<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rbz</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">R. Bras. Zootec.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">1516-3598</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">1806-9290</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="other">00809</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37496/rbz4920190258</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Ruminants</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Effect of different feeding methods on rumen microbes in growing Chinese Tan sheep</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-9936-6947</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Fu</surname>
						<given-names>Zilin</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-4220-539X</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Xu</surname>
						<given-names>Xiaofeng</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-5926-5116</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Zhang</surname>
						<given-names>Jie</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0003-1200-2735</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Zhang</surname>
						<given-names>Lili</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1">*</xref>
				</contrib>
				<aff id="aff1">
					<label>1</label>
					<institution content-type="orgname">Ningxia University</institution>
					<institution content-type="orgdiv1">College of Agriculture</institution>
					<addr-line>
						<named-content content-type="city">Yinchuan</named-content>
					</addr-line>
					<country country="CN">China</country>
					<institution content-type="original">Ningxia University, College of Agriculture, Yinchuan, China.</institution>
				</aff>
			</contrib-group>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c1">
					<label>*</label><bold>Corresponding author:</bold><email>zhanglilinx@126.com</email>
				</corresp>
				<fn fn-type="conflict">
					<p><bold>Conflict of Interest</bold></p>
					<p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>
				</fn>
				<fn fn-type="con">
					<p><bold>Author Contributions</bold></p>
					<p>Conceptualization: Z. Fu, X. Xu and L. Zhang. Data curation: Z. Fu, X. Xu and J. Zhang. Formal analysis: Z. Fu, X. Xu and J. Zhang. Funding acquisition: L. Zhang. Investigation: Z. Fu and J. Zhang. Methodology: Z. Fu, X. Xu and L. Zhang. Project administration: Z. Fu, X. Xu and L. Zhang. Resources: X. Xu and L. Zhang. Software: Z. Fu. Supervision: X. Xu and L. Zhang. Validation: L. Zhang. Visualization: J. Zhang. Writing-original draft: Z. Fu. Writing-review &amp; editing: X. Xu and J. Zhang.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>21</day>
				<month>07</month>
				<year>2020</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<year>2020</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>49</volume>
			<elocation-id>e20190258</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>23</day>
					<month>12</month>
					<year>2019</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>08</day>
					<month>05</month>
					<year>2020</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p>We evaluated the difference between rumen bacteria in Tan sheep fed either by grazing or in a feedlot. The aim was to provide a theoretical basis for ruminant nutrition and meat quality based on rumen fermentation. Twenty-four three-month-old Tan sheep were randomly and equally divided into two groups, the grazing group and ration group. Five sheep of each group were selected for slaughter at six months of age. Ruminal contents were collected and assessed to identify rumen bacteria, based on 16S rDNA sequencing analysis. A total of 17 phyla were identified, among which <italic>Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes</italic>, and <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> were dominant in both groups. The abundance of <italic>Firmicutes</italic> was higher in grazing group than in the ration group, while that of <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> was opposite. Besides the dominant phyla differences, the abundance of <italic>Fibrobacteres, Tenericutes, Elusimicrobia</italic>, and <italic>Cyanobacteria</italic> was significantly higher in the grazing group compared with the ration group. At genus level, a total of 174 genera were identified. The abundance of <italic>Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Dialister, Lachnospiraceae_NA</italic>, <italic>Catonella</italic>, <italic>Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014, Lachnospiraceae_NK3A20_group</italic>, and <italic>Fibrobacter</italic> in the grazing group was higher than in the ration group. However, the abundance of <italic>Succinivibrionaceae_NA</italic> was lower in the grazing group, and <italic>Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001</italic> showed a decreasing trend in the grazing group. The two feeding methods may influence the rumen bacterial composition, including the abundance of dominant bacteria, as well as the cellulolytic- and carbohydrate-degrading bacteria in the rumen of Tan sheep.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Keywords:</title>
				<kwd>feedlot</kwd>
				<kwd>grazing</kwd>
				<kwd>rumen microorganism</kwd>
				<kwd>Tan sheep</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<funding-group>
				<award-group>
					<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
					<award-id>31660668</award-id>
				</award-group>
			</funding-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="4"/>
				<table-count count="4"/>
				<equation-count count="0"/>
				<ref-count count="34"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>Introduction</title>
			<p>Tan sheep are an endemic breed to northwestern China, mainly found in the arid desert areas. The wool of Tan sheep is popular in both domestic and overseas markets for its delicate curl, soft texture, and snow-white appearance. The meat of Tan sheep is also considered top grade, because it is tender, without a goaty flavor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Kang et al., 2013</xref>). Owing to environmental concerns in recent years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen et al., 2013</xref>), feeding methods for Tan sheep have started to shift from full-forage grazing in desert and arid grasslands to the feedlot, which has also caused a change in the composition of animal diets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Morand-Fehr et al., 2007</xref>).</p>
			<p>The rumen, as an important digestive organ of ruminants, has an abundance of microorganisms, the composition of which is mainly influenced by the animal diet (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Henderson et al., 2015</xref>). A previous study showed that diet composition can alter the content and composition of rumen bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bas et al., 2003</xref>). Furthermore, rumen microbes affect fermentation that is associated with fat metabolism and nitrogen storage, which are closely related to ruminant digestion and a range of production traits such as feed efficiency and milk yield and components (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Schären et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Spanghero et al., 2017</xref>). Fat storage, an important factor of meat quality and flavor, is positively linear with the abundance of <italic>Firmicutes</italic> and negatively linear with that of <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic> in the porcine gut (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Guo, 2009</xref>). Therefore, improving the composition of rumen microorganisms has become a focus of recent ruminant research. However, only a few studies have evaluated the total rumen bacteria of Tan sheep.</p>
			<p>The population of rumen bacteria in goats usually becomes stable around six months of age (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Guo, 2015</xref>). As a result, the present study sampled the rumen content of six-month-old Tan sheep fed at three months of age to determine the effects of different feeding methods on bacterial populations in the developing rumen, based on the 16S rDNA sequencing technique. The objective was to provide a theoretical basis for animal nutrition and meat quality control in Tan sheep. We hypothesized that the diversity and variety of rumen bacteria can be altered with different feeding methods.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>Material and Methods</title>
			<p>The experimental procedure was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (NXU1074901).</p>
			<p>Twenty-four healthy three-month-old Tan ewes of similar weight (17.16±0.58 kg) were randomly divided into the grazing group (G6) and ration group (R6), (12 ewes in each group). The pasture was available for <italic>ad libitum</italic> feeding of the sheep in the grazing group. The pasture included 40% <italic>Astragalus adsurgens</italic>, 20% <italic>Lespedeza davurica</italic>, 5% <italic>Sophora alopecuroides</italic>, 10% <italic>Caragana korshinskii</italic> 10%, <italic>Glycyrrhizae radix</italic>, and 10% <italic>Achnatherum splendens</italic>. The sheep in the ration group were fed roughage supplemented with concentrate in feedlots (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). Both groups had free access to water.</p>
			<table-wrap id="t1">
				<label>Table 1</label>
				<caption>
					<title>Dietary composition and nutrition level of Tan sheep in the ration group</title>
				</caption>
				<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
					<colgroup width="25%">
						<col/>
						<col/>
						<col/>
						<col/>
					</colgroup>
					<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
						<tr>
							<th align="left" valign="middle">Ingredient</th>
							<th align="center" valign="middle">Content (%)</th>
							<th align="center" valign="middle">Dietary nutrition level</th>
							<th align="center" valign="middle">Value</th>
						</tr>
					</thead>
					<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle">Corn</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">27.6</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">Crude protein (%)</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">10.97</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle">Soybean meal</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">2.5</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">Net energy (MJ/kg)</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">12.15</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle">Bran</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">1.9</td>
							<td align="left" valign="top"/>
							<td align="left" valign="top"/>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Caragana microphylla</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">2.3</td>
							<td align="left" valign="top"/>
							<td align="left" valign="top"/>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle">Corn stalk</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">20.9</td>
							<td align="left" valign="top"/>
							<td align="left" valign="top"/>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle">Licorice</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">15.3</td>
							<td align="left" valign="top"/>
							<td align="left" valign="top"/>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle">Bitter soybean meal</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">16.3</td>
							<td align="left" valign="top"/>
							<td align="left" valign="top"/>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle">Alfalfa</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">7.5</td>
							<td align="left" valign="top"/>
							<td align="left" valign="top"/>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
				</table>
			</table-wrap>
			<p>At six months of age, five sheep from each group were slaughtered. The rumen fluid of the slaughtered sheep was filtered through four layers of gauze and collected separately. A volume of 50 mL of each sample, which contained digested plant particles and rumen fluid, were stored in CO<sub>2</sub>-containing centrifugal tubes and kept on ice for no longer than 30 min, before being stored in a refrigerator at −80 °C. Sample handling that entails cooling on ice and at −80 °C has little effect on the sample integrity or subsequent analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Wu et al., 2010</xref>). A total of 10 samples were tested for rumen bacteria. The DNA extraction was then conducted as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Denman and McSweeney, 2006</xref>) using a FastDNA Kit and FastPrep Instrument. The final samples were either stored at 4 °C for a short term, or −80 °C for a long term.</p>
			<p>After genomic DNA was extracted from the rumen samples, we conducted PCR amplification for the pre-experiments. Agarose gel electrophoresis was used to detect the purity and concentration of DNA samples before PCR amplification. After extracting genomic DNA from the samples, the V3 + V4 area of 16S rDNA was amplified. The primer sequence was as follows: 341F: CCTACGGGNGGGCWGCAG; 806R: GGACTACHVGGTATCTAAT. The 16S rDNA was sequenced using the Illumina Hiseq2500 PE250 platform (Guangzhou Gene Denovo Technology Co., Ltd. in Guangzhou, China).</p>
			<p>The operational taxonomic units (OTU) were obtained from the clustered effective tags of more than 97% similarity using the Uparse (version 9.2.64) software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Edgar, 2013</xref>), and then the abundances of OTU were calculated. Venn analysis was performed in R project VennDiagram package (version 1.6.16, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chen and Boutros, 2011</xref>). The alpha indexes were calculated in QIIME (version 1.9.1, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Caporaso et al., 2010</xref>) and then processed by the Excel 2007 software and analyzed by the SAS software (Statistical Analysis System, version 8.2) using a completely random design. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed in R project Vegan package (version 2.5.3, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Oksanen et al., 2011</xref>). Anosim analysis was conducted by the Mothur software and calculated in R project Vegan package (version 2.5.3, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Oksanen et al., 2011</xref>). The representative sequences were classified into bacteria based on SILVA database (version 132, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Pruesse et al., 2007</xref>) and Greengene database (version gg_13_5, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">DeSantis et al., 2006</xref>), with the confidence threshold values ranging from 0.8 to 1. The abundance statistics of each taxonomy was visualized using Krona (version 2.6, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Ondov et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>Results</title>
			<p>After removing the low-frequency and insignificant tags, effective tags were spliced and clustered into OTU. The results of OTU clustering of the different samples were analyzed, and a Venn diagram (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref>) was constructed, based on the common and unique OTU information. The OTU of the sheep in the grazing group was 1797, while that in the ration group was 1761 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref>), without any significant difference between the groups. A total of 1332 common OTU were shared between the two groups.</p>
			<fig id="f1">
				<label>Figure 1</label>
				<caption>
					<title>Venn diagram of microorganism operational taxonomic units between groups.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xlink:href="1806-9290-rbz-49-e20190258-gf01.tif"/>
			</fig>
			<p>Alpha diversity indexes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>), Chao1, ACE, Shannon, and Simpson were used to analyze species diversity and abundance. The Chao1 and ACE indexes predict the species of microorganisms (the number of OTU) in the sample based on the number of measured tags, OTU, and their relative proportions. The Shannon index reflects the species diversity according to OTU homogeneity and richness. The Simpson index refers to the probability that the randomly sampled species in two successive evaluations belong to different species. The Shannon and Simpson indexes both reflect the synthesis of species richness and evenness.</p>
			<table-wrap id="t2">
				<label>Table 2</label>
				<caption>
					<title>Alpha indexes of rumen bacteria of Tan sheep in the grazing and ration groups</title>
				</caption>
				<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
					<colgroup width="25%">
						<col/>
						<col/>
						<col/>
						<col/>
					</colgroup>
					<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
						<tr>
							<th align="left" valign="middle">Item</th>
							<th align="center" valign="middle">Grazing</th>
							<th align="center" valign="middle">Ration</th>
							<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
						</tr>
					</thead>
					<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle">ACE</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">1419.354±23.573</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">1297.686±97.432</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.260</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle">Chao1</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">1400.832±32.038</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">1272.312±89.579</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.214</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle">Shannon</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">5.804±0.131</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">4.830±0.561</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.129</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle">Simpson</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.947±0.014</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.836±0.048</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.064</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle">Goods coverage</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.997±0.000<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN2">a</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.997±0.000<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN2">b</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.033</td>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
				</table>
				<table-wrap-foot>
					<fn id="TFN1">
						<p>Data are presented as mean ± standard error.</p>
					</fn>
					<fn id="TFN2">
						<label>a,b</label>
						<p>P&lt;0.05.</p>
					</fn>
				</table-wrap-foot>
			</table-wrap>
			<p>Favorable coverage was more than 99% in both groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>), which suggests that the indexes could fully reflect the situation of rumen bacteria. The values of the ACE index and the Chao1 index of the grazing group were higher than those of the ration group; however, this difference was not significant (P = 0.260 and 0.214, respectively). The value of the Shannon index of the grazing group was higher than that of the ration group; however, this difference was not significant (P = 0.129). The Simpson index of the grazing group tended to be closer to 1 than that of the ration group (P = 0.064).</p>
			<p>The PCA plot was based on species abundance of the OTU list and evaluated the distance between samples by reducing dimensionality. The more similar the sample compositions were, the closer the distance reflected on the PCA plot. By evaluating the variance decomposition, the PCA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2</xref>) could identify the main elements and structures in data and simplify the complex relationships of sample composition, by reflecting the two eigenvalues of the abscissa and ordinate.</p>
			<fig id="f2">
				<label>Figure 2</label>
				<caption>
					<title>Principal component analysis (PCA) plots.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xlink:href="1806-9290-rbz-49-e20190258-gf02.tif"/>
			</fig>
			<p>The abscissa was the first principal factor (73.7%) and the ordinate was the second principal factor (13.5%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2</xref>). The samples in the grazing group were in close proximity to each other when considering the first factor, while two samples (G6-1 and G6-3) were separately distributed based on the second factor. Three samples (R6-2, R6-3, and R6-4) were concentrated, and the other two (R6-1 and R6-5) were separately distributed in the ration group. In addition, some samples in different groups (e.g., G6-3 and R6-5) showed a clustering trend.</p>
			<p>Anosim analysis is a non-parametric test for microbial community structure. It determines whether a significant difference exists between groups compared to within groups. Unweighted UniFrac only considers whether there are changes in the species composition. Weighted UniFrac synthesizes both the changes in species composition and abundance. The medians of the grazing and ration groups differed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">Figure 3</xref>), indicating statistical significance, whether the analysis was weighted or not (P&lt;0.05). Animal-to-animal variation was higher in the ration group than in the grazing group.</p>
			<fig id="f3">
				<label>Figure 3</label>
				<caption>
					<title>Unifrac Boxplots.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xlink:href="1806-9290-rbz-49-e20190258-gf03.tif"/>
			</fig>
			<p>The species taxonomic tree shows those species with an abundance greater than 1%, as selected by the Perl + SVG software, based on species annotation of the OTU. Seven levels of microbial species are displayed: kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, and species. As the taxonomic tree (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Figure 4</xref>) shows, most <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> were in the ration group at the phylum level, while most <italic>Spirochaetae</italic> and <italic>Firmicutes</italic> were in the grazing group. The abundance of <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic> was similar between the groups. In addition, in the <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic> phylum, most of the <italic>Bacteroidetes_S24_7_group</italic> were in the ration group at the family level, while most <italic>Rikenellaceae</italic> were in the grazing group. In the <italic>Negativicutes</italic> class, <italic>Firmicutes</italic> phylum, most <italic>Acidaminococcaceae</italic> were in the ration group at the family level, while most <italic>Veillonellaceae</italic> were in the grazing group.</p>
			<fig id="f4">
				<label>Figure 4</label>
				<caption>
					<title>Species taxonomic tree.</title>
				</caption>
				<graphic xlink:href="1806-9290-rbz-49-e20190258-gf04.tif"/>
			</fig>
			<p>A total of 17 phyla were identified in the rumen of Tan sheep: <italic>Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Spirochaetae, Cyanobacteria, Fibrobacteres, Verrucomicrobia, Synergistetes, Actinobacteria, Saccharibacteria, Elusimicrobia, Tenericutes, Lentisphaerae, Bacteria_NA, Planctomycetes, Euryarchaeota</italic>, and <italic>SR1</italic>. In terms of the abundance of rumen bacteria at the phylum level, <italic>Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes</italic>, and <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> were the dominant bacteria in both groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>), which accounted for more than 85% of the total rumen bacteria.</p>
			<table-wrap id="t3">
				<label>Table 3</label>
				<caption>
					<title>Phyla of rumen bacteria of Tan sheep in grazing and ration groups (%)</title>
				</caption>
				<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
					<colgroup width="25%">
						<col/>
						<col/>
						<col/>
						<col/>
					</colgroup>
					<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
						<tr>
							<th align="left" valign="middle">Phylum</th>
							<th align="center" valign="middle">Grazing</th>
							<th align="center" valign="middle">Ration</th>
							<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
						</tr>
					</thead>
					<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Bacteroidetes</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">50.952±1.711</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">38.834±9.201</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.176</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Firmicutes</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">28.357±5.943<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">a</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">13.679±2.197<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">b</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.041</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Proteobacteria</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">16.423±5.397<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">a</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">46.244±11.295<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">b</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.035</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Spirochaetae</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">2.704±1.835</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.496±0.211</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.204</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Cyanobacteria</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.444±0.053<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">a</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.228±0.056<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">b</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.014</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Fibrobacteres</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.376±0.059<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN5">A</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.083±0.044<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN5">B</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.003</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Verrucomicrobia</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.267±0.143</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.138±0.061</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.478</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Synergistetes</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.166±0.059</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.166±0.040</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.946</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Actinobacteria</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.164±0.050</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.059±0.014</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.068</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Saccharibacteria</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.045±0.009</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.030±0.014</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.414</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Elusimicrobia</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.033±0.012<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">a</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.006±0.001<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">b</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.037</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Tenericutes</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.029±0.005<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN5">A</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.004±0.002<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN5">B</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Lentisphaerae</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.019±0.013</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.011±0.006</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.654</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Bacteria_NA</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.013±0.003</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.018±0.003</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.225</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Planctomycetes</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.007±0.007</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">&lt;0.001</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.364</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Euryarchaeota</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.002±0.000</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.003±0.001</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.115</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>SR1</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.001±0.000a</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">&lt;0.001b</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.049</td>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
				</table>
				<table-wrap-foot>
					<fn id="TFN3">
						<p>Data are presented as the mean ± standard error.</p>
					</fn>
					<fn id="TFN4">
						<label>a,b</label>
						<p>P&lt;0.05;</p>
					</fn>
					<fn id="TFN5">
						<label>A,B</label>
						<p>P&lt;0.01.</p>
					</fn>
				</table-wrap-foot>
			</table-wrap>
			<p>The abundance of <italic>Fibrobacteres</italic> and <italic>Tenericutes</italic> was significantly higher in the grazing group than in the ration group (P&lt;0.01). The abundance of <italic>Firmicutes, Cyanobacteria</italic>, and <italic>Elusimicrobia</italic> was significantly higher in the grazing group than in the ration group (P&lt;0.05). The abundance of <italic>Actinobacteria</italic> showed a greater increasing trend in the grazing group than in the ration group; however, this difference was not significant (P = 0.068). Furthermore, the abundance of <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> was significantly lower in the grazing group than in the ration group (P&lt;0.05).</p>
			<p>A total of 174 genera were identified and analyzed in the rumen fluid. Only the dominant bacteria (with an abundance of more than 5%), subdominant bacteria (with an abundance of 0.5%–5%), and bacteria that showed significant group differences are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>. Eight dominant genera were identified in the grazing group: <italic>Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001</italic>, <italic>Prevotella_1, Prevotella_7, Prevotellaceae_NA, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Prevotellaceae_UCG-001, Veillonellaceae_NA</italic>, and <italic>Dialister</italic>. Five dominant genera were identified in the ration group: <italic>Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001, Prevotella_1, Prevotella_7, Bacteroidales_S24-7_group_NA</italic>, and <italic>Succinivibrionaceae_NA</italic>. Moreover, the abundance of the <italic>Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Lachnospiraceae_NA, Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014, Lachnospiraceae_NK3A20_group, Erysipelotrichaceae_UCG-004</italic>, and <italic>Fibrobacter</italic> was significantly higher in the grazing group than in the ration group (P&lt;0.01). In addition, the abundance of <italic>Dialister, Catonella, Roseburia</italic>, and <italic>Nodatum_group</italic> in the grazing group was significantly higher than in the ration group (P&lt;0.05). However, the abundance of <italic>Succinivibrionaceae_NA</italic> in the grazing group was significantly lower than that in the ration group (P&lt;0.01), and the abundance of <italic>Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001</italic> showed a decreasing trend in the ration group (P = 0.065).</p>
			<table-wrap id="t4">
				<label>Table 4</label>
				<caption>
					<title>Genera of rumen bacteria of Tan sheep in the grazing and ration groups</title>
				</caption>
				<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
					<colgroup width="25%">
						<col/>
						<col/>
						<col/>
						<col/>
					</colgroup>
					<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
						<tr>
							<th align="left" valign="middle">Genus</th>
							<th align="center" valign="middle">Grazing</th>
							<th align="center" valign="middle">Ration</th>
							<th align="center" valign="middle">P-value</th>
						</tr>
					</thead>
					<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">15.741±5.327</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">37.973±10.320</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.065</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Prevotella_1</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">13.876±2.146</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">14.236±5.875</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.964</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Prevotella_7</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">11.749±3.724</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">10.967±5.142</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.930</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Prevotellaceae_NA</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">6.958±2.162</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">3.295±0.466</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.103</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">6.631±0.926<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">A</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.994±0.170<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">B</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">&lt;0.001</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-001</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">6.610±3.257</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">1.416±0.621</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.127</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Veillonellaceae_NA</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">5.733±2.159</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">2.700±0.288</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.184</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Dialister</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">5.615±1.499<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN7">a</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">2.049±0.660<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN7">b</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.042</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Lachnospiraceae_NA</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">4.426±1.221<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">A</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.623±0.082<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">B</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.009</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Catonella</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">3.371±1.387<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN7">a</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.501±0.178<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN7">b</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.049</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Treponema_2</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">2.681±1.835</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.478±0.213</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.267</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Bacteroidales_S24-7_group_NA</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">2.172±0.725</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">6.247±4.088</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.384</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">1.405±0.278<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">A</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.297±0.037<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">B</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.002</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Lachnospiraceae_NK3A20_group</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.898±0.131<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">A</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.320±0.124<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">B</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.008</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Bacteroidales_BS11_gut_group_NA</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.792±0.474</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.409±0.112</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.516</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Succiniclasticum</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.749±0.599</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">2.216±1.443</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.413</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Acidaminococcus</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.710±0.257</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.212±0.095</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.078</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Erysipelotrichaceae_UCG-004</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.640±0.102<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">A</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.051±0.013<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">B</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">&lt;0.001</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Roseburia</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.568±0.067<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN7">a</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.279±0.114<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN7">b</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.0412</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Prevotellaceae_UCG-003</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.538±0.356</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.163±0.095</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.353</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Nodatum_group</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.396±0.143<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN7">a</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.033±0.006<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN7">b</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.024</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Fibrobacter</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.376±0.059<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">A</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.083±0.044<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">B</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.002</td>
						</tr>
						<tr>
							<td align="left" valign="middle"><italic>Succinivibrionaceae_NA</italic></td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.205±0.015<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">A</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">6.912±1.730<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">B</xref>
							</td>
							<td align="center" valign="middle">0.003</td>
						</tr>
					</tbody>
				</table>
				<table-wrap-foot>
					<fn id="TFN6">
						<p>Data are presented as the mean ± standard error.</p>
					</fn>
					<fn id="TFN7">
						<label>a,b</label>
						<p>P&lt;0.05;</p>
					</fn>
					<fn id="TFN8">
						<label>A,B</label>
						<p>P&lt;0.01.</p>
					</fn>
				</table-wrap-foot>
			</table-wrap>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="discussion">
			<title>Discussion</title>
			<p>The rumen provides a relatively stable living environment for rumen microorganisms, including bacteria, protozoa, and fungi, among which bacteria are the most abundant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Pitta et al., 2016a</xref>). In the present study, rumen bacteria were investigated under two feeding methods, full-forage grazing and feedlot feeding with high levels of concentrates. The analyses showed relatively high animal-to-animal variation, but significant group differences in some aspects. In terms of the rumen bacteria diversity, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Kocherginskaya et al. (2001)</xref> identified greater diversity in high-grain diets relative to hay diets; however, this was not supported by the results of the current study. This might be due to differences in the nutrition level of the diets. In the present study, the diversity and evenness of rumen bacteria showed an increasing trend in the grazing group, according to the Simpson index. These results are consistent with those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Grilli et al. (2016)</xref>.</p>
			<p>Rumen fermentation is influenced by the species composition of bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Oliveira et al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Ley et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Singh et al., 2012</xref>). The phyla of rumen bacteria detected by gene sequencing mainly include <italic>Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Spirochaetae, Fibrobacteria</italic>, and <italic>Actinobacteria</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Huws et al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Pitta et al., 2016a</xref>). These findings are consistent with those of the present study, although the abundance of individual species showed a disparity.</p>
			<p>The dominant bacteria of the 17 phyla identified in the rumen of both groups were <italic>Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes</italic>, and <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>. The abundance of the dominant phyla of the grazing and feedlot-fed groups was as follows: <italic>Bacteroidetes,</italic> 51 and 39%, respectively; <italic>Firmicutes,</italic> 28 and 14%, respectively; and <italic>Proteobacteria,</italic> 16 and 46%, respectively. Significant differences were observed in the <italic>Firmicutes</italic> and <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> phyla, indicating the existence of a strong effect on the abundance of dominant rumen bacteria under different feeding conditions.</p>
			<p><italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, as an important phylum in rumen metabolism, tends to become co-dominant in ruminants fed starch-based diets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Pitta et al., 2016b</xref>). However, in the present study, <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> became the most abundant phylum in sheep fed a high concentrate diet. The <italic>Fibrobacteres</italic> are closely associated with the degradation of cellulose and lignin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Ransom-Jones et al., 2012</xref>). Their abundance in the grazing group was significantly higher than that in the ration group, which was consistent with the differences in fiber intake between the groups.</p>
			<p>Roughage is a major feed component for ruminants. Fiber in roughage is degraded rapidly by rumen microorganisms into nutrients that provide energy for ruminants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aschenbach et al., 2011</xref>). Bacteria and fungi, including cellulolytic bacteria, play an important role in enzymatic decomposition, by degrading cellulose and hemicellulose into small molecules that can be absorbed by the rumen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Zebeli et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
			<p>The structure of rumen microflora is related to the dietary method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Yáñez-Ruiz et al., 2010</xref>). In one study of the effects on rumen flora of goats fed a high-grain diet (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Liu et al., 2015</xref>), the results showed that such diets improve the abundance of <italic>Succiniclasticum</italic> and decreases the abundance of unclassified <italic>Rikenellaceae</italic> and unclassified <italic>Erysipelotrichaceae. Ruminococcaceae, Fibrobacter</italic>, and <italic>Lachnospiraceae</italic>, which are associated with cellulose and hemicellulose degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Biddle et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Li et al., 2014</xref>).</p>
			<p>In the present study, the abundance of the <italic>Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group, Lachnospiraceae_NA, Ruminococcaceae_UCG-014, Lachnospiraceae_NK3A20_group, Erysipelotrichaceae_UCG-004</italic>, and <italic>Fibrobacter</italic> in the ration group was significantly lower than that in the grazing group. Most of these species are associated with cellulose and hemicellulose degradation. Moreover, in the present study, the abundance of <italic>Succinivibrionaceae_NA</italic> was significantly increased and that of <italic>Succinivibrionaceae_UCG-001</italic> showed an increasing trend, when the feeding method was switched from grazing to feedlot feeding. The genera of the <italic>Succinivibrionaceae</italic> family detected in the rumen mostly play a role in the degradation of starch (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Santos and Thompson, 2014</xref>), which could explain the results of this study.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>Conclusions</title>
			<p>The different feeding methods employed in this study have no significant effect on the diversity of rumen bacteria in Tan sheep, but affect the structure of bacterial populations. The change in methods from grazing to feedlot feeding with higher levels of concentrate feed decreases the abundance of cellulolytic bacteria, but increases that of the <italic>Succinivibrionaceae</italic> family, which is associated with starch decomposition in this study.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p>The authors thank for the support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31660668).</p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Aschenbach</surname>
							<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Penner</surname>
							<given-names>G. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stumpff</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gäbel</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Ruminant nutrition symposium: Role of fermentation acid absorption in the regulation of ruminal pH</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>89</volume>
					<fpage>1092</fpage>
					<lpage>1107</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3301">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3301</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Aschenbach, J. R.; Penner, G. B.; Stumpff, F. and Gäbel, G. 2011. Ruminant nutrition symposium: Role of fermentation acid absorption in the regulation of ruminal pH. Journal of Animal Science 89:1092-1107. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3301">https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2010-3301</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bas</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Archimède</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rouzeau</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sauvant</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<article-title>Fatty acid composition of mixed-rumen bacteria: Effect of concentration and type of forage</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
					<volume>86</volume>
					<fpage>2940</fpage>
					<lpage>2948</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73891-0">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73891-0</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Bas, P.; Archimède, H.; Rouzeau, A. and Sauvant, D. 2003. Fatty acid composition of mixed-rumen bacteria: Effect of concentration and type of forage. Journal of Dairy Science 86:2940-2948. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73891-0">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73891-0</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Biddle</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stewart</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Blanchard</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leschine</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Untangling the genetic basis of fibrolytic specialization by Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in diverse gut communities</article-title>
					<source>Diversity</source>
					<volume>5</volume>
					<fpage>627</fpage>
					<lpage>640</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/d5030627">https://doi.org/10.3390/d5030627</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Biddle, A.; Stewart, L.; Blanchard, J. and Leschine, S. 2013. Untangling the genetic basis of fibrolytic specialization by Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae in diverse gut communities. Diversity 5:627-640. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/d5030627">https://doi.org/10.3390/d5030627</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Caporaso</surname>
							<given-names>J. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kuczynski</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stombaugh</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bittinger</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bushman</surname>
							<given-names>F. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Costello</surname>
							<given-names>E. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fierer</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Peña</surname>
							<given-names>A. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Goodrich</surname>
							<given-names>J. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gordon</surname>
							<given-names>J. I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Huttley</surname>
							<given-names>G. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kelley</surname>
							<given-names>S. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Knights</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Koenig</surname>
							<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ley</surname>
							<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lozupone</surname>
							<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McDonald</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Muegge</surname>
							<given-names>B. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pirrung</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Reeder</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sevinsky</surname>
							<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Turnbaugh</surname>
							<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Walters</surname>
							<given-names>W. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Widmann</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yatsunenko</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zaneveld</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Knight</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data</article-title>
					<source>Nature Methods</source>
					<volume>7</volume>
					<fpage>335</fpage>
					<lpage>336</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303">https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Caporaso, J. G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F. D.; Costello, E. K.; Fierer, N.; Peña, A. G.; Goodrich, J. K.; Gordon, J. I.; Huttley, G. A.; Kelley, S. T.; Knights, D.; Koenig, J. E.; Ley, R. E.; Lozupone, C. A.; McDonald, D.; Muegge, B. D.; Pirrung, M.; Reeder, J.; Sevinsky, J. R.; Turnbaugh, P. J.; Walters, W. A.; Widmann, J.; Yatsunenko, T.; Zaneveld, J. and Knight, R. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nature Methods 7:335-336. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303">https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Boutros</surname>
							<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>VennDiagram: a package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R</article-title>
					<source>BMC Bioinformatics</source>
					<volume>12</volume>
					<fpage>35</fpage>
					<lpage>35</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-35">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-35</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Chen, H. and Boutros, P. C. 2011. VennDiagram: a package for the generation of highly-customizable Venn and Euler diagrams in R. BMC Bioinformatics 12:35. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-35">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-35</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Luo</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jiao</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chang</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zuo</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Effect of restricted grazing time on the foraging behavior and movement of Tan sheep grazed on desert steppe</article-title>
					<source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences</source>
					<volume>26</volume>
					<fpage>711</fpage>
					<lpage>715</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12556">https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12556</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Chen, Y.; Luo, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y; Liu, K.; Jiao, L.; Chang, Y. and Zuo, Z. 2013. Effect of restricted grazing time on the foraging behavior and movement of Tan sheep grazed on desert steppe. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 26:711-715. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12556">https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12556</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Denman</surname>
							<given-names>S. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McSweeney</surname>
							<given-names>C. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen</article-title>
					<source>FEMS Microbiology Ecology</source>
					<volume>58</volume>
					<fpage>572</fpage>
					<lpage>582</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00190.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00190.x</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Denman, S. E. and McSweeney, C. S. 2006. Development of a real-time PCR assay for monitoring anaerobic fungal and cellulolytic bacterial populations within the rumen. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 58:572-582. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00190.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00190.x</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>DeSantis</surname>
							<given-names>T. Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hugenholtz</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Larsen</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rojas</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brodie</surname>
							<given-names>E. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Keller</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Huber</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dalevi</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hu</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Andersen</surname>
							<given-names>G. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB</article-title>
					<source>Applied and Environmental Microbiology</source>
					<volume>72</volume>
					<fpage>5069</fpage>
					<lpage>5072</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03006-05">https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03006-05</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>DeSantis, T. Z.; Hugenholtz, P.; Larsen, N.; Rojas, M.; Brodie, E. L.; Keller, K.; Huber, T.; Dalevi, D.; Hu, P. and Andersen, G. L. 2006. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 72:5069-5072. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03006-05">https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.03006-05</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Edgar</surname>
							<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads</article-title>
					<source>Nature Methods</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<fpage>996</fpage>
					<lpage>998</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604">https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Edgar, R. C. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nature Methods 10:996-998. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604">https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2604</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Grilli</surname>
							<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fliegerová</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kopečný</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lama</surname>
							<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Egea</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sohaefer</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pereyra</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ruiz</surname>
							<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sosa</surname>
							<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Arenas</surname>
							<given-names>G. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mrázek</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity of goats during shift from forage to concentrate diet</article-title>
					<source>Anaerobe</source>
					<volume>42</volume>
					<fpage>17</fpage>
					<lpage>26</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.07.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.07.002</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Grilli, D. J.; Fliegerová, K.; Kopečný, J.; Lama, S. P.; Egea, V.; Sohaefer, N.; Pereyra, C.; Ruiz, M. S.; Sosa, M. A.; Arenas, G. N. and Mrázek, J. 2016. Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity of goats during shift from forage to concentrate diet. Anaerobe 42:17-26. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.07.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.07.002</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<element-citation publication-type="thesis">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Guo</surname>
							<given-names>X. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<source>Detection of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in the pig gut and the correlation between their abundance and fat deposit</source>
					<comment>Thesis (D. Sc.)</comment>
					<publisher-name>Sichuan Agricultural University</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Yaan, Sichuan, China</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Guo, X. L. 2009. Detection of Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in the pig gut and the correlation between their abundance and fat deposit. Thesis (D. Sc.). Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, Sichuan, China.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<element-citation publication-type="thesis">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Guo</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<source>The research on the composition structure of archaea and bacteria in the rumen of goat at different age stage</source>
					<comment>Thesis (D. Sc.)</comment>
					<publisher-name>Sichuan Agricultural University</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Yaan, Sichuan, China</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Guo W. 2015. The research on the composition structure of archaea and bacteria in the rumen of goat at different age stage. Thesis (D. Sc.). Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, Sichuan, China.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Henderson</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cox</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ganesh</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jonker</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Young</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<collab>Global Rumen Census Collaborators</collab>
						<name>
							<surname>Janssen</surname>
							<given-names>P. H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range</article-title>
					<source>Scientific Reports</source>
					<volume>5</volume>
					<fpage>14567</fpage>
					<lpage>14567</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14567">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14567</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Henderson, G.; Cox, F.; Ganesh, S.; Jonker, A.; Young, W.; Global Rumen Census Collaborators and Janssen, P. H. 2015. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Scientific Reports 5:14567. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14567">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14567</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Huws</surname>
							<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Edwards</surname>
							<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>E. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Scollan</surname>
							<given-names>N. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Specificity and sensitivity of eubacterial primers utilized for molecular profiling of bacteria within complex microbial ecosystems</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Microbiological Methods</source>
					<volume>70</volume>
					<fpage>565</fpage>
					<lpage>569</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2007.06.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2007.06.013</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Huws, S. A.; Edwards, J. E.; Kim, E. J. and Scollan, N. D. 2007. Specificity and sensitivity of eubacterial primers utilized for molecular profiling of bacteria within complex microbial ecosystems. Journal of Microbiological Methods 70:565-569. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2007.06.013">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2007.06.013</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kang</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Xu</surname>
							<given-names>Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fang</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Transcriptome profile at different physiological stages reveals potential mode for curly fleece in Chinese Tan sheep</article-title>
					<source>PLoS One</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<elocation-id>e71763</elocation-id>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071763">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071763</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Kang, X.; Liu, G.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Q.; Zhang, M. and Fang, M. 2013. Transcriptome profile at different physiological stages reveals potential mode for curly fleece in Chinese Tan sheep. PLoS One 8:e71763. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071763">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071763</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kocherginskaya</surname>
							<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Aminov</surname>
							<given-names>R. I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>White</surname>
							<given-names>B. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2001</year>
					<article-title>Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity under two different diet conditions using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, random sequencing, and statistical ecology approaches</article-title>
					<source>Anaerobe</source>
					<volume>7</volume>
					<fpage>119</fpage>
					<lpage>134</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/anae.2001.0378">https://doi.org/10.1006/anae.2001.0378</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Kocherginskaya, S. A.; Aminov, R. I. and White, B. A. 2001. Analysis of the rumen bacterial diversity under two different diet conditions using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, random sequencing, and statistical ecology approaches. Anaerobe 7:119-134. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/anae.2001.0378">https://doi.org/10.1006/anae.2001.0378</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ley</surname>
							<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lozupone</surname>
							<given-names>C. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hamady</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Knight</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gordon</surname>
							<given-names>J. I.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Worlds within worlds: evolution of the vertebrate gut microbiota</article-title>
					<source>Nature Reviews Microbiology</source>
					<volume>6</volume>
					<fpage>776</fpage>
					<lpage>788</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1978">https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1978</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Ley, R. E.; Lozupone, C. A.; Hamady, M.; Knight, R. and Gordon, J. I. 2008. Worlds within worlds: evolution of the vertebrate gut microbiota. Nature Reviews Microbiology 6:776-788. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1978">https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1978</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rui</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sun</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yan</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zheng</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Spatial differentiation of prokaryotes enhancing performance of co-fermentation with straw and swine manure</article-title>
					<source>CIESC Journal</source>
					<volume>65</volume>
					<fpage>1792</fpage>
					<lpage>1799</lpage>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Li, J.; Rui, J.; Zhang, S.; Sun, X.; Yan, Z.; Liu, X.; Zheng, T. and Li, X. 2014. Spatial differentiation of prokaryotes enhancing performance of co-fermentation with straw and swine manure. CIESC Journal 65:1792-1799.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bian</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhu</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mao</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>High-grain feeding causes strong shifts in ruminal epithelial bacterial community and expression of Toll-like receptor genes in goats</article-title>
					<source>Frontiers in Microbiology</source>
					<volume>6</volume>
					<fpage>167</fpage>
					<lpage>167</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00167">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00167</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Liu, J.; Bian, G.; Zhu, W. and Mao, S. 2015. High-grain feeding causes strong shifts in ruminal epithelial bacterial community and expression of Toll-like receptor genes in goats. Frontiers in Microbiology 6:167. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00167">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00167</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Morand-Fehr</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fedele</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Decandia</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Le Frileux</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Influence of farming and feeding systems on composition and quality of goat and sheep milk</article-title>
					<source>Small Ruminant Research</source>
					<volume>68</volume>
					<fpage>20</fpage>
					<lpage>34</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.019">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.019</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Morand-Fehr, P.; Fedele, V.; Decandia, M. and Le Frileux, Y. 2007. Influence of farming and feeding systems on composition and quality of goat and sheep milk. Small Ruminant Research 68:20-34. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.019">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.019</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Oksanen</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Blanchet</surname>
							<given-names>F. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kindt</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Legendre</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>O'Hara</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Simpson</surname>
							<given-names>G. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Vegan: Community Ecology Package</article-title>
					<source>R Package Version 1.17-6</source>
					<comment>Available at: &lt;<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org">http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org</ext-link>&gt;</comment>
					<date-in-citation content-type="access-date">Accessed on: July 16, 2018</date-in-citation>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Oksanen, J.; Blanchet, F. G.; Kindt, R.; Legendre, P.; O'Hara, R. and Simpson, G. L. 2011. Vegan: Community Ecology Package. R Package Version 1.17-6. Available at: &lt;<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org">http://vegan.r-forge.r-project.org</ext-link>&gt;. Accessed on: July 16, 2018.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>M. L. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Arêas</surname>
							<given-names>A. P. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Campos</surname>
							<given-names>I. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Monedero</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Perez-Martínez</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Miyaji</surname>
							<given-names>E. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leite</surname>
							<given-names>L. C. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Aires</surname>
							<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ho</surname>
							<given-names>P. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Induction of systemic and mucosal immune response and decrease in <italic>Streptococcus pneumoniae</italic> colonization by nasal inoculation of mice with recombinant lactic acid bacteria expressing pneumococcal surface antigen A</article-title>
					<source>Microbes and Infection</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<fpage>1016</fpage>
					<lpage>1024</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2005.10.020">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2005.10.020</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Oliveira, M. L. S.; Arêas, A. P. M.; Campos, I. B.; Monedero, V.; Perez-Martínez, G.; Miyaji, E. N.; Leite, L. C. C.; Aires, K. A. and Ho, P. L. 2006. Induction of systemic and mucosal immune response and decrease in <italic>Streptococcus pneumoniae</italic> colonization by nasal inoculation of mice with recombinant lactic acid bacteria expressing pneumococcal surface antigen A. Microbes and Infection 8:1016-1024. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2005.10.020">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2005.10.020</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ondov</surname>
							<given-names>B. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bergman</surname>
							<given-names>N. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Phillippy</surname>
							<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Interactive metagenomic visualization in a Web Browser</article-title>
					<source>BMC Bioinformatics</source>
					<volume>12</volume>
					<fpage>385</fpage>
					<lpage>385</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-385">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-385</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Ondov, B. D.; Bergman, N. H. and Phillippy, A. M. 2011. Interactive metagenomic visualization in a Web Browser. BMC Bioinformatics 12:385. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-385">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-385</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pitta</surname>
							<given-names>D. W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Indugu</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kumar</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vecchiarelli</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sinha</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Baker</surname>
							<given-names>L. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bhukya</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ferguson</surname>
							<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016a</year>
					<article-title>Metagenomic assessment of the functional potential of the rumen microbiome in Holstein dairy cows</article-title>
					<source>Anaerobe</source>
					<volume>38</volume>
					<fpage>50</fpage>
					<lpage>60</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.12.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.12.003</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Pitta, D. W.; Indugu, N.; Kumar, S.; Vecchiarelli, B.; Sinha, R.; Baker, L. D.; Bhukya, B. and Ferguson, J. D. 2016a. Metagenomic assessment of the functional potential of the rumen microbiome in Holstein dairy cows. Anaerobe 38:50-60. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.12.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2015.12.003</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pitta</surname>
							<given-names>D. W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pinchak</surname>
							<given-names>W. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Indugu</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vecchiarelli</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sinha</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fulford</surname>
							<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016b</year>
					<article-title>Metagenomic analysis of the rumen microbiome of steers with wheat-induced frothy bloat</article-title>
					<source>Frontiers in Microbiology</source>
					<volume>7</volume>
					<fpage>689</fpage>
					<lpage>689</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00689">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00689</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Pitta, D. W.; Pinchak, W. E.; Indugu, N.; Vecchiarelli, B.; Sinha, R. and Fulford, J. D. 2016b. Metagenomic analysis of the rumen microbiome of steers with wheat-induced frothy bloat. Frontiers in Microbiology 7:689. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00689">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.00689</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pruesse</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Quast</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Knittel</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fuchs</surname>
							<given-names>B. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ludwig</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Peplies</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Glöckner</surname>
							<given-names>F. O.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB</article-title>
					<source>Nucleic Acids Research</source>
					<volume>35</volume>
					<fpage>7188</fpage>
					<lpage>7196</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm864">https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm864</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Pruesse, E.; Quast, C.; Knittel, K.; Fuchs, B. M.; Ludwig, W.; Peplies, J. and Glöckner, F. O. 2007. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Research 35:7188-7196. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm864">https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm864</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ransom-Jones</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jones</surname>
							<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McCarthy</surname>
							<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McDonald</surname>
							<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>The <italic>Fibrobacteres</italic>: an important phylum of cellulose-degrading bacteria</article-title>
					<source>Microbial Ecology</source>
					<volume>63</volume>
					<fpage>267</fpage>
					<lpage>281</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9998-1">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9998-1</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Ransom-Jones, E.; Jones, D. L.; McCarthy, A. J. and McDonald, J. E. 2012. The <italic>Fibrobacteres</italic>: an important phylum of cellulose-degrading bacteria. Microbial Ecology 63:267-281. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9998-1">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-011-9998-1</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Santos</surname>
							<given-names>E. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Thompson</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<chapter-title>The Family <italic>Succinivibrionaceae</italic></chapter-title>
					<fpage>639</fpage>
					<lpage>648</lpage>
					<source>The Prokaryotes</source>
					<edition>4th</edition>
					<person-group person-group-type="editor">
						<name>
							<surname>Rosenberg</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>DeLong</surname>
							<given-names>E. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lory</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stackebrandt</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Thompson</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Berlin, Heidelberg</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Santos, E. O. and Thompson, F. 2014. The Family <italic>Succinivibrionaceae</italic>. p.639-648. In: The Prokaryotes. 4th ed. Rosenberg E.; DeLong, E. F.; Lory, S.; Stackebrandt, E. and Thompson, F., eds. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Schären</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Frahm</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kersten</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Meyer</surname>
							<given-names>U.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hummel</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Breves</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dänicke</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Interrelations between the rumen microbiota and production, behavioral, rumen fermentation, metabolic, and immunological attributes of dairy cows</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
					<volume>101</volume>
					<fpage>4615</fpage>
					<lpage>4637</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13736">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13736</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Schären, M.; Frahm, J.; Kersten, S.; Meyer, U.; Hummel, J.; Breves, G. and Dänicke, S. 2018. Interrelations between the rumen microbiota and production, behavioral, rumen fermentation, metabolic, and immunological attributes of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 101:4615-4637. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13736">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13736</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Singh</surname>
							<given-names>K. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ahir</surname>
							<given-names>V. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tripathi</surname>
							<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ramani</surname>
							<given-names>U. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sajnani</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Koringa</surname>
							<given-names>P. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jakhesara</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pandya</surname>
							<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rank</surname>
							<given-names>D. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Murty</surname>
							<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kothari</surname>
							<given-names>R. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Joshi</surname>
							<given-names>C. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Metagenomic analysis of Surti buffalo (<italic>Bubalus bubalis</italic>) rumen: A preliminary study</article-title>
					<source>Molecular Biology Reports</source>
					<volume>39</volume>
					<fpage>4841</fpage>
					<lpage>4848</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1278-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1278-0</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Singh, K. M.; Ahir, V. B.; Tripathi, A. K.; Ramani, U. V.; Sajnani, M.; Koringa, P. G.; Jakhesara, S.; Pandya, P. R.; Rank, D. N.; Murty, D. S.; Kothari, R. K. and Joshi, C. G. 2012. Metagenomic analysis of Surti buffalo (<italic>Bubalus bubalis</italic>) rumen: A preliminary study. Molecular Biology Reports 39:4841-4848. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1278-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-011-1278-0</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Spanghero</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mason</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zanfi</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nikulina</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Effect of diets differing in protein concentration (low vs medium) and nitrogen source (urea vs soybean meal) on in vitro rumen fermentation and on performance of finishing Italian Simmental bulls</article-title>
					<source>Livestock Science</source>
					<volume>196</volume>
					<fpage>14</fpage>
					<lpage>21</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.12.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.12.004</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Spanghero, M.; Mason, F.; Zanfi, C. and Nikulina, A. 2017. Effect of diets differing in protein concentration (low vs medium) and nitrogen source (urea vs soybean meal) on in vitro rumen fermentation and on performance of finishing Italian Simmental bulls. Livestock Science 196:14-21. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.12.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.12.004</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wu</surname>
							<given-names>G. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lewis</surname>
							<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hoffmann</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Knight</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bittinger</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hwang</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Berkowsky</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nessel</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bushman</surname>
							<given-names>F. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags</article-title>
					<source>BMC Microbiology</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<fpage>206</fpage>
					<lpage>206</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-206">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-206</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Wu, G. D.; Lewis, J. D.; Hoffmann, C.; Chen, Y. Y.; Knight, R.; Bittinger, K.; Hwang, J.; Chen, J.; Berkowsky, R.; Nessel, L.; Li, H. and Bushman, F. D. 2010. Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags. BMC Microbiology 10:206. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-206">https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-10-206</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Yáñez-Ruiz</surname>
							<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Macías</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pinloche</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Newbold</surname>
							<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>The persistence of bacterial and methanogenic archaeal communities residing in the rumen of young lambs</article-title>
					<source>FEMS Microbiology Ecology</source>
					<volume>72</volume>
					<fpage>272</fpage>
					<lpage>278</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00852.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00852.x</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Yáñez-Ruiz, D. R.; Macías, B.; Pinloche, E. and Newbold, C. J. 2010. The persistence of bacterial and methanogenic archaeal communities residing in the rumen of young lambs. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 72:272-278. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00852.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00852.x</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Zebeli</surname>
							<given-names>Q.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Aschenbach</surname>
							<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tafaj</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Boguhn</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ametaj</surname>
							<given-names>B. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Drochner</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Invited review: Role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in high-producing dairy cattle</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
					<volume>95</volume>
					<fpage>1041</fpage>
					<lpage>1056</lpage>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4421">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4421</ext-link>
					</comment>
				</element-citation>
				<mixed-citation>Zebeli, Q.; Aschenbach, J. R.; Tafaj, M.; Boguhn, J.; Ametaj, B. N. and Drochner, W. 2012. Invited review: Role of physically effective fiber and estimation of dietary fiber adequacy in high-producing dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 95:1041-1056. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4421">https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4421</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>