<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rbz</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">R. Bras. Zootec.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">1516-3598</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">1806-9290</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="other">00604</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37496/rbz5120210151</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Non-ruminants</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Performance, nutrient digestibility, and muscular evaluation of female broiler chickens fed different dietary protein levels and slaughtered at 38 or 46 days</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-6811-4723</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Abreu</surname>
						<given-names>Anna Rosa Chagas</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-8882-3180</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Araújo</surname>
						<given-names>Itallo Conrado Sousa de</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c01"><sup>*</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-7956-8269</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Vaz</surname>
						<given-names>Diego Pereira</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-5347-8276</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Saldanha</surname>
						<given-names>Mariana Masseo</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-9805-3706</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Fontes</surname>
						<given-names>Dalton de Oliveira</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-1008-4346</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Leão</surname>
						<given-names>Philipe Anibal</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-8052-5389</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Ecco</surname>
						<given-names>Roselene</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-1025-4605</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Lara</surname>
						<given-names>Leonardo José Camargos</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Escola de Veterinária</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv2">Departamento de Zootecnia</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Belo Horizonte</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">MG</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original"> Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária, Departamento de Zootecnia, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Departamento de Zootecnia</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Parauapebas</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">PA</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia, Departamento de Zootecnia, Parauapebas, PA, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff3">
				<label>3</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Escola de Veterinária</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv2">Departamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Belo Horizonte</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">MG</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Veterinária, Departamento de Clínica e Cirurgia Veterinárias, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c01">
					<label>*</label>Corresponding author: <email>italloconradovet@hotmail.com</email>
				</corresp>
				<fn fn-type="conflict">
					<p>Conflict of Interest</p>
					<p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>
				</fn>
				<fn fn-type="con">
					<p>Author Contributions</p>
					<p>Conceptualization: L.J.C. Lara. Data curation: A.R.C. Abreu, D.P. Vaz and M.M. Saldanha. Formal analysis: D.P. Vaz. Funding acquisition: L.J.C. Lara. Investigation: A.R.C. Abreu, I.C.S. Araújo, M.M. Saldanha, P.A. Leão and R. Ecco. Methodology: A.R.C. Abreu, I.C.S. Araújo, D.P. Vaz, D.O. Fontes and R. Ecco. Project administration: L.J.C. Lara. Resources: L.J.C. Lara. Supervision: L.J.C. Lara. Visualization: D.O. Fontes, R. Ecco and L.J.C. Lara. Writing-original draft: A.R.C. Abreu, I.C.S. Araújo, R. Ecco and L.J.C. Lara. Writing-review &amp; editing: I.C.S. Araújo.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>15</day>
				<month>07</month>
				<year>2022</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<year>2022</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>51</volume>
			<elocation-id>e20210151</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>10</day>
					<month>08</month>
					<year>2021</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>14</day>
					<month>02</month>
					<year>2022</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p> This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. </license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p>This study evaluated the effects of two protein levels and types of formulation on performance, nutrient metabolization, and myopathies of 390 female broilers from 21 to 46 days old distributed in a completely randomized design, with five treatments and six replicates of 13 broilers each. Treatments were two levels of protein (19.0 and 21.0%) in diets using only commercially available ingredients and three experimental formulations designed to keep similar the main nutrients that could influence nutritional performance (starch, fiber, ether extract), using unusual ingredients, with 19.0% (19E) or 21.0% (21E) crude protein and the third with 19.0% crude protein with amino acid levels similar to treatment 21P (19E+Aa). We studied broiler performance, nutrient digestibility, macroscopic muscular evaluation, and histological muscular evaluation. The design for the performance and myopathy assessment was a 5 × 2 factorial scheme, five diets × two ages (38 or 46 days). The worst feed conversion ratio was observed for the 19P treatment. Neither diet nor age had an effect on myopathies, however, older slaughter age increased the intensity of microscopic lesions. The diet 19P should be avoided and increased inclusion of lipids in diets improves nutrient utilization and, consequently, performance.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<kwd>alternative ingredients</kwd>
				<kwd>amino acid</kwd>
				<kwd>digestibility</kwd>
				<kwd>myopathy</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="1"/>
				<table-count count="6"/>
				<equation-count count="2"/>
				<ref-count count="34"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>1. Introduction</title>
			<p>The possibility and benefits of reducing protein levels in broiler chicken diets have been discussed in other studies, although with controversial results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Attia et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Soares et al., 2020</xref>). Reduced feed protein levels also bring a reduction in the inclusion of soybean meal, the main source of protein in field diets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Soares et al., 2020</xref>), which increases the inclusion of synthetic amino acids and corn and reduces the inclusion of soybean oil or another lipid source. However, the reduced inclusion of a lipid source may impair poultry performance mainly due to the extra-caloric effects of oils and fats.</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Soares et al. (2020)</xref> found worse performance and higher caloric increment for male broilers in the growing phase with protein reduction from 22 to 16%, which can be attributed to protein content, but also to the lower percentage of soybean oil in the 16% protein diet. This suggests that in addition to nutritional levels, the concentrations of ingredients also contributed to the result, thus highlighting the extra-caloric effects of lipid sources.</p>
			<p>Besides providing energy, the addition of lipids in diet leads to changes in gastrointestinal physiology, such as reduced peristaltic movements and improved nutrient digestibility due to increased cholecystokinin production, which stimulates gallbladder contraction and secretion of pancreatic enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ravindran et al., 2016</xref>). Thus, nutrients in the diet are under the action of enzymes and digestive juices for a longer period of time and, thus, can be better assimilated in the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, there is a reduction in caloric increase resulting from lipid metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baião and Lara, 2005</xref>). Thus, the manipulation of protein in association with lipid benefits can be explored to improve performance and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens because proteins and amino acids are closely related to muscle development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baião and Lara, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Attia et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
			<p>In addition to diet, broiler sex is also an important factor, as higher growth rates and carcass yield are found in male broilers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Marcato et al., 2010</xref>). To meet the demand of the poultry industry for heavier carcasses, nutritional strategies and older slaughtering age have been adopted for female broilers. On the other hand, heavier carcasses are associated with increased occurrence of myopathies in chicken meat, as these changes are correlated with high carcass yield, sex, and diet, beyond chicken handling at slaughter line (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bailey et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
			<p>The most frequent myopathies are white striping (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kuttappan et al., 2012</xref>) and wooden breast (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Sihvo et al., 2014</xref>) observed in the <italic>pectoralis major</italic> muscle. Green breast or deep pectoral myopathy have also been observed in the <italic>pectoralis minor</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Kijowski et al., 2009</xref>), in addition to dorsal muscle myopathy in the <italic>latissimus dorsi</italic>. These myopathies are not associated with infectious agents, yet they impair the appearance, texture, and quality of meat. Prior to the macroscopic appearance of myopathies, some histology changes, such as muscular fiber fragmentation, hyalinization, tissue necrosis, and macrophage infiltration, can be observed in tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Zimermann et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
			<p>In view of the above, our objective was to evaluate the effects of two feed protein levels and types of formulation to female broilers in the growing phase on performance, metabolism, and myopathies. In addition, the effects of slaughter age on performance and myopathies were also evaluated.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>2. Material and Methods</title>
			<p>The experiment was conducted in Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil (19°55' S and 43°56' W). The current experimental protocol was approved by the Ethical Principles in Animal Experimentation Committee (case number 179/2018).</p>
			<sec>
				<title>2.1. Animals, diets, and experimental design</title>
				<p>A total of 390 female Cobb500<sup>®</sup> broiler chickens were distributed in a completely randomized design, with five treatments and six replicates of 13 broilers each for the metabolism assay. The design for the performance and myopathy assessment was a 5 × 2 factorial scheme (five diets × two ages). One-day-old chicks were purchased from a commercial hatchery where they received vaccination against Marek’s and Gumboro diseases and were reared in a thermoneutral-climate room. Broilers were reared under the same conditions from 1 to 21 d receiving water and starter diet (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cobb, 2018</xref>). The light program used was six hours of dark and 18 hours of light/day throughout the rearing phase.</p>
				<p>At 21 days, all broilers were weighed (average weight of 0.927 kg/broiler) and homogeneously distributed in metabolic cages. Treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>) were two levels of protein (19.0 and 21.0%) in diets using only commercially available ingredients, in comparison to experimental diets. The two treatments were practical formulations with minimal cost, increased protein, and other changes with 19.0 (19P) or 21.0% (21P) crude protein (CP). Three experimental treatments were used: experimental formulations designed to keep similar the main nutrients that could influence nutritional performance (starch, fiber, ether extract [EE]), using unusual ingredients (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>), with 19.0 (19E) or 21.0% (21E) CP, and the third with 19.0% CP with amino acid levels similar to treatment 21P (19E+Aa). Thus, diets that the broilers received during the growth phase (22 to 46 d) were defined as treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t1">
						<label>Table 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Description of treatments</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" style="font-weight:normal">Treatment</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Protein level (%)</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">Description</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>19P</td>
									<td align="center">19</td>
									<td rowspan="2">Practical formulations with minimal cost, increased protein, and other changes.</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>21P</td>
									<td align="center">21</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>19E</td>
									<td align="center">19</td>
									<td rowspan="3">Experimental formulations – designed to keep similar the main nutrients that could influence nutritional performance (starch, fiber, ether extract), using unusual ingredients.</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>21E</td>
									<td align="center">21</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>19E+Aa</td>
									<td align="center">19*</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN1">
								<p>* Amino acids levels similar to treatment 21% CP.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t2">
						<label>Table 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Ingredients and calculated nutritional composition of starter (1-21 days of age) and grower (22-46 days of age) diets</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Ingredient (%)</th>
									<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Starter</th>
									<th colspan="5" style="font-weight:normal">Grower</th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">19P</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">21P</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">19E</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">21E</th>
									<th style="font-weight:normal">19E+Aa</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td>Corn</td>
									<td align="center">54.67</td>
									<td align="center">65.20</td>
									<td align="center">58.35</td>
									<td align="center">54.08</td>
									<td align="center">53.31</td>
									<td align="center">53.78</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Soybean meal (45.5%)</td>
									<td align="center">33.33</td>
									<td align="center">25.10</td>
									<td align="center">31.37</td>
									<td align="center">32.00</td>
									<td align="center">34.00</td>
									<td align="center">31.95</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Soy oil</td>
									<td align="center">3.67</td>
									<td align="center">3.06</td>
									<td align="center">4.11</td>
									<td align="center">5.50</td>
									<td align="center">5.50</td>
									<td align="center">5.50</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Meat and bone meal (41%)</td>
									<td align="center">6.67</td>
									<td align="center">5.15</td>
									<td align="center">5.00</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Starch</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">2.74</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">2.75</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Corn gluten bran</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">2.20</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Soybean hull</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.83</td>
									<td align="center">0.50</td>
									<td align="center">0.83</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Limestone</td>
									<td align="center">0.23</td>
									<td align="center">0.32</td>
									<td align="center">0.23</td>
									<td align="center">0.93</td>
									<td align="center">0.84</td>
									<td align="center">0.82</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Dicalcium phosphate</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">1.73</td>
									<td align="center">1.68</td>
									<td align="center">1.73</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Sodium chloride</td>
									<td align="center">0.42</td>
									<td align="center">0.36</td>
									<td align="center">0.36</td>
									<td align="center">0.41</td>
									<td align="center">0.41</td>
									<td align="center">0.41</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>DL-Methionine (99%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.32</td>
									<td align="center">0.24</td>
									<td align="center">0.18</td>
									<td align="center">0.22</td>
									<td align="center">0.16</td>
									<td align="center">0.22</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>L-Lisyne HCL (78%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.18</td>
									<td align="center">0.13</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.04</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.08</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>L-Threonine (98.5%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.06</td>
									<td align="center">0.03</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.08</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>L-Tryptophan</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.02</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>L-Arginine</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.12</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>L-Valine</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.11</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>L-Isoleucine</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.09</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Vitamin/mineral supplement<sup>1</sup></td>
									<td align="center">0.40</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Vitamin/mineral supplement <sup>2</sup></td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0.40</td>
									<td align="center">0.40</td>
									<td align="center">0.40</td>
									<td align="center">0.40</td>
									<td align="center">0.40</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Inert</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">1.12</td>
									<td align="center">1.00</td>
									<td align="center">1.10</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Total (%)</td>
									<td align="center">100.00</td>
									<td align="center">100.00</td>
									<td align="center">100.00</td>
									<td align="center">100.00</td>
									<td align="center">100.00</td>
									<td align="center">100.00</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Calculated analysis</td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
									<td> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Crude protein (%)</td>
									<td align="center">22.5</td>
									<td align="center">19.0</td>
									<td align="center">21.0</td>
									<td align="center">19.0</td>
									<td align="center">21.0</td>
									<td align="center">19.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg)</td>
									<td align="center">3,050</td>
									<td align="center">3,130</td>
									<td align="center">3,130</td>
									<td align="center">3,130</td>
									<td align="center">3,130</td>
									<td align="center">3,130</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Crude fiber (%)</td>
									<td align="center">2.58</td>
									<td align="center">2.43</td>
									<td align="center">2.61</td>
									<td align="center">2.78</td>
									<td align="center">2.78</td>
									<td align="center">2.78</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Starch (%)</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">38.85</td>
									<td align="center">35.87</td>
									<td align="center">36.01</td>
									<td align="center">33.78</td>
									<td align="center">35.85</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Fats (%)</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">6.58</td>
									<td align="center">7.46</td>
									<td align="center">8.09</td>
									<td align="center">8.13</td>
									<td align="center">8.07</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Calcium (%)</td>
									<td align="center">1.08</td>
									<td align="center">0.88</td>
									<td align="center">0.85</td>
									<td align="center">0.87</td>
									<td align="center">0.83</td>
									<td align="center">0.84</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Available phosphorus (%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.49</td>
									<td align="center">0.39</td>
									<td align="center">0.39</td>
									<td align="center">0.41</td>
									<td align="center">0.41</td>
									<td align="center">0.41</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Ash (%)</td>
									<td align="center">5.47</td>
									<td align="center">4.59</td>
									<td align="center">4.77</td>
									<td align="center">2.86</td>
									<td align="center">2.98</td>
									<td align="center">2.85</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible lysine (%)</td>
									<td align="center">1.20</td>
									<td align="center">0.95</td>
									<td align="center">0.99</td>
									<td align="center">0.95</td>
									<td align="center">0.98</td>
									<td align="center">0.98</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible Met + Cis (%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.90</td>
									<td align="center">0.74</td>
									<td align="center">0.74</td>
									<td align="center">0.74</td>
									<td align="center">0.74</td>
									<td align="center">0.74</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible methionine (%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.62</td>
									<td align="center">0.49</td>
									<td align="center">0.47</td>
									<td align="center">0.48</td>
									<td align="center">0.46</td>
									<td align="center">0.48</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible threonine (%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.78</td>
									<td align="center">0.65</td>
									<td align="center">0.71</td>
									<td align="center">0.65</td>
									<td align="center">0.72</td>
									<td align="center">0.72</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible tryptophan (%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.21</td>
									<td align="center">0.19</td>
									<td align="center">0.22</td>
									<td align="center">0.21</td>
									<td align="center">0.23</td>
									<td align="center">0.23</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible valine (%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.91</td>
									<td align="center">0.76</td>
									<td align="center">0.86</td>
									<td align="center">0.79</td>
									<td align="center">0.89</td>
									<td align="center">0.89</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible arginine (%)</td>
									<td align="center">1.39</td>
									<td align="center">1.12</td>
									<td align="center">1.29</td>
									<td align="center">1.17</td>
									<td align="center">1.27</td>
									<td align="center">1.28</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Digestible isoleucine (%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.82</td>
									<td align="center">0.67</td>
									<td align="center">0.77</td>
									<td align="center">0.74</td>
									<td align="center">0.82</td>
									<td align="center">0.82</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td>Sodium (%)</td>
									<td align="center">0.21</td>
									<td align="center">0.18</td>
									<td align="center">0.18</td>
									<td align="center">0.17</td>
									<td align="center">0.17</td>
									<td align="center">0.17</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN2">
								<p><sup>1</sup> Vitamin/mineral supplement (starter). Each 1.0 kg contains: folic acid, 142 mg; pantothenic acid, 2,600 mg; Halquinol, 7,500 mg; <italic>Bacillus subtilus</italic>, 75×10<sup>e9</sup> cfu; biotin, 13 mg; copper 1,500 mg; choline, 75 g; iron, 26 g; iodine, 250 mg; manganese, 16.25 g; niacin, 8,750 mg; monensin, 30 g; selenium, 60 mg; vitamin A, 2,500,000 IU; vitamin B1, 370 mg; vitamin B12, 3,000 mcg; vitamin B2, 1,280 mg; vitamin B6, 410 mg; vitamin D3, 500,000 IU; vitamin E, 3,750 IU; vitamin K3, 635 mg; zinc, 11.37 g.</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN3">
								<p><sup>2</sup> Vitamin/mineral supplement (grower phase). Each 1.0 kg contains: folic acid, 877.5 mg; pantothenic acid, 9,900 mg; BHT, 13,750 mg; biotin, 68,750 mg; copper, 10,000 mg; choline, 1,546.3 mg; iron, 30,000 mg; iodine, 1,000 mg; manganese, 90,000 mg; niacin, 38,500 mg; selenium, 212.5 mg; vitamin A, 9,775 IU; vitamin B1, 1,725 mg; vitamin B2, 6,187.5 mg; vitamin B6, 3,900 mg; vitamin B12, 15,225 mg; vitamin D3, 2,255 IU; vitamin E, 25 mg; vitamin K3, 3,150 mg; zinc, 80,000 mg.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.2. Performance</title>
				<p>Broilers and feed were weighed weekly to obtain feed intake (FI), body weight gain (BWG), and feed conversion ratio (FCR). Viability (VIA) was calculated considering the percentage of broilers that died during the period. The productive factor (PF) of the experimental period was calculated using the following formula: (daily weight gain (kg) × viability (%) / feed conversion) × 100.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.3. Nutrient digestibility</title>
				<p>Nutrient digestibility, nitrogen excretion (NE), apparent metabolizable energy (AME), and apparent metabolizable energy corrected for nitrogen balance (AMEn) were obtained using the traditional total excreta collection method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sakomura and Rostagno, 2016</xref>). Thirteen chickens were used per experimental unit, from 28 to 32 days, with seven days of adaptation.</p>
				<p>Excreta and diets were analyzed to determine dry matter (DM), CP, crude energy (CE), and EE (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">AOAC, 2006</xref>). Acid hydrolysis was used to determine EE content of excreta. Values for CE were determined using a Parr<sup>®</sup> brand isoperibol 6200 adiabatic heat pump. Calculations for apparent metabolizable energy (AME) were performed according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Matterson et al. (1965)</xref>. The apparent DM digestibility coefficient (DMDC), CP digestibility coefficient (CPDC), and EE digestibility coefficient (EEDC) were calculated by: nutrient metabolism (%) = ((ingested nutrient (g) − excreted nutrient (g))/nutrient ingested (g)) × 100.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.4. Macroscopic muscular evaluation</title>
				<p>Twelve <italic>pectoralis major</italic> muscles from each treatment were macroscopically evaluated in a bright environment (white light with minimum intensity of 500 lux) at 38 d and 46 d, by a well-trained assessor for the identification and classification of white striping and wooden breast according to the methodologies of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kuttappan et al. (2012)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Sihvo et al. (2014)</xref>, respectively.</p>
				<p>White striping was classified into grades from 0 to 5, in which: 0 = normal; 1 = discrete white striping; 2 = white striping &lt; 1 mm thick; 3 = white striping &gt; 1 mm thick; 4 = white striping between 2 and 3 mm thick; and 5 = white striping &gt; 3 mm thick (Adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kuttappan et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
				<p>Wooden breast was classified as PRESENT, when the musculature presented areas with diffuse or focused hardening in large areas, paleness, or surface with clear liquid and presence of petechiae (Adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Sihvo et al., 2014</xref>) or ABSENT, when normal.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.5. Histological muscular evaluation</title>
				<p>Samples of approximately 4 cm<sup>2</sup> were collected from the <italic>pectoralis major, pectoralis minor</italic>, and <italic>latissimus dorsi</italic> muscles of six 38- and 46-day-old broiler chickens per treatment and fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 72 h. Samples were then washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, 0.1 M,pH 7.4), dehydrated in an increasing ethanol series (70-100%), and embedded in paraffin. Subsequently, 4-μm thick sections were made and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bancroft and Stevens, 1996</xref>).</p>
				<p>For examining the slides, the evaluator (a trained pathologist) used the following criteria: hyaline degeneration, observed by swelling and hypereosinophilia of the fibers; muscle fiber necrosis – observed by fiber fragmentation with or without swelling and interspersed inflammatory cells; fibrosis – assigned an intensity from 1 to 3 when fibrosis was observed; adipocytes – assigned an intensity from 1 to 3 when adipocytes were observed; lymphohistiocytic infiltration – assigned an intensity of 0 to 3 when infiltrate was observed; lesion score – microscopic lesions were classified as normal, mild (less than 4 necrotic fibers in 10 fields), moderate (5-10 necrotic fibers in 10 fields), or marked (more the 11 necrotic fibers in 10 fields).</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.6. Statistical analysis</title>
				<p>Nutrient digestibility data were analyzed using the following fixed effect model:</p>
				<disp-formula id="e1">
					<mml:math>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>γ</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>μ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
					</mml:math>
					<label>(1)</label>
				</disp-formula>
				<p>in which <italic>Y</italic><sub><italic>ij</italic></sub> is the response variable, <italic>μ</italic> is the overall mean, <italic>T</italic><sub><italic>i</italic></sub> is the fixed effect of treatment (<italic>i</italic> = 19P,19E, 21P, 21E, 19E+Aa), and <italic>e</italic> is the residual error.</p>
				<p>Performance and myopathies data were analyzed using the following fixed effect model:</p>
				<disp-formula id="e2">
					<mml:math>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>γ</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:mi>μ</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:msup>
							<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
							<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
						</mml:msup>
						<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:msup>
							<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
							<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
						</mml:msup>
						<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
						<mml:mo> </mml:mo>
						<mml:msub>
							<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
							<mml:mrow>
								<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
								<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
							</mml:mrow>
						</mml:msub>
					</mml:math>
					<label>(2)</label>
				</disp-formula>
				<p>in which <italic>Y</italic><sub><italic>ij</italic></sub> is the quantitative response variable; <italic>μ</italic> is the overall mean; <italic>T</italic><sup>1</sup><italic>i</italic> = 19P, 19E, 21P, 21E,19E+Aa; <italic>T</italic><sup>2</sup><italic>j</italic> = 38 or 46 days; <italic>Y</italic> is the effect of factors “<italic>i”</italic> and “<italic>j</italic>”, and <italic>ɛ</italic> is the random error.</p>
				<p>Results were analyzed using Statistical Analysis System (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">SAS, 2002</xref>). Normality of the data was tested by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Normal data were subjected to analysis of variance (F test) to evaluate significant effects among simple factors. Differences between means were considered significant when P≤0.05 and compared by Tukey test at 5% probability. Non-normal data were evaluated by non-parametric statistics, namely analysis by the Wilcoxon test for the dependent variable and Kruskal-Wallis for the independent variable, both at 5% probability. Frequency data were analyzed using the chi-square test.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>3. Results</title>
			<p>There was no interaction between diet and age for any of the performance variables studied (P&gt;0.05). Broilers that received the 19P diet had higher FI than those that received the 21P and 21E diets (P≤0.05), while FI was intermediate for the other treatments. Regardless of diet, higher FI values were found at 44 days compared with 37 days (P≤0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t3">
					<label>Table 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Performance of female broilers according to diets and age (37 and 44 days)</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal"> </th>
								<th colspan="6" style="font-weight:normal">Performance</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Initial weight (kg)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">FI (kg)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">BWG (kg)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">FCR</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Viability (%)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">PF</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Diet</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19P</td>
								<td align="center">0.937</td>
								<td align="center">2.930a</td>
								<td align="center">1.689</td>
								<td align="center">1.73b</td>
								<td align="center">100.00</td>
								<td align="center">499.80b</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21P</td>
								<td align="center">0.928</td>
								<td align="center">2.842bc</td>
								<td align="center">1.705</td>
								<td align="center">1.66a</td>
								<td align="center">100.00</td>
								<td align="center">524.51ab</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19E</td>
								<td align="center">0.916</td>
								<td align="center">2.901ab</td>
								<td align="center">1.720</td>
								<td align="center">1.68a</td>
								<td align="center">100.00</td>
								<td align="center">521.80ab</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21E</td>
								<td align="center">0.928</td>
								<td align="center">2.811c</td>
								<td align="center">1.706</td>
								<td align="center">1.64a</td>
								<td align="center">98.71</td>
								<td align="center">524.45ab</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19E+Aa</td>
								<td align="center">0.926</td>
								<td align="center">2.879abc</td>
								<td align="center">1.731</td>
								<td align="center">1.66a</td>
								<td align="center">98.71</td>
								<td align="center">526.14a</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Age</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>37 days</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">2.326b</td>
								<td align="center">1.390b</td>
								<td align="center">1.67</td>
								<td align="center">99.48</td>
								<td align="center">516.84</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>44 days</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">3.419a</td>
								<td align="center">2.031a</td>
								<td align="center">1.68</td>
								<td align="center">99.48</td>
								<td align="center">521.84</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>P-value</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Diet</td>
								<td align="center">0.5679</td>
								<td align="center">0.0030</td>
								<td align="center">0.2577</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
								<td align="center">0.1764</td>
								<td align="center">0.0349</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Age</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
								<td align="center">0.3041</td>
								<td align="center">0.5000</td>
								<td align="center">0.3992</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Diet × age</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">0.9898</td>
								<td align="center">0.7996</td>
								<td align="center">0.9321</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">0.9156</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">0.076</td>
								<td align="center">0.048</td>
								<td align="center">0.040</td>
								<td align="center">1.455</td>
								<td align="center">22.78</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN4">
							<p>FI - feed intake; BWG - body weight gain; FCR - feed conversion ratio; PF - productive factor; SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN5">
							<p>a,b,c - Means followed by distinct letters in column differ from each other by Tukey test (P&lt;0.05).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Diet did not affect broiler chicken BWG (P&gt;0.05). Broilers had higher BWG at 44 days than at 37 days (P≤0.05). Broilers fed the 19P diet had higher FCR compared with those in the other treatments (P≤0.05), but age had no effect on FCR (P&gt;0.05). Neither diet (P&gt;0.05) nor age (P&gt;0.05) had an effect on VIA. Treatment 19E+Aa showed higher PF than treatment 19P (P≤0.05), while the other treatments showed intermediate PF values. Regardless of diet, age had no effect on PF (P&gt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
			<p>Values of DMDC for treatments 19P, 21P, and 19E+Aa were higher than those for treatment 21E, while treatment 19E was intermediate and similar to the others (P≤0.05). Treatment 19E+Aa had better CPDC than the other treatments (P≤0.05). Treatment 19E+Aa had lower NE than treatments 21P and 21E, while treatments 19P and 19E had intermediate values (P≤0.05). Animals that received treatments 19E, 21E, and 19E+Aa had better EEDC compared with animals receiving 19P and 21P (P≤0.05). Treatment 21P had lower AME and AMEn than the other treatments (P≤0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t4">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Nutrient digestibility and apparent metabolizable energy corrected for nitrogen balance (AMEn) of female broilers fed different diets, from 28 to 32 days of age</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" style="font-weight:normal">Diet</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">DMDC</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">CPDC</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">NE</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">EEDC</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">AME</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">AMEn</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>19P</td>
								<td align="center">74.58a</td>
								<td align="center">57.14b</td>
								<td align="center">99.45ab</td>
								<td align="center">77.25b</td>
								<td align="center">3,306a</td>
								<td align="center">3,154a</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21P</td>
								<td align="center">73.16a</td>
								<td align="center">56.88b</td>
								<td align="center">110.78a</td>
								<td align="center">77.82b</td>
								<td align="center">3,129b</td>
								<td align="center">2,956b</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19E</td>
								<td align="center">71.49ab</td>
								<td align="center">59.28b</td>
								<td align="center">95.64ab</td>
								<td align="center">80.80a</td>
								<td align="center">3,396a</td>
								<td align="center">3,227a</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21E</td>
								<td align="center">69.78b</td>
								<td align="center">57.18b</td>
								<td align="center">113.55a</td>
								<td align="center">80.93a</td>
								<td align="center">3,396a</td>
								<td align="center">3,219a</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19E+Aa</td>
								<td align="center">73.66a</td>
								<td align="center">63.13a</td>
								<td align="center">86.18b</td>
								<td align="center">81.09a</td>
								<td align="center">3,403a</td>
								<td align="center">3,221a</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>P-value</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								<td align="center">0.049</td>
								<td align="center">0.013</td>
								<td align="center">0.034</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.3245</td>
								<td align="center">0.6938</td>
								<td align="center">2.5536</td>
								<td align="center">0.6208</td>
								<td align="center">0.1411</td>
								<td align="center">0.1225</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN6">
							<p>DMDC - dry matter digestibility coefficient (%); CPDC - crude protein digestibility coefficient (%); NE - nitrogen excretion (g/kg); EEDC - ether extract digestibility coefficient (%); AME - apparent metabolizable energy (kcal/kg); AMEn - apparent metabolizable energy corrected for nitrogen balance (kcal/kg); SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN7">
							<p>ab - Means followed by distinct letters in column differ from each other by Tukey test (P&lt;0.05).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Neither diet (P&gt;0.05) nor slaughter age (P&gt;0.05) had an effect on the white striping score or on the appearance of wooden breast in female broilers (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>). For the <italic>pectoralis major</italic> muscle (Figures 1A and 1B), connective tissue intensity was lower for the 19P treatment compared with the other treatments (P≤0.05). The other histological variables were not affected by diet (P&gt;0.05). Age had no effect on any of the evaluated variables in this muscle (P&gt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t5">
					<label>Table 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Macroscopic evaluation of white striping scores and wooden breast frequency study in <italic>pectoralis major</italic> muscle in female broilers according to diets and slaughter age</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal"> </th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">White striping<sup>1</sup></th>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Wooden breast<sup>2</sup></th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Score</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Absent (%)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Present (%)</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Diet</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19P</td>
								<td align="center">0.91</td>
								<td align="center">62.50</td>
								<td align="center">37.50</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21P</td>
								<td align="center">0.81</td>
								<td align="center">54.55</td>
								<td align="center">45.45</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19E</td>
								<td align="center">0.95</td>
								<td align="center">58.33</td>
								<td align="center">41.67</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21E</td>
								<td align="center">1.33</td>
								<td align="center">37.50</td>
								<td align="center">62.50</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19E+Aa</td>
								<td align="center">0.72</td>
								<td align="center">63.64</td>
								<td align="center">36.36</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Age</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>38 days</td>
								<td align="center">0.83</td>
								<td align="center">53.33</td>
								<td align="center">46.64</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>46 days</td>
								<td align="center">1.03</td>
								<td align="center">57.14</td>
								<td align="center">42.46</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>P-value</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Diet</td>
								<td align="center">0.4383</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="2">0.368</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Age</td>
								<td align="center">0.4565</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="2">0.680</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN8">
							<p><sup>1</sup> Means compared by the Kruskal Wallis test (P&lt;0.05) for the independent variable and the Wilcoxon test (P&lt;0.05) for the dependent variable.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN9">
							<p><sup>2</sup> Means compared by Chi-square test (P&gt;0.05).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t6">
					<label>Table 6</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Histological evaluation of muscles according to the diets and age of female broilers</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal"> </th>
								<th colspan="6" style="font-weight:normal">Variable</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">MFN</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">HD</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">FIB</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">ADP</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">LHI</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">LS</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Diet</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="6"><italic>Pectoralis major</italic></td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19P</td>
								<td align="center">5.10</td>
								<td align="center">15.15</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.40</td>
								<td align="center">0.70</td>
								<td align="center">1.50</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21P</td>
								<td align="center">6.17</td>
								<td align="center">15.69</td>
								<td align="center">0.25</td>
								<td align="center">0.62</td>
								<td align="center">0.87</td>
								<td align="center">1.75</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19E</td>
								<td align="center">5.58</td>
								<td align="center">17.14</td>
								<td align="center">0.11</td>
								<td align="center">0.44</td>
								<td align="center">1.11</td>
								<td align="center">1.67</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21E</td>
								<td align="center">5.95</td>
								<td align="center">12.69</td>
								<td align="center">0.25</td>
								<td align="center">0.50</td>
								<td align="center">0.62</td>
								<td align="center">1.62</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19E+Aa</td>
								<td align="center">5.64</td>
								<td align="center">25.09</td>
								<td align="center">0.45</td>
								<td align="center">0.54</td>
								<td align="center">0.82</td>
								<td align="center">1.64</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Age</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>38 days</td>
								<td align="center">6.58</td>
								<td align="center">16.68</td>
								<td align="center">0.12</td>
								<td align="center">0.37</td>
								<td align="center">0.75</td>
								<td align="center">1.79</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>46 days</td>
								<td align="center">4.66</td>
								<td align="center">18.56</td>
								<td align="center">0.32</td>
								<td align="center">0.64</td>
								<td align="center">0.91</td>
								<td align="center">1.45</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>P-value</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Diet</td>
								<td align="center">0.879</td>
								<td align="center">0.507</td>
								<td align="center">0.138</td>
								<td align="center">0.897</td>
								<td align="center">0.183</td>
								<td align="center">0.922</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Age</td>
								<td align="center">0.057</td>
								<td align="center">0.349</td>
								<td align="center">0.116</td>
								<td align="center">0.079</td>
								<td align="center">0.187</td>
								<td align="center">0.095</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td> </td>
								<td align="center" colspan="6"><italic>Pectoralis minor</italic></td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Diet</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19P</td>
								<td align="center">2.52</td>
								<td align="center">13.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.25</td>
								<td align="center">0.37</td>
								<td align="center">0.75</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21P</td>
								<td align="center">4.97</td>
								<td align="center">21.55</td>
								<td align="center">0.33</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">1.55</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19E</td>
								<td align="center">3.66</td>
								<td align="center">15.60</td>
								<td align="center">0.20</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
								<td align="center">0.70</td>
								<td align="center">1.22</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21E</td>
								<td align="center">3.17</td>
								<td align="center">16.94</td>
								<td align="center">0.12</td>
								<td align="center">0.12</td>
								<td align="center">0.75</td>
								<td align="center">1.12</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19E+Aa</td>
								<td align="center">4.96</td>
								<td align="center">22.44</td>
								<td align="center">0.62</td>
								<td align="center">0.50</td>
								<td align="center">1.12</td>
								<td align="center">1.75</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Age</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>38 days</td>
								<td align="center">2.27b</td>
								<td align="center">12.28b</td>
								<td align="center">0.13</td>
								<td align="center">0.13</td>
								<td align="center">0.65b</td>
								<td align="center">0.87b</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>46 days</td>
								<td align="center">5.71a</td>
								<td align="center">24.32a</td>
								<td align="center">0.50</td>
								<td align="center">0.30</td>
								<td align="center">1.10a</td>
								<td align="center">1.89a</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>P-value</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Diet</td>
								<td align="center">0.301</td>
								<td align="center">0.563</td>
								<td align="center">0.607</td>
								<td align="center">0.164</td>
								<td align="center">0.392</td>
								<td align="center">0.423</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Age</td>
								<td align="center">0.001</td>
								<td align="center">0.002</td>
								<td align="center">0.076</td>
								<td align="center">0.296</td>
								<td align="center">0.004</td>
								<td align="center">&gt;0.001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td> </td>
								<td align="center" colspan="6"><italic>Latissimus dorsi</italic></td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Diet</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19P</td>
								<td align="center">2.78</td>
								<td align="center">14.58</td>
								<td align="center">0.45</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.54</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21P</td>
								<td align="center">2.52</td>
								<td align="center">15.83</td>
								<td align="center">0.40</td>
								<td align="center">0.90</td>
								<td align="center">0.60</td>
								<td align="center">0.90</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19E</td>
								<td align="center">2.46</td>
								<td align="center">20.64</td>
								<td align="center">0.33</td>
								<td align="center">0.89</td>
								<td align="center">0.44</td>
								<td align="center">0.89</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>21E</td>
								<td align="center">3.08</td>
								<td align="center">16.85</td>
								<td align="center">0.20</td>
								<td align="center">1.20</td>
								<td align="center">0.70</td>
								<td align="center">1.10</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>19E+Aa</td>
								<td align="center">2.36</td>
								<td align="center">17.69</td>
								<td align="center">0.20</td>
								<td align="center">0.90</td>
								<td align="center">0.40</td>
								<td align="center">0.60</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Age</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>38 days</td>
								<td align="center">2.74</td>
								<td align="center">15.63</td>
								<td align="center">0.13b</td>
								<td align="center">0.56b</td>
								<td align="center">0.22b</td>
								<td align="center">0.83</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>46 days</td>
								<td align="center">2.57</td>
								<td align="center">18.16</td>
								<td align="center">0.48a</td>
								<td align="center">1.33a</td>
								<td align="center">0.81a</td>
								<td align="center">0.96</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>P-value</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Diet</td>
								<td align="center">0.650</td>
								<td align="center">0.494</td>
								<td align="center">0.817</td>
								<td align="center">0.947</td>
								<td align="center">0.972</td>
								<td align="center">0.488</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Age</td>
								<td align="center">0.868</td>
								<td align="center">0.262</td>
								<td align="center">0.024</td>
								<td align="center">0.003</td>
								<td align="center">&gt;0.001</td>
								<td align="center">0.425</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN10">
							<p>MFN - muscle fiber necrosis; HD - hyaline degeneration; FIB - fibrosis; ADP - adipocytes; LHI - lymphohistiocytic infiltration; LS - lesion score.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN11">
							<p>a,b - Means followed by distinct letters in the column differ from each other by the Kruskal Wallis test for the independent variable (P&lt;0.05) and the Wilcoxon test for the dependent variable (P&lt;0.05).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>For the <italic>pectoralis minor</italic> muscle (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f01">Figure 1C</xref>), diet had no effect on any of the evaluated parameters (P&gt;0.05). However, there was an increase in the intensity of necrosis, hyaline degeneration, lymphohistiocytic infiltration, and lesion score at 46 days compared with 38 days (P≤0.05). Age had no effect on fibrosis and adipocyte intensity (P&gt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<fig id="f01">
					<label>Figure 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Histology of <italic>pectoralis major, pectoralis minor</italic>, and <italic>latissimus dorse</italic> muscles from broilers.</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="1806-9290-rbz-51-e20210151-gf01.tif"/>
					<attrib>A - Normal <italic>pectoralis major</italic> muscle; B - <italic>Pectoralis major</italic> muscle with fiber degeneration (→), fiber necrosis (▲), and inflamatory inflitrate (★); C - <italic>Pectoralis minor</italic> muscle with fiber degeneration (→), fiber necrosis (▲), and inflamatory inflitrate (★); D - <italic>Latissimus dorsi</italic> muscle with fiber degeneration (→) and fiber necrosis (▲).</attrib>
					<attrib>Hematoxylin and eosin.</attrib>
				</fig>
			</p>
			<p>For the <italic>latissimus dorsi</italic> muscle (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f01">Figure 1D</xref>), diet had no effect on any of the variables studied (P&gt;0.05). However, higher fibrosis, adipocytes and lymphohistiocytic infiltration were more frequent at 46 days than at 38 days (P≤0.05). Age had no effect on necrosis, hyaline degeneration, and lesion scores in this muscle (P&gt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>).</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="discussion">
			<title>4. Discussion</title>
			<p>Despite numerous studies aiming to reduce dietary protein in broiler feed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Si et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Leeson and Summers, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Attia et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Soares et al., 2020</xref>), studies considering protein reduction without altering the concentration of lipids, fiber, and starch in the diet cannot be found. These factors may influence nutrient utilization and, consequently, animal performance.</p>
			<p>The higher FCR observed for the 19P treatment may be associated with the lower inclusion of oil in the diet since the 19E treatment, which had the lowest FCR, had the same CP content but with higher oil inclusion. Inclusion of lipids in poultry diets improves FCR because lipids reduce gastric movement, slowing the passage of diet in the digestive tract (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baião and Lara, 2005</xref>). This, in turn, improves nutrient utilization and increases the feeling of satiety, and thus lipids are known as gastric emptying inhibitors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Khoddami et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
			<p>In the present study, the experimental feed represented by treatments 19E, 21E, and 19E+Aa, designed to isolate the lipid, fiber, and starch factors, which can affect nutrient utilization, did not affect BWG and FCR. When these factors are isolated, it is possible to perceive the beneficial effects of lipids on broiler performance because for treatments 19P and 21P, in which these factors were not isolated, the former, with lower lipid content, had worse FCR.</p>
			<p>In a study using different CP levels (16, 18, 20, or 22%) for male broilers, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Soares et al. (2020)</xref> observed higher BWG and lowest FCR for the two highest CP levels, which was explained by CP level and inclusion of oil in diets. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Attia et al. (2018)</xref> evaluated a 2% increase in CP contents, in addition to energy increase along with the increase of CP in the initial diets, and growth of broilers under heat stress. The authors found, along with the energy increase, higher BWG and lower FCR for the treatment with higher CP content (22%), whose formulation had about 2% greater inclusion of oil.</p>
			<p>According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cobb (2018)</xref>, the BWG of female broilers from 21 to 37 days is 1.332 kg and from 21 to 44 days, it is 1.932 kg, while FCR is 1.79 from 21 to 37 days and 1.92 from 21 to 44 days. However, the present study found higher BWG (1.390 kg from 21 to 37 days and 2.031 kg from 21 to 44 days) and lower FCR (1.67 from 21 to 37 days and 1.68 from 21 to 44 days). Thus, FCR did not worsen with increasing age as suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cobb (2018)</xref>, as the increase in FI was proportional to the increase in BWG observed at 37 and 44 days. This proportional increase may have been achieved by adequate conditions in the experimental environment, which was also reflected in the low mortality rate, leading to similar viability results at 37 and 44 days. The higher PF value of treatment 19E+Aa compared with treatment 19P occurred in response to the BWG and dietary FCR found for these treatments.</p>
			<p>The results found for performance in the present study are in agreement with nutrient digestibility and diet energy values. Reduced nutritional levels in a diet improves nutrient digestibility for broiler chickens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Viola et al., 2008</xref>); however, the lack of standardization of the nutritional matrix of corn gluten meal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Santos, 2004</xref>) and higher inclusion of soybean meal may have worsened DMDC for the 21E treatment, which was similar to that of 19E and lower than the others. The amount and quality of carbohydrates, proteins, and fats contained in different diets can alter the retention time of digestion and thus influence the efficiency of digestion and absorption of nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Soares et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
			<p>The greater inclusion of synthetic amino acids in the 19E+Aa treatment improved CPDC because these amino acids are absorbed faster and more efficiently than those contained in the intact dietary protein. In addition, the NE values, and also the lowest AME and AMEn values, observed in the 21P treatment confirm that the CP supply may be above the requirements. Excess CP is catabolized and excreted as uric acid, which has a high energy cost to the animal and may be associated with the loss of about 0.7 kcal of energy in the urine for each gram of dietary CP. Thus, the energy of productive processes is converted to nitrogen excretion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Noblet and Perez, 1993</xref>).</p>
			<p>A reduction in AME and AMEn values was not observed for the 21E treatment, as was observed for 21P. This is due to the higher inclusion of oil in the diet of the 21E treatment compared with the 21P treatment, evidencing the extra-caloric effect of oil in improving energy utilization by broilers. Similarly, higher oil inclusion improved EEDC in treatments 19E, 21E, and 19E+Aa compared with the others. Increased yield of carcass and parts is one of the main objectives of the poultry industry because this factor is responsible for higher profitability of the activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Nortey et al., 2019</xref>). The difference in protein deposition at different ages of broilers is mainly due to changes in metabolism, because the difference between anabolic and catabolic processes decreases with advancing age (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Radaelli et al., 2017</xref>). When the animal reaches its peak growth, the tendency is for fat deposition to increase and protein deposition to decrease.</p>
			<p>Linked to older slaughter age and higher carcass yields, the pursuit of rapid growth and yield of poultry has implications for animal physiology and, consequently, changes in meat quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bailey et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Petracci et al., 2019</xref>). Since pectoral muscle growth is achieved by muscle fiber hypertrophy, which results in increased fiber diameter, there is also reduced space for connective tissue and, as a consequence, increased muscle degeneration. These morphological changes limit blood supply, compromising nutrient supply and the removal of metabolites produced by muscle fibers, thereby altering meat quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Sandercock et al., 2009</xref>) and causing the onset of myopathies.</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Mudalal et al. (2015)</xref> found a strong association between the occurrence of wooden breast and higher weight and white striping of the <italic>pectoralis major</italic> muscle; however, the myopathies studied here (white striping and wooden breast) were not associated with the diets provided to broilers nor with slaughter age. Furthermore, it was not possible to notice any difference in the intensity of myopathic lesions due to slaughter age.</p>
			<p>Although the white striping myopathy has no defined etiology, it seems to be related to high growth rates, and so males have a higher incidence, which can be explained by the greater body weight of these animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kuttappan et al., 2012</xref>). Wooden breast in the <italic>pectoralis major</italic> of broiler chickens may be associated with white striping myopathy in the most severe cases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Sihvo et al., 2014</xref>), but its etiology and the factors that cause its appearance have not been identified, being predominantly described, as well as white striping in fast growing strains.</p>
			<p>Histological changes in muscle tissue can be seen in broilers affected by myopathies before macroscopic perception. Changes in muscle tissues can present pathological aspects and usually affect the <italic>pectoralis major, pectoralis minor</italic>, and <italic>latissimus dorsi</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Ecco and Braga, 2015</xref>). The pectoral muscles act synergistically for wing movement, with the <italic>pectoralis major</italic> as the main thruster muscle, being composed of fast-twitch myofibers with glycolytic activity, the fibers of which respond rapidly with increased white muscle mass when given high nutritional diets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Roy et al., 2006</xref>). However, although tissue lesions were observed, no association was observed between the experimental diets of the present study and histological characterization.</p>
			<p>The connective tissue of the pectoral muscle has thousands of cells with tissue connection, support, and filling functions. Despite its regenerative capacity, when damage to skeletal muscle leads to cell destruction, connective tissue proliferation occurs, and when the muscle area is replaced by fibrous tissue, complete regeneration is inhibited. After muscle fiber degeneration, revascularization of the injured area occurs and inflammatory cells are activated to remove necrotic tissue, which requires the formation of healing connective tissue to keep the ends of the myofibrils connected (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cruz et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Petracci et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
			<p>These principles may underlie the lower connective tissue intensity observed for the 19P treatment, which contained lower CP content and oil inclusion, and possibly led to slower muscle development, compared with the other treatments. The changes observed in the <italic>pectoralis minor</italic> and <italic>latissimus dorsi</italic> due to slaughter age were not associated with infectious conditions. However, histological changes were possibly a consequence of ischemia and the rapid growth of these muscles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Velleman et al., 2014</xref>).</p>
			<p>Whereas white striping and wooden breast myopathies may exhibit similar histological lesions, including myodegeneration and regeneration, fibrosis, and lipidosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Sihvo et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Soglia et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Radaelli et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Petracci et al., 2019</xref>), there is probably some common mechanism that allows both myopathies to involve the same muscle, which can also be observed in the present study. Moreover, in this study, the histological features found were consistent with macroscopic evaluation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Baldi et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>5. Conclusions</title>
			<p>Diet with 19% crude protein, using only commercially available ingredients, was not adequate because it worsens feed conversion. The diet with 21% crude protein, using only commercially available ingredients, reduces the availability of apparent metabolizable energy and apparent metabolizable energy corrected for nitrogen balance due to high nitrogen excretion, so it should be avoided. The experimental diet 19% crude protein plus synthetic amino acids (19E+Aa) improves the crude protein digestibility coefficient, exhibits low nitrogen excretion, and has feed conversion similar to diets with 21% crude protein (using only commercially available ingredients), 19% crude protein (using experimental ingredients), and 21% crude protein (using experimental ingredients), all with higher oil inclusion. However, the choice of the most appropriate diet should be based on the cost and availability of ingredients. In addition, slaughter of 46-day-old instead of 38-day-old female broiler chickens is recommended. Broilers slaughtered at 46 days have higher weight gain without worsening feed conversion and the intensity of myopathies.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p>The authors acknowledge the assistance of the Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa at the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) for providing funds for publication. We also wish to acknowledge the Frango Ferreira Company for their support in conducting the research in commercial slaughterhouse facilities and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for providing scholarship.</p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>AOAC International. 2006. Official methods of analysis. 18th ed. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>AOAC International</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<source>Official methods of analysis</source>
					<edition>18th</edition>
					<publisher-name>AOAC International</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Gaithersburg, MD</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>Attia, Y. A.; Al-Harthi, M. A. and Elnaggar, A. S. 2018. Productive, physiological and immunological responses of two broiler strains fed different dietary regimens and exposed to heat stress. Italian Journal of Animal Science 17:686-697. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1416961">https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1416961</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Attia</surname>
							<given-names>Y. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Al-Harthi</surname>
							<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Elnaggar</surname>
							<given-names>A. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Productive, physiological and immunological responses of two broiler strains fed different dietary regimens and exposed to heat stress</article-title>
					<source>Italian Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>17</volume>
					<fpage>686</fpage>
					<lpage>697</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1416961">https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1416961</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>Baião, N. C. and Lara, L. J. C. 2005. Oil and fat in broiler nutrition. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 7:129-141.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Baião</surname>
							<given-names>N. C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lara</surname>
							<given-names>L. J. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Oil and fat in broiler nutrition</article-title>
					<source>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>7</volume>
					<fpage>129</fpage>
					<lpage>141</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>Bailey, R. A.; Watson, K. A.; Bilgili, S. F. and Avendano, S. 2015. The genetic basis of pectoralis major myopathies in modern broiler chicken lines. Poultry Science 94:2870-2879. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev304">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev304</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bailey</surname>
							<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Watson</surname>
							<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bilgili</surname>
							<given-names>S. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Avendano</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>The genetic basis of pectoralis major myopathies in modern broiler chicken lines</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>94</volume>
					<fpage>2870</fpage>
					<lpage>2879</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev304">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev304</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Baldi, G.; Soglia, F.; Mazzoni, M.; Sirri, F.; Canonico, L.; Babini, E.; Lagui, L.; Cavani, C. and Petracci, M. 2018. Implications of white striping and spaghetti meat abnormalities on a meat quality and histological features in broilers. Animal 12:164-173. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001069">https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001069</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Baldi</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soglia</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mazzoni</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sirri</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Canonico</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Babini</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lagui</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cavani</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Petracci</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Implications of white striping and spaghetti meat abnormalities on a meat quality and histological features in broilers</article-title>
					<source>Animal</source>
					<volume>12</volume>
					<fpage>164</fpage>
					<lpage>173</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001069">https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001069</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Bancroft, J. D. and Stevens, A. 1996. Theory and practice of histological techniques. 4th ed. Churchill Livingstone, New York.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bancroft</surname>
							<given-names>J. D</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stevens</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1996</year>
					<source>Theory and practice of histological techniques</source>
					<edition>4th</edition>
					<publisher-name>Churchill Livingstone</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Cobb. 2018. Broiler performance &amp; nutrition supplement. Cobb - Vantress. L-2114-08 EN: April 2018.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="other">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>Cobb</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<source>Broiler performance &amp; nutrition supplement</source>
					<comment>Cobb - Vantress. L-2114-08 EN: April 2018</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Cruz, R. F. A.; Vieira, S. L.; Kindlein, L.; Kipper, M.; Cemin, H. S. and Rauber, S. M. 2017. Occurrence of white striping and wooden breast in broilers fed grower and finisher diets with increasing lysine levels. Poultry Science 96:501-510. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew310">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew310</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Cruz</surname>
							<given-names>R. F. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vieira</surname>
							<given-names>S. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kindlein</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kipper</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cemin</surname>
							<given-names>H. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rauber</surname>
							<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Occurrence of white striping and wooden breast in broilers fed grower and finisher diets with increasing lysine levels</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>96</volume>
					<fpage>501</fpage>
					<lpage>510</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew310">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew310</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Ecco, R. and Braga, J. F. V. 2015. Miopatia em frango de corte. Cadernos Técnicos de Veterinária e Zootecnia (76):117-125.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ecco</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Braga</surname>
							<given-names>J. F. V.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Miopatia em frango de corte</article-title>
					<source>Cadernos Técnicos de Veterinária e Zootecnia</source>
					<issue>76</issue>
					<fpage>117</fpage>
					<lpage>125</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Khoddami, A.; Chrystal, P. V.; Selle, P. H. and Liu, S. Y. 2018. Dietary starch to lipid ratios influence growth performance, nutrient utilisation and carcass traits in broiler chickens offered diets with different energy densities. PLoS One 13:e0205272. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205272">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205272</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Khoddami</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chrystal</surname>
							<given-names>P. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Selle</surname>
							<given-names>P. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Dietary starch to lipid ratios influence growth performance, nutrient utilisation and carcass traits in broiler chickens offered diets with different energy densities</article-title>
					<source>PLoS One</source>
					<volume>13</volume>
					<fpage>e0205272</fpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205272">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205272</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Kijowski, J.; Kupińska, E.; Kaczmarek, A.; Stangierski, J. and Popiół, A. 2009. Occurrence and characteristics of chicken breast muscles with DPM symptoms. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 65:466-471.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kijowski</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kupińska</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kaczmarek</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stangierski</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Popiół</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Occurrence and characteristics of chicken breast muscles with DPM symptoms</article-title>
					<source>Medycyna Weterynaryjna</source>
					<volume>65</volume>
					<fpage>466</fpage>
					<lpage>471</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Kuttappan, V. A.; Brewer, V. B.; Apple, J. K.; Waldroup, P. W. and Owens, C. M. 2012. Influence of growth rate on the occurrence of white striping in broiler breast fillets. Poultry Science 91:2677-2685. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02259">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02259</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kuttappan</surname>
							<given-names>V. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brewer</surname>
							<given-names>V. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Apple</surname>
							<given-names>J. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Waldroup</surname>
							<given-names>P. W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Owens</surname>
							<given-names>C. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Influence of growth rate on the occurrence of white striping in broiler breast fillets</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>91</volume>
					<fpage>2677</fpage>
					<lpage>2685</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02259">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2012-02259</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Leeson, S. and Summers, J. D. 2005. Commercial poultry nutrition. 3rd ed. University Books, Ontario.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Leeson</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Summers</surname>
							<given-names>J. D</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<source>Commercial poultry nutrition</source>
					<edition>3rd</edition>
					<publisher-name>University Books</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Ontario</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Marcato, S. M.; Sakomura, N. K.; Fernandes, J. B. K.; Siqueira, J. C. D.; Dourado, L. R. B. and Freitas, E. R. 2010. Crescimento e deposição de nutrientes nos órgãos de frangos de corte de duas linhagens comerciais. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 39:1082-1091. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000500019">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000500019</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Marcato</surname>
							<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sakomura</surname>
							<given-names>N. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fernandes</surname>
							<given-names>J. B. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Siqueira</surname>
							<given-names>J. C. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dourado</surname>
							<given-names>L. R. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Freitas</surname>
							<given-names>E. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Crescimento e deposição de nutrientes nos órgãos de frangos de corte de duas linhagens comerciais</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>39</volume>
					<fpage>1082</fpage>
					<lpage>1091</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000500019">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010000500019</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Matterson, L. D.; Potter, L. M.; Stutz, M. W. and Singsen, E. P. 1965. The metabolizable energy of feeds ingredients for chickens. The University of Connecticut, Agricultural Experiment Station, Storrs, Connecticut.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Matterson</surname>
							<given-names>L. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Potter</surname>
							<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stutz</surname>
							<given-names>M. W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Singsen</surname>
							<given-names>E. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1965</year>
					<source>The metabolizable energy of feeds ingredients for chickens</source>
					<publisher-name>The University of Connecticut, Agricultural Experiment Station</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Storrs, Connecticut</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Mudalal, S.; Lorenzi, M.; Soglia, F.; Cavani, C. and Petracci, M. 2015. Implications of white striping and wooden breast abnormalities on quality traits of raw and marinated chicken meat. Animal 9:728-734. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111400295X">https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111400295X</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Mudalal</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lorenzi</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soglia</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cavani</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Petracci</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Implications of white striping and wooden breast abnormalities on quality traits of raw and marinated chicken meat</article-title>
					<source>Animal</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<fpage>728</fpage>
					<lpage>734</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111400295X">https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111400295X</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Noblet, J. and Perez, J. M. 1993. Prediction of digestibility of nutrients and energy values of pig diets from chemical analysis. Journal of Animal Science 71:3389-3398. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71123389x">https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71123389x</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Noblet</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Perez</surname>
							<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1993</year>
					<article-title>Prediction of digestibility of nutrients and energy values of pig diets from chemical analysis</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>71</volume>
					<fpage>3389</fpage>
					<lpage>3398</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71123389x">https://doi.org/10.2527/1993.71123389x</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Nortey, T. N. N.; Quarshie, E. A.; Owusu-Bremang, R.; Agyei-Henneh, E.; Frempong, N. S. and Stark, C. R. 2019. Effect of added dietary lysine and methionine above recommended levels, on growth performance, breast meat yield and financial returns in broilers. Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science 54:24-37. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/gjas.v54i1.3">https://doi.org/10.4314/gjas.v54i1.3</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Nortey</surname>
							<given-names>T. N. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Quarshie</surname>
							<given-names>E. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Owusu-Bremang</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Agyei-Henneh</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Frempong</surname>
							<given-names>N. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stark</surname>
							<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Effect of added dietary lysine and methionine above recommended levels, on growth performance, breast meat yield and financial returns in broilers</article-title>
					<source>Ghana Journal of Agricultural Science</source>
					<volume>54</volume>
					<fpage>24</fpage>
					<lpage>37</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/gjas.v54i1.3">https://doi.org/10.4314/gjas.v54i1.3</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>Petracci, M.; Soglia, F.; Madruga, M.; Carvalho, L.; Ida, E. and Estévez, M. 2019. Wooden-breast, white striping, and spaghetti meat: causes, consequences and consumer perception of emerging broiler meat abnormalities. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 18:565-583. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12431">https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12431</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Petracci</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soglia</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Madruga</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Carvalho</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ida</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Estévez</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Wooden-breast, white striping, and spaghetti meat: causes, consequences and consumer perception of emerging broiler meat abnormalities</article-title>
					<source>Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety</source>
					<volume>18</volume>
					<fpage>565</fpage>
					<lpage>583</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12431">https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12431</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Radaelli, G.; Piccirillo, A.; Birolo, M.; Bertotto, D.; Gratta, F.; Ballarin, C.; Vascellari, M.; Xiccato, G. and Trocino, A. 2017. Effect of age on the occurrence of muscle fiber degeneration associated with myopathies in broiler chickens submitted to feed restriction. Poultry Science 96:309-319. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew270">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew270</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Radaelli</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Piccirillo</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Birolo</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bertotto</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gratta</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ballarin</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vascellari</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Xiccato</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Trocino</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Effect of age on the occurrence of muscle fiber degeneration associated with myopathies in broiler chickens submitted to feed restriction</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>96</volume>
					<fpage>309</fpage>
					<lpage>319</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew270">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew270</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>Ravindran, V.; Tancharoenrat, P.; Zaefarian, F. and Ravindran, G. 2016. Fats in poultry nutrition: Digestive physiology and factors influencing their utilisation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 213:1-21. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.01.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.01.012</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ravindran</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tancharoenrat</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zaefarian</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ravindran</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Fats in poultry nutrition: Digestive physiology and factors influencing their utilisation</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>213</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>21</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.01.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2016.01.012</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation>Roy, B. C.; Oshima, I.; Miyachi, H.; Shiba, N.; Nishimura, S.; Tabata, S. and Iwamoto, H. 2006. Effects of nutritional level on muscle development, histochemical properties of myofibre and collagen architecture in the pectoralis muscle of male broilers. British Poultry Science 47:433-442. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660600828334">https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660600828334</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Roy</surname>
							<given-names>B. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oshima</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Miyachi</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Shiba</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nishimura</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tabata</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Iwamoto</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Effects of nutritional level on muscle development, histochemical properties of myofibre and collagen architecture in the pectoralis muscle of male broilers</article-title>
					<source>British Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>47</volume>
					<fpage>433</fpage>
					<lpage>442</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660600828334">https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660600828334</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation>SAS - Statistical Analysis System. 2002. User’s guide. SAS Institute, Cary. 525p.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>SAS - Statistical Analysis System</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2002</year>
					<source>User’s guide</source>
					<publisher-name>SAS Institute</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Cary</publisher-loc>
					<size units="pages">525</size>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation>Sakomura, N. K. and Rostagno, H. S. 2016. Métodos de pesquisa em nutrição de monogástricos. 2.ed. FUNEP, Jaboticabal.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sakomura</surname>
							<given-names>N. K</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rostagno</surname>
							<given-names>H. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<source>Métodos de pesquisa em nutrição de monogástricos</source>
					<edition>2</edition>
					<publisher-name>FUNEP</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Jaboticabal</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation>Sandercock, D. A.; Barker, Z. E.; Mitchell, M. A. and Hocking, P. M. 2009. Changes in muscle cell cation regulation and meat quality traits are associated with genetic selection for high body weight and meat yield in broiler chickens. Genetics Selection Evolution 41:8. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-8">https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-8</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sandercock</surname>
							<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barker</surname>
							<given-names>Z. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mitchell</surname>
							<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hocking</surname>
							<given-names>P. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Changes in muscle cell cation regulation and meat quality traits are associated with genetic selection for high body weight and meat yield in broiler chickens</article-title>
					<source>Genetics Selection Evolution</source>
					<volume>41</volume>
					<size units="pages">8</size>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-8">https://doi.org/10.1186/1297-9686-41-8</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation>Santos, F. A. 2004. Glúten de milho na alimentação de aves e suínos. Revista Eletronica Nutritime 1:79-100.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Santos</surname>
							<given-names>F. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Glúten de milho na alimentação de aves e suínos</article-title>
					<source>Revista Eletronica Nutritime</source>
					<volume>1</volume>
					<fpage>79</fpage>
					<lpage>100</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation>Si, J.; Fritts, C. A.; Burnham, D. J. and Waldroup, P. W. 2004. Extent to which crude protein may be reduced in corn-soybean meal broiler diets through amino acid supplementation. International Journal Poultry Science 3:46-50. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.46.50">https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.46.50</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Si</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fritts</surname>
							<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Burnham</surname>
							<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Waldroup</surname>
							<given-names>P. W</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Extent to which crude protein may be reduced in corn-soybean meal broiler diets through amino acid supplementation</article-title>
					<source>International Journal Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>3</volume>
					<fpage>46</fpage>
					<lpage>50</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.46.50">https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2004.46.50</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation>Sihvo, H. K.; Immonen, K. and Puolanne, E. 2014. Myodegeneration with fibrosis and regeneration in the pectoralis major muscle of broilers. Veterinary Pathology 51:619-623. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985813497488">https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985813497488</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sihvo</surname>
							<given-names>H. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Immonen</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Puolanne</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Myodegeneration with fibrosis and regeneration in the pectoralis major muscle of broilers</article-title>
					<source>Veterinary Pathology</source>
					<volume>51</volume>
					<fpage>619</fpage>
					<lpage>623</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985813497488">https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985813497488</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation>Sihvo, H. K.; Lindén, J.; Airas, N.; Immonen, K.; Valaja, J. and Puolanne, E. 2017. Wooden breast myodegeneration of pectoralis major muscle over the growth period in broilers. Veterinary Pathology 54:119-128. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985816658099">https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985816658099</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sihvo</surname>
							<given-names>H. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lindén</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Airas</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Immonen</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Valaja</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Puolanne</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Wooden breast myodegeneration of pectoralis major muscle over the growth period in broilers</article-title>
					<source>Veterinary Pathology</source>
					<volume>54</volume>
					<fpage>119</fpage>
					<lpage>128</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985816658099">https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985816658099</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<mixed-citation>Soares, K. R.; Lara, L. J. C.; Martins, N. R. S.; Silva, R. R.; Pereira, L. F. P.; Cardeal, P. C. and Teixeira, M. P. F. 2020. Protein diets for growing broilers created under a thermoneutral environment or heat stress. Animal Feed Science and Technology 259:114332. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114332">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114332</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Soares</surname>
							<given-names>K. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lara</surname>
							<given-names>L. J. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Martins</surname>
							<given-names>N. R. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>R. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pereira</surname>
							<given-names>L. F. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cardeal</surname>
							<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Teixeira</surname>
							<given-names>M. P. F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Protein diets for growing broilers created under a thermoneutral environment or heat stress</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>259</volume>
					<fpage>114332</fpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114332">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114332</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation>Soglia, F.; Mudalal, S.; Babini, E.; Di Nunzio, M.; Mazzoni, M.; Sirri, F.; Cavani, C. and Petracci, M. 2016. Histology, composition, and quality traits of chicken Pectoralis major muscle affected by wooden breast abnormality. Poultry Science 95:651-659. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev353">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev353</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Soglia</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mudalal</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Babini</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Di Nunzio</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mazzoni</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sirri</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cavani</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Petracci</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Histology, composition, and quality traits of chicken Pectoralis major muscle affected by wooden breast abnormality</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>95</volume>
					<fpage>651</fpage>
					<lpage>659</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev353">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev353</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<mixed-citation>Velleman, S. G.; Coy, C. S. and Emmerson, D. A. 2014. Effect of the timing of posthatch feed restrictions on the deposition of fat during broiler breast muscle development. Poultry Science 93:2622-2627. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04206">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04206</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Velleman</surname>
							<given-names>S. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Coy</surname>
							<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Emmerson</surname>
							<given-names>D. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Effect of the timing of posthatch feed restrictions on the deposition of fat during broiler breast muscle development</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>93</volume>
					<fpage>2622</fpage>
					<lpage>2627</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04206">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2014-04206</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation>Viola, T. H.; Ribeiro, A. M. L.; Beretta Neto, C. and Kessler, A. M. 2008. Formulação com aminoácidos totais ou digestíveis em rações com níveis decrescentes de proteína bruta para frangos de corte de 21 a 42 dias de idade. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37:303-310. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008000200017">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008000200017</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Viola</surname>
							<given-names>T. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
							<given-names>A. M. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Beretta</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
							<suffix>Neto</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kessler</surname>
							<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Formulação com aminoácidos totais ou digestíveis em rações com níveis decrescentes de proteína bruta para frangos de corte de 21 a 42 dias de idade</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>37</volume>
					<fpage>303</fpage>
					<lpage>310</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008000200017">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982008000200017</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation>Zimermann, F. C.; Fallavena, L. C. B.; Salle, C. T. P.; Moraes, H. L. S.; Soncini, R. A.; Barreta, M. H. and Nascimento, V. P. 2012. Downgrading of heavy broiler chicken carcasses due to myodegeneration of the anterior latissimus dorsi: pathologic and epidemiologic studies. Avian Diseases 56:418-421. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1637/9860-072111-Case.1">https://doi.org/10.1637/9860-072111-Case.1</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Zimermann</surname>
							<given-names>F. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fallavena</surname>
							<given-names>L. C. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Salle</surname>
							<given-names>C. T. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Moraes</surname>
							<given-names>H. L. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soncini</surname>
							<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barreta</surname>
							<given-names>M. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nascimento</surname>
							<given-names>V. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Downgrading of heavy broiler chicken carcasses due to myodegeneration of the anterior latissimus dorsi: pathologic and epidemiologic studies</article-title>
					<source>Avian Diseases</source>
					<volume>56</volume>
					<fpage>418</fpage>
					<lpage>421</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1637/9860-072111-Case.1">https://doi.org/10.1637/9860-072111-Case.1</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>