align="center">0.050</td>
									<td align="center">0.050</td>
									<td align="center">0.050</td>
									<td align="center">0.050</td>
									<td align="center">0.050</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Vitamin supplement<sup>2</sup></td>
									<td align="center">0.130</td>
									<td align="center">0.130</td>
									<td align="center">0.130</td>
									<td align="center">0.130</td>
									<td align="center">0.100</td>
									<td align="center">0.100</td>
									<td align="center">0.100</td>
									<td align="center">0.100</td>
									<td align="center">0.100</td>
									<td align="center">0.100</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>DL-Methionine (99%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.396</td>
									<td align="center">0.397</td>
									<td align="center">0.377</td>
									<td align="center">0.378</td>
									<td align="center">0.333</td>
									<td align="center">0.334</td>
									<td align="center">0.289</td>
									<td align="center">0.290</td>
									<td align="center">0.269</td>
									<td align="center">0.270</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>L-Threonine (98%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.126</td>
									<td align="center">0.126</td>
									<td align="center">0.120</td>
									<td align="center">0.120</td>
									<td align="center">0.117</td>
									<td align="center">0.117</td>
									<td align="center">0.103</td>
									<td align="center">0.104</td>
									<td align="center">0.098</td>
									<td align="center">0.098</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>L-Lysine HCl (50.7%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.498</td>
									<td align="center">0.493</td>
									<td align="center">0.499</td>
									<td align="center">0.495</td>
									<td align="center">0.546</td>
									<td align="center">0.541</td>
									<td align="center">0.557</td>
									<td align="center">0.551</td>
									<td align="center">0.550</td>
									<td align="center">0.544</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Choline chloride (60%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.060</td>
									<td align="center">0.060</td>
									<td align="center">0.060</td>
									<td align="center">0.060</td>
									<td align="center">0.060</td>
									<td align="center">0.060</td>
									<td align="center">0.060</td>
									<td align="center">0.060</td>
									<td align="center">0.060</td>
									<td align="center">0.060</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Inert<sup>3</sup></td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.035</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.035</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.035</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.035</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.035</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Celite<sup>®</sup></td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">1.000</td>
									<td align="center">1.000</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Calculated composition</td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>ME (kcal kg<sup>−1</sup>)</td>
									<td align="center">2935</td>
									<td align="center">2975</td>
									<td align="center">3010</td>
									<td align="center">3050</td>
									<td align="center">3100</td>
									<td align="center">3150</td>
									<td align="center">3150</td>
									<td align="center">3200</td>
									<td align="center">3200</td>
									<td align="center">3250</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible protein (%)</td>
									<td align="center">21.94</td>
									<td align="center">21.94</td>
									<td align="center">21.09</td>
									<td align="center">21.09</td>
									<td align="center">18.61</td>
									<td align="center">18.61</td>
									<td align="center">16.79</td>
									<td align="center">16.79</td>
									<td align="center">15.79</td>
									<td align="center">15.79</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Calcium (%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.971</td>
									<td align="center">0.971</td>
									<td align="center">0.878</td>
									<td align="center">0.878</td>
									<td align="center">0.758</td>
									<td align="center">0.758</td>
									<td align="center">0.634</td>
									<td align="center">0.634</td>
									<td align="center">0.581</td>
									<td align="center">0.581</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Avaiable P (%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.463</td>
									<td align="center">0.463</td>
									<td align="center">0.419</td>
									<td align="center">0.419</td>
									<td align="center">0.374</td>
									<td align="center">0.374</td>
									<td align="center">0.296</td>
									<td align="center">0.296</td>
									<td align="center">0.271</td>
									<td align="center">0.271</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Sodium (%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.225</td>
									<td align="center">0.225</td>
									<td align="center">0.218</td>
									<td align="center">0.218</td>
									<td align="center">0.208</td>
									<td align="center">0.208</td>
									<td align="center">0.197</td>
									<td align="center">0.197</td>
									<td align="center">0.192</td>
									<td align="center">0.192</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible Lys (%)</td>
									<td align="center">1.307</td>
									<td align="center">1.307</td>
									<td align="center">1.256</td>
									<td align="center">1.256</td>
									<td align="center">1.124</td>
									<td align="center">1.124</td>
									<td align="center">1.014</td>
									<td align="center">1.014</td>
									<td align="center">0.954</td>
									<td align="center">0.954</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible Met+cys (%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.967</td>
									<td align="center">0.967</td>
									<td align="center">0.929</td>
									<td align="center">0.929</td>
									<td align="center">0.832</td>
									<td align="center">0.832</td>
									<td align="center">0.750</td>
									<td align="center">0.750</td>
									<td align="center">0.706</td>
									<td align="center">0.706</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible Thr (%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.863</td>
									<td align="center">0.863</td>
									<td align="center">0.829</td>
									<td align="center">0.829</td>
									<td align="center">0.742</td>
									<td align="center">0.742</td>
									<td align="center">0.669</td>
									<td align="center">0.669</td>
									<td align="center">0.630</td>
									<td align="center">0.630</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN1">
								<p>1 Mineral supplement, per kg of diet: 50 mg iron; 10 mg copper; 65 mg manganese; 65 mg zinc; 1 mg iodine.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN2">
								<p>2 Vitamin supplement from 1 to 21 d, per kg of diet: 14,300 IU vitamin A; 5,200 IU vitamin D3; 71.5 IU vitamin E; 3.9 mg vitamin K3; 2.99 mg vitamin B1; 9.10 mg vitamin B2; 15.6 mg pantothenic acid; 5.2 mg vitamin B6; 3.25 mcg vitamin B12; 78 mg nicotinic acid; 2.6 mg folic acid; 325 mcg biotin; 390 mcg selenium. Vitamin supplement from 22 to 49 d, per kg of diet: 11,000 IU vitamin A; 4,000 IU vitamin D3; 55 IU vitamin E; 3 mg vitamin K3; 2.3 mg vitamin B1; 7 mg vitamin B2; 12 mg pantothenic acid; 4 mg vitamin B6; 2.5 mcg vitamin B12; 60 mg nicotinic acid; 2 mg folic acid; 250 mcg biotin; 300 mcg selenium.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN3">
								<p>3 The inclusion of the emulsifier was performed in substitution to the inert Caulim<sup>®</sup> following the nutritional matrix: 40 kcal kg<sup>−1</sup> from 1 to 21 d and 50 kcal kg<sup>−1</sup> from 22 to 49 d.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.2. Performance</title>
				<p>Body weight and feed intake were recorded at 7, 21, 35, and 49 d to determine weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion ratio. Mortality was recorded daily to adjust weight gain according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Sakomura and Rostagno (2016)</xref>.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.3. Intestinal morphometry</title>
				<p>At days 14 and 21, one bird per EU, with a representative weight (± 5%), was selected and slaughtered by cervical dislocation. Fragments of approximately 5 cm were taken from the duodenum (ascending portion of the duodenal loop) and jejunum (anterior portion of the Meckel’s diverticulum), cleaned with saline solution, and placed in a formalin solution (10%) buffered with phosphate (pH 7.0). Subsequently, the samples were dehydrated in a graded alcohol series, cleared in xylol, and embedded in paraffin. Histological sections (5 µm) of the tissue samples were prepared using a microtome, and four discontinuous sections from each sample were placed on a slide. These sections were deparaffinized in xylol, hydrated in ethanol, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin.</p>
				<p>The slides were digitized (Epson 3170; EPSON Inc., Long Beach, CA) to determine the height and width of the villi, as well as the width and depth of the crypts, using the PROPLUS IMAGE 4.1 imaging system. These morphometric measurements were used to calculate the absorptive area of the intestinal mucosa, as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Tenório et al. (2022)</xref>. The villus height:crypt depth ratio was also estimated.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.4. Relative weight of pancreas and lipase activity</title>
				<p>At 14 and 21 d, the pancreas of the slaughtered birds was collected and weighed on an analytical scale to determine the relative weight of the organ in relation to the weight of the live bird. Subsequently, the pancreas was frozen at −20 °C for further analysis of lipase activity. The pancreas was homogenized (IKA ultra-Turrax homogenizer) (1:20 g mL<sup>1</sup>) in a buffer solution 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) containing 50 mM CaCl<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Pinheiro et al., 2004</xref>). We used 2,3-dimercaptopropanol tributyrate (BALB) as substrate and dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB; BALB-DNTP method, Gold Analisa, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil) as chromophore. Enzimatic activity was expressed as international units (IU) per mg of protein (Bradford et al., 1976).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.5. Blood analysis</title>
				<p>At days 14, 21, and 49, one bird per EU, with a representative weight (± 5%), was selected, and after 6 h of fasting, 4 mL of blood were collected by puncture of the ulnar vein. After clotting, samples were centrifuged (Centrífuga Kasvi K14-4000) at 1050 × <italic>g</italic> for 10 min, and serum was stored at −20 °C until analyses. The following biochemical traits were determined: triglyceride, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) utilizing commercial kits (Elitech Clinical Systems, ELITechGroup, Paris, FR). The analyses were performed on an automatic spectrophotometer, with automatic calibration and high-performance reading (Elitech EL 200).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.6. Ileal digestibility</title>
				<p>A source of silica (Celite<sup>®</sup>) was added to the experimental diets from 42 to 49 d (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>) at the proportion of 1% as an indigestible indicator. At day 49, two birds with average weight (± 5%) were selected by EU and slaughtered. The ileal content was collected (starting right after Meckel’s diverticulum and ending 4 cm from the ileocecal junction), homogenized, and dried in a forced-ventilation oven at 55 °C for 72 h. The samples of each experimental diet and ileal content were grounded and analyzed for dry matter (method number 934.01; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">AOAC, 2012</xref>), crude protein (method number 954.01; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">AOAC, 2012</xref>), and acid-insoluble ash (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Van Keulen and Young, 1977</xref>). Gross energy was determined in a bomb calorimeter (model C200, IKA Works Inc., Wilmington, NC). The digestibility coefficients of the nutrients and the digestible energy values were calculated according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ahmadi-Sefat et al. (2022)</xref>.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.7. Processing yield</title>
				<p>The same birds used to assess ileal digestibility were also used to determine the carcass characteristics. The birds were individually weighed, euthanized, scalded, and feathers, head, viscera, and feet were removed. The weight of the warm eviscerated carcass was considered in relation to the live weight to calculate carcass yield. Yields of the parts (breast, legs, and wings) were calculated in relation to the weight of the eviscerated carcass after cooling in a tank for 30 min at 2 °C. The abdominal fat present around the cloaca, gizzard, proventriculus, and adjacent abdominal muscles was removed, weighed, and calculated in relation to the live weight.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.8. Meat quality</title>
				<p>Measurements of pH and color were evaluated 15 min and 24 h postmortem in the right portion of breast meat (<italic>Pectoralis major</italic>) and in the right leg of the two chickens slaughtered at 49 d. The meat pH was determined using a pH meter (HI 99163 Hanna Instruments) with a meat-penetrating probe. A portable colorimeter (CR-400, Konica Minolta Sensing, São Paulo, Brazil) was used to determine the meat color, being measured on the inside of both muscles. The components L* (lightness), a* (redness), and b* (yellowness) were expressed in the Cielab color scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Honikel, 1998</xref>).</p>
				<p>The left portion of the breast meat was used to measure water-holding capacity (WHC), cooking loss (CL), and shear force (SF). The centrifugation method was used to estimate WHC, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Nakamura and Katok (1981)</xref>. To determine the CL, the method proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Honikel (1998)</xref> was used, and the percentage was calculated considering the difference in weight of the sample before and after cooking the meat on an electrically heated plate (until it reached an internal temperature of 80 °C). The samples that were used for determining CL were then used to determine SF. Three parallelepiped (1 × 1 × 4 cm) strips were cut from each cooked breast, parallel to the direction of the muscle fibers, and the SF was determined in kilogram-force (kgf cm<sup>2</sup>), using a Brookfield CT3 Texture Analyzer, coupled with a TA 3/100 probe (TA - SBA fixture, calibrated with 0.01 kgf cm<sup>2</sup>, 20 mm strain, and 2.5 mm.s<sup>1</sup> test speed).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.9. Statistical procedures</title>
				<p>For statistical analysis of the performance, each box was considered as the experimental unit, using the average data of animals per box. For statistical analysis of intestinal morphometry, relative weight of pancreas, lipase activity, and blood analysis, each bird was considered as the experimental unit. For statistical analysis of ileal digestibility, processing yield, and meat quality, the average data obtained from the two birds slaughtered per pen was considered as the experimental unit.</p>
				<p>Data was tested for normality (Shapiro–Wilk) using the UNIVARIATE procedure and analyzed using the General Linear Model Procedure of SAS<sup>®</sup> (Statistical Analysis System, University Edition). Comparison of means was done using the F-test at a significance level of 5%.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>3. Results</title>
			<p>During 1–7 d, the birds fed diet containing DFFS without the emulsifier showed higher weight gain (P = 0.014) and feed intake (P = 0.048). During 1−35 d, the same birds showed a greater feed conversion ratio (P = 0.044). Regarding the other periods evaluated, there was no effect (P&gt;0.05) on broiler performance (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t2">
					<label>Table 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Growth performance of broilers fed diets containing deactivated full-fat soybean as a lipid source, with or without emulsifier</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal"> </th>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Emulsifier</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">CV (%)</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Without</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">With</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Day 1 to 7</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Weight gain (g)</td>
								<td align="center">155.6a</td>
								<td align="center">151.1b</td>
								<td align="center">3.27</td>
								<td align="center">2.13</td>
								<td align="center">0.014</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Feed intake (g)</td>
								<td align="center">175.2a</td>
								<td align="center">168.6b</td>
								<td align="center">6.06</td>
								<td align="center">3.53</td>
								<td align="center">0.048</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Feed conversion ratio</td>
								<td align="center">1.126</td>
								<td align="center">1.116</td>
								<td align="center">0.03</td>
								<td align="center">2.73</td>
								<td align="center">0.551</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Day 1 to 21</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Weight gain (g)</td>
								<td align="center">1017.2</td>
								<td align="center">1016.0</td>
								<td align="center">28.61</td>
								<td align="center">2.81</td>
								<td align="center">0.932</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Feed intake (g)</td>
								<td align="center">1302.3</td>
								<td align="center">1293.7</td>
								<td align="center">31.55</td>
								<td align="center">2.43</td>
								<td align="center">0.595</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Feed conversion ratio</td>
								<td align="center">1.280</td>
								<td align="center">1.274</td>
								<td align="center">0.03</td>
								<td align="center">2.08</td>
								<td align="center">0.629</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Day 1 to 35</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Weight gain (g)</td>
								<td align="center">2474.2</td>
								<td align="center">2442.6</td>
								<td align="center">88.39</td>
								<td align="center">3.40</td>
								<td align="center">0.487</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Feed intake (g)</td>
								<td align="center">3660.0</td>
								<td align="center">3659.3</td>
								<td align="center">106.09</td>
								<td align="center">2.90</td>
								<td align="center">0.990</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Feed conversion ratio</td>
								<td align="center">1.480b</td>
								<td align="center">1.499a</td>
								<td align="center">0.02</td>
								<td align="center">1.15</td>
								<td align="center">0.044</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Day 1 to 49</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Weight gain (g)</td>
								<td align="center">3841.9</td>
								<td align="center">3782.1</td>
								<td align="center">183.34</td>
								<td align="center">4.81</td>
								<td align="center">0.525</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Feed intake (g)</td>
								<td align="center">6599.7</td>
								<td align="center">6565.8</td>
								<td align="center">269.59</td>
								<td align="center">4.10</td>
								<td align="center">0.805</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Feed conversion ratio</td>
								<td align="center">1.719</td>
								<td align="center">1.736</td>
								<td align="center">0.02</td>
								<td align="center">1.12</td>
								<td align="center">0.086</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN4">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean; CV - coefficient of variation.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN5">
							<p>a,b - Means followed by a different letter in the row are different at an alpha level of 0.05 according to F-test.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>At 14 and 21 d, the morphometric parameters of the duodenum and jejunum (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>), the relative weight of the pancreas, and the pancreatic lipase activity (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>) were not influenced (P&gt;0.05) by the inclusion of emulsifier in diets containing DFFS.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t3">
					<label>Table 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Morphometry of duodenum and jejunum segments of broilers fed diets containing deactivated full-fat soybean as a lipid source, with or without emulsifier</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal"> </th>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Emulsifier</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">CV (%)</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Without</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">With</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>14 d</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Duodenum</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Villus height (µm)</td>
								<td align="center">829.71</td>
								<td align="center">888.30</td>
								<td align="center">118.62</td>
								<td align="center">13.85</td>
								<td align="center">0.436</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Crypt depth (µm)</td>
								<td align="center">48.47</td>
								<td align="center">50.71</td>
								<td align="center">14.15</td>
								<td align="center">28.60</td>
								<td align="center">0.799</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Villus:crypt ratio</td>
								<td align="center">17.61</td>
								<td align="center">18.56</td>
								<td align="center">3.76</td>
								<td align="center">20.81</td>
								<td align="center">0.684</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Absorptive area (µm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
								<td align="center">21.15</td>
								<td align="center">22.84</td>
								<td align="center">2.88</td>
								<td align="center">13.15</td>
								<td align="center">0.361</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Jejunum</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Villus height (µm)</td>
								<td align="center">390.78</td>
								<td align="center">355.52</td>
								<td align="center">70.31</td>
								<td align="center">18.84</td>
								<td align="center">0.367</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Crypt depth (µm)</td>
								<td align="center">49.08</td>
								<td align="center">42.85</td>
								<td align="center">8.88</td>
								<td align="center">19.31</td>
								<td align="center">0.214</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Villus:crypt ratio</td>
								<td align="center">7.95</td>
								<td align="center">8.67</td>
								<td align="center">1.84</td>
								<td align="center">22.17</td>
								<td align="center">0.476</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Absorptive area (µm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
								<td align="center">8.97</td>
								<td align="center">8.47</td>
								<td align="center">1.54</td>
								<td align="center">17.66</td>
								<td align="center">0.549</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21 d</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Duodenum</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Villus height (µm)</td>
								<td align="center">824.84</td>
								<td align="center">790.59</td>
								<td align="center">88.41</td>
								<td align="center">10.95</td>
								<td align="center">0.518</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Crypt depth (µm)</td>
								<td align="center">57.80</td>
								<td align="center">57.33</td>
								<td align="center">5.07</td>
								<td align="center">8.81</td>
								<td align="center">0.874</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Villus:crypt ratio</td>
								<td align="center">14.33</td>
								<td align="center">13.89</td>
								<td align="center">1.93</td>
								<td align="center">13.65</td>
								<td align="center">0.700</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Absorptive area (µm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
								<td align="center">18.70</td>
								<td align="center">17.93</td>
								<td align="center">3.39</td>
								<td align="center">18.51</td>
								<td align="center">0.705</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Jejunum</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Villus height (µm)</td>
								<td align="center">354.82</td>
								<td align="center">398.63</td>
								<td align="center">53.15</td>
								<td align="center">14.17</td>
								<td align="center">0.167</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Crypt depth (µm)</td>
								<td align="center">42.69</td>
								<td align="center">42.90</td>
								<td align="center">4.84</td>
								<td align="center">11.31</td>
								<td align="center">0.938</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Villus:crypt ratio</td>
								<td align="center">8.31</td>
								<td align="center">9.40</td>
								<td align="center">1.24</td>
								<td align="center">14.10</td>
								<td align="center">0.143</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Absorptive area (µm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
								<td align="center">8.67</td>
								<td align="center">9.84</td>
								<td align="center">1.37</td>
								<td align="center">14.90</td>
								<td align="center">0.154</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN6">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean; CV - coefficient of variation.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t4">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Relative weight (%) of pancreas and lipase activity (IU/mg of protein) in pancreas of broilers fed diets containing deactivated full-fat soybean as a lipid source, with or without emulsifier</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal"> </th>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Emulsifier</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">CV (%)</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Without</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">With</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>14 d</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Relative weight</td>
								<td align="center">0.47</td>
								<td align="center">0.45</td>
								<td align="center">0.05</td>
								<td align="center">10.44</td>
								<td align="center">0.574</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Lipase activity</td>
								<td align="center">4.62</td>
								<td align="center">3.63</td>
								<td align="center">1.54</td>
								<td align="center">36.99</td>
								<td align="center">0.317</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21 d</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Relative weight</td>
								<td align="center">0.34</td>
								<td align="center">0.32</td>
								<td align="center">0.03</td>
								<td align="center">9.36</td>
								<td align="center">0.470</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Lipase activity</td>
								<td align="center">22.12</td>
								<td align="center">24.42</td>
								<td align="center">13.42</td>
								<td align="center">57.70</td>
								<td align="center">0.737</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN7">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean; CV - coefficient of variation.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>At 14, 21, and 49 d, there was no interference (P&gt;0.05) of diets containing DFFS as a lipid source with emulsifier (data not shown) on serum lipid levels.</p>
			<p>Energy-restricted diets containing DFFS and emulsifier impaired the digestible energy value at 49 d, with a reduction (P&lt;0.0001) of 389 kcal kg<sup>1</sup> compared with the diet with regular energy level without inclusion of the additive. Additionally, the absence of emulsifier increased the ileal coefficient of digestibility of dry matter (P = 0.0001), gross energy (P&lt;0.0001), and crude protein (P = 0.038) in 13.73, 14.84, and 6.05%, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t5">
					<label>Table 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Digestible energy (kcal kg−1) and ileal digestible coefficients (%) of dry matter, gross energy, and crude protein determined in broilers at 49 d fed diets containing deactivated full-fat soybean as a lipid source, with or without emulsifier</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal"> </th>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Emulsifier</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">CV (%)</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Without</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">With</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Digestible energy</td>
								<td align="center">2889a</td>
								<td align="center">2500b</td>
								<td align="center">55.12</td>
								<td align="center">2.05</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Digestibility coefficient</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Dry matter</td>
								<td align="center">69.34a</td>
								<td align="center">60.97b</td>
								<td align="center">1.31</td>
								<td align="center">2.01</td>
								<td align="center">0.0001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Gross energy</td>
								<td align="center">70.66a</td>
								<td align="center">61.53b</td>
								<td align="center">1.35</td>
								<td align="center">2.05</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Crude protein</td>
								<td align="center">67.48a</td>
								<td align="center">63.63b</td>
								<td align="center">2.06</td>
								<td align="center">3.14</td>
								<td align="center">0.038</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN8">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean; CV - coefficient of variation.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN9">
							<p>a,b - Means followed by a different letter in the row are different at an alpha level of 0.05 according to F-test.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Breast yield was higher for birds fed diets without the emulsifier (29.20% <italic>vs</italic> 27.22%, data not shown). For the remaining carcass and cuts yields, there were no differences (P&gt;0.05) among the treatments. No difference (P&gt;0.05) was observed for meat quality (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Tables 6</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="t7">7</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t6">
					<label>Table 6</label>
					<caption>
						<title><italic>Pectoralis major</italic> meat quality of broilers at 49 d, fed diets containing deactivated full-fat soybean as a lipid source, with or without emulsifier</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal"> </th>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Emulsifier</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">CV (%)</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Without</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">With</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Cooking loss (%)</td>
								<td align="center">32.71</td>
								<td align="center">31.84</td>
								<td align="center">2.62</td>
								<td align="center">8.11</td>
								<td align="center">0.518</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Shear force (kgf cm<sup>−2</sup>)</td>
								<td align="center">3.11</td>
								<td align="center">3.61</td>
								<td align="center">0.86</td>
								<td align="center">25.63</td>
								<td align="center">0.272</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>WHC (%)</td>
								<td align="center">62.47</td>
								<td align="center">61.84</td>
								<td align="center">3.43</td>
								<td align="center">0.52</td>
								<td align="center">0.722</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>pH</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>15 min</td>
								<td align="center">5.98</td>
								<td align="center">6.04</td>
								<td align="center">0.13</td>
								<td align="center">2.22</td>
								<td align="center">0.329</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24 h</td>
								<td align="center">5.86</td>
								<td align="center">5.80</td>
								<td align="center">0.13</td>
								<td align="center">2.15</td>
								<td align="center">0.386</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>L*</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>15 min</td>
								<td align="center">50.08</td>
								<td align="center">49.54</td>
								<td align="center">3.39</td>
								<td align="center">6.80</td>
								<td align="center">0.755</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24 h</td>
								<td align="center">51.24</td>
								<td align="center">48.43</td>
								<td align="center">2.62</td>
								<td align="center">5.27</td>
								<td align="center">0.061</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>a*</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>15 min</td>
								<td align="center">2.13</td>
								<td align="center">1.69</td>
								<td align="center">0.81</td>
								<td align="center">41.99</td>
								<td align="center">0.306</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24 h</td>
								<td align="center">3.25</td>
								<td align="center">2.73</td>
								<td align="center">0.98</td>
								<td align="center">32.70</td>
								<td align="center">0.306</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>b*</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>15 min</td>
								<td align="center">4.16</td>
								<td align="center">4.25</td>
								<td align="center">2.15</td>
								<td align="center">51.07</td>
								<td align="center">0.930</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24 h</td>
								<td align="center">7.23</td>
								<td align="center">6.03</td>
								<td align="center">1.40</td>
								<td align="center">21.18</td>
								<td align="center">0.110</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN10">
							<p>WHC - water-holding capacity; L* - brightness; a* - red/green intensity; b* - yellow/blue intensity; SEM - standard error of the mean; CV - coefficient of variation.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t7">
					<label>Table 7</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Leg quarters pH and meat color of broilers at 49 d fed diets containing deactivated full-fat soybean as a lipid source, with or without emulsifier</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal"> </th>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Emulsifier</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">CV (%)</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Without</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">With</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>pH</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>15 min</td>
								<td align="center">6.11</td>
								<td align="center">6.08</td>
								<td align="center">0.16</td>
								<td align="center">2.62</td>
								<td align="center">0.713</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24 h</td>
								<td align="center">6.02</td>
								<td align="center">5.97</td>
								<td align="center">0.16</td>
								<td align="center">2.75</td>
								<td align="center">0.525</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>L*</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>15 min</td>
								<td align="center">58.11</td>
								<td align="center">58.49</td>
								<td align="center">2.72</td>
								<td align="center">4.68</td>
								<td align="center">0.785</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24 h</td>
								<td align="center">54.69</td>
								<td align="center">52.51</td>
								<td align="center">2.67</td>
								<td align="center">4.99</td>
								<td align="center">0.127</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>a*</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>15 min</td>
								<td align="center">3.18</td>
								<td align="center">2.76</td>
								<td align="center">1.16</td>
								<td align="center">39.15</td>
								<td align="center">0.486</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24 h</td>
								<td align="center">3.29</td>
								<td align="center">3.72</td>
								<td align="center">1.28</td>
								<td align="center">36.43</td>
								<td align="center">0.511</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>b*</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>15 min</td>
								<td align="center">5.36</td>
								<td align="center">7.57</td>
								<td align="center">2.60</td>
								<td align="center">40.24</td>
								<td align="center">0.111</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24 h</td>
								<td align="center">4.66</td>
								<td align="center">5.17</td>
								<td align="center">2.01</td>
								<td align="center">40.88</td>
								<td align="center">0.618</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN11">
							<p>L* - brightness; a* - red/green intensity; b* - yellow/blue intensity; SEM - standard error of the mean; CV - coefficient of variation.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="discussion">
			<title>4. Discussion</title>
			<p>The results of this study indicate that the use of an emulsifier based on glyceryl polyethyleneglycol ricinoleate in diets containing DFFS impairs the performance of broilers. It is important to emphasize that in diets containing the emulsifying agent, the metabolizable energy was reduced by 40 and 50 kcal kg<sup>1</sup> from 1 to 21 d and 22 to 49 d, respectively.</p>
			<p>The dietary inclusion of exogenous emulsifiers can favor the digestion and absorption of lipids, as it increases the active interface of fats, resulting in increased lipase activity, facilitating micelle formation and nutrient transport via the enterocyte membrane. Previous studies with poultry and swine have shown that exogenous emulsifier supplementation between 20 and 50 kcal kg<sup>1</sup> in energy-restricted diets improves nutrient utilization, providing similar performance to that in animals fed diets with regular energy levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Yin et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Saleh et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
			<p>The results of this study reinforce the idea that the effectiveness of emulsifiers may depend on the processing of the lipid source and the specific characteristics of the diet. Previous studies showed that emulsifiers can be beneficial when combined with lower-quality lipid sources, such as acid soybean oil, while their effect may be reduced in diets with more complex lipid sources, such as DFFS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Tenório et al., 2022</xref>). The authors reported a 6.2% increase in digestible energy with the inclusion of emulsifier, while in this study there was approximately 13% reduction in the digestible energy of the diet containing DFFS and emulsifier. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Oliveira et al. (2024)</xref> emphasized that the age of animals and the type and concentration of emulsifier are important factors and can directly influence animals’ performance.</p>
			<p>The digestible energy difference between lipid sources is expected since lipid digestion is dependent on processing of the ingredient present in the diet. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Rocha et al. (2014)</xref> reported 13% higher digestible energy in diets containing DFFS for broiler chickens at 21 d compared with diets containing non-heat-treated full-fat soybean. Compared with extruded soybean, DFFS provides less energy to the animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Freitas et al., 2005</xref>). This may be related to the fact that the oil present in soybean grain is encapsulated in subcellular structures called lipid bodies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Shao et al., 2019</xref>) and is not fully available to the animal without going through a steaming process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Jiménez-Moreno et al., 2009</xref>).</p>
			<p>Ileal digestibility coefficients are important parameters for evaluating the utilization of dietary nutrients. In diets containing emulsifiers, an increase in lipid digestibility is expected due to greater efficiency in micelle formation and fatty acid transport (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Roy et al., 2010</xref>). However, some studies demonstrate that the effect may vary depending on the fat source and diet formulation, and the improvement in energy digestibility did not, however, translate into an improvement in poultry performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Kerr et al., 2024</xref>). Thus, even though most of the lipid fraction contained in DFFS is triacylglycerol, the emulsifier was not able to favor the digestive processes. This is probably due to poorer accessibility to the lipid substrate, which may not have been completely extracted in the deactivation process. The restriction of dietary energy and the low availability of the lipid source may be responsible for the worsening of nutrient digestibility coefficients and for the performance of the birds fed diets containing DFFS and emulsifier. Considering that, the hypothesis of this study—to add exogenous emulsifier to diets containing DFFS as an intact lipid source, aiming to increase the use of nutrients, maintain performance, and allow the possibility of reducing energy in poultry diets—was not proven. However, it opens a new possibility of a hypothesis for testing the on-top use of this additive with DFFS as a lipid source, mainly up to 21 d, considering the feed efficiency results shown by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Khonyoung et al. (2015)</xref>.</p>
			<p>Another possible explanation for the worsening of nutrient digestibility is the higher levels of animal fat in diets containing emulsifier. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Kamran et al. (2020)</xref> showed that the performance of birds and nutrient digestibilities of dry matter and crude fat was increased in birds that fed diet containing soy oil and polyglycerol polyricinoleate compared with birds fed diets contaning poultry fat and oxidized oil. As animal fats in broiler feeds reduce digestibility and the level of apparent metabolizable energy due to higher level of saturated fatty acids comparing to vegetable fats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Tancharoenrat et al., 2013</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2014</xref>), the variation in fat sources in the diets could have influenced the results, probably by the interaction between emulsifier and fat source.</p>
			<p>Besides the processing of the lipid source, the age of birds can also influence the digestion of lipid fraction, considering the limited physiological capacity during the initial phase, including low production of bile salts and pancreatic lipase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Noy and Sklan, 1995</xref>). Bile salts, endogenous emulsifiers, are responsible not only for emulsifying fat particles but also for activating pancreatic lipase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chen et al., 1975</xref>). In this context, considering the physiological limitations during the initial phase and the possible influence of the emulsifier on pancreatic lipase activity, we decided to evaluate the relative weight of the pancreas and the enzyme activity at 14 and 21 d. Despite evidence in the literature supporting the idea that the dietary inclusion of emulsifier can affect lipase activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Hu et al., 2019</xref>) by improvements in fat digestibility that can increase the demand for lipase production, no effect was observed in this study, probably due to the lipid source not being fully available due to the physical structure of DFFS.</p>
			<p>These same factors may be responsible for the absence of changes in intestinal morphometry at 14 and 21 d in birds fed diets containing emulsifier. Histological analysis of the intestine can provide insights into the efficiency of nutrient digestion and absorption. Previous studies indicate that additives such as emulsifiers and phytogenics can modulate intestinal morphology, increasing villus height and the villus:crypt ratio, which is associated with better nutrient absorption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Facchi et al., 2023</xref>). However, Kubiś et al. (2020) also did not observe an isolated effect of glyceryl polyethyleneglycol ricinoleate on the morphometric parameters of the intestine of broiler chickens fed wheat-based diets with beef tallow used as supplemental fat. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Khonyoung et al. (2015)</xref> observed by electron microscopy analysis that, despite subtle changes in morphometric parameters, the intestinal cells from birds fed diets containing emulsifier (lisolecithin) were more active, indicating epithelial hypertrophy. These results indicate the need to evaluate additional intestinal morphophysiological parameters, providing a better correlation of the dietary influence of additives on intestinal function.</p>
			<p>The type and processing of the lipid source can modify the concentration of serum lipids, such as triglycerides, total cholesterol, and the HDL and LDL fractions, due its fatty acid composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Upadhaya et al., 2018</xref>). Furthermore, emulsification can reduce the concentration of these metabolites by favoring lipid metabolism and transport (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Hu et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Geng et al., 2022</xref>). However, it is noteworthy that the effect of emulsifiers on the lipid profile of broilers is still controversial in the literature, with a reduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Serpunja and Kim, 2019</xref>), increase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Wang et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bontempo et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Saleh et al., 2020</xref>), or no change in levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aguilar et al., 2013</xref>) being reported. These variations can be correlated to the different lipid sources, and the type and inclusion level of the emulsifiers used. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Roy et al. (2010)</xref> observed that the inclusion of a glyceryl polyethyleneglycol ricinoleate-based emulsifier in broiler diets reduced the total blood cholesterol level and provided a lower concentration of fat in the liver, suggesting a fast and efficient rate of removal of lipids from the organ. However, the authors calculated the additive level based on the percentage inclusion of the lipid source present in the diet, observing better results with 1% inclusion. Thus, in addition to considering that the studied lipid source allowed less access of the additive to the substrate, the inclusion level (0.35%) may not have been enough to influence the evaluated parameters.</p>
			<p>Although there was interference on performance at 7 and 35 d and on breast yield, the meat quality parameters were not affected. Furthermore, the percentage of abdominal fat was not altered with dietary inclusion of the emulsifier, which indicates that the additive did not interfere with metabolism and body lipid deposition. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Serpunja and Kim (2019)</xref> observed higher lipid deposition in birds fed diets with regular energy levels when compared with those fed energy-restricted diets with emulsifier. Improvement in the quality of broiler chicken meat has been reported in the literature when an emulsifier is included in the diet, such as an increase in WHC, a reduction in SF (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">An et al., 2020</xref>), and a great meat color (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Upadhaya et al., 2018</xref>), a factor which directly affects consumer acceptance. Since there is no evidence that the inclusion of emulsifier in the presence of DFFS influenced lipid metabolism, there was no favoring of digestion and absorption of the fat-soluble metabolic pigments contained in the diet, as also observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Upadhaya et al. (2018)</xref>.</p>
			<p>Therefore, although the literature shows positive results regarding the use of emulsifier in poultry diets, the use of emulsifier (considered in the energy matrix) with DFFS as a lipid source is not indicated for improving performance, intestinal morphometric parameters, pancreatic lipase activity, carcass yield, and meat quality. Thus, it is important to emphasize that the effects of including emulsifiers in the diet may vary according to the type of processing of the lipid source, the energy level of the diet, and the inclusion level of the additive in the diet.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>5. Conclusions</title>
			<p>The inclusion of an exogenous emulsifier based on glyceryl polyethyleneglycol ricinoleate in energy-restricted diets containing deactivated full-fat soybean as the main lipid source impaired the performance of broilers and the ileal digestibility of nutrients. However, its dietary inclusion does not affect the intestinal morphometry or meat quality of broilers.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p>The authors are grateful to the Brazilian institutions and research agencies Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for partially financing this study.</p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>Aguilar, Y. M.; Becerra, J. C.; Bertot, R. R.; Peláez, J. C.; Liu, G. and Hurtado, C. B. 2013. Growth performance, carcass traits and lipid profile of broiler chicks fed with an exogenous emulsifier and increasing levels of energy provided by palm oil. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment 11:629-633.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Aguilar</surname>
							<given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Becerra</surname>
							<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bertot</surname>
							<given-names>R. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Peláez</surname>
							<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hurtado</surname>
							<given-names>C. B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Growth performance, carcass traits and lipid profile of broiler chicks fed with an exogenous emulsifier and increasing levels of energy provided by palm oil</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment</source>
					<volume>11</volume>
					<fpage>629</fpage>
					<lpage>633</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>Ahmadi-Sefat, A. A.; Taherpour, K.; Ghasemi, H. A.; Gharaei, M. A.; Shirzadi, H. and Rostami, F. 2022. Effects of an emulsifier blend supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology, and muscle fatty acid profile of broiler chickens fed with different levels of energy and protein. Poultry Science 101:102145. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102145">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102145</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ahmadi-Sefat</surname>
							<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Taherpour</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ghasemi</surname>
							<given-names>H. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gharaei</surname>
							<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Shirzadi</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rostami</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<article-title>Effects of an emulsifier blend supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology, and muscle fatty acid profile of broiler chickens fed with different levels of energy and protein</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>101</volume>
					<size units="pages">102145</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102145">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102145</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>An, J. S.; Yun, W.; Lee, J. H.; Oh, H. J.; Kim, T. H.; Cho, E. A.; Kim, G. M.; Kim, K. H.; Lee, S. D. and Cho, J. H. 2020. Effects of exogenous emulsifier supplementation on growth performance, energy digestibility, and meat quality in broilers. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 62:43-51. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.1.43">https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.1.43</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>An</surname>
							<given-names>J. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yun</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oh</surname>
							<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>T. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cho</surname>
							<given-names>E. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>G. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>K. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>S. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cho</surname>
							<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Effects of exogenous emulsifier supplementation on growth performance, energy digestibility, and meat quality in broilers</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>62</volume>
					<fpage>43</fpage>
					<lpage>51</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.1.43">https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.1.43</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2012. Official methods of analysis. 19th ed. AOAC International, Arlington, VA.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<source>Official methods of analysis</source>
					<edition>19th</edition>
					<publisher-name>AOAC International</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Arlington, VA</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Bontempo, V.; Comi, M.; Jiang, X. R.; Rebucci, R.; Caprarulo, V.; Giromini, C.; Gottardo, D.; Fusi, E.; Stella, S.; Tirloni, E.; Cattaneo, D. and Baldi, A. 2018. Evaluation of a synthetic emulsifier product supplementation on broiler chicks. Animal Feed Science and Technology 240:157-164. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.04.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.04.010</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bontempo</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Comi</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jiang</surname>
							<given-names>X. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rebucci</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Caprarulo</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Giromini</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gottardo</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fusi</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stella</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tirloni</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cattaneo</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Baldi</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Evaluation of a synthetic emulsifier product supplementation on broiler chicks</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>240</volume>
					<fpage>157</fpage>
					<lpage>164</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.04.010">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.04.010</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Bradford, M. M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry 72:248-254. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3">https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697 (76)90527-3</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bradford</surname>
							<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1976</year>
					<article-title>A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding</article-title>
					<source>Analytical Biochemistry</source>
					<volume>72</volume>
					<fpage>248</fpage>
					<lpage>254</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3">https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697 (76)90527-3</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Chen, M.; Gratzel, M. and Thomas, J. K. 1975. Kinetic studies in bile acid micelles. Journal of the American Chemical Society 97:2052-2057. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00841a010">https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00841a010</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gratzel</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Thomas</surname>
							<given-names>J. K.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1975</year>
					<article-title>Kinetic studies in bile acid micelles</article-title>
					<source>Journal of the American Chemical Society</source>
					<volume>97</volume>
					<fpage>2052</fpage>
					<lpage>2057</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00841a010">https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00841a010</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Freitas, E. R.; Sakomura, N. K.; Neme, R.; Santos, A. L. D. and Fernandes, J. B. K. 2005. Efeito do processamento da soja integral sobre a energia metabolizável e a digestibilidade dos aminoácidos para aves. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 34:1938-1949. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982005000600018">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982005000600018</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Freitas</surname>
							<given-names>E. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sakomura</surname>
							<given-names>N. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Neme</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Santos</surname>
							<given-names>A. L. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fernandes</surname>
							<given-names>J. B. K.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Efeito do processamento da soja integral sobre a energia metabolizável e a digestibilidade dos aminoácidos para aves</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>34</volume>
					<fpage>1938</fpage>
					<lpage>1949</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982005000600018">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982005000600018</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Facchi, C. S.; Valentini, F. D. A.; Pagnussatt, H.; Leite, F.; Dal Santo, A.; Aniecevski, E.; Rossato, G.; Zaccaron, G.; Alba, D. F.; Milarch, C. F.; Petrolli, R. R.; Galli, G. M.; Da Silva, A. S.; Tavernari, F. C. and Petrolli, T. G. 2023. Effects of microencapsulated carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde on feed digestibility, intestinal mucosa, and biochemical and antioxidant parameters in broilers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 52:e20220079. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5220220079">https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5220220079</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Facchi</surname>
							<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valentini</surname>
							<given-names>F. D. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pagnussatt</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leite</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dal Santo</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Aniecevski</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rossato</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zaccaron</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Alba</surname>
							<given-names>D. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Milarch</surname>
							<given-names>C. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Petrolli</surname>
							<given-names>R. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Galli</surname>
							<given-names>G. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Da Silva</surname>
							<given-names>A. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tavernari</surname>
							<given-names>F. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Petrolli</surname>
							<given-names>T. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2023</year>
					<article-title>Effects of microencapsulated carvacrol and cinnamaldehyde on feed digestibility, intestinal mucosa, and biochemical and antioxidant parameters in broilers</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>52</volume>
					<elocation-id>e20220079</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5220220079">https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5220220079</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Fortes, B. D. A.; Stringhini, J. H.; Café, M. B.; Mello, H. H. C. and Arnhold, E. 2024. Use of exogenous enzymes to improve nutrient digestibility and performance of broilers fed different protein sources. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 53:e20230139. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5320230139">https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5320230139</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Fortes</surname>
							<given-names>B. D. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stringhini</surname>
							<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Café</surname>
							<given-names>M. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mello</surname>
							<given-names>H. H. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Arnhold</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2024</year>
					<article-title>Use of exogenous enzymes to improve nutrient digestibility and performance of broilers fed different protein sources</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>53</volume>
					<elocation-id>e20230139</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5320230139">https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5320230139</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Geng, S.; Zhang, Y.; Cao, A.; Liu, Y.; Di, Y.; Li, J.; Lou, Q. and Zhang, L. 2022. Effects of fat type and exogenous bile acids on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, lipid metabolism and breast muscle fatty acid composition in broiler chickens. Animals 12:1258. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12101258">https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12101258</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Geng</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cao</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Di</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lou</surname>
							<given-names>Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<article-title>Effects of fat type and exogenous bile acids on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, lipid metabolism and breast muscle fatty acid composition in broiler chickens</article-title>
					<source>Animals</source>
					<volume>12</volume>
					<size units="pages">1258</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12101258">https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12101258</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Honikel, K. O. 1998. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat Science 49:447-457. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740 (98)00034-5">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740 (98)00034-5</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Honikel</surname>
							<given-names>K. O.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1998</year>
					<article-title>Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat</article-title>
					<source>Meat Science</source>
					<volume>49</volume>
					<fpage>447</fpage>
					<lpage>457</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740 (98)00034-5">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740 (98)00034-5</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Hu, X. Q.; Wang, W. B.; Liu, L.; Wang, C.; Feng, W.; Luo, Q. P.; Han, R. and Wang, X. D. 2019. Effects of fat type and emulsifier in feed on growth performance, slaughter traits, and lipid metabolism of Cherry Valley ducks. Poultry Science 98:5759-5766. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez369">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez369</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hu</surname>
							<given-names>X. Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>W. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Feng</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Luo</surname>
							<given-names>Q. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Han</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>X. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Effects of fat type and emulsifier in feed on growth performance, slaughter traits, and lipid metabolism of Cherry Valley ducks</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>98</volume>
					<fpage>5759</fpage>
					<lpage>5766</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez369">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez369</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Jiménez-Moreno, E.; González-Alvarado, J. M.; Lázaro, R. and Mateos, G. G. 2009. Effects of type of cereal, heat processing of the cereal, and fiber inclusion in the diet on gizzard pH and nutrient utilization in broilers at different ages. Poultry Science 88:1925-1933. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00193">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00193</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Jiménez-Moreno</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>González-Alvarado</surname>
							<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lázaro</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mateos</surname>
							<given-names>G. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Effects of type of cereal, heat processing of the cereal, and fiber inclusion in the diet on gizzard pH and nutrient utilization in broilers at different ages</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>88</volume>
					<fpage>1925</fpage>
					<lpage>1933</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00193">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00193</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Kamran, J.; Mehmood, S.; Mahmud, A. and Saima. 2020. Effect of fat sources and emulsifier levels in broiler diets on performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass parameters. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 22:eRBCA-2019-1158. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1158">https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1158</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kamran</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mehmood</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mahmud</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Saima</surname>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Effect of fat sources and emulsifier levels in broiler diets on performance, nutrient digestibility, and carcass parameters</article-title>
					<source>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>22</volume>
					<elocation-id>eRBCA-2019-1158</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1158">https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1158</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Kerr, B. J.; Pearce, S. C.; Risley, C. R.; Wilson, B. A. and Koltes, D. A. 2024. Energy digestibility in broilers and poult performance when fed palm or soybean oil with or without glyceryl monolaurate. Poultry Science 103:104442. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104442">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104442</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kerr</surname>
							<given-names>B. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pearce</surname>
							<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Risley</surname>
							<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wilson</surname>
							<given-names>B. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Koltes</surname>
							<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2024</year>
					<article-title>Energy digestibility in broilers and poult performance when fed palm or soybean oil with or without glyceryl monolaurate</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>103</volume>
					<size units="pages">104442</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104442">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2024.104442</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Khonyoung, D.; Yamauchi, K. and Suzuki, K. 2015. Influence of dietary fat sources and lysolecithin on growth performance, visceral organ size, and histological intestinal alteration in broiler chickens. Livestock Science 176:111-120. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.011">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.011</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Khonyoung</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yamauchi</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Suzuki</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Influence of dietary fat sources and lysolecithin on growth performance, visceral organ size, and histological intestinal alteration in broiler chickens</article-title>
					<source>Livestock Science</source>
					<volume>176</volume>
					<fpage>111</fpage>
					<lpage>120</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.011">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.011</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Kubis, M.; Kolodziejski, P.; Pruszynska-Oszmalek, E.; Sassek, M.; Konieczka, P.; Górka, P.; Flaga, J.; Katarzynska-Banasik, D.; Hejdysz, M.; Wisniewska, Z. and Kaczmarek, S. A. 2020. Emulsifier and xylanase can modulate the gut microbiota activity of broiler chickens. Animals 10:2197. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122197">https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122197</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kubis</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kolodziejski</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pruszynska-Oszmalek</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sassek</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Konieczka</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Górka</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Flaga</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Katarzynska-Banasik</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hejdysz</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wisniewska</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kaczmarek</surname>
							<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Emulsifier and xylanase can modulate the gut microbiota activity of broiler chickens</article-title>
					<source>Animals</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<size units="pages">2197</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122197">https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10122197</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>Nakamura, M. and Katok, K. 1981. Influence of thawing method on several properties of rabbit meat. Bulletin of Ishikawa Prefecture College of Agriculture 11:45-49.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Nakamura</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Katok</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1981</year>
					<article-title>Influence of thawing method on several properties of rabbit meat</article-title>
					<source>Bulletin of Ishikawa Prefecture College of Agriculture</source>
					<volume>11</volume>
					<fpage>45</fpage>
					<lpage>49</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Noy, Y. and Sklan, D. 1995. Digestion and absorption in the young chick. Poultry Science 74:366-373. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0740366">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0740366</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Noy</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sklan</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1995</year>
					<article-title>Digestion and absorption in the young chick</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>74</volume>
					<fpage>366</fpage>
					<lpage>373</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0740366">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0740366</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>Oliveira, M. V. G.; Silva, J. M. S.; Batista, J. M. M.; Café, M. C.; Mello, H. H.; Oliveira, H. F.; Pires, M. F.; Leandro, N. S. M. and Jacob, D. V. 2024. Evaluation of the effects of an emulsifier and two lipid sources on growth performance and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 53:e20230087. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5320230087">https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5320230087</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>M. V. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>J. M. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Batista</surname>
							<given-names>J. M. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Café</surname>
							<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mello</surname>
							<given-names>H. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>H. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pires</surname>
							<given-names>M. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leandro</surname>
							<given-names>N. S. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jacob</surname>
							<given-names>D. V.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2024</year>
					<article-title>Evaluation of the effects of an emulsifier and two lipid sources on growth performance and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>53</volume>
					<elocation-id>e20230087</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5320230087">https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz5320230087</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation>Pinheiro, D. F.; Cruz, V. C.; Sartori, J. R. and Paulino, M. L. V. 2004. Effect of early feed restriction and enzyme supplementation on digestive enzyme activities in broilers. Poultry Science 83:1544-1550. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.9.1544">https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.9.1544</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pinheiro</surname>
							<given-names>D. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cruz</surname>
							<given-names>V. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sartori</surname>
							<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Paulino</surname>
							<given-names>M. L. V.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Effect of early feed restriction and enzyme supplementation on digestive enzyme activities in broilers</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>83</volume>
					<fpage>1544</fpage>
					<lpage>1550</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.9.1544">https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.9.1544</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation>Rocha, C.; Durau, J. F.; Barrilli, L. N. E.; Dahlke, F.; Maiorka, P. and Maiorka, A. 2014. The effect of raw and roasted soybeans on intestinal health, diet digestibility, and pancreas weight of broilers. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 23:71-79. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00829">https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00829</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rocha</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Durau</surname>
							<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barrilli</surname>
							<given-names>L. N. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dahlke</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Maiorka</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Maiorka</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>The effect of raw and roasted soybeans on intestinal health, diet digestibility, and pancreas weight of broilers</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Applied Poultry Research</source>
					<volume>23</volume>
					<fpage>71</fpage>
					<lpage>79</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00829">https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00829</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation>Rostagno, H. S.; Albino, L. F. T.; Hannas, M. I.; Donzele, J. L.; Sakomura, N. K.; Perazzo, F. G.; Saraiva, A.; Abreu, M. L. T.; Rodrigues, P. B.; Oliveira, R. F. M.; Barreto, S. L. T. and Brito, C. O. 2017. Brazilian tables for poultry and swine: composition of feedstuffs and nutritional requirements. 4th ed. UFV, Viçosa, MG.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rostagno</surname>
							<given-names>H. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Albino</surname>
							<given-names>L. F. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hannas</surname>
							<given-names>M. I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Donzele</surname>
							<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sakomura</surname>
							<given-names>N. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Perazzo</surname>
							<given-names>F. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Saraiva</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Abreu</surname>
							<given-names>M. L. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rodrigues</surname>
							<given-names>P. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>R. F. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barreto</surname>
							<given-names>S. L. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brito</surname>
							<given-names>C. O.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<source>Brazilian tables for poultry and swine: composition of feedstuffs and nutritional requirements</source>
					<edition>4th</edition>
					<publisher-name>UFV</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Viçosa, MG</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation>Rostagno, H. S.; Albino, L. F. T.; Calderano, A. A.; Hannas, M. I.; Sakomura, N. K.; Perazzo, F. G.; Rocha, G. C.; Saraiva, A.; Abreu, M. L. T.; Genova, J. L. and Tavernari, F. C. 2024. Brazilian tables for poultry and swine: composition of feedstuffs and nutritional requirements. 5th ed. UFV, Viçosa, MG.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rostagno</surname>
							<given-names>H. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Albino</surname>
							<given-names>L. F. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Calderano</surname>
							<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hannas</surname>
							<given-names>M. I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sakomura</surname>
							<given-names>N. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Perazzo</surname>
							<given-names>F. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rocha</surname>
							<given-names>G. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Saraiva</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Abreu</surname>
							<given-names>M. L. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Genova</surname>
							<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tavernari</surname>
							<given-names>F. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2024</year>
					<source>Brazilian tables for poultry and swine: composition of feedstuffs and nutritional requirements</source>
					<edition>5th</edition>
					<publisher-name>UFV</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Viçosa, MG</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation>Roy, A.; Haldar, S.; Mondal, S. and Ghosh, T. K. 2010. Effects of supplemental exogenous emulsifier on performance, nutrient metabolism, and serum lipid profile in broiler chickens. Veterinary Medicine International 2010:262604.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Roy</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Haldar</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mondal</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ghosh</surname>
							<given-names>T. K.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Effects of supplemental exogenous emulsifier on performance, nutrient metabolism, and serum lipid profile in broiler chickens</article-title>
					<source>Veterinary Medicine International</source>
					<comment>2010</comment>
					<size units="pages">262604</size>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation>Sakomura, N. K. and Rostagno, H. S. 2016. Métodos de pesquisa em nutrição de monogástricos. 2.ed. Funep, Jaboticabal.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sakomura</surname>
							<given-names>N. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rostagno</surname>
							<given-names>H. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<source>Métodos de pesquisa em nutrição de monogástricos</source>
					<edition>2</edition>
					<publisher-name>Funep</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Jaboticabal</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation>Saleh, A. A.; Amber, K. A.; Mousa, M. M.; Nada, A. L.; Awad, W.; Dawood, M. A. O.; Abd El-Moneim, A. E. E.; Ebeid, T. A. and Abdel-Daim, M. M. 2020. A mixture of exogenous emulsifiers increased the acceptance of broilers to low energy diets: growth performance, blood chemistry, and fatty acids traits. Animals 10:437. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030437">https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030437</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Saleh</surname>
							<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Amber</surname>
							<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mousa</surname>
							<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nada</surname>
							<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Awad</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dawood</surname>
							<given-names>M. A. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Abd El-Moneim</surname>
							<given-names>A. E. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ebeid</surname>
							<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Abdel-Daim</surname>
							<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>A mixture of exogenous emulsifiers increased the acceptance of broilers to low energy diets: growth performance, blood chemistry, and fatty acids traits</article-title>
					<source>Animals</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<size units="pages">437</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030437">https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10030437</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation>Serpunja, S. and Kim, I. H. 2019. The effect of sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate (80%) and tween 20 (20%) supplementation in low-energy density diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, relative organ weight, serum lipid profiles, and excreta microbiota in broilers. Poultry Science 98:269-275. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey342">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey342</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Serpunja</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>I. H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>The effect of sodium stearoyl-2-lactylate (80%) and tween 20 (20%) supplementation in low-energy density diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, relative organ weight, serum lipid profiles, and excreta microbiota in broilers</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>98</volume>
					<fpage>269</fpage>
					<lpage>275</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey342">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey342</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<mixed-citation>Shao, Q.; Liu, X.; Su, T.; Ma, C. and Wang, P. 2019. New insights into the role of seed oil body proteins in metabolism and plant development. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1568. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01568">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01568</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Shao</surname>
							<given-names>Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Su</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ma</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>New insights into the role of seed oil body proteins in metabolism and plant development</article-title>
					<source>Frontiers in Plant Science</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<size units="pages">1568</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01568">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01568</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation>Tancharoenrat, P.; Ravindran, V.; Zaefarian, F. and Ravindran, G. 2013. Influence of age on the apparent metabolisable energy and total tract apparent fat digestibility of different fat sources for broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 186:186-192. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.013</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Tancharoenrat</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ravindran</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zaefarian</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ravindran</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Influence of age on the apparent metabolisable energy and total tract apparent fat digestibility of different fat sources for broiler chickens</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>186</volume>
					<fpage>186</fpage>
					<lpage>192</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.10.013</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<mixed-citation>Tancharoenrat, P.; Ravindran, V.; Zaefarian, F. and Ravindran, G. 2014. Digestion of fat and fatty acids along the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens. Poultry Science 93:371-379. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03344">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03344</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Tancharoenrat</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ravindran</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zaefarian</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ravindran</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Digestion of fat and fatty acids along the gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>93</volume>
					<fpage>371</fpage>
					<lpage>379</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03344">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03344</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation>Tenório, K. I.; Eyng, C.; Amaral Duarte, C. R.; Nunes, R. V.; Broch, J.; Rohloff Júnior, N.; Köhler, T. L. and Cirilo, E. H. 2022. Effect of lipid source and emulsifier on productive and physiological parameters of broilers. Animal Bioscience 35:54-63. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0621">https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0621</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Tenório</surname>
							<given-names>K. I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Eyng</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Amaral Duarte</surname>
							<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nunes</surname>
							<given-names>R. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Broch</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rohloff</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
							<suffix>Júnior</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Köhler</surname>
							<given-names>T. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cirilo</surname>
							<given-names>E. H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2022</year>
					<article-title>Effect of lipid source and emulsifier on productive and physiological parameters of broilers</article-title>
					<source>Animal Bioscience</source>
					<volume>35</volume>
					<fpage>54</fpage>
					<lpage>63</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0621">https://doi.org/10.5713/ab.20.0621</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation>Upadhaya, S. D.; Lee, J. S.; Jung, K. J. and Kim, I. H. 2018. Influence of emulsifier blends having different hydrophilic-lipophilic balance value on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, serum lipid profiles, and meat quality of broilers. Poultry Science 97:255-261. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex303">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex303</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Upadhaya</surname>
							<given-names>S. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>J. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jung</surname>
							<given-names>K. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>I. H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Influence of emulsifier blends having different hydrophilic-lipophilic balance value on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, serum lipid profiles, and meat quality of broilers</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>97</volume>
					<fpage>255</fpage>
					<lpage>261</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex303">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex303</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B35">
				<mixed-citation>Van Keulen, J. and Young, B. A. 1977. Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science 44:282-287. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.442282x">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.442282x</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Van Keulen</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Young</surname>
							<given-names>B. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1977</year>
					<article-title>Evaluation of acid-insoluble ash as a natural marker in ruminant digestibility studies</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>44</volume>
					<fpage>282</fpage>
					<lpage>287</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.442282x">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1977.442282x</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B36">
				<mixed-citation>Wang, J. P.; Zhang, Z. F.; Yan, L. and Kim, I. H. 2016. Effects of dietary supplementation of emulsifier and carbohydrase on the growth performance, serum cholesterol and breast meat fatty acids profile of broiler chickens. Animal Science Journal 87:250-256. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12412">https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12412</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>Z. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yan</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>I. H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Effects of dietary supplementation of emulsifier and carbohydrase on the growth performance, serum cholesterol and breast meat fatty acids profile of broiler chickens</article-title>
					<source>Animal Science Journal</source>
					<volume>87</volume>
					<fpage>250</fpage>
					<lpage>256</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12412">https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12412</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B37">
				<mixed-citation>Yin, J.; Jiao, Y.; Kim, Y. M. and Kim, I. H. 2018. Effects of reducing dietary energy (tallow) in diets containing emulsifier blend on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood profile in growing pigs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 99:206-209. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2017-0155">https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2017-0155</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Yin</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jiao</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>I. H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Effects of reducing dietary energy (tallow) in diets containing emulsifier blend on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and blood profile in growing pigs</article-title>
					<source>Canadian Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>99</volume>
					<fpage>206</fpage>
					<lpage>209</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2017-0155">https://doi.org/10.1139/cjas-2017-0155</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>