<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rbz</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">R. Bras. Zootec.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">1516-3598</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">1806-9290</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="other">00605</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37496/rbz5020200161</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Non-ruminants</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Performance and egg quality of Japanese quail fed diets containing microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp.</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-8062-0645</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Santana</surname>
						<given-names>Lidiane da Costa</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-2948-7540</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Mendonça</surname>
						<given-names>Michele de Oliveira</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-8512-5093</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Silva</surname>
						<given-names>Vanessa Riani Olmi</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-7787-4967</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Castro</surname>
						<given-names>Mailson das Dores Adriano</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-1295-6387</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Costa</surname>
						<given-names>Patrícia Kelly Felix</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-9556-724X</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Moura</surname>
						<given-names>Guilherme de Souza</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-5700-6249</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Bertechini</surname>
						<given-names>Antônio Gilberto</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sudeste de Minas Gerais</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Rio Pomba</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">MG</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original">Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Sudeste de Minas Gerais, Rio Pomba, MG, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Unaí</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">MG</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Unaí, MG, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff3">
				<label>3</label>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal de Lavras</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Departamento de Zootecnia</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Lavras</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">MG</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade Federal de Lavras, Departamento de Zootecnia, Lavras, MG, Brasil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c01"><bold>* Corresponding author:</bold><email>michele.mendonca@ifsudestemg.edu.br</email>
				</corresp>
				<fn fn-type="conflict">
					<p>Conflict of Interest</p>
					<p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>
				</fn>
				<fn fn-type="con">
					<p>Author Contributions</p>
					<p>Conceptualization: M.O. Mendonça. Data curation: L.C. Santana, M.O. Mendonça, V.R.O. Silva, M.D.A. Castro and P.K.F. Costa. Formal analysis: L.C. Santana, M.O. Mendonça, V.R.O. Silva and G.S. Moura. Funding acquisition: M.O. Mendonça and G.S. Moura. Investigation: L.C. Santana, M.O. Mendonça, M.D.A. Castro, P.K.F. Costa and G.S. Moura. Methodology: M.O. Mendonça, V.R.O. Silva, G.S. Moura and A.G. Bertechini. Project administration: L.C. Santana, M.O. Mendonça and G.S. Moura. Resources: L.C. Santana. Supervision: M.O. Mendonça, V.R.O. Silva and G.S. Moura. Validation: L.C. Santana and V.R.O. Silva. Visualization: L.C. Santana, M.O. Mendonça and V.R.O. Silva. Writing-original draft: L.C. Santana, M.O. Mendonça, V.R.O. Silva, M.D.A. Castro, P.K.F. Costa, G.S. Moura and A.G. Bertechini. Writing-review &amp; editing: L.C. Santana, M.O. Mendonça, G.S. Moura and A.G. Bertechini.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>09</day>
				<month>06</month>
				<year>2021</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<year>2021</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>50</volume>
			<elocation-id>e20200161</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>13</day>
					<month>07</month>
					<year>2020</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>5</day>
					<month>03</month>
					<year>2021</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p> This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. </license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p>A trial was carried out to evaluate the effects of different levels of microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. on performance, yolk lipid profile, and egg quality of Japanese quail. A flock of 210 quail was distributed in a completely randomized design, with five treatments (0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 g of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp./kg of feed) and six replications with seven birds per cage. Performance and egg quality were not affected, except for a quadratic effect on yolk color, which reached the maximum value with the inclusion of 40 g of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp./kg. There was linear reduction in the content of saturated fatty acids and a linear increase of polyunsaturated:saturated and polyunsaturated:monounsaturated ratios and n-6. The content of n-3 showed a minimum value with the inclusion of 6.5 g of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp./kg, and the n-6:n-3 ratio was maximized with the addition of 10.5 g of microalgae/kg. As for the sensory attributes color, aroma, and overall impression, there was linear increase with the addition of increasing levels of microalgae. The inclusion of up to 40 g of microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp./kg in the diet of Japanese quail did not present changes in the performance nor in the egg quality but accentuated the yolk color, promoted the fortification of n-3 in the eggs, and still provided excellent sensorial acceptance. The egg fortification can add value to the product, increasing the producer remuneration and improving the nutritional quality of the diet for humans.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<kwd>animal nutrition</kwd>
				<kwd>fatty acids</kwd>
				<kwd>fat deposition</kwd>
				<kwd>feed quality</kwd>
				<kwd>omega 3</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="0"/>
				<table-count count="6"/>
				<equation-count count="1"/>
				<ref-count count="17"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>1. Introduction</title>
			<p>In recent years, the poultry and egg industries have explored nutritional strategies in the formulation of poultry diets, by modifying the composition of the yolk lipids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Brelaz et al., 2019</xref>). Therefore, the eggs can be considered a reference model for transferring nutrients from the diet, once the yolk fatty acid type is related to the consumed in the feed.</p>
			<p>In countries that need to improve sustainable rural development, the search for alternative, environmentally adequate, and efficient food resources is highly relevant. Hence, the inclusion of algae in animal feed forms a foundation, due to its specificities and its importance in sustainable rural development, as it is a renewable source.</p>
			<p>The use of algae in animal nutrition has become a potential possibility, because they directly produce polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) such as those present in the n-6 and n-3 series, important lipids present in fish oil and meal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Shields and Lupatsch, 2012</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Kralik et al. (2020)</xref> demonstrated that the nutrient content of eggs can be altered by a simple technological process, adding certain ingredients into the laying poultry feed. The fatty acid profile in diets influences the fatty acid profile in egg yolks.</p>
			<p>According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Fernandes et al. (2020)</xref>, although microalgae have desirable levels of bioactive compounds that can be used in the nutrition of laying hens, the patterns of deposition and egg enrichment may not be proportional to the inclusion level or period of dietary supplementation. So, it is necessary to develop research that can fill these gaps.</p>
			<p>Thus, the hypothesis of this study is that the efficiency of egg enrichment with n-3 PUFA will be higher when using greater amount of microalgae in the quail diet, without harming animal performance or sensory attributes.</p>
			<p>Quail egg production is a segment that is booming. When considering the development of this activity, the increase in the number of quail housed and in annual egg consumption per capita stand out.</p>
			<p>Since most of the studies related to egg fortification with PUFA n-3 were conducted with hens, together with the lack of published results for quail, the need of further research for this species is evident. In this sense, the objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of different levels of microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. on performance, yolk lipid profile, and egg quality of Japanese quail.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>2. Material and Methods</title>
			<p>The research was conducted in Rio Pomba, Minas Gerais, Brazil (21°16'45&quot; S, 43°10'30&quot; W, 434 m) during 42 days divided into three periods of 14 days, after being approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Use (case number 09/2016).</p>
			<p>The nutritional composition of the microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. was analyzed by the company that supplied the product (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). The diets were formulated based on corn and soybean meal (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>), isonutritive, with the requirements and nutritional composition based on the recommendations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Rostagno et al. (2017)</xref>. The nutritional profile of the microalgae was considered in the balance of the experimental diets.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t1">
					<label>Table 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Nutritional composition of the microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp., as dry matter1</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" style="font-weight:normal">Nutritional composition</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">g/kg</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Dry matter</td>
								<td align="center">963.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Crude protein</td>
								<td align="center">192.2</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Ether extract</td>
								<td align="center">500.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Crude fiber</td>
								<td align="center">9.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Ash</td>
								<td align="center">36.7</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Total phosphorus</td>
								<td align="center">4.7</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Total calcium</td>
								<td align="center">3.4</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td colspan="2">
									<hr/>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Fatty acid</td>
								<td align="center">g/kg</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td colspan="2">
									<hr/>
								</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Saturated</td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Myristic (C14:0)</td>
								<td align="center">38.6</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Palmitic (C16:0)</td>
								<td align="center">546.9</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Margaric (C17:0)</td>
								<td align="center">6.3</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Stearic (C18:0)</td>
								<td align="center">18.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Arachidic (C20:0)</td>
								<td align="center">2.8</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Monounsaturated</td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Myristoleic (C14:1n9)</td>
								<td align="center">16.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Polyunsaturated</td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Eicosapentaenoic (EPA; C20:5 n3)</td>
								<td align="center">2.8</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Erucic (C22:1 n9)</td>
								<td align="center">5.3</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Docosadienoic (C22:2 n6)</td>
								<td align="center">4.3</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Docosahexaenoic (DHA; C22:6 n3)</td>
								<td align="center">272.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Other fatty acids<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Not identified</td>
								<td align="center">7.1</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>EPA + DHA</td>
								<td align="center">274.8</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN1">
							<p>1 All-G-Rich (Alltech Inc.<sup>®</sup>).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN2">
							<p>2 These fatty acids were detected in concentrations below 0.005%: caproic (C6:0), heptanoic (C7:0), caprylic (C8:0), nonanoic (C9:0), capric (C10:0), undecanoic (C11:0), lauric (C12:0), tridecanoic (C13:0), pentadecanoic (C15:0), palmitoleic (C16:0), margaroleic (C17:1), vaccenic (C18:1 n7), oleic (C18:1 n9), elaidic (C18:1 n9t) , linoleic (C18:2 n6), linolelaidic (C18:2 n6t), α-linoleic (C18:3 n3), γ-linoleic (C18:3 n6), nonadecanoic (C19:0), eicosenoic (C20:1 n9), eicosadienoic (C20:2 n6), eicosatrienoic (C20:3 n6), homo-γ-linoleic (C20:3 n6), arachidonic (C20:4 n6), heneicosanoic (C21:0), behenic (C22:0), docosapentaenoic (C22:5 n3), tricosanoic (C23:0), lignoceric (C24:0), and nervonic (C24:1 n9).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t2">
					<label>Table 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Calculated nutritional composition of the experimental diets (as-fed basis)</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Item</th>
								<th colspan="5" style="font-weight:normal">Levels of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. meal (g/kg)</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">0</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">10</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">20</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">30</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">40</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Ingredient (g/kg)</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Corn grain</td>
								<td align="center">435.29</td>
								<td align="center">431.66</td>
								<td align="center">427.92</td>
								<td align="center">424.18</td>
								<td align="center">420.45</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Soybean meal (45%)</td>
								<td align="center">324.45</td>
								<td align="center">319.58</td>
								<td align="center">314.64</td>
								<td align="center">309.69</td>
								<td align="center">305.75</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Wheat bran</td>
								<td align="center">92.37</td>
								<td align="center">95.74</td>
								<td align="center">99.26</td>
								<td align="center">102.77</td>
								<td align="center">106.29</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Limestone</td>
								<td align="center">60.00</td>
								<td align="center">60.00</td>
								<td align="center">60.00</td>
								<td align="center">60.00</td>
								<td align="center">60.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Dicalcium phosphate</td>
								<td align="center">40.00</td>
								<td align="center">40.00</td>
								<td align="center">40.00</td>
								<td align="center">40.00</td>
								<td align="center">40.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Soya oil</td>
								<td align="center">40.00</td>
								<td align="center">35.05</td>
								<td align="center">30.12</td>
								<td align="center">25.19</td>
								<td align="center">20.26</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic><sup>1</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">10.00</td>
								<td align="center">20.00</td>
								<td align="center">30.00</td>
								<td align="center">40.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Salt</td>
								<td align="center">3.40</td>
								<td align="center">3.40</td>
								<td align="center">3.40</td>
								<td align="center">3.40</td>
								<td align="center">3.40</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Choline chloride</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>L-lysine</td>
								<td align="center">1.90</td>
								<td align="center">1.95</td>
								<td align="center">2.00</td>
								<td align="center">2.06</td>
								<td align="center">2.11</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>L-threonine</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.17</td>
								<td align="center">0.06</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
								<td align="center">0.14</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Vitamin-mineral supplement<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">1.50</td>
								<td align="center">1.50</td>
								<td align="center">1.50</td>
								<td align="center">1.50</td>
								<td align="center">1.50</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Antioxidant (BHT)</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Total</td>
								<td align="center">1000</td>
								<td align="center">1000</td>
								<td align="center">1000</td>
								<td align="center">1000</td>
								<td align="center">1000</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Calculated composition (g/kg)</td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
								<td> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg)</td>
								<td align="center">2900</td>
								<td align="center">2900</td>
								<td align="center">2900</td>
								<td align="center">2900</td>
								<td align="center">2900</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Crude protein</td>
								<td align="center">200</td>
								<td align="center">200</td>
								<td align="center">200</td>
								<td align="center">200</td>
								<td align="center">200</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Ether extract</td>
								<td align="center">63.62</td>
								<td align="center">63.60</td>
								<td align="center">63.60</td>
								<td align="center">63.60</td>
								<td align="center">63.60</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Digestible met+cyst</td>
								<td align="center">5.48</td>
								<td align="center">5.43</td>
								<td align="center">6.19</td>
								<td align="center">5.32</td>
								<td align="center">5.27</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Digestible lysine</td>
								<td align="center">11.12</td>
								<td align="center">11.05</td>
								<td align="center">10.97</td>
								<td align="center">10.90</td>
								<td align="center">10.82</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Total threonine</td>
								<td align="center">7.68</td>
								<td align="center">7.66</td>
								<td align="center">7.66</td>
								<td align="center">7.66</td>
								<td align="center">7.66</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Total tryptophan</td>
								<td align="center">2.53</td>
								<td align="center">2.52</td>
								<td align="center">2.51</td>
								<td align="center">2.50</td>
								<td align="center">2.50</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Total calcium</td>
								<td align="center">33.46</td>
								<td align="center">33.49</td>
								<td align="center">33.51</td>
								<td align="center">33.54</td>
								<td align="center">33.56</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Available phosphorus</td>
								<td align="center">8.78</td>
								<td align="center">8.76</td>
								<td align="center">8.76</td>
								<td align="center">8.76</td>
								<td align="center">8.76</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Sodium</td>
								<td align="center">1.56</td>
								<td align="center">1.57</td>
								<td align="center">1.58</td>
								<td align="center">1.59</td>
								<td align="center">1.59</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN3">
							<p>BHT - butyl-hydroxy-toluene.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN4">
							<p>1 All-G Rich – Alltech Inc.<sup>®</sup></p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN5">
							<p>2 Vitamin supplement - guaranteed levels per kilogram of product: vitamin A, 8,000 IU; vitamin E, 15,000 mg; vitamin D3, 2300 IU; vitamin K3, 1000 mg; vitamin B1, 200 mg; vitamin B2, 3000 mg; vitamin B6, 1700 mg; vitamin B12, 10,000 mcg; niacin, 20,000 mg; folic acid, 500 mg; biotin, 15.00 mg. Mineral supplement - guaranteed levels per kilogram of product: manganese, 120,000 mg; zinc, 120,000 mg; iron, 60,000 mg; copper, 18,000 mg; iodine, 2000 mg; calcium, 9600 mg.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Birds were housed in galvanized wire cages (25 L × 16.5 H × 50 W, cm), with an animal density of 178 cm<sup>2</sup>/quail, equipped with gutter-type feeders and nipple drinkers, and had free access to feed and water.</p>
			<p>The daily practice consisted of collecting and counting eggs, providing ration three times a day, cleaning egg trimmers, reading temperatures (maximum and minimum) and relative humidity (RH), and providing 16 h of light daily, during the entire trial period.</p>
			<p>The evaluated productive parameters were feed intake (g/d), feed conversion (kg/kg eggs and kg/dozen eggs), egg mass (g/bird/d), egg production (%), marketable egg production (%; whole eggs/total eggs produced/number of live quail × 100), and bird viability (%). The number and weights of eggs were recorded daily during the study period, and egg mass was calculated by multiplying the number of laid eggs by their weight.</p>
			<p>Normal eggs were randomly selected from the eggs laid during the final three days of each period of 14 days (five groups × six replicates per group × four eggs per replicate) to assess the following qualitative traits: weight (g), specific gravity (g/cm<sup>3</sup>), yolk and albumen weight (g) and percentage (%), eggshell weight (g) and percentage (%), and yolk color. The specific gravity of eggs was determined by immersing them in saline solutions of different densities (1.05-1.09 g/cm<sup>3</sup>). Albumen weight (g) was calculated as the difference between the weight of the entire egg and the combined weight of the yolk and eggshell (g). Percentages of yolk, albumen, and eggshell were determined by the following formula: yolk (%) = [yolk weight (g)/egg weight (g)] × 100. Albumen and eggshell weights were substituted in the formula, as necessary. The evaluation of yolk color was performed subjectively with the use of the DSM<sup>®</sup> colorimetric fan (score from 1 to 15, which varies from light yellow to orange).</p>
			<p>Egg fatty acid profile was determined at the end of the experimental period, on the forty-third day. The determination of fatty acid profile in the yolks (twenty-four yolks per group) was carried out by gas chromatography, using the direct methylation method, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Wang et al. (2000)</xref>.</p>
			<p>To perform the sensory test, the project was previously submitted to the Human Research Ethics Committee and was approved with CAAE registration no. 62071716.7.0000.5588. Fifty-three evaluators of both sexes, over 18 years of age, untrained, and voluntarily recruited, participated in the test. They were aware of the voluntary participation through a Free and Informed Consent Term, which contained data on the research, risks, and benefits of participation.</p>
			<p>On the day of the sensory analysis, quail eggs were boiled and served cut longitudinally, containing albumen and yolk, as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Moraes (1985)</xref>. The tasters were accommodated in individual, clean cabins, free from noise and odors with good ventilation and lighting, as recommended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">ABNT (2014)</xref>.</p>
			<p>The acceptability test was applied, and the affective quantitative method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Meilgaard et al., 1999</xref>) was used, to evaluate the attributes, color, aroma, flavor, and global acceptance of eggs, through a nine-point mixed structured hedonic scale (starting from 1 - “I really disliked it” to 9 - “I liked it a lot”), and intention to buy the product with a scale ranging from 1 - “decidedly not buying” to 5 - “decidedly buying”.</p>
			<p>The statistical model used was:</p>
			<disp-formula id="e1">
				<mml:math>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
						</mml:mrow>
					</mml:msub>
					<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
					<mml:mi>μ</mml:mi>
					<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>α</mml:mi>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
						</mml:mrow>
					</mml:msub>
					<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
					<mml:msub>
						<mml:mi>ε</mml:mi>
						<mml:mrow>
							<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
							<mml:msup>
								<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mi>′</mml:mi>
								</mml:mrow>
							</mml:msup>
						</mml:mrow>
					</mml:msub>
				</mml:math>
			</disp-formula>
			<p>in which <italic>y</italic><sub><italic>ij</italic></sub> is the response variable measured in the <italic>j</italic>-th replicate that received the <italic>i-</italic>th treatment, <italic>μ</italic> is the general constant, <italic>α</italic><sub><italic>i</italic></sub> is the fixed effect of the <italic>i</italic>-th treatment, and <italic>ε</italic><sub><italic>ij</italic></sub> is the random error term.</p>
			<p>A total of 210 Japanese laying quail (<italic>Coturnix coturnix japonica</italic>, 22th week, and initial body weight of 174.3±12.6 g) were distributed after the uniformity of lots, in a completely randomized design, composed of five treatments (0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 g of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> microalgae sp./kg of feed), six replicates, and seven birds per experimental unit.</p>
			<p>Data obtained for each evaluated parameter was subjected to analysis of variance, and for significant parameters at the 0.05 level of probability, mean comparison was done by Tukey test, and a polynomial regression was performed using the JMP software version 8.01 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Linear and quadratic effects are reported where applicable to determine the relationship between the level of microalgae and the analyzed variable.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>3. Results</title>
			<p>Quail breeding was not carried out in an environmentally controlled installation. The average of minimum and maximum temperatures observed inside the installation during the trial were 14.6±1.3 and 27.3±3.3 °C, respectively, and the average relative humidity was 69.5±13.7%, being within the standards of thermal comfort for laying quails.</p>
			<p>The inclusion of the microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. did not influence (P&gt;0.05) performance of quail (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). Therefore, the inclusion of up to 40 g of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp./kg did not damage their performance.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t3">
					<label>Table 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Mean values of performance of Japanese quail fed diets supplemented with different levels of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp.</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Variable</th>
								<th colspan="5" style="font-weight:normal">Microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. (g/kg)</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">0</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">10</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">20</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">30</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">40</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>FI (g/bird/d)</td>
								<td align="center">26.07</td>
								<td align="center">25.57</td>
								<td align="center">25.97</td>
								<td align="center">25.97</td>
								<td align="center">26.46</td>
								<td align="center">0.54</td>
								<td align="center">0.35</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>EP (%/bird/d)</td>
								<td align="center">87.64</td>
								<td align="center">86.28</td>
								<td align="center">86.69</td>
								<td align="center">82.65</td>
								<td align="center">86.17</td>
								<td align="center">0.86</td>
								<td align="center">3.32</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>MEP (%/bird/d)</td>
								<td align="center">87.19</td>
								<td align="center">85.54</td>
								<td align="center">86.18</td>
								<td align="center">81.63</td>
								<td align="center">85.94</td>
								<td align="center">0.80</td>
								<td align="center">3.32</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>EW (g)</td>
								<td align="center">10.25</td>
								<td align="center">10.08</td>
								<td align="center">9.94</td>
								<td align="center">9.96</td>
								<td align="center">10.26</td>
								<td align="center">0.12</td>
								<td align="center">0.11</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>EM (g/bird/d)</td>
								<td align="center">9.00</td>
								<td align="center">8.69</td>
								<td align="center">8.62</td>
								<td align="center">8.19</td>
								<td align="center">8.85</td>
								<td align="center">0.56</td>
								<td align="center">0.35</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>CM (kg/kg)</td>
								<td align="center">2.91</td>
								<td align="center">2.97</td>
								<td align="center">3.04</td>
								<td align="center">3.19</td>
								<td align="center">3.03</td>
								<td align="center">0.54</td>
								<td align="center">0.12</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>CDZ (kg/dozen)</td>
								<td align="center">0.36</td>
								<td align="center">0.36</td>
								<td align="center">0.36</td>
								<td align="center">0.39</td>
								<td align="center">0.37</td>
								<td align="center">0.59</td>
								<td align="center">0.01</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>VI (%)</td>
								<td align="center">100.00</td>
								<td align="center">100.00</td>
								<td align="center">99.20</td>
								<td align="center">100.00</td>
								<td align="center">100.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.43</td>
								<td align="center">0.35</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN6">
							<p>FI - feed intake; EP - egg production; MEP - marketable egg production; EW - egg weight; EM - egg mass; CM - conversion per mass; CDZ - conversion per dozen eggs; VI - viability of quail; SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>The addition of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. in Japanese quail diet did not affect (P&gt;0.05) egg quality variables, except for yolk color, in which a quadratic effect was observed (P&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). This variable reached its maximum value with the inclusion of 40 g of microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp./kg in feed, showing that the PUFA of the microalgae directly influenced yolk pigmentation.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t4">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Mean values for measurements of eggs from Japanese quail fed diets supplemented with different levels of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp.</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Variable</th>
								<th colspan="5" style="font-weight:normal">Microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. (g/kg)</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">0</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">10</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">20</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">30</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">40</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Yolk color<sup>1</sup></td>
								<td align="center">4.97d</td>
								<td align="center">5.83c</td>
								<td align="center">6.34b</td>
								<td align="center">6.82a</td>
								<td align="center">6.83a</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Specific gravity (g/cm<sup>3</sup>)</td>
								<td align="center">1.074</td>
								<td align="center">1.074</td>
								<td align="center">1.074</td>
								<td align="center">1.073</td>
								<td align="center">1.072</td>
								<td align="center">0.29</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Shell weight (g)</td>
								<td align="center">0.82</td>
								<td align="center">0.81</td>
								<td align="center">0.79</td>
								<td align="center">0.78</td>
								<td align="center">0.81</td>
								<td align="center">0.34</td>
								<td align="center">0.11</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Shell (%)</td>
								<td align="center">8.01</td>
								<td align="center">7.99</td>
								<td align="center">8.00</td>
								<td align="center">7.91</td>
								<td align="center">7.88</td>
								<td align="center">0.80</td>
								<td align="center">0.09</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Albumen weight (g)</td>
								<td align="center">6.33</td>
								<td align="center">6.22</td>
								<td align="center">6.20</td>
								<td align="center">6.16</td>
								<td align="center">6.34</td>
								<td align="center">0.19</td>
								<td align="center">0.06</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Albumen (%)</td>
								<td align="center">61.78</td>
								<td align="center">61.67</td>
								<td align="center">62.37</td>
								<td align="center">61.88</td>
								<td align="center">61.78</td>
								<td align="center">0.48</td>
								<td align="center">0.28</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Yolk weight (g)</td>
								<td align="center">3.10</td>
								<td align="center">3.06</td>
								<td align="center">2.95</td>
								<td align="center">3.01</td>
								<td align="center">3.11</td>
								<td align="center">0.16</td>
								<td align="center">0.05</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Yolk (%)</td>
								<td align="center">30.21</td>
								<td align="center">30.34</td>
								<td align="center">29.63</td>
								<td align="center">30.21</td>
								<td align="center">30.34</td>
								<td align="center">0.33</td>
								<td align="center">0.27</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN7">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN8">
							<p>1 Yolk color = 4.9743 + 0.096x − 0.0012x<sup>2</sup>; R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99 (P = 0.000).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN9">
							<p>Means within the same row with different letters differ significantly by Tukey’s test (P&lt;0.05).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>The inclusion of increasing levels of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. in the diet of Japanese quail promoted the effect (P&lt;0.05) of lipid profile of yolk on saturated fatty acids (SFA), PUFA, PUFA:monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) ratio, total omega 6 (n-6), total omega 3 (n-3), and the omega 6:omega 3 ratio (n-6:n-3) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t5">
					<label>Table 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Mean values of content of saturated fatty acids (SFA; %), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA; %), polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA; %), MUFA:SFA ratio, PUFA:SFA ratio, PUFA:MUFA ratio, total omega 6 (n-6; %), total omega 3 (n-3; %), and n-6:n-3 ratio in egg yolk of Japanese quail fed diets supplemented with different levels of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp.</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Total fatty acids and their relationships</th>
								<th colspan="5" style="font-weight:normal">Microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. (g/kg)</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">0</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">10</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">20</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">30</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">40</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>SFA*</td>
								<td align="center">47.900a</td>
								<td align="center">45.737ab</td>
								<td align="center">45.467ab</td>
								<td align="center">42.833ab</td>
								<td align="center">41.100b</td>
								<td align="center">0.04</td>
								<td align="center">1.38</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>MUFA</td>
								<td align="center">36.900</td>
								<td align="center">37.717</td>
								<td align="center">37.433</td>
								<td align="center">38.100</td>
								<td align="center">37.900</td>
								<td align="center">0.96</td>
								<td align="center">1.23</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>PUFA*</td>
								<td align="center">15.600c</td>
								<td align="center">16.450c</td>
								<td align="center">17.233bc</td>
								<td align="center">19.167ab</td>
								<td align="center">20.833a</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.47</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>MUFA:SFA</td>
								<td align="center">0.773</td>
								<td align="center">0.830</td>
								<td align="center">0.830</td>
								<td align="center">0.891</td>
								<td align="center">0.923</td>
								<td align="center">0.31</td>
								<td align="center">0.05</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>PUFA:SFA*</td>
								<td align="center">0.326c</td>
								<td align="center">0.361c</td>
								<td align="center">0.380bc</td>
								<td align="center">0.447ab</td>
								<td align="center">0.508a</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.02</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>PUFA:MUFA*</td>
								<td align="center">0.423b</td>
								<td align="center">0.437b</td>
								<td align="center">0.463ab</td>
								<td align="center">0.503ab</td>
								<td align="center">0.550a</td>
								<td align="center">0.01</td>
								<td align="center">0.02</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>n-6*</td>
								<td align="center">13.867c</td>
								<td align="center">14.687c</td>
								<td align="center">15.233bc</td>
								<td align="center">16.800ab</td>
								<td align="center">17.768a</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.43</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>n-3**</td>
								<td align="center">1.733b</td>
								<td align="center">1.720b</td>
								<td align="center">2.000b</td>
								<td align="center">2.167b</td>
								<td align="center">2.933a</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>n-6:n-3**</td>
								<td align="center">8.030a</td>
								<td align="center">8.591a</td>
								<td align="center">7.632ab</td>
								<td align="center">7.780ab</td>
								<td align="center">6.084b</td>
								<td align="center">0.01</td>
								<td align="center">0.39</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN10">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN11">
							<p>N = 24 yolks per treatment.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN12">
							<p>Means within the same row with different letters differ significantly by Tukey’s test (P&lt;0.05).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN13">
							<p>* Linear effect (P&lt;0.05).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN14">
							<p>** Quadratic effect (P&lt;0.05).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN15">
							<p>* SFA = 47.9080 − 0.1650x, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.96 (P = 0.004); PUFA = 15.2200 + 0.1318x, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.96 (P = 0.000); PUFA:SFA = 0.3146 + 0.0045x, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.96 (P = 0.000); PUFA:MUFA = 0.4116 + 0.0032x, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.96 (P = 0.000); n-6 = 13.6880 + 0.0991x, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.97 (P = 0.000).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN16">
							<p>** n-3 = 1.7480 − 0.0129x + 0.0010x<sup>2</sup>, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.97 (P = 0.003); n-6:n-3 = 8.0777 + 0.0503x − 0.0024x<sup>2</sup>, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.87 (P = 0.040).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>For saturated fatty acids, a linear reduction (P&lt;0.05) in their levels was observed with the microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. in quail diets. Although there was a linear increase (P&lt;0.05) in PUFA:SFA and PUFA:MUFA ratios. This also occurred for the n-6 content, a linear increase, and for the total n-3 in the egg yolk, the curve was quadratic. When the quadratic equation was derived, the minimum value of n-3 was reached with 6.5 g <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp./kg; after that, higher levels of microalgae supplementation promoted greater incorporation of n-3 in eggs (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
			<p>There was a quadratic effect for the n-6:n-3 ratio in eggs with the inclusion of microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. in the feed. The addition of the microalgae provided n6:n3 ratio values suitable for human diets, presenting a maximum value with the derivation of the quadratic curve at the inclusion level of 10.5 g of microalgae/kg of feed (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
			<p>Regarding the sensory quality of quail eggs fed diets supplemented with microalgae, no negative results were demonstrated, and in general, the eggs produced by birds that received 40 g of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp./kg of feed were better evaluated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>). The addition of microalgae to quail diet promoted a linear increase in the attributes of color, aroma, and overall impression.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t6">
					<label>Table 6</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Mean values for sensory attributes of eggs from Japanese quail fed diets supplemented with different levels of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp.</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Sensory attribute</th>
								<th colspan="5" style="font-weight:normal">Microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. (g/kg)</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">P-value</th>
								<th rowspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">0</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">10</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">20</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">30</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">40</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Color*</td>
								<td align="center">7.53b</td>
								<td align="center">7.92ab</td>
								<td align="center">7.87ab</td>
								<td align="center">7.98a</td>
								<td align="center">8.06a</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.11</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Flavor</td>
								<td align="center">7.09</td>
								<td align="center">7.62</td>
								<td align="center">7.40</td>
								<td align="center">7.53</td>
								<td align="center">7.58</td>
								<td align="center">0.08</td>
								<td align="center">0.15</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Aroma*</td>
								<td align="center">7.23b</td>
								<td align="center">7.72ab</td>
								<td align="center">7.51ab</td>
								<td align="center">7.64ab</td>
								<td align="center">7.94a</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.13</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Global impression*</td>
								<td align="center">7.21b</td>
								<td align="center">7.74a</td>
								<td align="center">7.58ab</td>
								<td align="center">7.60ab</td>
								<td align="center">7.72a</td>
								<td align="center">0.03</td>
								<td align="center">0.13</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Purchase intention</td>
								<td align="center">3.72</td>
								<td align="center">4.02</td>
								<td align="center">3.66</td>
								<td align="center">3.91</td>
								<td align="center">4.08</td>
								<td align="center">0.08</td>
								<td align="center">0.11</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN17">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN18">
							<p>Means within the same row with different letters differ significantly by Tukey’s test (P&lt;0.05).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN19">
							<p>* Linear effect (P&lt;0.05).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN20">
							<p>* Color = 7.648 + 0.0112x, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.75 (P = 0.001); aroma = 7.336 + 0.0134x, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.65 (P = 0.000); global impression = 7.394 + 0.0089x, R<sup>2</sup> = 0.43 (P = 0.032).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>For all the sensory characteristics evaluated in the egg samples, the tasters attributed a score higher than 6 (“I liked it little”), which can be considered the minimum value for the sample, not to be considered as “refused”. This demonstrates, therefore, the acceptance of eggs fortified with n-3 from the quail feed, with different levels of the referred microalgae. It is important to note that eggs from quail fed the diet containing 40 g <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp./kg had 92.5% marks assigned for global printing within the acceptance zone scores (6 to 9) and no scores in the rejection zone (1 to 4).</p>
			<p>The scores for the variable purchase intention (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>) were not affected by increasing levels of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. in the feed. However, it was found that 77% of the tasters (grades 4 and 5) would possibly buy quail eggs fed rations added with 40 g of microalgae/kg, while for the other treatments 0, 10, 20, and 30 g of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp./kg, 62, 74, 60, and 75% of the tasters rated 4 to 5, respectively.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="discussion">
			<title>4. Discussion</title>
			<p>The results obtained in the present study for quail egg quality parameters corroborate those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Ross and Dominy (1990)</xref>, who added different levels of the algae <italic>Spirulina platensis</italic> to the diet of laying hens and found no difference in shell thickness or specific weight.</p>
			<p>However, the increasing levels of algae in the feed promoted a significant increment in the yolk color. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Herber-McNeill and Van Elswyk (1998)</xref>, when analyzing the effect of the addition of 2.4 and 4.8% of the microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> in the feed of laying hens, observed a significant difference, to a level of 1% increase in the yellow color of the yolk.</p>
			<p>The inclusion of microalgae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. is seen to be beneficial, as it linearly reduced the content of saturated fatty acids in Japanese quail egg yolks. In this sense, there was a significant linear increase (P&lt;0.05) in the levels of PUFA on the yolks of Japanese quail eggs, obtained from birds fed diets containing the microalgae. This corroborates the results found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Pita et al. (2006)</xref>, who observed significant changes in PUFA contents in egg yolks of hens that received diets added with different sources of n-3.</p>
			<p>In another study with layers, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Gladkowski et al. (2014)</xref> observed an increase of 7.33, 4.57, and 23.91% in the levels of PUFA, α-linolenic acid (ALA, 18:3), and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6, DHA), respectively, as well as the reduction of the n-6:n-3 ratio in the lipid fractions of eggs. These results were also confirmed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Herber and Van Elswyk (1996)</xref>, who demonstrated that by adding seaweed and fish oil to the diet of laying hens, the fatty acid profile of the eggs is modified. The authors demonstrated that the values of n-6 PUFA decreased, and the values of n-3 were significantly increased, thus providing a better n-6:n-3 ratio.</p>
			<p>Unlike the present study, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Park et al. (2015)</xref> observed an improvement in egg production and weight in layers fed diets containing <italic>Schizochitrium</italic> sp. However, similarly to the results of this study, these authors also observed an improvement in the yolk color, an increase in n-3 levels, and a reduction in the n-6:n-3 ratio.</p>
			<p>In Japanese quail eggs, the occurrence of fresh yolks produced with poor pigmentation is common, with a reduction in the color of cooked egg, the most regular form of consumption. Cooked quail eggs with slightly pigmented yolks are less attractive to the consumer, and a possible solution is the inclusion of fat-soluble dyes in the feed, which increases the deposition of carotenoids in the yolk color (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Oliveira et al., 2007</xref>). In this study, there was a linear increase in yolk color with the inclusion of microalgae in quail diet.</p>
			<p>The addition of seaweed to the diet of laying hens results in eggs with high levels of PUFA n-3; however, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Stansby (1982)</xref> mentioned that high levels of these fatty acids may predispose the final product to present a strange odor and taste due to the formation of undesirable compounds. However, in this study, it was observed that the inclusion of up to 40 g of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp./kg did not compromise the aroma or flavor of the eggs. Thus, there was a linear increase in the aroma attribute as a function of the level of inclusion of microalgae in the feed.</p>
			<p>The tasters attributed to the egg samples, for all the sensory characteristics evaluated, a score higher than 6 (“I liked it a little”), minimum value for the sample not to be considered as “refused”. This, therefore, demonstrates the acceptance of eggs fortified with n-3 from the quail fed diets containing different levels of microalgae.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>5. Conclusions</title>
			<p>The inclusion of 40 g of <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp./kg in the diet of Japanese laying quail can be used without negative effects on performance or egg quality, besides promoting higher yolk color score and improving the egg sensory attributes color, aroma, and overall impression, as well as a higher content of n-3 and an adequate n-6:n-3 fatty acid ratio.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p>We would like to thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) and Instituto Federal do Sudeste de Minas Gerais, Campus Rio Pomba, for supporting this research, and Alltech for granting the tested product.</p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>ABNT - Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas. 2014. Análise sensorial - Guia geral para o projeto de ambientes de teste – NBR ISO 8589:2015. ABNT, Rio de Janeiro.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>ABNT - Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<source>Análise sensorial - Guia geral para o projeto de ambientes de teste – NBR ISO 8589:2015</source>
					<publisher-name>ABNT</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Rio de Janeiro</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>Brelaz, K. C. B. T. R.; Cruz, F. G. G.; Brasil, R. J. M.; Silva, A. F.; Rufino, J. P. F.; Costa, V. R. and Viana Filho, G. B. 2019. Fish waste oil in laying hens diets. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 21:eRBCA-2019-1069. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1069">https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1069</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Brelaz</surname>
							<given-names>K. C. B. T. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cruz</surname>
							<given-names>F. G. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brasil</surname>
							<given-names>R. J. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>A. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rufino</surname>
							<given-names>J. P. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Costa</surname>
							<given-names>V. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Viana</surname>
							<given-names>G. B.</given-names>
							<suffix>Filho</suffix>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Fish waste oil in laying hens diets</article-title>
					<source>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>21</volume>
					<fpage>eRBCA</fpage>
					<lpage>2019-1069</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1069">https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2019-1069</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>Fernandes, R. T. V.; Gonçalves, A. A. and Arruda, A. M. V. 2020. Production, egg quality, and intestinal morphometry of laying hens fed marine microalga. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 49:e20200011. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920200011">https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920200011</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Fernandes</surname>
							<given-names>R. T. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gonçalves</surname>
							<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Arruda</surname>
							<given-names>A. M. V.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Production, egg quality, and intestinal morphometry of laying hens fed marine microalga</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>49</volume>
					<elocation-id>e20200011</elocation-id>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920200011">https://doi.org/10.37496/rbz4920200011</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>Herber, S. M. and Van Elswyk, M. E. 1996. Dietary marine algae promotes efficient deposition of n-3 fatty acids for the production enriched shell eggs. Poultry Science 75:1501-1507. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0751501">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0751501</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Herber</surname>
							<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Van Elswyk</surname>
							<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1996</year>
					<article-title>Dietary marine algae promotes efficient deposition of n-3 fatty acids for the production enriched shell eggs</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>75</volume>
					<fpage>1501</fpage>
					<lpage>1507</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0751501">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0751501</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Herber-McNeill, S. M. and Van Elswyk, M. E. 1998. Dietary marine algae maintain egg consumer acceptability while enhancing yolk color. Poultry Science 77:493-496. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.3.493">https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.3.493</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Herber-McNeill</surname>
							<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Van Elswyk</surname>
							<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1998</year>
					<article-title>Dietary marine algae maintain egg consumer acceptability while enhancing yolk color</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>77</volume>
					<fpage>493</fpage>
					<lpage>496</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.3.493">https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.3.493</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Gladkowski, W.; Kielbowicz, G.; Chojnacka, A.; Bobak, L.; Spychai, R.; Dobrzanski, Z.; Trziszka, T. and Wawrzenczvk, C. 2014. The effect of feed supplementation with dietary sources of <italic>n</italic>-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, flaxseed and algae <italic>Schizochytrium</italic> sp. on their incorporation into lipid fractions of Japanese quail eggs. International Journal of Food Science and Technology 49:1876-1885. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12497">https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12497</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Gladkowski</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kielbowicz</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chojnacka</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bobak</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Spychai</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dobrzanski</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Trziszka</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wawrzenczvk</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>The effect of feed supplementation with dietary sources of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, flaxseed and algae Schizochytrium sp. on their incorporation into lipid fractions of Japanese quail eggs</article-title>
					<source>International Journal of Food Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>49</volume>
					<fpage>1876</fpage>
					<lpage>1885</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12497">https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12497</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Kralik, G.; Kralik, Z. and Hanžek, D. 2020. The effect of vegetable oils and the fish oil on the fatty acid profile in egg yolks. Poljoprivreda 26:79-87. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18047/poljo.26.2.10">https://doi.org/10.18047/poljo.26.2.10</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kralik</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kralik</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hanžek</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>The effect of vegetable oils and the fish oil on the fatty acid profile in egg yolks</article-title>
					<source>Poljoprivreda</source>
					<volume>26</volume>
					<fpage>79</fpage>
					<lpage>87</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18047/poljo.26.2.10">https://doi.org/10.18047/poljo.26.2.10</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Meilgaard, M. C. G.; Civille, G. V. and Carr, B. T. 1999. Sensory evaluation techniques. 3rd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Meilgaard</surname>
							<given-names>M. C. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Civille</surname>
							<given-names>G. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Carr</surname>
							<given-names>B. T.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1999</year>
					<source>Sensory evaluation techniques</source>
					<edition>3rd</edition>
					<publisher-name>CRC Press</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Boca Raton</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Moraes, M. A. C. 1985. Métodos para avaliação sensorial dos alimentos. 5.ed. Experimental, Campinas.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Moraes</surname>
							<given-names>M. A. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1985</year>
					<source>Métodos para avaliação sensorial dos alimentos</source>
					<edition>5</edition>
					<publisher-name>Experimental</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Campinas</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Oliveira, N. T. E.; Fonseca, J. B.; Soares, R. T. R. N.; Ferreira, K. S. and Thiébaut, J. T. L. 2007. Pigmentação de gemas de ovos de codornas japonesas alimentadas com rações contendo colorífico. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 31:1525-1531. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542007000500038">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542007000500038</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>N. T. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fonseca</surname>
							<given-names>J. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soares</surname>
							<given-names>R. T. R. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ferreira</surname>
							<given-names>K. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Thiébaut</surname>
							<given-names>J. T. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Pigmentação de gemas de ovos de codornas japonesas alimentadas com rações contendo colorífico</article-title>
					<source>Ciência e Agrotecnologia</source>
					<volume>31</volume>
					<fpage>1525</fpage>
					<lpage>1531</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542007000500038">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542007000500038</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Park, S. D.; Upadhaya, S. D. and Kim, I. H. 2015. Effect of dietary marine microalgae (<italic>Schizochytrium</italic>) powder on egg production, blood lipid profiles, egg quality, and fatty acid composition of egg yolk in layers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 28:391-397. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0463">https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0463</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Park</surname>
							<given-names>S. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Upadhaya</surname>
							<given-names>S. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>I. H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Effect of dietary marine microalgae (Schizochytrium) powder on egg production, blood lipid profiles, egg quality, and fatty acid composition of egg yolk in layers</article-title>
					<source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences</source>
					<volume>28</volume>
					<fpage>391</fpage>
					<lpage>397</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0463">https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0463</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Pita, M. C.; Piber Neto, E.; Carvalho, P. R. and Mendonca Junior, C. X. 2006. Efeito da suplementação de linhaça, óleo de canola e vitamina E na dieta sobre as concentrações de ácidos graxos poliinsaturados em ovos de galinha. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 58:925-931. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352006000500031">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352006000500031</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pita</surname>
							<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Piber</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
							<suffix>Neto</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Carvalho</surname>
							<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mendonca</surname>
							<given-names>C. X.</given-names>
							<suffix>Junior</suffix>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Efeito da suplementação de linhaça, óleo de canola e vitamina E na dieta sobre as concentrações de ácidos graxos poliinsaturados em ovos de galinha</article-title>
					<source>Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>58</volume>
					<fpage>925</fpage>
					<lpage>931</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352006000500031">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352006000500031</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Ross, E. and Dominy, W. 1990. The nutritional value of dehydrated, blue green algae (<italic>Spirulina platensis</italic>) for poultry. Poultry Science 69:794-800. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690794">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690794</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ross</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dominy</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1990</year>
					<article-title>The nutritional value of dehydrated, blue green algae (Spirulina platensis) for poultry</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>69</volume>
					<fpage>794</fpage>
					<lpage>800</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690794">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690794</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Rostagno, H. S.; Albino, L. F. T.; Donzele, J. L.; Oliveira, R. F.; Lopes, D. C.; Ferreira, A. S. and Barreto, S. L. T. 2017. Brazilian tables for poultry and swines: composition of feedstuffs and nutritional requirements. 4th ed. UFV, Viçosa, MG.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rostagno</surname>
							<given-names>H. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Albino</surname>
							<given-names>L. F. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Donzele</surname>
							<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>R. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lopes</surname>
							<given-names>D. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ferreira</surname>
							<given-names>A. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barreto</surname>
							<given-names>S. L. T.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<source>Brazilian tables for poultry and swines: composition of feedstuffs and nutritional requirements</source>
					<edition>4th</edition>
					<publisher-name>UFV</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Viçosa, MG</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Shields, R. J. and Lupatsch, I. 2012. Algae for aquaculture and animal feeds. Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 21:23-37.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Shields</surname>
							<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lupatsch</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Algae for aquaculture and animal feeds</article-title>
					<source>Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis</source>
					<volume>21</volume>
					<fpage>23</fpage>
					<lpage>37</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Stansby, M. E. 1982. Properties of fish oils and their application to handling of fish and to nutritional and industrial use. p.75-92. In: Chemistry and biochemistry of marine food products. Martin, R. E.; Flick, G. J.; Hebard, C. E. and Ward, D. R., eds. Avi Publishing Company, Westport.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Stansby</surname>
							<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1982</year>
					<chapter-title>Properties of fish oils and their application to handling of fish and to nutritional and industrial use</chapter-title>
					<fpage>75</fpage>
					<lpage>92</lpage>
					<source>Chemistry and biochemistry of marine food products</source>
					<person-group person-group-type="editor">
						<name>
							<surname>Martin</surname>
							<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Flick</surname>
							<given-names>G. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hebard</surname>
							<given-names>C. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ward</surname>
							<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<role>eds</role>
					</person-group>
					<publisher-name>Avi Publishing Company</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Westport</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Wang, Y.; Sunwoo, H.; Cherian, G. and Sim, J. S. 2000. Fatty acid determination in chicken egg yolk: a comparison of different methods. Poultry Science 79:1168-1171. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.8.1168">https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.8.1168</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sunwoo</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cherian</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sim</surname>
							<given-names>J. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Fatty acid determination in chicken egg yolk: a comparison of different methods</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>79</volume>
					<fpage>1168</fpage>
					<lpage>1171</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.8.1168">https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.8.1168</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>