<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rbz</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">R. Bras. Zootec.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">1516-3598</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">1806-9290</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="other">00610</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37496/rbz5220220119</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Non-ruminants</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Cottonseed peptides produced by dual degradation improved growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and health status of growing-finishing pigs</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-0527-2713</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Peng</surname>
						<given-names>Yangxiang</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Data curation</role>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Investigation</role>
					<role>Methodology</role>
					<role>Project administration</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-9996-8537</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Deng</surname>
						<given-names>Xuejuan</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Conceptualization</role>
					<role>Data curation</role>
					<role>Investigation</role>
					<role>Methodology</role>
					<role>Project administration</role>
					<role>Supervision</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-5298-488X</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Hu</surname>
						<given-names>Siyu</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Data curation</role>
					<role>Investigation</role>
					<role>Methodology</role>
					<role>Software</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-4777-4161</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Li</surname>
						<given-names>Jiantao</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Data curation</role>
					<role>Formal analysis</role>
					<role>Investigation</role>
					<role>Methodology</role>
					<role>Project administration</role>
					<role>Validation</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-1134-0839</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Liu</surname>
						<given-names>Ning</given-names>
					</name>
					<role>Conceptualization</role>
					<role>Writing – original draft</role>
					<role>Writing – review &amp; editing</role>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c01"><sup>*</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Henan University of Science and Technology</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">College of Animal Science</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Luoyang</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="CN">China</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Henan University of Science and Technology , College of Animal Science , Luoyang , China .</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">National Engineering Research Center of Biological Feed</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Beijing</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="CN">China</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> National Engineering Research Center of Biological Feed , Beijing , China .</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff3">
				<label>3</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">China Agricultural University</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Department of Zoology</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Beijing</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="CN">China</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> China Agricultural University , Department of Zoology , Beijing , China .</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff4">
				<label>4</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Jiuzhou Dadi Biological Technology Co., Ltd</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Shenyang</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="CN">China</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Jiuzhou Dadi Biological Technology Co., Ltd ., Shenyang , China .</institution>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c01">
					<label>*</label> Corresponding author: <email>ningliu68@163.com</email>
				</corresp>
				<fn fn-type="conflict">
					<p>Conflict of Interest</p>
					<p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>07</day>
				<month>11</month>
				<year>2023</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<year>2023</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>52</volume>
			<elocation-id>e20220119</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>30</day>
					<month>08</month>
					<year>2022</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>5</day>
					<month>05</month>
					<year>2023</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p>The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of cottonseed peptides from <italic>in vitro</italic> degradation with protease, <italic>Enterococcus faecalis</italic> ( <italic>E. faecalis</italic> ), or both on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and health status of pigs. We used four diets containing non-degraded, protease-degraded, <italic>E. faecalis</italic> -degraded, or both-degraded cottonseed meal at 20% for growing phase (6 wk) and 16% for finishing phase (7 wk), corresponding to barrows, with six replicates of six pigs each. Results showed that the <italic>in vitro</italic> degradation of cottonseed meal increased proportions of peptides and organic acids and decreased nitrogen-free extract and phytate phosphorus. The degraded cottonseed meal increased feed intake, body weight gain, feed efficiency, apparent ileal digestibility of dry matter, energy, crude protein, Ile, Leu, Lys, Met, Cys, Ser, and Gly, and blood profiles of superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase, catalase, IgA, and IgG. The diet containing cottonseed meal by dual degradation showed more pronounced effects on nutritional compositions, growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and serum parameters than the other diets. The data suggest that cottonseed meal dually degraded <italic>in vitro</italic> with enzymes and probiotics can improve its nutritional properties and application in animal feed.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<kwd>amino acid</kwd>
				<kwd>antioxidation</kwd>
				<kwd>Enterococcus faecalis</kwd>
				<kwd>protease</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="0"/>
				<table-count count="5"/>
				<equation-count count="1"/>
				<ref-count count="21"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>1. Introduction</title>
			<p>With the development of animal production, miscellaneous meals are becoming an important supplement for soybean meal; however, the relatively poor quality of miscellaneous meals limits their use in practice. This drives some methods, such as enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation, to enrich peptides and improve utilization of miscellaneous meals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Wang et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Luz et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Feng et al., 2020</xref>). The degradation of protein-rich materials is mainly involved in proteases and probiotics for enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation. In contrast to raw materials, these treatment methods can significantly improve digestibility and confer more dietary nitrogen assimilation into body protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Gu et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Niu et al., 2021</xref>). Also, with these treatments for protein-sourced feedstuffs, more nitrogen and phosphorus are assimilated in the body, while fewer parts are excreted into the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Liu et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Tavares-Samay et al., 2019</xref>). Additionally, the fermentation can cover bitterness generated from enzymatic processing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Idowu and Benjakul, 2019</xref>). Furthermore, the dual degradation can yield more peptides than a single one. Therefore, the dual degradation of dietary ingredients by enzymes and probiotics has recently become a hot topic in the food and feed industry.</p>
			<p>Cottonseed meal is a high-protein solid residue derived from oil production, containing approximately 45% of crude protein (CP), 10.5% of crude fiber (CF), and 1% of gossypol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Gadelha et al., 2014</xref>). Significantly, this leftover gossypol restricts its utilization in the feed due to its toxicity and hazard for animals and humans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Câmara et al., 2015</xref>). With the development of extraction technologies, these concerns of cottonseed meal have been recently resolved by processes including decortication, extraction at a low temperature, and dephenolization. The dephenolized and dehulled cottonseed meal contains approximately 51.1% of CP, 6.9% of CF, and a fine safe content of gossypol. It is reported that fermented cottonseed meal improved production performance and lipid metabolism in broilers chickens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Nie et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Niu et al., 2021</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Silva et al. (2021)</xref> reported that cottonseed meal plus enzymes had no effects on the performance and financial profits of finishing pigs. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdallh et al. (2020)</xref> found that cottonseed meal with enzyme supplementation can substitute up to 90% soybean meal in broiler chicken diets without compromising performance and feed nutritive values. However, literature is unavailable about the application of cottonseed meal dually degraded <italic>in vitro</italic> by proteases and probiotics in meat-type animals.</p>
			<p>Hypothetically, the <italic>in vitro</italic> dual degradation by enzymatic hydrolysis and probiotic fermentation can improve the quality of cottonseed meal and its use in feed formulations for animals. The objective of the present study was to compare the compositions of cottonseed meal non-degraded or degraded by protease, <italic>E. faecalis</italic> , or both and their effects on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and health status of growing-finishing pigs.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>2. Material and Methods</title>
			<p>Research on animals was conducted according to the institutional committee on animal use (2021002).</p>
			<sec>
				<title>2.1. Cottonseed peptide preparation</title>
				<p>Cottonseed kernel meal (dephenolized) is the byproduct obtained after oil extraction from cottonseed. Commercial acid protease (PROMAX <sup>®</sup> Protease, pH 1.5-6.0) was used for the enzymatic hydrolysis of cottonseed kernel meal. The <italic>E. faecalis</italic> strain CGMCC 18916 was obtained from the China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center for the fermentation of cottonseed kernel meal.</p>
				<p>The cottonseed meal was ground (16 mesh size), mixed with corn flour (5%), and sterilized at 121 ℃ for 20 min. The sterilized cottonseed kernel meal and deionized water (100/35, weight/weight) were mixed as a fermented substrate for solid-state fermentation. The protease was incubated with the fermented substrate at 3,000 U/kg, at 30 ℃ for 48 h, for preparing enzymatic hydrolysis of cottonseed meal. The <italic>E. faecalis</italic> strain was incubated with the fermented substrate at 1.0×10 <sup>9</sup> CFU/kg, 30 ℃ for 48 h, to prepare fermented cottonseed kernel meal. The same protease activity and <italic>E. faecalis</italic> amount were dually incubated with fermented substrates at 30 ℃ for 48 h for preparing a double treated cottonseed kernel meal. The statistical unit was from three independent and parallel preparations for the raw, protease-degraded, <italic>E. faecalis</italic> -degraded, and dually degraded cottonseed meal. The products obtained by enzymolysis, fermentation, or both, were freeze-dried and ground (24 mesh size) for the preparation of the four diets.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.2. Diets, animals, and samples</title>
				<p>Four diets contained non-degraded (control), enzymatic (PCM), fermented (ECM), or dually degraded (DCM) dephenolized cottonseed kernel meal at an amount of 20% in the growing phase and 16% in the finishing phase. The diets were formulated referring to the Nutritional Requirement of Chinese Growing-Finishing Pigs (Standards in Agricultural Industries in China, NY/T 65-2004; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref> ). A total of 144 (Duroc × Landrace × Large White) barrows with initial body weight (BW) of 28±2.4 kg (BW±SD) were randomly distributed into four groups with six replicates (pens; size, 4.0 m × 3.0 m) of six pigs each. The feeding trial after a three-day adjustment period lasted for 13 weeks (growing/finishing phase, 6/7 wk). The pig house was controlled at 22 ℃ of room temperature and automatic mechanical ventilation. All pigs were given <italic>ad libitum</italic> access to diets and water throughout the feeding trial. Pigs and feed in each pen were weighed weekly, and feed efficiency was adjusted for mortality on a pen basis. The general health of pigs was monitored twice a day.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t1">
						<label>Table 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Ingredients and nutrient levels of diets (air-dry basis)</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">Item</th>
									<th colspan="4" style="font-weight:normal">Growing phase (6 wk)</th>
									<th colspan="4" style="font-weight:normal">Finishing phase (7 wk)</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th colspan="4" style="font-weight:normal">
										<hr/>
									</th>
									<th colspan="4" style="font-weight:normal">
										<hr/>
									</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Control</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">PCM</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">ECM</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">DCM</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Control</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">PCM</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">ECM</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">DCM</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>Ingredient (%)</td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Cottonseed meal</td>
									<td align="center">20.0</td>
									<td align="center">20.0</td>
									<td align="center">20.0</td>
									<td align="center">20.0</td>
									<td align="center">16.0</td>
									<td align="center">16.0</td>
									<td align="center">16.0</td>
									<td align="center">16.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Corn gluten feed</td>
									<td align="center">10.0</td>
									<td align="center">10.0</td>
									<td align="center">10.0</td>
									<td align="center">10.0</td>
									<td align="center">8.0</td>
									<td align="center">12.0</td>
									<td align="center">12.0</td>
									<td align="center">12.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Corn</td>
									<td align="center">61.8</td>
									<td align="center">61.9</td>
									<td align="center">62.1</td>
									<td align="center">62.4</td>
									<td align="center">69.8</td>
									<td align="center">65.1</td>
									<td align="center">65.1</td>
									<td align="center">65.3</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Mixed oil</td>
									<td align="center">4.0</td>
									<td align="center">4.0</td>
									<td align="center">3.9</td>
									<td align="center">3.8</td>
									<td align="center">2.5</td>
									<td align="center">3.3</td>
									<td align="center">3.3</td>
									<td align="center">3.2</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Limestone</td>
									<td align="center">1.0</td>
									<td align="center">1.0</td>
									<td align="center">1.0</td>
									<td align="center">1.0</td>
									<td align="center">0.9</td>
									<td align="center">0.9</td>
									<td align="center">1.0</td>
									<td align="center">1.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Di-calcium phosphate</td>
									<td align="center">0.6</td>
									<td align="center">0.5</td>
									<td align="center">0.4</td>
									<td align="center">0.2</td>
									<td align="center">0.4</td>
									<td align="center">0.3</td>
									<td align="center">0.2</td>
									<td align="center">0.1</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Premix <sup>1</sup></td>
									<td align="center">2.6</td>
									<td align="center">2.6</td>
									<td align="center">2.6</td>
									<td align="center">2.6</td>
									<td align="center">2.4</td>
									<td align="center">2.4</td>
									<td align="center">2.4</td>
									<td align="center">2.4</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Nutrient level <sup>2</sup> (%)</td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Metabolizable energy (MJ kg <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
									<td align="center">12.88</td>
									<td align="center">12.89</td>
									<td align="center">12.88</td>
									<td align="center">12.89</td>
									<td align="center">12.87</td>
									<td align="center">12.88</td>
									<td align="center">12.89</td>
									<td align="center">12.87</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Crude protein</td>
									<td align="center">17.21</td>
									<td align="center">16.91</td>
									<td align="center">17.19</td>
									<td align="center">17.23</td>
									<td align="center">15.52</td>
									<td align="center">15.63</td>
									<td align="center">15.62</td>
									<td align="center">15.65</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ca</td>
									<td align="center">0.59</td>
									<td align="center">0.56</td>
									<td align="center">0.57</td>
									<td align="center">0.56</td>
									<td align="center">0.49</td>
									<td align="center">0.47</td>
									<td align="center">0.49</td>
									<td align="center">0.47</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Total P</td>
									<td align="center">0.52</td>
									<td align="center">0.50</td>
									<td align="center">0.51</td>
									<td align="center">0.52</td>
									<td align="center">0.45</td>
									<td align="center">0.47</td>
									<td align="center">0.45</td>
									<td align="center">0.42</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Non-phytate P</td>
									<td align="center">0.23</td>
									<td align="center">0.25</td>
									<td align="center">0.24</td>
									<td align="center">0.24</td>
									<td align="center">0.19</td>
									<td align="center">0.20</td>
									<td align="center">0.20</td>
									<td align="center">0.21</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible Lys</td>
									<td align="center">0.75</td>
									<td align="center">0.77</td>
									<td align="center">0.77</td>
									<td align="center">0.75</td>
									<td align="center">0.66</td>
									<td align="center">0.70</td>
									<td align="center">0.70</td>
									<td align="center">0.70</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible Met</td>
									<td align="center">0.28</td>
									<td align="center">0.28</td>
									<td align="center">0.30</td>
									<td align="center">0.28</td>
									<td align="center">0.25</td>
									<td align="center">0.25</td>
									<td align="center">0.25</td>
									<td align="center">0.25</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible Thr</td>
									<td align="center">0.65</td>
									<td align="center">0.65</td>
									<td align="center">0.65</td>
									<td align="center">0.66</td>
									<td align="center">0.45</td>
									<td align="center">0.44</td>
									<td align="center">0.44</td>
									<td align="center">0.45</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible Trp</td>
									<td align="center">0.14</td>
									<td align="center">0.14</td>
									<td align="center">0.14</td>
									<td align="center">0.15</td>
									<td align="center">0.14</td>
									<td align="center">0.14</td>
									<td align="center">0.13</td>
									<td align="center">0.14</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN1">
								<p>Control - containing non-degraded cottonseed meal; PCM - cottonseed meal degraded with PROMAX <sup>®</sup> Protease; ECM - cottonseed meal degraded with <italic>E. faecalis</italic> strain CGMCC 18915; DCM - dual-degraded cottonseed meal with the protease and <italic>E. faecalis</italic> .</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN2">
								<p>1 Supplied per kilogram of diet for growing/finishing phase: lysine 200/200 mg; threonine 200/0 mg; choline chloride 300/300 mg; vitamin A, 1,400/1,300 IU; vitamin D <sub>3</sub> , 160/150 IU, vitamin E, 11/11 IU; vitamin K, 0.50/0.50 mg, thiamin, 1.00/1.00 mg; riboflavin, 2.00/2.00 mg; niacin, 8.50/7.50 mg; pantothenic acid, 7.50/7.00 mg; pyridoxine, 1.00/1.00 mg; biotin, 0.05/0.05 mg; folic acid, 0.30/0.30 mg; vitamin B <sub>12</sub> , 8.00/6.00 µg; K, 2.1/1.8 mg; Mg, 0.4/0.4 mg; Fe, 60/50 mg; Cu, 4.00/3.50 mg; Mn, 2.00/2.00 mg; Zn, 60/50 mg; I, 0.14/0.14 mg; Se, 0.25/0.25 mg; NaCl, 400/400 mg/kg; TiO <sub>2</sub> , 500/500 mg.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN3">
								<p>2 Metabolizable energy, calculated according to China Feed Database (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Xiong et al., 2020</xref>); crude protein, Ca, total P, and non-phytate P, determined; and digestible aminoacids, calculated from determined total aminoacids.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>On the last day of the 6th and 13th weeks, four pigs per pen were randomly selected and fasted. Blood samples were collected from left-ear veins and prepared to quantify serum immunoglobulins and whole blood lymphocytes, and the average of each pen was a statistical unit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Wang et al., 2011</xref>). On the last day of the 13th week, after blood sampling, the four pigs were fed, and three hours later were euthanized by electric stunning, and then dissected. Ileal digesta was collected and pooled by replicate to detect the apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.3. Chemical analysis</title>
				<p>The contents of nutrients in the feed and digesta were determined according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">AOAC (1990)</xref> for total P (964.06), phytate P (927.02), Ca (935.13), and CP (976.05), crude fat (EE, 920.39), CF (962.09), and ash (942.05). Gross energy was measured in an Oxygen Bomb Calorimeter (Model 6300, PARR, Moline, IL, USA). Dry matter (DM) was determined by drying a 2-g sample at 65 ℃ to a constant mass. Aminoacids were measured using an AA analyzer (Beckman 6300; Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA). Titanium dioxide was used as an exogenous marker for the calculation of digestibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Liu et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
				<p>Peptide (≤1 000 Da) was quantified using electrophoresis in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Fling and Gregerson, 1986</xref>). For organic acids estimation, the sample slurry was centrifuged at 1 × 10 <sup>4</sup> g for 20 min. The supernatant was analyzed using HPLC (Model 1100, Agilent Technologies, Inc, Santa Clara, CA, USA) using 10 mM perchloric acid as mobile phase at 40 ℃. Protease activity was analyzed according to China National Standard GB/T 28715-2012. A protease activity unit was the enzyme amount that hydrolyzes casein to produce color equivalent to 1.0 µmole of tyrosine per minute at pH 7.5 at 37 ℃. Gossypol contents were detected according to methods for determination of free-gossypol in feeds (China National Standard, GB/T 13086-2020). Briefly, free-gossypol was extracted using a mixed solvent of 3-Amino-1-isopropyl alcohol and isopropyl alcohol-hexane, then reacted with aniline, and the absorbance of aniline-gossypol was measured at 440 nm.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.4. Biochemical analysis and bacterium enumeration</title>
				<p>Concentrations of immunoglobulin A (IgA), immunoglobulin G (IgG), and immunoglobulin M (IgM) in the serum were measured using an automatic biochemistry analyzer (Model 7600, Hitachi High-Tech, Tokyo, Japan). Commercial kits from Nanjing Jiancheng Biological Institutes (Nanjing, China) were used for detecting superoxide dismutase (SOD, A001-0302), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px, A005-102), catalase (CAT, A007-1-1).</p>
				<p><italic>Enterococcus faecalis</italic> was enumerated according to China National Standard GB/T 34224-2017. Briefly, 1 g of the strain powder was diluted with 9 mL of 1% Tryptic Soy Broth medium (TSB, Hopebio Co., Ltd, Qingdao, China) and then homogenized. Viable counts of bacteria were conducted by plating serial 10-fold dilutions onto TSB agar plates after being cultured at anaerobically 37 ℃, pH 6.2, for 24 h.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.5. Statistical analysis</title>
				<p>Variables were analyzed according to the following mathematical model:</p>
				<disp-formula id="e1">
					<mml:math>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>μ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>β</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>ε</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mtext>, </mml:mtext>
					</mml:math>
					<label>(1)</label>
				</disp-formula>
				<p>in which Y <sub>ij</sub> = observation <italic>j</italic> of experimental unit subjected to treatments <italic>i</italic> , µ = general constant, β <sub>i</sub> = effects of PCM, ECM, and DCM, and ε <sub>ij</sub> = random error associated to each observation. All data were expressed as mean and SEM using one-way ANOVA program of IBM SPSS Statistics 23. Differences in variables were separated using Tukey’s b test at a significance level of P&lt;0.05.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>3. Results</title>
			<p>Cottonseed meal degraded with protease, <italic>E. faecalis</italic> , or both did not affect the contents of gross energy, DM, CP, crude fat, and ash (some unaffected data not shown), increased (P&lt;0.001) peptides and organic acids, and decreased (P&lt;0.001) phytate P, nitrogen-free extract, and arginine ( <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref> ). Compared wiith PCM and ECM, the effect of DCM on peptides, organic acids, and phytate phosphorus was more pronounced (P&lt;0.05). Furthermore, the toxic residue, free gossypol, disappeared with the fermentation.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t2">
					<label>Table 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Compositions of cottonseed peptides produced by protease, <italic>E. faecalis</italic> , and both</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" style="font-weight:normal">Item</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Control</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">PCM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">ECM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">DCM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Dry matter (%)</td>
								<td align="center">90.7</td>
								<td align="center">89.5</td>
								<td align="center">89.5</td>
								<td align="center">89.5</td>
								<td align="center">0.410</td>
								<td align="center">0.163</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Crude protein (%)</td>
								<td align="center">50.0</td>
								<td align="center">49.6</td>
								<td align="center">49.5</td>
								<td align="center">49.6</td>
								<td align="center">0.430</td>
								<td align="center">0.851</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Peptides (≤ 1 kDa, %)</td>
								<td align="center">5.42d</td>
								<td align="center">40.4b</td>
								<td align="center">35.6c</td>
								<td align="center">55.6a</td>
								<td align="center">0.451</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Phytate P (%)</td>
								<td align="center">0.66a</td>
								<td align="center">0.51b</td>
								<td align="center">0.42c</td>
								<td align="center">0.25d</td>
								<td align="center">0.023</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Organic acids (%)</td>
								<td align="center">0.58d</td>
								<td align="center">0.82c</td>
								<td align="center">3.73b</td>
								<td align="center">4.45a</td>
								<td align="center">0.043</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nitrogen-free extract (%)</td>
								<td align="center">27.3a</td>
								<td align="center">25.6a</td>
								<td align="center">9.51b</td>
								<td align="center">5.22c</td>
								<td align="center">0.418</td>
								<td align="center">0.031</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Total Arg (%)</td>
								<td align="center">5.79a</td>
								<td align="center">5.69a</td>
								<td align="center">4.26b</td>
								<td align="center">4.04b</td>
								<td align="center">0.055</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Total Lys (%)</td>
								<td align="center">2.25b</td>
								<td align="center">2.47b</td>
								<td align="center">2.47b</td>
								<td align="center">2.51a</td>
								<td align="center">0.021</td>
								<td align="center">0.002</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Total Val (%)</td>
								<td align="center">2.37b</td>
								<td align="center">2.35b</td>
								<td align="center">2.48a</td>
								<td align="center">2.49a</td>
								<td align="center">0.023</td>
								<td align="center">0.007</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Protease (U kg <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">–</td>
								<td align="center">155</td>
								<td align="center">–</td>
								<td align="center">142</td>
								<td align="center">10.15</td>
								<td align="center">0.851</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td><italic>E. faecalis</italic> (log10 CFU g <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">–</td>
								<td align="center">–</td>
								<td align="center">6.27</td>
								<td align="center">5.46</td>
								<td align="center">0.352</td>
								<td align="center">0.428</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Free gossypol (mg kg <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">55.3a</td>
								<td align="center">31.1b</td>
								<td align="center">–</td>
								<td align="center">–</td>
								<td align="center">4.271</td>
								<td align="center">0.025</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN4">
							<p>– Undetectable; SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN5">
							<p>Control - containing non-degraded cottonseed meal; PCM - cottonseed meal degraded with PROMAX <sup>®</sup> Protease; ECM - cottonseed meal degraded with <italic>E. faecalis</italic> strain CGMCC 18915; DCM - dual-degraded cottonseed meal with the protease and <italic>E. faecalis</italic> .</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN6">
							<p>a-d - Means within a row with different letters were significantly different (P&lt;0.05, Turkey’s b test).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>During the growing, finishing, and whole phase, PCM, ECM, and DCM beneficially affected (P≤0.025) average daily feed intake (ADFI), average daily body weight gain (ADG), and feed:gain ( <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref> ). The DCM treatment was more pronounced (P&lt;0.05) on ADFI than PCM and ECM during the growing and whole phase. For the ADG, during the growing phase, DCM had a better effect (P&lt;0.05) than PCM, but had a similar impact to that of ECM, whereas during the finishing and whole phase, there were no differences among the three degraded groups. For feed:gain, there were no differences among PCM, ECM, and DCM. Additionally, one pig died during the feeding trial, which was irrelevant to the dietary treatment (data not shown).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t3">
					<label>Table 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effect of cottonseed peptides on the growth performance of pigs</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" style="font-weight:normal">Item</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Control</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">PCM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">ECM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">DCM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Growing phase (6 wk)</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Average daily feed intake (kg pig <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">1.40c</td>
								<td align="center">1.61b</td>
								<td align="center">1.60b</td>
								<td align="center">1.66a</td>
								<td align="center">0.013</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Average daily gain (kg pig <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">0.58c</td>
								<td align="center">0.70b</td>
								<td align="center">0.74ab</td>
								<td align="center">0.80a</td>
								<td align="center">0.019</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Feed:gain</td>
								<td align="center">2.43a</td>
								<td align="center">2.29ab</td>
								<td align="center">2.18ab</td>
								<td align="center">2.08b</td>
								<td align="center">0.070</td>
								<td align="center">0.025</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Finishing phase (7 wk)</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Average daily feed intake (kg pig <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">2.69b</td>
								<td align="center">2.76a</td>
								<td align="center">2.76a</td>
								<td align="center">2.77a</td>
								<td align="center">0.011</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Average daily gain (kg pig <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">0.90b</td>
								<td align="center">1.03a</td>
								<td align="center">1.07a</td>
								<td align="center">1.04a</td>
								<td align="center">0.030</td>
								<td align="center">0.005</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Feed:gain</td>
								<td align="center">3.01a</td>
								<td align="center">2.69b</td>
								<td align="center">2.60b</td>
								<td align="center">2.68b</td>
								<td align="center">0.074</td>
								<td align="center">0.006</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Whole phase</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Average daily feed intake (kg pig <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">2.05c</td>
								<td align="center">2.18b</td>
								<td align="center">2.18b</td>
								<td align="center">2.22a</td>
								<td align="center">0.009</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Average daily gain (kg pig <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">0.74b</td>
								<td align="center">0.87a</td>
								<td align="center">0.90a</td>
								<td align="center">0.92a</td>
								<td align="center">0.013</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Feed:gain</td>
								<td align="center">2.77a</td>
								<td align="center">2.52b</td>
								<td align="center">2.42b</td>
								<td align="center">2.42b</td>
								<td align="center">0.034</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN7">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN8">
							<p>Control - containing non-degraded cottonseed meal; PCM - cottonseed meal degraded with PROMAX <sup>®</sup> Protease; ECM - cottonseed meal degraded with <italic>E. faecalis</italic> strain CGMCC 18915; DCM - dual-degraded cottonseed meal with the protease and <italic>E. faecalis.</italic></p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN9">
							<p>a-c - Means within a row with different letters were significantly different (P&lt;0.05, Turkey’s b test).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>During the finishing phase, the dietary treatment influenced (P≤0.027) the apparent ileal digestibility of dry matter, energy, crude protein, Arg, Thr, Ile, Leu, Lys, Met, Cys, Ser, and Gly ( <xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref> ). In contrast with the control, all degraded groups increased (P&lt;0.05) the digestibility of DM, energy, CP, Ser, and Cys. Among the degraded groups, DCM showed the most excellent (P&lt;0.05) digestibility on Lys and Gly.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t4">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effect of cottonseed peptides on the apparent ileal digestibility of nutrients of finishing pigs</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" style="font-weight:normal">Item</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Control</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">PCM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">ECM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">DCM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Dry matter (%)</td>
								<td align="center">73.7b</td>
								<td align="center">81.4a</td>
								<td align="center">82.2a</td>
								<td align="center">85.3a</td>
								<td align="center">4.551</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Energy (%)</td>
								<td align="center">66.3c</td>
								<td align="center">71.5b</td>
								<td align="center">74.0ab</td>
								<td align="center">74.9a</td>
								<td align="center">2.851</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Crude protein (%)</td>
								<td align="center">73.2b</td>
								<td align="center">80.6a</td>
								<td align="center">83.1a</td>
								<td align="center">83.9a</td>
								<td align="center">4.750</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Ile (%)</td>
								<td align="center">76.5b</td>
								<td align="center">83.1a</td>
								<td align="center">78.0b</td>
								<td align="center">85.3a</td>
								<td align="center">1.023</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Leu (%)</td>
								<td align="center">77.6b</td>
								<td align="center">83.0a</td>
								<td align="center">82.2ab</td>
								<td align="center">85.7a</td>
								<td align="center">1.318</td>
								<td align="center">0.003</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Lys (%)</td>
								<td align="center">80.3b</td>
								<td align="center">83.5b</td>
								<td align="center">83.7b</td>
								<td align="center">87.8a</td>
								<td align="center">1.017</td>
								<td align="center">0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Met (%)</td>
								<td align="center">68.8ab</td>
								<td align="center">67.1b</td>
								<td align="center">69.4ab</td>
								<td align="center">71.4a</td>
								<td align="center">0.808</td>
								<td align="center">0.018</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Cys (%)</td>
								<td align="center">80.9b</td>
								<td align="center">84.0ab</td>
								<td align="center">86.0ab</td>
								<td align="center">87.0a</td>
								<td align="center">1.376</td>
								<td align="center">0.027</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Ser (%)</td>
								<td align="center">74.0b</td>
								<td align="center">80.2a</td>
								<td align="center">80.7a</td>
								<td align="center">83.4a</td>
								<td align="center">1.405</td>
								<td align="center">0.002</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Gly (%)</td>
								<td align="center">70.5c</td>
								<td align="center">75.5b</td>
								<td align="center">76.0b</td>
								<td align="center">81.7a</td>
								<td align="center">0.995</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN10">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN11">
							<p>Control - containing non-degraded cottonseed meal; PCM - cottonseed meal degraded with PROMAX <sup>®</sup> Protease; ECM - cottonseed meal degraded with <italic>E. faecalis</italic> strain CGMCC 18915; DCM - dual-degraded cottonseed meal with the protease and <italic>E. faecalis</italic> .</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN12">
							<p>a-c - Means within a row with different letters were significantly different (P&lt;0.05, Turkey’s b test).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>During the growing phase, the dietary treatment increased (P≤0.047) the activities of SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT and the concentrations of IgG, IgA, and IgM in the serum of pigs ( <xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref> ). In contrast with the control, PCM, ECM, and DCM increased (P&lt;0.05) SOD, CAT, IgG, and IgM. The DCM treatment had a more pronounced (P&lt;0.05) effect on IgA, IgG, IgM, and SOD than PCM or ECM.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t5">
					<label>Table 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effect of cottonseed peptides on the serum parameters of antioxidation and immunity of pigs</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" style="font-weight:normal">Item</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Control</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">PCM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">ECM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">DCM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Growing phase</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Superoxide dismutase (U mL <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">76.7b</td>
								<td align="center">81.1a</td>
								<td align="center">81.1a</td>
								<td align="center">82.9a</td>
								<td align="center">1.108</td>
								<td align="center">0.008</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Glutathione peroxidase (U mL <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">3.31b</td>
								<td align="center">3.77ab</td>
								<td align="center">3.79ab</td>
								<td align="center">4.05a</td>
								<td align="center">0.174</td>
								<td align="center">0.047</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Catalase (U mL <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">101b</td>
								<td align="center">119a</td>
								<td align="center">119a</td>
								<td align="center">123a</td>
								<td align="center">2.525</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>IgG (g L <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">7.54c</td>
								<td align="center">8.90b</td>
								<td align="center">9.12ab</td>
								<td align="center">9.88a</td>
								<td align="center">0.201</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>IgA (g L <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">1.02b</td>
								<td align="center">1.12ab</td>
								<td align="center">1.15ab</td>
								<td align="center">1.33a</td>
								<td align="center">0.031</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>IgM (g L <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">0.73c</td>
								<td align="center">0.95b</td>
								<td align="center">0.93b</td>
								<td align="center">1.12a</td>
								<td align="center">0.033</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Finishing phase</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Superoxide dismutase (U mL <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">77.4c</td>
								<td align="center">103b</td>
								<td align="center">111a</td>
								<td align="center">108ab</td>
								<td align="center">2.127</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Glutathione peroxidase (U mL <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">3.55b</td>
								<td align="center">4.33a</td>
								<td align="center">4.19a</td>
								<td align="center">4.39a</td>
								<td align="center">0.154</td>
								<td align="center">0.004</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Catalase (U mL <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">92.2b</td>
								<td align="center">125a</td>
								<td align="center">135a</td>
								<td align="center">133a</td>
								<td align="center">2.549</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>IgG (g L <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">7.91c</td>
								<td align="center">9.46b</td>
								<td align="center">11.1a</td>
								<td align="center">11.9a</td>
								<td align="center">0.323</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>IgA (g L <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">1.02c</td>
								<td align="center">1.18b</td>
								<td align="center">1.28ab</td>
								<td align="center">1.39a</td>
								<td align="center">0.044</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>IgM (g L <sup>−1</sup> )</td>
								<td align="center">0.77b</td>
								<td align="center">0.95a</td>
								<td align="center">0.95a</td>
								<td align="center">1.02a</td>
								<td align="center">0.030</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN13">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN14">
							<p>Control - containing non-degraded cottonseed meal; PCM - cottonseed meal degraded with PROMAX <sup>®</sup> Protease; ECM - cottonseed meal degraded with <italic>E. faecalis</italic> strain CGMCC 18915; DCM - dual-degraded cottonseed meal with the protease and <italic>E. faecalis.</italic></p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN15">
							<p>a-c - Means within a row with different letters were significantly different (P&lt;0.05, Turkey’s b test).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="discussion">
			<title>4. Discussion</title>
			<p>Compared to soybean meal, cottonseed meal has a similar protein level, but toxic free gossypol limits its use in feed formulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Gadelha et al., 2014</xref>). Recently, with the global protein shortage and the oil extracting development, modifying the nutritional values of miscellaneous meals by the technologies of fermentation and enzymolysis has been a hot topic. As known, fermentation is a conventional and natural method for food quality modification and detoxification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Liu et al., 2017</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2018</xref>). The fermented cottonseed meal and its application has been well documented, whereas information about the <italic>in vitro</italic> dual degradation with enzymes and probiotics is unavailable. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Niu et al. (2021)</xref> reported that fermented cottonseed meal increased CP (40.2% versus 44.4%), but decreased free gossypol (150 versus 36 mg/kg). Also, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jazi et al. (2017)</xref> compared the significant changes between none versus fermented cottonseed meal for DM (92.6% versus 90.1%), pH (5.91 versus 4.15), and CP (36.3% versus 39.2%). Additionally, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Wang et al. (2021)</xref> observed that hydrolyzed cottonseed meal was rich in acidic/basic and aromatic aminoacids, and identified 19 peptides. The present study did not identify and compare functional peptides of cottonseed meals <italic>in vitro</italic> degraded, which deserves further study.</p>
			<p>The present study showed that dual degradation with the enzyme and the probiotic was more effective on producing peptides. However, more studies are needed on the property of cottonseed meal treated by dual degradation, especially with multi-enzymes and multi-probiotics with the focus on peptides, antinutritional factors, and toxins. Additionally, in the present study, the content of free gossypol in protease-degraded cottonseed meal was reduced from 55.3 to 31.1 mg/kg, whereas it disappeared with the fermentation. This is consistent with the finding that fermentation decreased free gossypol from 584 to 68 mg/kg (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jazi et al., 2017</xref>). The Food and Drug Administration of America limited free gossypol to 45 mg/kg in 1974 and has recently approved ultra-low gossypol cottonseed for human and animal consumption in 2019. Currently, in China, the content of free gossypol is limited to 60 mg/kg in the feed of growing/finishing pigs (GB 13078-2001). Obviously, the dephenolization, ultra-low gossypol, dehulling, and <italic>in vitro</italic> degradation will incredibly increase the availability of cottonseed meal in feed formulation.</p>
			<p>In the present study, the <italic>in vitro</italic> enzymolytic, fermented, or dually degraded cottonseed meal significantly improved the ADFI, ADG, and feed efficiency of growing-finishing pigs. Similar results were found that fermented cottonseed meal improved the growth performance and decreased the diarrhea rate of broilers and weaned piglets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jazi et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Gu et al., 2021</xref>). Diets containing 5–10% cottonseed meal plus enzyme complex did not negatively affect the growth performance of finishing pigs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Silva et al., 2021</xref>). Literature is unavailable about the property of cottonseed meal <italic>in vitro</italic> treated with enzymes or dually treated with enzymes and probiotics and its application in animal feed. In theory, the <italic>in vitro</italic> degradation of cottonseed meal benefits the digestibility of nutrients: the more peptides, the higher digestibility of CP and aminoacids. Indeed, in the present study, the advanced degradation of cottonseed meal by both protease and <italic>E. faecalis</italic> significantly increased the apparent ileal digestibility of most nutrients, indicating that the degradation considerably improved the digestible properties of cottonseed meal. This is consistent with the finding that the fermented cottonseed meal significantly enhanced the digestibility of DM, CP, energy, and aminoacids of weaned piglets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Gu et al., 2021</xref>).</p>
			<p>The increased serum anti-oxidase activity and immunoglobulins in the degraded groups of the present study indicate that the <italic>in vitro</italic> degradation of cottonseed meal can improve the antioxidant capacity and immune function of pigs. These benefits are mainly ascribed to the peptides and organic acids of degraded cottonseed meal. Fermented cottonseed meal improved IgG, IgM, anti-oxidases, membrane lipids antioxidation, and gut microbiota of broilers and piglets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Tang et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Gu et al., 2021</xref>). Cottonseed meal fermented by <italic>Candida tropicalis</italic> enhanced health status by improving fat metabolism and altering cecum bacteria-host metabolic cross-talk of broilers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Niu et al., 2021</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Wang et al. (2021)</xref> observed that cottonseed peptides prepared by enzymatic hydrolysis and microbial fermentation exhibited excellent radical scavenging activity and ferrous ion chelating activity. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Yuan et al. (2020)</xref> also found that cottonseed protein hydrolysate enhanced metabolism, antioxidant capacities, and innate immunity of blunt snout bream hepatocytes. The present study first reported the effect of cottonseed meal <italic>in vitro</italic> degraded with proteases, probiotics, or both on the antioxidant capacity and immunity of animals; however, more studies are needed.</p>
			<p>Additionally, to simplify the experiment, the present study selected a protease and a probiotic strain as the <italic>in vitro</italic> dietary treatment factors. As known, degradation with multi-enzymes and multi-probiotics will have a better effect than a single enzyme or probiotic strain on the quality improvement of feedstock, and so does the diversity of dietary protein sources. Undoubtedly, these may confer cottonseed meal more useful in practice.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>5. Conclusions</title>
			<p>Degradation by protease, <italic>E. faecalis</italic> , or both improved the nutritional compositions of cottonseed meal, growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and health status of growing-finishing pigs. The effect of dual degradation on these parameters is more pronounced. It is suggested that using dual degradation can improve the quality and application of miscellaneous meal in the feed.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>Abdallh, M. E.; Musigwa, S.; Ahiwe, E. U.; Chang’a, E. P.; Al-Qahtani, M.; Bhuiyan, M. and Iji, P. A. 2020. Replacement value of cottonseed meal for soybean meal in broiler chicken diets with or without microbial enzymes. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 62:159-173. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.159">https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.159</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Abdallh</surname>
							<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Musigwa</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ahiwe</surname>
							<given-names>E. U.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chang’a</surname>
							<given-names>E. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Al-Qahtani</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bhuiyan</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Iji</surname>
							<given-names>P. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Replacement value of cottonseed meal for soybean meal in broiler chicken diets with or without microbial enzymes</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>62</volume>
					<fpage>159</fpage>
					<lpage>173</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.159">https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.159</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis of AOAC. 15th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1990</year>
					<source>Official methods of analysis of AOAC</source>
					<edition>15</edition>
					<publisher-name>Association of Official Analytical Chemists</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>Câmara, A. C. L.; Gadelha, I. C. N.; Borges P. A. C.; Paiva, S. A.; Melo, M. M. and Soto-Blanco, B. 2015. Toxicity of gossypol from cottonseed cake to sheep ovarian follicles. PLoS One 10:e0143708. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143708">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143708</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Câmara</surname>
							<given-names>A. C. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gadelha</surname>
							<given-names>I. C. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Borges</surname>
							<given-names>P. A. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Paiva</surname>
							<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Melo</surname>
							<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soto-Blanco</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Toxicity of gossypol from cottonseed cake to sheep ovarian follicles</article-title>
					<source>PLoS One</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<elocation-id>e0143708</elocation-id>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143708">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143708</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>Feng, H.; Qu, H.; Liu, Y.; Shi, Y.; Wu, S. and Bao, W. 2020. Effect of fermented soybean meal supplementation on some growth performance, blood chemical parameters, and fecal microflora of finishing pigs. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 49:e20190096. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190096">https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190096</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Feng</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Qu</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Shi</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wu</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bao</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Effect of fermented soybean meal supplementation on some growth performance, blood chemical parameters, and fecal microflora of finishing pigs</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>49</volume>
					<elocation-id>e20190096</elocation-id>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190096">https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920190096</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Fling, S. P. and Gregerson, D. S. 1986. Peptide and protein molecular weight determination by electrophoresis using a high-molarity tris buffer system without urea. Analytical Biochemistry 155:83-88. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(86)90228-9">https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697 (86)90228-9</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Fling</surname>
							<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gregerson</surname>
							<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1986</year>
					<article-title>Peptide and protein molecular weight determination by electrophoresis using a high-molarity tris buffer system without urea</article-title>
					<source>Analytical Biochemistry</source>
					<volume>155</volume>
					<fpage>83</fpage>
					<lpage>88</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(86)90228-9">https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697 (86)90228-9</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Gadelha, I. C. N.; Fonseca, N. B. S.; Oloris, S. C. S.; Melo, M. M. and Soto-Blanco, B. 2014. Gossypol toxicity from cottonseed products. The Scientific World Journal 2014:231635. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/231635">https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/231635</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Gadelha</surname>
							<given-names>I. C. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fonseca</surname>
							<given-names>N. B. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oloris</surname>
							<given-names>S. C. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Melo</surname>
							<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soto-Blanco</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Gossypol toxicity from cottonseed products</article-title>
					<source>The Scientific World Journal</source>
					<volume>2014</volume>
					<size units="pages">231635</size>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/231635">https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/231635</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Gu, X.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Chen, J.; Jiang, Q.; Liu, N.; Liu, X.; Zhang, F.; Tan, B.; Li, H. and Ma, X. 2021. Fermented cottonseed meal as a partial replacement for soybean meal could improve the growth performance, immunity and antioxidant properties, and nutrient digestibility by altering the gut microbiota profile of weaned piglets. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:734389. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.734389">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.734389</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Gu</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jiang</surname>
							<given-names>Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tan</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ma</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Fermented cottonseed meal as a partial replacement for soybean meal could improve the growth performance, immunity and antioxidant properties, and nutrient digestibility by altering the gut microbiota profile of weaned piglets</article-title>
					<source>Frontiers in Microbiology</source>
					<volume>12</volume>
					<size units="pages">734389</size>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.734389">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.734389</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Idowu, A. T. and Benjakul, S. 2019. Bitterness of fish protein hydrolysate and its debittering prospects. Journal of Food Biochemistry 43:e12978. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12978">https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12978</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Idowu</surname>
							<given-names>A. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Benjakul</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Bitterness of fish protein hydrolysate and its debittering prospects</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Food Biochemistry</source>
					<volume>43</volume>
					<elocation-id>e12978</elocation-id>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12978">https://doi.org/10.1111/jfbc.12978</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Jazi, V.; Boldaji, F.; Dastar, B.; Hashemi, S. R. and Ashayerizadeh, A. 2017. Effects of fermented cottonseed meal on the growth performance, gastrointestinal microflora population and small intestinal morphology in broiler chickens. British Poultry Science 58:402-408. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2017.1315051">https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2017.1315051</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Jazi</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Boldaji</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dastar</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hashemi</surname>
							<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ashayerizadeh</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Effects of fermented cottonseed meal on the growth performance, gastrointestinal microflora population and small intestinal morphology in broiler chickens</article-title>
					<source>British Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>58</volume>
					<fpage>402</fpage>
					<lpage>408</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2017.1315051">https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2017.1315051</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Liu, N.; Ding, K.; Wang, J.; Deng, Q.; Gu, K. and Wang, J. 2018. Effects of lactic acid bacteria and smectite after aflatoxin B 1 challenge on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility and blood parameters of broilers. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 102:953-961. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12901">https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12901</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ding</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Deng</surname>
							<given-names>Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gu</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Effects of lactic acid bacteria and smectite after aflatoxin B 1 challenge on the growth performance, nutrient digestibility and blood parameters of broilers</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition</source>
					<volume>102</volume>
					<fpage>953</fpage>
					<lpage>961</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12901">https://doi.org/10.1111/jpn.12901</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Liu, N.; Ding, K.; Wang, J. Q.; Jia, S. C.; Wang, J. P. and Xu, T. S. 2017. Detoxification, metabolism, and glutathione pathway activity of aflatoxin B 1 by dietary lactic acid bacteria in broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science 95:4399-4406. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2017.1644">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2017.1644</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ding</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>J. Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jia</surname>
							<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Xu</surname>
							<given-names>T. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Detoxification, metabolism, and glutathione pathway activity of aflatoxin B 1 by dietary lactic acid bacteria in broiler chickens</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>95</volume>
					<fpage>4399</fpage>
					<lpage>4406</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2017.1644">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2017.1644</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Luz, V. B.; Gadelha, I. C. N.; Cordeiro, L. A. V.; Melo, M. M. and Soto-Blanco, B. 2018. In vitro study of gossypol’s ovarian toxicity to rodents and goats. Toxicon 145:56-60. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.02.051">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.02.051</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Luz</surname>
							<given-names>V. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gadelha</surname>
							<given-names>I. C. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cordeiro</surname>
							<given-names>L. A. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Melo</surname>
							<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soto-Blanco</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>In vitro study of gossypol’s ovarian toxicity to rodents and goats</article-title>
					<source>Toxicon</source>
					<volume>145</volume>
					<fpage>56</fpage>
					<lpage>60</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.02.051">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.02.051</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Nie, C.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J.; Ge, W.; Ma, X. and Zhang, W. 2020. Impacts of dietary protein from fermented cottonseed meal on lipid metabolism and metabolomic profiling in the serum of broilers. Current Protein &amp; Peptide Science 21:812-820. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203721666200203152643">https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203721666200203152643</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Nie</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ge</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ma</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Impacts of dietary protein from fermented cottonseed meal on lipid metabolism and metabolomic profiling in the serum of broilers</article-title>
					<source>Current Protein &amp; Peptide Science</source>
					<volume>21</volume>
					<fpage>812</fpage>
					<lpage>820</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203721666200203152643">https://doi.org/10.2174/1389203721666200203152643</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Niu, J.; Wei, L.; Luo, Y.; Yang, W.; Lu, Q.; Zheng, X.; Niu, Y.; Sheng, W.; Cheng, H.; Zhang, W. and Nie, C. 2021. Fermented cottonseed meal improves production performance and reduces fat deposition in broiler chickens. Animal Bioscience 34:680-691. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0571">https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0571</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Niu</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wei</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Luo</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yang</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lu</surname>
							<given-names>Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zheng</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Niu</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sheng</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cheng</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nie</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Fermented cottonseed meal improves production performance and reduces fat deposition in broiler chickens</article-title>
					<source>Animal Bioscience</source>
					<volume>34</volume>
					<fpage>680</fpage>
					<lpage>691</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0571">https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0571</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Silva, J. R.; Andrade, R. V.; Corassa, A.; Sbardella, M.; D’Avila Lima, H. J.; Arantes, V. M. and Amorim, A. B. 2021. Cottonseed meal with enzyme complex for finishing pigs. Tropical Animal Health and Production 53:306. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02762-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02762-8</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Andrade</surname>
							<given-names>R. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Corassa</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sbardella</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>D’Avila Lima</surname>
							<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Arantes</surname>
							<given-names>V. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Amorim</surname>
							<given-names>A. B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Cottonseed meal with enzyme complex for finishing pigs</article-title>
					<source>Tropical Animal Health and Production</source>
					<volume>53</volume>
					<size units="pages">306</size>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02762-8">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02762-8</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Tang, J. W.; Sun, H.; Yao, X. H.; Wu, Y. F.; Wang, X. and Feng, J. 2012. Effects of replacement of soybean meal by fermented cottonseed meal on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters and immune function of yellow-feathered broilers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 25:393-400.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Tang</surname>
							<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sun</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yao</surname>
							<given-names>X. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wu</surname>
							<given-names>Y. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Feng</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Effects of replacement of soybean meal by fermented cottonseed meal on growth performance, serum biochemical parameters and immune function of yellow-feathered broilers</article-title>
					<source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences</source>
					<volume>25</volume>
					<fpage>393</fpage>
					<lpage>400</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Tavares-Samay, A. M. A.; Dutra Junior, W. M.; Palhares, L. O.; Lopes, C. C.; Rabello, C. B. and Coelho, A. H. S. C. 2019. Determination of nutrient and energy values of cottonseed meal supplemented or not with phytase and protease for broiler chicks. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 48:e20180142. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180142">https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180142</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Tavares-Samay</surname>
							<given-names>A. M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dutra</surname>
							<given-names>W. M.</given-names>
							<suffix>Junior</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Palhares</surname>
							<given-names>L. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lopes</surname>
							<given-names>C. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rabello</surname>
							<given-names>C. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Coelho</surname>
							<given-names>A. H. S. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Determination of nutrient and energy values of cottonseed meal supplemented or not with phytase and protease for broiler chicks</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>48</volume>
					<elocation-id>e20180142</elocation-id>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180142">https://doi.org/10.1590/rbz4820180142</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Xiong, B. H.; Luo, Q. Y.; Zheng, S. S. and Zhao, Y. G. 2020. Tables of feed composition and nutritive values in China. China Feed 2020:87-97.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Xiong</surname>
							<given-names>B. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Luo</surname>
							<given-names>Q. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zheng</surname>
							<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhao</surname>
							<given-names>Y. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<source>Tables of feed composition and nutritive values in China</source>
					<publisher-name>China Feed 2020</publisher-name>
					<fpage>87</fpage>
					<lpage>97</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>Wang, J. P.; Liu, N.; Song, M. Y.; Qin, C. L. and Ma, C. S. 2011. Effect of enzymolytic soybean meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and immune function of growing broilers. Animal Feed Science and Technology 169:224-229. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.06.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.06.012</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Song</surname>
							<given-names>M. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Qin</surname>
							<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ma</surname>
							<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Effect of enzymolytic soybean meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and immune function of growing broilers</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>169</volume>
					<fpage>224</fpage>
					<lpage>229</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.06.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.06.012</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Wang, L.; Ma, M.; Yu, Z. and Du, S. 2021. Preparation and identification of antioxidant peptides from cottonseed proteins. Food Chemistry 352:129399. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129399">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129399</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ma</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yu</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Du</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Preparation and identification of antioxidant peptides from cottonseed proteins</article-title>
					<source>Food Chemistry</source>
					<volume>352</volume>
					<size units="pages">129399</size>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129399">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129399</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>Yuan, X.; Liu, W.; Wang, C.; Huang, Y.; Dai, Y.; Cheng, H. and Jiang, G. 2020. Evaluation of antioxidant capacity and immunomodulatory effects of cottonseed meal protein hydrolysate and its derivative peptides for hepatocytes of blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala). Fish &amp; Shellfish Immunology 98:10-18. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2020.01.008">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2020.01.008</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Yuan</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Huang</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dai</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cheng</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jiang</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Evaluation of antioxidant capacity and immunomodulatory effects of cottonseed meal protein hydrolysate and its derivative peptides for hepatocytes of blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala)</article-title>
					<source>Fish &amp; Shellfish Immunology</source>
					<volume>98</volume>
					<fpage>10</fpage>
					<lpage>18</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2020.01.008">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2020.01.008</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>