<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rbz</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">R. Bras. Zootec.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1516-3598</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1806-9290</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher-name></publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="other">00610</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37496/rbz4920190036</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Non-ruminants</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Feather and blood meal at different processing degrees in broiler pre-starter and starter diets</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-7359-6760</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Laboissi&#xE8;re</surname><given-names>Michele</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-7412-1794</contrib-id>
<name><surname>da Costa</surname><given-names>Miliane Alves</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-8810-1284</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Jardim</surname><given-names>Roberto de Moraes</given-names><suffix>Filho</suffix></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-6525-9975</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Leandro</surname><given-names>Nadja Susana Mogyca</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-1478-8009</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Caf&#xE9;</surname><given-names>Marcos Barcellos</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-3710-6963</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Stringhini</surname><given-names>Jos&#xE9; Henrique</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref> <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1">*</xref></contrib>
<aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Estadual de Goi&#xE1;s</institution>
<addr-line>
<named-content content-type="city">S&#xE3;o Lu&#xED;s de Montes Belos</named-content>
<named-content content-type="state">GO</named-content></addr-line>
<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
<institution content-type="original">Universidade Estadual de Goi&#xE1;s, S&#xE3;o Lu&#xED;s de Montes Belos, GO, Brasil.</institution></aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal de Goi&#xE1;s</institution>
<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Escola de Veterin&#xE1;ria e Zootecnia</institution>
<institution content-type="orgdiv2">Departamento de Zootecnia</institution>
<addr-line>
<named-content content-type="city">Goi&#xE2;nia</named-content>
<named-content content-type="state">GO</named-content></addr-line>
<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
<institution content-type="original">Universidade Federal de Goi&#xE1;s, Escola de Veterin&#xE1;ria e Zootecnia, Departamento de Zootecnia, Goi&#xE2;nia, GO, Brasil.</institution></aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<institution content-type="orgname">S&#xE3;o Salvador Alimentos</institution>
<addr-line>
<named-content content-type="city">Itabera&#xED;</named-content>
<named-content content-type="state">GO</named-content></addr-line>
<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
<institution content-type="original">S&#xE3;o Salvador Alimentos, Itabera&#xED;, GO, Brasil.</institution></aff></contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1">
<label>*</label><bold>Corresponding author:</bold> <email>jhstring@hotmail.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="conflict">
<p><bold>Conflict of Interest</bold></p>
<p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="con">
<p><bold>Author Contributions</bold></p>
<p>Conceptualization: J.H. Stringhini. Formal analysis: N.S.M. Leandro. Funding acquisition: R.M. Jardim Filho. Investigation: M. Laboissi&#xE8;re. Methodology: M. Laboissi&#xE8;re and J.H. Stringhini. Project administration: M. Laboissi&#xE8;re and J.H. Stringhini. Resources: R.M. Jardim Filho. Supervision: M.B. Caf&#xE9; and J.H. Stringhini. Validation: N.S.M. Leandro and M.B. Caf&#xE9;. Writing-review &#x26; editing: M.A. Costa and J.H. Stringhini.</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub">
<day>27</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2020</year></pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2020</year></pub-date>
<volume>49</volume>
<elocation-id>e20190036</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>02</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2019</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>12</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2020</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
<license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the inclusion of feather and blood meal (FBM) in broiler pre-starter and starter diets according to the processing method used. Performance, digestibility, and intestinal morphometry of broilers fed diets containing FBM were evaluated in two experiments, in the pre-starter (1-7 d) and starter (8-21 d) phases in a randomized block design with four treatments and five replicates of 12 birds, totaling 20 experimental units per trial. The criteria used for block formation was the battery floor. The meal was processed under different degrees of hydrolysis pressure (2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 40 min; 2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 30 min; and 3.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 20 min) and added at 9% to the pre-starter (Experiment I) and starter (Experiment II) diets. In each experiment, 480 male Cobb 500<sup>&#xAE;</sup> chicks were allocated to batteries. The following variables were measured: live weight, weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, and digestibility and retention of dry matter, nitrogen, and ether extract. Performance was not influenced by the dietary inclusion of the ingredient. However, FBM subjected to the highest hydrolysis pressure resulted in the worst overall nutritional balances. The chickens were more susceptible to FBM processing in the pre-starter phase, when the hydrolysis pressure of 2.5 kgf/m<sup>2</sup> for 30 min provided the best results. In the starter diet, FBM processed at a hydrolysis pressure of 2.0 kgf/m<sup>2</sup> for 40 min provided the best performance results up to 14 days of age, without changing nutrient metabolism. Up to 9% feather and blood meal can be included in broiler pre-starter and starter diets as long as the ingredient processing method is well-known.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
<title>Keywords:</title>
<kwd>chick</kwd>
<kwd>feeding</kwd>
<kwd>metabolism</kwd>
<kwd>poultry</kwd>
<kwd>poultry byproduct</kwd></kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="0"/>
<table-count count="7"/>
<equation-count count="2"/>
<ref-count count="34"/></counts></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>Animal-derived ingredients are important inputs in the nutritional, economic, and food-safety aspects of animal diets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bellaver et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Caires et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Silva et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Beski et al., 2015</xref>). Approximately 17% of a bird consists of non-edible wastes that are mainly composed of feathers and offal (8.5 and 6.5%, respectively), with the remaining constituents representing a minimal portion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Olivo et al., 2006</xref>).</p>
<p>Despite the widespread use of animal products in the formulation of animal diets, their nutritional value should be better investigated. Restrictions on their inclusion, real chemical and energy composition, quality and industrial yield, and methods to prevent bacteria proliferation through them must be considered (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">McCasland and Richardon, 1966</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Nunes et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Beski et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>Feather and blood meal (FBM) is the result of the pressurized cooking of clean and undecomposed feathers. Blood can be included if it does not significantly alter the composition of hydrolyzed feather meal. Feathers are included in practical feeds as part of the protein and amino acid source (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Branco et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Saima et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Baker, 2009</xref>).</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Xavier et al. (2011)</xref> described that up to 6% FBM can be included in diets for broilers in the pre-starter (one to seven days old) and starter (eight to 21 days old) phases. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Carvalho et al. (2012)</xref>, however, stated that the inclusion of 5% feather meal impaired the performance of birds at 35 days of age. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Haryanto et al. (2017)</xref> found that the use of 2.5% feather meal had positive effects on performance, generating improved feed conversion and reduced lipid profile levels.</p>
<p>Feathers have a high content of crude protein, which is primarily constituted of keratins, simple proteins resistant to proteolytic enzymes in the stomach and intestines of the animal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Scapim et al., 2003</xref>). For this reason, they must be hydrolyzed by pressurized steam-cooking to be digested (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Isika et al., 2006</xref>).</p>
<p>Therefore, standards must be established for the use of poultry slaughterhouse wastes so that their nutritional value can be determined and the effect of their processing methods on poultry production understood. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Latshaw (1990)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Shirley and Parsons (2000)</xref> found that changes in processing pressure can alter the digestibility of amino acids in feather meal. However, in view of the evolution in the processing of slaughterhouse wastes and in poultry farming, it is important to update the knowledge about the effects of the processing of animal meals on the performance of chickens.</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Beski et al. (2015)</xref> highlighted the importance of using animal ingredients in poultry diets. According to the researchers, although these ingredients do not supply large amounts of metabolizable energy, their protein and amino acid contents as well as high levels of available phosphorus and some macro- and microminerals can decisively contribute to the balance of diets. Therefore, experiments are warranted to continuously evaluate the processing of feather meal and its impact on broiler performance within the modern context of animal production processes as well as the evolution of methods of slaughter and processing of meat and slaughterhouse wastes.</p>
<p>On this basis, this experiment was developed to evaluate different temperatures and pressures used in the processing of FBM and their effect on nutrient digestibility in broilers.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>2. Material and Methods</title>
<p>Two experiments were carried out in the pre-starter (one to seven days of age) and starter (eight to 21 days of age) phases in Goi&#xE2;nia - GO, Brazil (latitude: &#x2212;16.599288, longitude: &#x2212;49.2769467, 738 m asl). This research project was conducted in accordance with welfare standards proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Avila et al. (2007)</xref>.</p>
<p>For each experiment, 480 male Cobb 500<sup>&#xAE;</sup> broiler chicks (240 in the pre-starter and 240 in the starter phase) were housed in four galvanized steel batteries with five floors, each having 0.80 &#xD7; 0.75 &#xD7; 0.25 m (length &#xD7; width &#xD7; height) divisions. The batteries were located in a masonry shed covered by French roof tiles and roof lining. Both experiments were laid out in a randomized block design, and the battery floor was the criterion for distribution into the blocks, with four treatments and five replicates of 12 birds each, totaling 20 experimental units for each experiment.</p>
<p>Temperature and relative humidity means during the evaluated period were appropriate for rearing chicken in the initial development phases (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="t1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<title>Temperature and relative humidity means during the experimental period, from one to 21 days of age</title></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup width="33%">
<col width="1%"/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/></colgroup>
<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2"/>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Pre-starter phase</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Starter phase</th></tr></thead>
<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="2">Temperature (&#xB0;C)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Maximum</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33.8</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Minimum</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">26.6</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Mean</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">28.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">30.2</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Range</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.2</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="2">Relative humidity (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Maximum</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">58.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">69.4</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Minimum</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">28.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">52.2</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap>
<p>The feather and bone meal was obtained from hydrolysis at a slaughterhouse waste processing industry. The processing indices were evaluated according to the capacity of the available equipment and the indication that the pressure applied to the waste could alter its digestibility. In the industry where the ingredient was prepared, the method consisted of applying pressure and temperature in the presence of moisture to the waste in a conventional batch digester. The pressurized thermal action promotes molecular breaking, resulting in simple protein fractions that can be digested by the gastrointestinal tract of birds.</p>
<p>The feathers were received at the meal and oil factory, pressed, and conducted to the receptor box to be automatically dosed per batch. After loading the 60-min digester, the feathers were hydrolyzed for 50 min at a temperature of 133 &#xB0;C. This period consisted of 15 min for pressurization to reach 133 &#xB0;C, 20 min at a constant temperature, and another 15 min for depressurization. Pre-drying was carried out for 70 min and discharge for 20 min. Subsequently, the material was dried in a flash dryer, in a process that consists of heating the cold air with combustion gas from the furnace. The dryer works as follows: the warm air, generated by the exhauster, circulates to promote air movement and particle suspension. The dryer removes 28% of the moisture in 60 min and the 800-kg fixed load is completed with a final moisture of 6 to 8%. The total duration of the process was approximately 260 min per batch. The FBM yield was approximately 3.3% of the live weight.</p>
<p>For both experiments, three internal hydrolysis pressure degrees were applied for three different durations: 2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 40 min, 2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 30 min, and 3.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 20 min. The choice of these values followed the principle that hydrolysis time decreases as the degree of internal pressure applied is increased.</p>
<p>After processing, FBM was sprayed with antioxidants and substances for the microbiological control of <italic>Salmonella</italic>. The absence of <italic>Salmonella</italic> in the meals was confirmed by microbiological analysis.</p>
<p>The experimental diets were formulated with 9% FBM differentiated by the processing method (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). Previous experiments conducted by our research group indicated the possibility of using 9% inclusion as the maximum level, which would allow the nutritional effects of processing to be more effectively observed. Diets were formulated to meet the recommendations and composition proposed by the S&#xE3;o Salvador Alimentos - SSA company and the Brazilian Tables for Poultry and Swine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Rostagno et al., 2011</xref>) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="t2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<title>Chemical analysis of feather and blood meal (FBM) obtained by processing methods involving different hydrolysis pressures and cooking times</title></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup width="14%">
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/></colgroup>
<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Meal processing</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">Pre-starter phase</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">Starter phase</th></tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle">% DM</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">% N.DM</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">% EE</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">% DM</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">% N.DM</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">% EE</th></tr></thead>
<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">FBM 2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 40 min</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91.75</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.89</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92.44</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.97</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">FBM 2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 30 min</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92.16</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.89</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">91.84</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.32</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.37</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">FBM 3.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 20 min</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">92.23</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.96</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.91</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90.18</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.11</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.18</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup width="16%">
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/></colgroup>
<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="6" style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">Reference analytical standards for FBM quality control</th></tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle">PD (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">A (NaOH/g)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">PI (meq/1000 g)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">CP (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Moisture (%)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Retention in 2.0-mm sieve (%)</th></tr></thead>
<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">84</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.0</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot><attrib>Source: S&#xE3;o Salvador Alimentos - SSA.</attrib>
<fn id="TFN1">
<p>DM - dry matter; N - nitrogen; EE - ether extract; PD - pepsin digestibility; A - acidity; PI - peroxide index; CP - crude protein.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="t3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<title>Composition of the experimental diets</title></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup width="19%">
<col width="1%"/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/></colgroup>
<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle" colspan="2" rowspan="2">Item</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">Pre-starter phase (1-7 days)</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">Starter phase (8-21 days)</th></tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Control</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Feather and blood meal</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Control</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Feather and blood meal</th></tr></thead>
<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="2">Ingredient (g/kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Corn grain</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">521.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">645.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">551.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">680.32</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Soybean meal</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">267.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">176.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">154.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">74.00</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Whole soybean</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">130.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">210.93</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">70.20</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Meat meal</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60.40</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">70.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">60.60</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Feather and blood meal</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">90.00</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Common salt</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.90</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Limestone</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.07</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.00</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Sodium bicarbonate</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.00</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">L-threonine</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.40</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">DL-methionine</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.50</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">L-lysine HCl 98%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.30</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.40</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.90</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Choline 60%</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.40</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.40</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Min./vit. supplement<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN3">1</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.00</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Anticoccidial</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.60</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Growth promoter</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.10</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Antioxidant</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.01</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.01</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle" colspan="2">Nutritional composition</td>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">AMEn (kcal/kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.000</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.999</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.119</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.119</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Protein (g/kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">240.51</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">240.55</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">220.51</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">220.52</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Calcium (g/kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.80</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Available phosphorus (g/kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.90</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.90</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Digestible threonine (g/kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.10</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.20</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Digestible met + cys (g/kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.70</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.80</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Digestible lysine (g/kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">13.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.60</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Potassium (g/kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.60</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.40</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">8.80</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.50</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Sodium (g/kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.20</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.00</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.00</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Chlorine (g/kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.40</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.50</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.60</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Mongin&#x27;s number (meq/kg)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">243</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">134</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">214</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">100</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TFN2">
<p>AMEn - apparent metabolizable energy corrected for nitrogen.</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN3">
<label>1</label>
<p>Mineral and vitamin supplement for broilers; provides per kilogram of the product: 3,125,000 IU vitamin A; 550,000 IU vitamin D3; 3,750 mg vitamin E; 625 mg vitamin K3; 250 mg vitamin B1; 1,125 mg vitamin B2; 250 mg vitamin B6; 3,750 mcg vitamin B12, 9,500 mg niacin; 3,750 mg calcium pantothenate; 125 mg folic acid; 350,000 mg DL-methionine; 150,000 mg choline chloride 50%; 12,500 mg selenium; 2,500 mg manganese; 100,000 mg zinc; 100,000 mg iron; 16,000 mg copper; 150,000 mg excipient q.s. (iodine).</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<p>The average initial weight of the birds was 40.94&#xB1;0.1 (1st day of age) in Experiment I and 44.47&#xB1;0.3 (1st day of age) in Experiment II. Birds and diets were weighed on the 1st, 4th, 7th, 14th, 17th, and 21st days of age, and the data were used for the calculation of weight gain, feed intake, and feed conversion. Mortality was recorded daily and expressed as percentage, and dead birds were weighed for performance correction.</p>
<p>The total experimental period was from the 1st to the 21st day of age. In Experiment I (pre-starter phase; days 1-7), the chicks were fed the experimental diets containing FBM subjected to the different processing methods, immediately after being housed. In Experiment II (starter phase; days 8 to 21), the chicks were fed the same diet (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). The same control diet, composed of animal ingredients, was used in both experiments.</p>
<p>Between the 4th and 7th days (Experiment I) and the 17th and the 21st days (Experiment II), a metabolism trial was carried out by the total excreta collection method, twice daily. The collected material was homogenized, weighed, pre-dried in a forced-air oven at 60&#xB1;5 &#xB0;C, and subsequently ground in a Wiley mill. Chemical analyses of diets and excreta were performed following the method proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Silva and Queiroz (2009)</xref>.</p>
<p>The metabolizability coefficient (MC%) of the diets was calculated as proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Sakomura and Rostagno (2007)</xref>:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq1">
<mml:math id="m1" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MC</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>&#x0025;</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>nutrient&#x00A0;intake</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>nutrient&#x00A0;excretion)</mml:mtext><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>nutrient&#x00A0;intake</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100.</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>Retention analysis was performed according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Noy and Sklan (2002)</xref>, considering the nutrient balance and weight gain in the periods of 4-7 days and 17-21 days.</p>
<p>Statistical analyses were carried out using SAEG (version 7.1) software and Tukey&#x27;s test was applied at the 5% probability level for mean comparison.</p>
<p>The statistical model used in the ANOVA is described below:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq2">
<mml:math id="m2" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>y</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ij</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x03BC;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>x</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>ij</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>in which y<sub>ij</sub> = observed value of response variable Y in treatment x<sub>i</sub> (i = 1, 2..., 7) and replicate j (j = 1, 2,..., 8); &#x3BC; = constant inherent to all observations; x<sub>i</sub> = 2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 40 min, 2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 30 min, or 3.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 20 min; and e<sub>ij</sub> = effect of experimental error associated with observation y<sub>ij</sub>.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>3. Results</title>
<p>The performance evaluation in Experiment I (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>) revealed that the treatments did not affect (P&#x3E;0.05) weight gain, feed intake, or feed conversion of broilers in the pre-starter phase.</p>
<table-wrap id="t4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<title>Performance of broilers fed pre-starter diets (1-7 days) containing feather and blood meal (FBM) obtained from different processing methods</title></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup width="14%">
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/></colgroup>
<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">CV%</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">P-value</th></tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Without FBM</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 40 min</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 30 min</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">3.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 20 min</th></tr></thead>
<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">1 to 7 days</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Mean weight (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">176</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">178</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">174</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">168</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.253</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Weight gain (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">136</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">137</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">134</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">127</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.263</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Feed intake (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">95</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">94</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3E;0.5</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Feed conversion</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.693</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.695</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.689</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.742</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3E;0.5</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">8 to 21 days</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Weight gain (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">650</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">653</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">695</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">644</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.179</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Feed intake (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">739</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">776</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">781</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">730</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.310</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Feed conversion</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.137</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.192</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.124</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.133</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.136</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">1 to 21 days</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Mean weight (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">831</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">832</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">883</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">808</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.150</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Weight gain (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">789</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">790</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">840</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">767</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.145</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Feed intake (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">834</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">872</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">880</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">822</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.356</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Feed conversion</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.058</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.105</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.050</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.070</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.298</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TFN4">
<p>Means followed by different letters in the row differ between each other by Tukey&#x27;s test at 5% probability.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<p>In the metabolism trial carried out from days 4 to 7 in Experiment I (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>), the dry matter (DM) excretion values decreased as the processing pressure applied to FBM was increased. However, DM intake and balance remained unaltered (P&#x3E;0.05), indicating that there was no effect of FBM processing method on the absorption rates. Only DM excretion decreased when FBM was processed at 2.5 and 3.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p>
<table-wrap id="t5">
<label>Table 5</label>
<caption>
<title>Nutrient metabolizability of starter broiler diets containing feather and blood meal (FBM) obtained from different processing methods, in the period from four to seven days</title></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup width="14%">
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/></colgroup>
<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">CV%</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">P-value</th></tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Without FBM</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 40 min</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 30 min</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">3.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 20 min</th></tr></thead>
<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Dry matter intake (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.160</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.187</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.149</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.131</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.333</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Dry matter excretion (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">339a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">314ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">298b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">293b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.045</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Dry matter balance (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">821</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">873</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">851</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">838</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.139</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Nitrogen intake (g)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN6">1</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">49.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">52.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">51.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">51.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.186</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Nitrogen excretion (g)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN6">1</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">20.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.077</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Nitrogen balance (g)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN6">1</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">29.2b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33.8a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33.1a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">34.2a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3C;0.001</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ether extract intake (g)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN6">1</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">93.5a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">64.3d</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">87.2b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">71.1c</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3C;0.001</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ether extract excretion (g)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN6">1</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">24.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">22.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">19.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">18.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">16.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.153</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ether extract balance (g)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN6">1</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">68.7a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">41.9c</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">67.3a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">52.5b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3C;0.001</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Dry matter MC (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">70.7b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">73.7a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">74.1a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">74.1a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.002</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Nitrogen MC (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">59.2b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">63.9a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">64.9a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">66.4a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3C;0.001</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ether extract MC (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">73.4a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">65.8c</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.3a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">74.4b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.006</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Dry matter retention (mg/g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">754.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">799.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">806.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">852.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.072</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Nitrogen retention (mg/g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">36.9b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47.7a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">49.1a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">53.2a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.003</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ether extract retention (mg/g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">63.3a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">38.2c</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">64.0a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">53.2b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3C;0.001</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TFN5">
<p>MC - metabolizability coefficient.</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN6">
<label>1</label>
<p>Dry-matter basis.</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN7">
<p>Means followed by different letters in the row differ between each other by Tukey&#x27;s test at 5% probability.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<p>Nitrogen intake and excretion were not affected by the processing of FBM (P&#x3E;0.05), whereas N balance varied with the degrees of pressure tested (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>). The experimental diets containing FBM provided the highest N balance (P&#x3C;0.05), suggesting that there was an increase in the amount of N retained as compared with diets that did not contain FBM in their composition. Ether extract (EE) intake was reduced (P&#x3C;0.05) in the groups fed the pre-starter diets containing FBM, with the lowest values obtained when the ingredient was processed at 2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 40 min. Accordingly, EE balance was affected (P&#x3C;0.05) by the degrees of pressure used in the processing of FBM (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>). Among the treatments including FBM, the highest EE balance (P&#x3C;0.05) was obtained with control and the diet with FBM processed at the hydrolysis pressures of 2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, followed by 3.0 and 2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p>
<p>The results of the metabolism trial obtained in Experiment I (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>) revealed that the FBM levels affected (P&#x3C;0.05) the metabolizability of DM, N, and EE.</p>
<p>The pre-starter diets with inclusion of 9% FBM improved the metabolizability of DM and N as compared with the diet without the ingredient (P&#x3C;0.05), regardless of the degree of processing to which it was subjected. However, the metabolizability coefficient of EE from the diets with FBM revealed greater digestibility (P&#x3C;0.05) for FBM processed at 2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, followed by 3.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, and the worst for the hydrolysis pressure of 2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, indicating that the higher degree of FBM processing improved the utilization of lipid compounds from the pre-starter diet.</p>
<p>Experiment I also revealed that the treatments affected (P&#x3C;0.05) N and EE retention (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>). The pre-starter diets with 9% FBM also provided better N retention than the diet without FBM. The highest EE retention value (P&#x3C;0.05) of the diets with FBM was obtained when the ingredient was processed at 2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, followed by 3.0 and 2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p>
<p>In Experiment II, which was conducted with FBM subjected to different hydrolysis pressures and times in the starter phase (eight to 21 days of age), the treatments did not affect (P&#x3E;0.05) the average weight of the birds on the 14th and 21st days of life (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>). However, the experimental diets affected (P&#x3C;0.05) weight gain and feed conversion from eight to 14 days of age. The diet without FBM resulted in greater weight gain than the diets containing the meal. The best feed conversion ratio (P&#x3C;0.05) was achieved with the treatments without FBM and with FBM subjected to the hydrolysis pressure of 2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> during processing.</p>
<table-wrap id="t6">
<label>Table 6</label>
<caption>
<title>Performance of broilers fed starter diets (8-21 days) containing feather and blood meal (FBM) obtained from different processing methods</title></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup width="14%">
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/></colgroup>
<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">CV%</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">P-value</th></tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Without FBM</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 40 min</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 30 min</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">3.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 20 min</th></tr></thead>
<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">8 to 14 days</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Mean weight (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">491</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">462</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">475</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">470</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.159</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Weight gain (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">301a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">273b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">288ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">278b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.049</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Feed intake (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">322</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">319</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">324</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">352</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.278</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Feed conversion</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.068b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.176ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.123b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.263a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.022</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle" colspan="2">1 to 21 days</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/>
<td align="center" valign="middle"/></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Mean weight (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">905</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">832</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">837</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">850</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.219</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Weight gain (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">756</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">686</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">693</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">703</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.201</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Feed intake (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">813</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">788</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">786</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">827</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3E;0.5</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Feed conversion</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.075</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.146</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.134</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">1.176</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">4.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.127</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TFN8">
<p>Means followed by different letters in the row differ between each other by Tukey&#x27;s test at 5% probability.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<p>However, in the total period (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>), the experimental diets had no significant effect on performance (P&#x3E;0.05). In this case, FBM inclusion did not determine a reduction in performance variables under any of the tested processing methods.</p>
<p>The metabolism trial carried out from the 17th to the 21st days in Experiment II (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t7">Table 7</xref>) indicated a lack of effects (P&#x3E;0.05) on the intake, excretion, balance, metabolizability coefficient, and retention of DM, N, and EE.</p>
<table-wrap id="t7">
<label>Table 7</label>
<caption>
<title>Nutrient metabolizability of broiler diets containing feather and blood meal (FBM) obtained from different processing methods, in the period from 17 to 21 days</title></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup width="14%">
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/></colgroup>
<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<th align="left" valign="middle" rowspan="2">Variable</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" colspan="4" style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">Treatment</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">CV%</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle" rowspan="2">P-value</th></tr>
<tr>
<th align="center" valign="middle">Without FBM</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 40 min</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 30 min</th>
<th align="center" valign="middle">3.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>, 20 min</th></tr></thead>
<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Dry matter intake (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.306</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.562</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.344</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">3.690</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.349</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Dry matter excretion (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">966</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">858</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">769</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">954</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">12.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.202</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Dry matter balance (g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.341</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.704</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.576</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">2.736</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3E;0.5</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Nitrogen intake (g)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN10">1</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">162b</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">175ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">174ab</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">202a</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.043</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Nitrogen excretion (g)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN10">1</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">54</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">53</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">55</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">65</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">17.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3E;0.5</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Nitrogen balance (g)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN10">1</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">108</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">122</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">119</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">137</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3E;0.5</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ether extract intake (g)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN10">1</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">296</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">275</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">256</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">284</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">7.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">10.2</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ether extract excretion (g)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN10">1</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">76</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">31</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">63</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">33.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3E;0.5</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ether extract balance (g)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN10">1</xref></td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">219</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">228</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">225</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">222</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">15.5</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3E;0.5</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Dry matter MC (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">70.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">75.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">73.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">5.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3E;0.5</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Nitrogen MC (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">65.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">69.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">67.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">67.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">6.9</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3E;0.5</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ether extract MC (%)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">73.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">86.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">9.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.293</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Dry matter retention (mg/g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">869.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">978.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">915.2</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">959.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3E;0.5</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Nitrogen retention (mg/g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">39.8</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">43.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">42.4</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">47.7</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">11.0</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">0.388</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="middle">Ether extract retention (mg/g)</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">80.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">82.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">79.3</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">77.6</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">14.1</td>
<td align="center" valign="middle">&#x3E;0.5</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TFN9">
<p>MC - metabolizability coefficient.</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN10">
<label>1</label>
<p>Dry-matter basis.</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN11">
<p>Means followed by different letters in the row differ between each other by Tukey&#x27;s test at 5% probability.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<p>In the starter phase, the FBM processing methods induced different responses from N intake. The chickens fed the diet containing FBM processed at 3.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 20 min obtained the best results for this variable in comparison with control group (P&#x3C;0.05). The groups fed the diet containing FBM processed at 2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 40 min and 2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 30 min were similar to each other, to control group, and to the group which received the diet with FBM processed at 3.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 20 min, for N intake.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>4. Discussion</title>
<p>The performance evaluation in Experiment I (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>) revealed that the treatments did not affect the weight gain, feed intake, or feed conversion of broilers in the pre-starter phase.</p>
<p>In experiments conducted with the same ingredient evaluated in this experiment, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Xavier et al. (2011)</xref> observed that the inclusion level of 6.0% in broiler pre-starter diet worsened performance up to 21 days of age, eliciting a negative linear response from weight gain and feed intake, but no changes in feed conversion. The authors recommended the inclusion of 3 to 4% in the broiler pre-starter and starter phases.</p>
<p>Nonetheless, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baker et al. (1981)</xref> supplemented methionine and lysine to feather meal and concluded that it can replace up to 40% of CP in the feed. In meat quail, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Santos et al. (2006)</xref> found that up to 9.0% inclusion of feather meal caused a linear decrease in intake from one to 21 days of age, having no effect on the other variables tested in the protocol. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Caires et al. (2010)</xref>, on the other hand, found that the inclusion of 5% of the ingredient did not interfere with performance, but resulted in decreased costs. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hasni et al. (2014)</xref> suggested that the inclusion of 6.5 to 6.8% feather meal in the diet can replace fish meal and provide similar performance, at a lower cost, in chickens. Lastly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Haryanto et al. (2017)</xref> evaluated inclusion levels of up to 10% of the product in the diet and found that feed conversion was improved at 2.5%. However, the authors did not test the effects of variations in ingredient processing on broiler performance.</p>
<p>The DM balance results remained unaltered, indicating that there was no effect of the FBM processing method on the absorption rates in the pre-starter phase. Only DM excretion decreased when FBM was processed at 2.5 and 3.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>.</p>
<p>There are many factors related to improved utilization of nutrients from animal-derived ingredients. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Papadopoulos et al. (1985)</xref> concluded that the temperature, pressure, and processing time of feather meal were considered primary factors affecting the protein quality of this ingredient. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Batterham et al. (1986)</xref> increased the retention time and temperature in the processing of meat and bone meal and found decreased availability of amino acids, especially lysine. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Papadopoulos et al. (1986)</xref> found that, with the increase in hydrolysis time, cysteine decreased whereas N solubility increased. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Wang and Parsons (1997)</xref> noted that a negative aspect of the thermal process is the degradation of thermolabile amino acids, which compromises the quality of feather meal. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baker et al. (1981)</xref> observed that the reduced digestibility of cysteine and methionine is due to the processing of the meal, in which cysteine is transformed into lanthionine.</p>
<p>As regards the metabolism of N compounds, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Shirley and Parsons (2000)</xref> found that increasing processing pressures (0, 30, and 60 psi) reduced the digestibility of amino acids from feather meal. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Moritz and Latshaw (2001)</xref> found that higher processing pressures (207 to 724 kPa or 2.0 to 7.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup>) of feather meal reduced amino acid digestibility, and the average density of the meal in kg/m<sup>3</sup> increased as the pressure was elevated in a constant time.</p>
<p>Because the apparent metabolizable energy corrected for nitrogen (AMEn) values of animal byproducts are highly variable, processing emerges as a tool to adjust the characteristics of the desired product.</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bellaver et al. (2001)</xref> observed a significant difference in AMEn when FBM was processed in a fixed load digester at a pressure of 3.0 atm. When hydrolysis time was increased from 30 to 60 min, AMEn went from 2,414 to 2,713 kcal/kg. This effect was not observed for the pressures of 2.0 and 3.0 atm in a fixed time.</p>
<p>The inclusion of FBM did not determine a reduction in performance variables in any of the studied processing methods. These results are similar to those found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Xavier et al. (2011)</xref>, who evaluated increasing levels (0, 2, 4, and 6%) of FBM in the broiler starter diet and observed no effects on weight gain, feed intake, or feed conversion. Nevertheless, the diet with FBM turned out to be economic, as it increased nutrient and energy diversity in poultry diets.</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Xavier et al. (2011)</xref> used the same ingredient and observed a quadratic effect on the metabolizability of DM and EE, but no effect for N, disagreeing with the present study. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Eaksuree et al. (2016)</xref>, in turn, found that N retention ranged from 48 to 85% and EE digestibility varied between 63 and 88% following the inclusion of the keratinase enzyme in the diet.</p>
<p>In the starter phase, the FBM processing methods resulted in differences in weight gain and feed conversion from eight to 14 days of age. The broilers fed the diet with FBM subjected to the hydrolysis pressure of 2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 30 min and the diet without FBM had the best performance.</p>
<p>The increase in hydrolysis time decreases digestibility and may affect the final quality of FBM. In the present study, 60% digestibility was obtained in 30 min of processing at 2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> of pressure. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Sinhorini (2013)</xref> evaluated the <italic>in vitro</italic> digestibility of FBM and found that both variables, pressure and hydrolysis time, were significant in the processing of the meals, which showed a protein content of 83.44% and a true digestibility coefficient of 43.72% at the pressure of 2.0 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> under 40 min of hydrolysis. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Eyng et al. (2012)</xref> concluded that the chemical composition of byproducts may vary depending on thermal processing, percentage of inclusion, and origin of the ingredients, which are not constant and may be attributed to low standardization and to the type and proportion of constituents.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions">
<title>5. Conclusions</title>
<p>The diet with feather and blood meal subjected to the hydrolysis pressure of 2.5 kgf/cm<sup>2</sup> for 30 min is the most adequate for the broiler pre-starter phase. Feather and blood meal processed at a hydrolysis pressure 2.0 kgf/m<sup>2</sup> for 40 min provides the best performance and nutrient metabolizability results. Up to 9% feather and blood meal can be included in pre-starter and starter diets as long as the ingredient processing is well-known. Therefore, it is crucial to analyze the production process and establish the nutritional characteristics of the desired product in advance.</p>
</sec></body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>Authors thank the S&#xE3;o Salvador Alimentos for experimental resources and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient&#xED;fico e Tecnol&#xF3;gico (CNPq) and Coordena&#xE7;&#xE3;o de Aperfei&#xE7;oamento de Pessoal de N&#xED;vel Superior (CAPES) for scholar and research fellowships.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Avila</surname><given-names>V. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kunz</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bellaver</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Paiva</surname><given-names>D. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jaenisch</surname><given-names>F. R. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mazzuco</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Trevisol</surname><given-names>I. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Palhares</surname><given-names>J. C. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Abreu</surname><given-names>P. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rosa</surname><given-names>P. S.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2007</year>
<source>Boas pr&#xE1;ticas de produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o de frangos de corte</source>
<publisher-name>Embrapa Su&#xED;nos e Aves, Conc&#xF3;rdia</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Conc&#xF3;rdia</publisher-loc>
<publisher-name>Circular T&#xE9;cnica</publisher-name>
<fpage>51</fpage>
<lpage>51</lpage>
<comment>Available at: &#x3C;<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/CNPSA/16385/1/publicacao_s8t285e.pdf">https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/CNPSA/16385/1/publicacao_s8t285e.pdf</ext-link>&#x3E;.</comment>
<date-in-citation content-type="access-date">Accessed on: May 30, 2019</date-in-citation></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Avila, V. S.; Kunz, A.; Bellaver, C.; Paiva, D. P.; Jaenisch, F. R. F.; Mazzuco, H.; Trevisol, I. M.; Palhares, J. C. P.; Abreu, P. G. and Rosa, P. S. 2007. Boas pr&#xE1;ticas de produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o de frangos de corte. Embrapa Su&#xED;nos e Aves, Conc&#xF3;rdia. Circular T&#xE9;cnica, 51. Available at: &#x3C;https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/CNPSA/16385/1/publicacao_s8t285e.pdf&#x3E;. Accessed on: May 30, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>D. H.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2009</year>
<article-title>Advances in protein&#x2013;amino acid nutrition of poultry</article-title>
<source>Amino Acids</source>
<volume>37</volume>
<fpage>29</fpage>
<lpage>41</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-008-0198-3">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-008-0198-3</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Baker, D. H. 2009. Advances in protein&#x2013;amino acid nutrition of poultry. Amino Acids 37:29-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-008-0198-3</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>D. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Blitenthal</surname><given-names>R. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Boebel</surname><given-names>K. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Czarnecki</surname><given-names>G. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Southern</surname><given-names>L. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Willis</surname><given-names>G. M.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1981</year>
<article-title>Protein-amino acid evaluation of steam-processed feather meal</article-title>
<source>Poultry Science</source>
<volume>60</volume>
<fpage>1865</fpage>
<lpage>1872</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0601865">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0601865</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Baker, D. H.; Blitenthal, R. C.; Boebel, K. P.; Czarnecki, G. L.; Southern, L. L. and Willis, G. M. 1981. Protein-amino acid evaluation of steam-processed feather meal. Poultry Science 60:1865-1872. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0601865</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Batterham</surname><given-names>E. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Darnell</surname><given-names>R. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Herbert</surname><given-names>L. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Major</surname><given-names>E. J.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1986</year>
<article-title>Effect of pressure and temperature on the availability of lysine in meat and bone meal as determined by slope-ratio assays with growing pigs, rats and chicks and by chemical techniques</article-title>
<source>British Journal of Nutrition</source>
<volume>55</volume>
<fpage>441</fpage>
<lpage>453</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19860050">https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19860050</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Batterham, E. S.; Darnell, R. E.; Herbert, L. S. and Major, E. J. 1986. Effect of pressure and temperature on the availability of lysine in meat and bone meal as determined by slope-ratio assays with growing pigs, rats and chicks and by chemical techniques. British Journal of Nutrition 55:441-453. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn19860050</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<element-citation publication-type="webpage">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Bellaver</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Brum</surname><given-names>P. A. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zanotto</surname><given-names>D. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Klein</surname><given-names>C. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lima</surname><given-names>G. M. M.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2001</year>
<source>Estimativa da energia metaboliz&#xE1;vel de farinhas de abatedouro de aves obtidas sob diferentes processamentos industriais</source>
<comment>Available at: &#x3C;<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.cnpsa.embrapa.br/sgc/sgc_arquivos/palestras">http://www.cnpsa.embrapa.br/sgc/sgc_arquivos/palestras</ext-link>&#x3E;.</comment>
<date-in-citation content-type="access-date">Accessed on: June 22, 2017</date-in-citation></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Bellaver, C.; Brum, P. A. R.; Zanotto, D. L.; Klein, C. H. and Lima, G. M. M. 2001. Estimativa da energia metaboliz&#xE1;vel de farinhas de abatedouro de aves obtidas sob diferentes processamentos industriais. Available at: &#x3C;http://www.cnpsa.embrapa.br/sgc/sgc_arquivos/palestras&#x3E;. Accessed on: June 22, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Bellaver</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>C. A. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Avila</surname><given-names>V. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fraha</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lima</surname><given-names>G. J. M. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hackenhar</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Baldi</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2005</year>
<article-title>Substitui&#xE7;&#xE3;o de farinhas de origem animal por ingredientes de origem vegetal em dietas para frangos de corte</article-title>
<source>Ci&#xEA;ncia Rural</source>
<volume>35</volume>
<fpage>671</fpage>
<lpage>677</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782005000300030">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782005000300030</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Bellaver, C.; Costa, C. A. F.; Avila, V. S.; Fraha, M.; Lima, G. J. M. M.; Hackenhar, L. and Baldi, P. 2005. Substitui&#xE7;&#xE3;o de farinhas de origem animal por ingredientes de origem vegetal em dietas para frangos de corte. Ci&#xEA;ncia Rural 35:671-677. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782005000300030</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Beski</surname><given-names>S. S. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Swick</surname><given-names>R. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Iji</surname><given-names>P. A.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2015</year>
<article-title>Specialized protein products in broiler chicken nutrition: A review</article-title>
<source>Animal Nutrition</source>
<volume>1</volume>
<fpage>47</fpage>
<lpage>53</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2015.05.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2015.05.005</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Beski, S. S. M.; Swick, R. A. and Iji, P. A. 2015. Specialized protein products in broiler chicken nutrition: A review. Animal Nutrition 1:47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2015.05.005</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Branco</surname><given-names>A. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Coneglian</surname><given-names>S. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mouro</surname><given-names>G. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>G. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zeoula</surname><given-names>L. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bumbieris</surname><given-names>V. H.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2003</year>
<article-title>Farinha de penas hidrolisada em dietas de ovinos</article-title>
<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
<volume>32</volume>
<fpage>1454</fpage>
<lpage>1460</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982003000600020">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982003000600020</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Branco, A. F.; Coneglian, S. M.; Mouro, G. F.; Santos, G. T.; Zeoula, L. M. and Bumbieris, V. H. 2003. Farinha de penas hidrolisada em dietas de ovinos. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 32:1454-1460. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982003000600020</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Caires</surname><given-names>C. M. I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fernandes</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fagundes</surname><given-names>N. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Carvalho</surname><given-names>A. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Maciel</surname><given-names>M. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>B. R.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2010</year>
<article-title>The use of animal byproducts in broiler feeds: Use of animal co-products in broilers diets</article-title>
<source>Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science</source>
<volume>12</volume>
<fpage>41</fpage>
<lpage>46</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2010000100006">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2010000100006</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Caires, C. M. I.; Fernandes, E. A.; Fagundes, N. S.; Carvalho, A. P.; Maciel, M. P. and Oliveira, B. R. 2010. The use of animal byproducts in broiler feeds: Use of animal co-products in broilers diets. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science 12:41-46. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2010000100006</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Carvalho</surname><given-names>C. M. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fernandes</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Carvalho</surname><given-names>A. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Caires</surname><given-names>R. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fagundes</surname><given-names>N. S.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2012</year>
<article-title>Uso de farinhas de origem animal na alimenta&#xE7;&#xE3;o de frangos de corte</article-title>
<source>Revista Portuguesa de Ci&#xEA;ncias Veterin&#xE1;rias</source>
<volume>107</volume>
<fpage>69</fpage>
<lpage>73</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.fmv.ulisboa.pt/spcv/PDF/pdf6_2012/69-73.pdf">http://www.fmv.ulisboa.pt/spcv/PDF/pdf6_2012/69-73.pdf</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Carvalho, C. M. C.; Fernandes, E. A.; Carvalho, A. P.; Caires, R. M. and Fagundes, N. S. 2012. Uso de farinhas de origem animal na alimenta&#xE7;&#xE3;o de frangos de corte. Revista Portuguesa de Ci&#xEA;ncias Veterin&#xE1;rias 107:69-73. http://www.fmv.ulisboa.pt/spcv/PDF/pdf6_2012/69-73.pdf</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Eaksuree</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Prachayakitti</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Upathanpreecha</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Taharnklaew</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nitisinprasert</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Keawsompong</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2016</year>
<article-title>In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals</article-title>
<source>SpringerPlus</source>
<volume>5</volume>
<fpage>971</fpage>
<lpage>971</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2626-2">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2626-2</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Eaksuree, W.; Prachayakitti, A.; Upathanpreecha, T.; Taharnklaew, R.; Nitisinprasert, S. and Keawsompong, S. 2016. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals. SpringerPlus 5:971. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2626-2</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Eyng</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nunes</surname><given-names>R. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rostagno</surname><given-names>H. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Albino</surname><given-names>L. F. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nunes</surname><given-names>C. G. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pozza</surname><given-names>P. C.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2012</year>
<article-title>Composi&#xE7;&#xE3;o qu&#xED;mica e aminoac&#xED;dica e coeficientes de digestibilidade verdadeira dos amino&#xE1;cidos de farinhas de penas e sangue determinados em galos cecectomizados</article-title>
<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
<volume>41</volume>
<fpage>80</fpage>
<lpage>85</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000100012">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000100012</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Eyng, C.; Nunes, R. V.; Rostagno, H. S.; Albino, L. F. T.; Nunes, C. G. V. and Pozza, P. C. 2012. Composi&#xE7;&#xE3;o qu&#xED;mica e aminoac&#xED;dica e coeficientes de digestibilidade verdadeira dos amino&#xE1;cidos de farinhas de penas e sangue determinados em galos cecectomizados. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 41:80-85. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982012000100012</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Haryanto</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Purwaningrum</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Andityas</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wijayanti</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2017</year>
<article-title>Effect of chicken feather meal on the feed conversion ratio and blood lipid profile of broiler chickens</article-title>
<source>Asian Journal of Poultry Science</source>
<volume>11</volume>
<fpage>64</fpage>
<lpage>69</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2017.64.69">https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2017.64.69</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Haryanto, A.; Purwaningrum, M.; Andityas, M. and Wijayanti, N. 2017. Effect of chicken feather meal on the feed conversion ratio and blood lipid profile of broiler chickens. Asian Journal of Poultry Science 11:64-69. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajpsaj.2017.64.69</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hasni</surname><given-names>M. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sahito</surname><given-names>H. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Memon</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sanjrani</surname><given-names>M. I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gopang</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Soomro</surname><given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2014</year>
<article-title>Effect of feeding various levels of feather meal as a replacement of fish meal on the growth of broiler</article-title>
<source>International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research</source>
<volume>3</volume>
<fpage>505</fpage>
<lpage>511</lpage></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Hasni, M. S.; Sahito, H. A.; Memon, M. A.; Sanjrani, M. I.; Gopang, M. A. and Soomro, N. A. 2014. Effect of feeding various levels of feather meal as a replacement of fish meal on the growth of broiler. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research 3:505-511.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Isika</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Agiang</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Eneji</surname><given-names>C. A.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2006</year>
<article-title>Complementary effect of processed broiler offal and feather meals on nutrient retention, carcass and organ mass of broiler chickens</article-title>
<source>International Journal of Poultry Science</source>
<volume>5</volume>
<fpage>656</fpage>
<lpage>661</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.656.661">https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.656.661</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Isika, M. A.; Agiang, E. A. and Eneji, C. A. 2006. Complementary effect of processed broiler offal and feather meals on nutrient retention, carcass and organ mass of broiler chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science 5:656-661. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2006.656.661</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Latshaw</surname><given-names>J. D.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1990</year>
<article-title>Quality of feather meal as affected by feather processing conditions</article-title>
<source>Poultry Science</source>
<volume>69</volume>
<fpage>953</fpage>
<lpage>958</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690953">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690953</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Latshaw, J. D. 1990. Quality of feather meal as affected by feather processing conditions. Poultry Science 69:953-958. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0690953</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>McCasland</surname><given-names>W. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Richardson</surname><given-names>L. R.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1966</year>
<article-title>Methods for determining the nutritive value of feather meals</article-title>
<source>Poultry Science</source>
<volume>45</volume>
<fpage>1231</fpage>
<lpage>1236</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0451231">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0451231</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>McCasland, W. E. and Richardson, L. R. 1966. Methods for determining the nutritive value of feather meals. Poultry Science 45:1231-1236. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0451231</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Moritz</surname><given-names>J. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Latshaw</surname><given-names>J. D.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2001</year>
<article-title>Indicators of nutritional value of hydrolyzed feather meal</article-title>
<source>Poultry Science</source>
<volume>80</volume>
<fpage>79</fpage>
<lpage>86</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.1.79">https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.1.79</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Moritz, J. S. and Latshaw, J. D. 2001. Indicators of nutritional value of hydrolyzed feather meal. Poultry Science 80:79-86. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/80.1.79</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Noy</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sklan</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2002</year>
<article-title>Nutrient use in chicks during the first week posthatch</article-title>
<source>Poultry Science</source>
<volume>81</volume>
<fpage>391</fpage>
<lpage>399</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.3.391">https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.3.391</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Noy, Y. and Sklan, D. 2002. Nutrient use in chicks during the first week posthatch. Poultry Science 81:391-399. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/81.3.391</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Nunes</surname><given-names>R. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pozza</surname><given-names>P. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nunes</surname><given-names>C. G. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Campestrine</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>K&#xFC;hl</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rocha</surname><given-names>L. D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Costa</surname><given-names>F. G. P.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2005</year>
<article-title>Valores energ&#xE9;ticos de subprodutos de origem animal para aves</article-title>
<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
<volume>34</volume>
<fpage>1217</fpage>
<lpage>1224</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982005000400017">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982005000400017</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Nunes, R. V.; Pozza, P. C.; Nunes, C. G. V.; Campestrine, E.; K&#xFC;hl, R.; Rocha, L. D. and Costa, F. G. P. 2005. Valores energ&#xE9;ticos de subprodutos de origem animal para aves. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 34:1217-1224. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982005000400017</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Olivo</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rabelo</surname><given-names>R. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Demartini</surname><given-names>A. C.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2006</year>
<article-title>F&#xE1;brica de farinha e &#xF3;leo</article-title>
<fpage>567</fpage>
<lpage>578</lpage>
<source>O mundo do frango - Cadeia produtiva da carne de frango</source>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name><surname>Olivo</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group>
<publisher-name>Imprint</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Crici&#xFA;ma</publisher-loc></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Olivo, R.; Rabelo, R. A. and Demartini, A. C. 2006. F&#xE1;brica de farinha e &#xF3;leo. p.567-578. In: O mundo do frango - Cadeia produtiva da carne de frango. Olivo, R., ed. Imprint, Crici&#xFA;ma.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Papadopoulos</surname><given-names>M. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>El Boushy</surname><given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ketelaars</surname><given-names>E. H.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1985</year>
<article-title>Effect of different processing conditions on amino acid digestibility of feather meal determined by chick assay</article-title>
<source>Poultry Science</source>
<volume>64</volume>
<fpage>1729</fpage>
<lpage>1741</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0641729">https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0641729</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Papadopoulos, M. C.; El Boushy, A. R. and Ketelaars, E. H. 1985. Effect of different processing conditions on amino acid digestibility of feather meal determined by chick assay. Poultry Science 64:1729-1741. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0641729</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Papadopoulos</surname><given-names>M. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>El Boushy</surname><given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Roodbeen</surname><given-names>A. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ketelaars</surname><given-names>E. H.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1986</year>
<article-title>Effects of processing time and moisture content on amino acid composition and nitrogen characteristics of feather meal</article-title>
<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
<volume>14</volume>
<fpage>279</fpage>
<lpage>290</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(86)90100-8">https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(86)90100-8</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Papadopoulos, M. C.; El Boushy, A. R.; Roodbeen, A. E. and Ketelaars, E. H. 1986. Effects of processing time and moisture content on amino acid composition and nitrogen characteristics of feather meal. Animal Feed Science and Technology 14:279-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(86)90100-8</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rostagno</surname><given-names>H. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Albino</surname><given-names>L. F. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Donzele</surname><given-names>J. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gomes</surname><given-names>P. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>R. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lopes</surname><given-names>D. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>A. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Barreto</surname><given-names>S. L. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Euclides</surname><given-names>R. F.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2011</year>
<source>Tabelas brasileiras para aves e su&#xED;nos - Composi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de alimentos e exig&#xEA;ncias nutricionais</source>
<edition>3.ed.</edition>
<publisher-name>Imprensa Universit&#xE1;ria - Universidade Federal de Vi&#xE7;osa</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Vi&#xE7;osa, MG</publisher-loc> <size units="pages">252p</size></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Rostagno, H. S.; Albino, L. F. T.; Donzele, J. L.; Gomes, P. C.; Oliveira, R. F.; Lopes, D. C.; Ferreira, A. S.; Barreto, S. L. T. and Euclides, R. F. 2011. Tabelas brasileiras para aves e su&#xED;nos - Composi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de alimentos e exig&#xEA;ncias nutricionais. 3.ed. Imprensa Universit&#xE1;ria - Universidade Federal de Vi&#xE7;osa, Vi&#xE7;osa, MG. 252p.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Saima</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>M. Z. U.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Anjum</surname><given-names>M. I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rizwan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ijaz</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2008</year>
<article-title>Investigation on the availability of amino acids from different animal protein sources in golden cockerels</article-title>
<source>The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences</source>
<volume>18</volume>
<fpage>53</fpage>
<lpage>56</lpage></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Saima, M. A.; Khan, M. Z. U.; Anjum, M. I.; Ahmed, S.; Rizwan, M. and Ijaz, M. 2008. Investigation on the availability of amino acids from different animal protein sources in golden cockerels. The Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 18:53-56.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sakomura</surname><given-names>N. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rostagno</surname><given-names>H. S.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2007</year>
<source>M&#xE9;todos de pesquisa em nutri&#xE7;&#xE3;o de monog&#xE1;stricos</source>
<publisher-name>FUNEP</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Jaboticabal</publisher-loc> <size units="pages">283p</size></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Sakomura, N. K. and Rostagno, H. S. 2007. M&#xE9;todos de pesquisa em nutri&#xE7;&#xE3;o de monog&#xE1;stricos. FUNEP, Jaboticabal. 283p.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>A. L. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gomes</surname><given-names>A. V. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pess&#xF4;a</surname><given-names>M. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mostaf&#xE1;</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Curvelo</surname><given-names>F. A.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2006</year>
<article-title>N&#xED;veis de inclus&#xE3;o de farinha de penas na dieta sobre o desempenho e caracter&#xED;sticas de carca&#xE7;a de codornas para corte</article-title>
<source>Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences</source>
<volume>28</volume>
<fpage>27</fpage>
<lpage>30</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.661">https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.661</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Santos, A. L. S.; Gomes, A. V. C.; Pess&#xF4;a, M. F.; Mostaf&#xE1;, S. and Curvelo, F. A. 2006. N&#xED;veis de inclus&#xE3;o de farinha de penas na dieta sobre o desempenho e caracter&#xED;sticas de carca&#xE7;a de codornas para corte. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences 28:27-30. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v28i1.661</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Scapim</surname><given-names>M. R. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Loures</surname><given-names>E. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rostagno</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cecon</surname><given-names>P. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Scapim</surname><given-names>C. R.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2003</year>
<article-title>Avalia&#xE7;&#xE3;o nutricional da farinha de penas e de sangue para frangos de corte submetida a diferentes tratamentos t&#xE9;rmicos</article-title>
<source>Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences</source>
<volume>25</volume>
<fpage>91</fpage>
<lpage>98</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2104">https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2104</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Scapim, M. R. S.; Loures, E. G.; Rostagno, H.; Cecon, P. R. and Scapim, C. R. 2003. Avalia&#xE7;&#xE3;o nutricional da farinha de penas e de sangue para frangos de corte submetida a diferentes tratamentos t&#xE9;rmicos. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences 25:91-98. https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v25i1.2104</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Shirley</surname><given-names>R. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Parsons</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2000</year>
<article-title>Effect of pressure processing on amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meal for poultry</article-title>
<source>Poultry Science</source>
<volume>79</volume>
<fpage>1775</fpage>
<lpage>1781</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.12.1775">https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.12.1775</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Shirley, R. B. and Parsons, C. M. 2000. Effect of pressure processing on amino acid digestibility of meat and bone meal for poultry. Poultry Science 79:1775-1781. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.12.1775</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>D. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Queiroz</surname><given-names>A. C.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2009</year>
<source>An&#xE1;lise de alimentos (m&#xE9;todos qu&#xED;micos e biol&#xF3;gicos)</source>
<edition>3.ed.</edition>
<publisher-name>Universidade Federal de Vi&#xE7;osa</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Vi&#xE7;osa, MG</publisher-loc> <size units="pages">235p</size></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Silva, D. J. and Queiroz, A. C. 2009. An&#xE1;lise de alimentos (m&#xE9;todos qu&#xED;micos e biol&#xF3;gicos). 3.ed. Universidade Federal de Vi&#xE7;osa, Vi&#xE7;osa, MG. 235p.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>E. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rabello</surname><given-names>C. B. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lima</surname><given-names>M. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ludke</surname><given-names>J. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Arruda</surname><given-names>E. M. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Albino</surname><given-names>L. F. T.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2014</year>
<article-title>Poultry offal meal in broiler chicken feed</article-title>
<source>Scientia Agricola</source>
<volume>71</volume>
<fpage>188</fpage>
<lpage>194</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162014000300003">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162014000300003</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Silva, E. P.; Rabello, C. B. V.; Lima, M. B.; Ludke, J. V.; Arruda, E. M. F. and Albino, L. F. T. 2014. Poultry offal meal in broiler chicken feed. Scientia Agricola 71:188-194. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162014000300003</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<element-citation publication-type="thesis">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sinhorini</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2013</year>
<source>Processo de produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o de farinha de penas hidrolisadas: estudos de otimiza&#xE7;&#xE3;o do teor proteico e do valor de digestibilidade da prote&#xED;na</source>
<comment>Disserta&#xE7;&#xE3;o (M.Sc.)</comment>
<publisher-name>Universidade Tecnol&#xF3;gica Federal do Paran&#xE1;</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Londrina</publisher-loc></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Sinhorini, M. R. 2013. Processo de produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o de farinha de penas hidrolisadas: estudos de otimiza&#xE7;&#xE3;o do teor proteico e do valor de digestibilidade da prote&#xED;na. Disserta&#xE7;&#xE3;o (M.Sc.). Universidade Tecnol&#xF3;gica Federal do Paran&#xE1;, Londrina.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Parsons</surname><given-names>C. M.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1997</year>
<article-title>Effect of processing systems on protein quality of feather meals and hog hair meals</article-title>
<source>Poultry Science</source>
<volume>76</volume>
<fpage>491</fpage>
<lpage>496</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.3.491">https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.3.491</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Wang, X. and Parsons, C. M. 1997. Effect of processing systems on protein quality of feather meals and hog hair meals. Poultry Science 76:491-496. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/76.3.491</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Xavier</surname><given-names>S. A. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Stringhini</surname><given-names>J. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Brito</surname><given-names>A. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Andrade</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Caf&#xE9;</surname><given-names>M. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Leandro</surname><given-names>N. S. M.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2011</year>
<article-title>Feather and blood meal in pre-starter and starter diets for broilers</article-title>
<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
<volume>40</volume>
<fpage>1745</fpage>
<lpage>1752</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000800018">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000800018</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Xavier, S. A. G.; Stringhini, J. H.; Brito, A. B.; Andrade, M. A.; Caf&#xE9;, M. B. and Leandro, N. S. M. 2011. Feather and blood meal in pre-starter and starter diets for broilers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40:1745-1752. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000800018</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list>
</back>
</article>