<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rbz</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">R. Bras. Zootec.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1516-3598</issn>	
<issn pub-type="epub">1806-9290</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher-name></publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="other">00402</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/rbz4820190075</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Forage Crops</subject></subj-group></article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Genetic assessment of seed yield-related traits in superior hybrids of <italic>Paspalum plicatulum</italic> &#xD7; <italic>Paspalum guenoarum</italic></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-6053-4619</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Lopes</surname><given-names>Rodrigo Ramos</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref> <xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1">*</xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-3363-1728</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Franke</surname><given-names>Lucia Brand&#xE3;o</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-6215-9071</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Souza</surname><given-names>Cleber Henrique Lopes de</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-8502-4439</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Bertoncelli</surname><given-names>Patricia</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-7242-617X</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Graminho</surname><given-names>Larissa Arnhold</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-6278-7513</contrib-id>
<name><surname>&#xC1;vila</surname><given-names>Mariana Rockenbach de</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-5784-8462</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>Emerson Andr&#xE9;</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref></contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-5942-5850</contrib-id>
<name><surname>Motta</surname><given-names>Eder Alexandre Minski da</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref></contrib>
<aff id="aff1">
<label>1</label>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul</institution>
<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Faculdade de Agronomia</institution>
<institution content-type="orgdiv2">Departamento de Plantas Forrageiras e Agrometeorologia</institution>
<addr-line>
<named-content content-type="city">Porto Alegre</named-content>
<named-content content-type="state">RS</named-content></addr-line>
<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
<institution content-type="original">Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Agronomia, Departamento de Plantas Forrageiras e Agrometeorologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil</institution></aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<label>2</label>
<institution content-type="orgname">University of Florida/IFAS</institution>
<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Agronomy Department</institution>
<institution content-type="orgdiv2">Forage Breeding and Genetics</institution>
<addr-line>
<named-content content-type="city">Gainesville</named-content>
<named-content content-type="state">FL</named-content></addr-line>
<country country="US">United States of America</country>
<institution content-type="original">University of Florida/IFAS, Agronomy Department, Forage Breeding and Genetics, Gainesville, FL, United States of America</institution></aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<label>3</label>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad de la Republica</institution>
<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Facultad de Agronomia</institution>
<institution content-type="orgdiv2">Departamento de Fitotecnia</institution>
<addr-line>
<named-content content-type="city">Montevideo</named-content></addr-line>
<country country="UY">Uruguay</country>
<institution content-type="original">Universidad de la Republica, Facultad de Agronomia, Departamento de Fitotecnia, Montevideo, Uruguay</institution></aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<label>4</label>
<institution content-type="orgname">Instituto Nacional de Tecnolog&#xED;a Agropecuaria</institution>
<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Recursos Naturales</institution>
<addr-line>
<named-content content-type="city">San Carlos de Bariloche</named-content>
<named-content content-type="state">R&#xED;o Negro</named-content></addr-line>
<country country="AR">Argentina</country>
<institution content-type="original">Instituto Nacional de Tecnolog&#xED;a Agropecuaria (INTA), Recursos Naturales, San Carlos de Bariloche, R&#xED;o Negro, Argentina</institution></aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<label>5</label>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul</institution>
<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Departamento de Estudos Agr&#xE1;rios</institution>
<addr-line>
<named-content content-type="city">Iju&#xED;</named-content>
<named-content content-type="state">RS</named-content></addr-line>
<country country="BR">Brasil</country>
<institution content-type="original">Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Estudos Agr&#xE1;rios, Iju&#xED;, RS, Brasil</institution></aff></contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c1">
<label>*</label> <bold>Corresponding author</bold>: <email>lopezhsf@hotmail.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="conflict">
<p><bold>Conflict of Interest</bold></p>
<p>The authors declare no conflict of interest.</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="con">
<p><bold>Author Contributions</bold></p>
<p>Conceptualization: R.R. Lopes and L.B. Franke. Data curation: R.R. Lopes, C.H.L. Souza, P. Bertoncelli, L.A. Graminho, M.R. &#xC1;vila and E.A.M. Motta. Formal analysis: R.R. Lopes, C.H.L. Souza, P. Bertoncelli, L.A. Graminho, M.R. &#xC1;vila, E.A. Pereira and E.A.M. Motta. Funding acquisition: L.B. Franke. Investigation: R.R. Lopes, L.B. Franke, C.H.L. Souza, L.A. Graminho, M.R. &#xC1;vila and E.A. Pereira. Methodology: R.R. Lopes, L.B. Franke and P. Bertoncelli. Project administration: R.R. Lopes and L.B. Franke. Resources: L.B. Franke. Supervision: R.R. Lopes and L.B. Franke. Visualization: E.A. Pereira and E.A.M. Motta. Writing-original draft: R.R. Lopes, C.H.L. Souza, P. Bertoncelli, L.A. Graminho, M.R. &#xC1;vila, E.A. Pereira and E.A.M. Motta. Writing-review &#x26; editing: R.R. Lopes, L.B. Franke, C.H.L. Souza, P. Bertoncelli, L.A. Graminho, M.R. &#xC1;vila, E.A. Pereira and E.A.M. Motta.</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub">
<day>13</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2019</year></pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2019</year></pub-date>
<volume>48</volume>
<elocation-id>e20190075</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>15</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2019</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>09</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2019</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
<license-p>This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</license-p></license></permissions>
<abstract>
<title>ABSTRACT</title>
<p>This study aimed to estimate the genetic parameters, genetic correlations, genetic dissimilarity, and predicted gains with the selection of interspecific apomictic <italic>Paspalum plicatulum</italic> &#xD7; <italic>Paspalum guenoarum</italic> hybrids in relation to seed yield traits. Nineteen genotypes that showed increased forage yield in previous studies were planted in a randomized complete block design with ten blocks. Traits evaluated in this study were: number of tillers/plant, number of reproductive tillers/plant, number of racemes/inflorescence, number of seeds/inflorescence, weight of a thousand seeds, and seed yield. Data were analyzed using a mixed model approach. The genotypes evaluated in our study showed improvement potential in relation to high heritability <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x3E;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.50</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, high precision (Acgen&#x3E; 90%), and genetic dissimilarity (forming three groups) for seed yield traits. Seed yield showed high correlation to reproductive tillers that can be used as indirect selection tools for genetic improvement of seed yield.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
<title>Keywords:</title>
<kwd>clustering analysis</kwd>
<kwd>genetic correlation</kwd>
<kwd>genetic gains</kwd>
<kwd>genetic parameters</kwd>
<kwd>REML/BLUP</kwd></kwd-group> <funding-group>
<award-group>
<funding-source>Coordena&#xE7;&#xE3;o de Aperfei&#xE7;oamento de Pessoal de N&#xED;vel Superior (CAPES)</funding-source>
<award-id>007488/2011-35</award-id>
</award-group></funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="1"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="9"/>
<ref-count count="37"/></counts></article-meta></front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Apomixis is the predominant mode of reproduction in polyploid germplasms of the genus <italic>Paspalum</italic>, which has the largest number of apomictic species in the Poaceae family (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Ortiz et al., 2013</xref>). The natural variation is blocked in apomictic species because apomixis results in genetically identical progeny derived from an unreduced, unfertilized egg cell (parthenogenesis) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Hand and Koltunow, 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>The presence of diploid plants of <italic>P. plicatulum</italic> in nature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Novo et al., 2017</xref>) shows an excellent potential to exploit natural variation by using sexual reproduction. Colchicine has been used for chromosome duplication in diploid plants of <italic>P. plicatulum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Sartor et al., 2009</xref>) to obtain a sexual tetraploid plant called &#x201C;4c-4x&#x201D;, enabling the production of new hybrids through crossbreeding with compatible species.</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aguilera et al. (2011</xref>) artificially hybridized the sexual ecotype 4c-4x (female parent) with the apomictic cultivar &#x201C;Rojas&#x201D; of <italic>P. guenoarum</italic> (male parent) and obtained 23 interspecific hybrids. In a later study, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Pereira (2013</xref>) performed artificial crosses between 4c-4x and the apomictic ecotypes of <italic>P. guenoarum</italic> called &#x201C;Azul&#xE3;o&#x201D; and &#x201C;Baio&#x201D;. These ecotypes are native in subtropical regions of southern Brazil, showing cold tolerance, productive persistence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Steiner et al., 2017</xref>), and dry matter yield over 15 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Pereira et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Motta et al. (2016</xref>) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Motta et al. (2017</xref>) evaluated superior progenies resulting from hybridization between <italic>P. plicatulum</italic> &#xD7; <italic>P. guenoarum</italic> species for two years in different places and showed the existence of genetic variability for different agronomic traits. The superior hybrids from these crosses resulted in total yield over 21 t DM ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and leaf yield over 17 t DM ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, showing the potential for improving cultivars for forage yield adapted to subtropical conditions.</p>
<p>Currently, strategies that include selection criteria such as agronomic traits and potential capacity to produce viable seeds are crucial for the dissemination of new cultivars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Lopes and Franke, 2011a</xref>). Seed production is a trait of great interest for forage species, as seed multiplication is economically relevant for new cultivars to be able to compete commercially (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Boelt and Studer, 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>Therefore, the objectives of this study were to estimate genetic parameters, examine genetic correlations between traits, identify any existing genetic dissimilarity, and predict the genetic gains that could be obtained through the selection of superior hybrids of <italic>P. plicatulum</italic> &#xD7; <italic>P. guenoarum</italic> in relation to their seed yield traits.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Material and Methods</title>
<p>The experiment was conducted in the 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 growing seasons in Eldorado do Sul (30&#xB0;05&#x27;52&#x22; S, 51&#xB0;39&#x27;08&#x22; W, 32 m asl), Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The climate is type Cfa, according to the K&#xF6;ppen classification system, with annual rainfall of 1440 mm (monthly average of 120 mm). The soil was dystrophic Argisoil (Rhodustults, PVd) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Santos et al., 2013</xref>), with the following chemical characteristics: pH (H<sub>2</sub>O) = 5.6; organic matter (OM) = 1.2%; Al<sup>3+</sup> = 0.0 cmol dm<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>; Ca2<sup>+</sup> = 2.9 cmolc dm<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>; Mg<sup>2+</sup> = 1.4 cmolc dm<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>; and cation exchange capacity (CEC) = 8.4 cmolc dm<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>.</p>
<p>The experimental area <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mn>15</mml:mn><mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xD7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>24</mml:mn><mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>360</mml:mn><mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was corrected with 2500 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> of lime on July 7, 2014. On October 2014, 290 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> of 5-20-20 fertilizer, 115 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> of N (urea), and 45 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> of P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> (triple superphosphate) were applied to meet the needs of perennial warm-season grasses (CQFS-RS/SC, 2004). In the second year, 30 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> of N (urea) and 75 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> of P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> (replenishment dose) were applied.</p>
<p>Nineteen apomictic genotypes of <italic>Paspalum</italic> were evaluated: four hybrids (10E104, 10E202, 10E2058, and 10E2084) resulting from the crossing between <italic>P. plicatulum</italic> 4c-4x and <italic>P. guenoarum</italic> Azul&#xE3;o, eight hybrids (10E3016, 10E3020, 10E3031, 10E3040, 10E3061, 10E3077, 10E3087, and 10E3093) from the cross between <italic>P. plicatulum</italic> 4c-4x and <italic>P. guenoarum</italic> Baio, four hybrids (H12, H13, H20, and H22) from the cross between <italic>P. plicatulum</italic> 4c-4x and <italic>P. guenoarum</italic> cv. Rojas, and two native ecotypes from the state of Rio Grande do Sul called Azul&#xE3;o and Baio. These genotypes stood out in previous studies due to their increased forage yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Pereira et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Huber et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Motta et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Motta et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Vegetative propagules were collected from two-year-old plants that were grown at the Experimental Station in Eldorado do Sul. Individually separated propagules (one tiller) were planted in 13&#xD7;8 cm containers with Carolina Soil&#x2122;, a commercial substrate, composed of peat, vermiculite, organic residue, and limestone. This process took place between May and June 2014. Seedlings were kept in a greenhouse during the winter until it was time for them to be planted in the field (October 24, 2014). Before planting, the aerial parts of the tillers were cut to a uniform height of 0.15 m, and the number of tillers was reduced to three tillers per genotype. In the second year, rejuvenation pruning was performed on all the genotypes (September 26, 2015) at a height of 0.15 m.</p>
<p>Phenotyping was done prior to harvest, and the following traits were evaluated: TT - number of total tillers: direct count of all the tillers/plant; RT - reproductive tillers/plant: direct count of the tillers that formed inflorescences; and NRI - number of racemes/inflorescence: average number of racemes of six inflorescences from each genotype, randomly chosen.</p>
<p>Seeds were manually harvested when more than 50% of the inflorescences exhibited brown coloring and showed signs of dehiscence in caryopses. All inflorescences per plant were harvested (March 25, 2015 - first year, and February 18, 2016 - second year). After seed harvesting, the following traits were assessed:</p>
<p>SY - seed yield/plant: the inflorescences collected were dried in a forced-air oven at 30 &#xB0;C for 72 h and manually threshed; sieves were used to remove impurities, and a De Leo&#x2122; South Dakota seed blower (blower-motor: &#x2153; HP; tube: 68.6 &#xD7; 10.2 cm; aperture: 4.5 - 5.5 cm; period: 2 min.) was used to separate heavy and empty seeds. After cleaning, the pure seeds of each genotype were weighed on a precision balance (model Marte&#x2122; AD500) and expressed in g;</p>
<p>WTS - weight of a thousand seeds: average weight of eight subsamples of 100 seeds, multiplied by 10 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Brasil, 2009</xref>);</p>
<p>and NSI - number of seeds/inflorescence, obtained from the following equation:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq1">
<mml:math id="m3" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NSI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Sample weight of seeds/inflorescence</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#xD7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>number of inflorescences</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#xD7;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>WTS</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>The sample weight of seeds/inflorescence was determined at harvest, when six intact inflorescences were separated from each genotype, manually threshed, processed, and individually weighed on a precision balance and expressed in g.</p>
<p>The experiment consisted of 190 experimental units (single plant; spacing on the row and interrow of 1 m) arranged under a randomized complete block design, with the nineteen genotypes arranged individually in 10 blocks. The data were analyzed using mixed model approach in the SELEGEN software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Resende, 2016</xref>), and estimates for genetic parameters were obtained. Genotypic values were predicted using the REML/BLUP procedure. The model used considered the randomized block design in one location and two harvests, according to Resende (2007):</p>
<disp-formula id="eq2">
<mml:math id="m4" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">y</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Xm</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Zg</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>Wp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>e,</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>in which y is the data vector, m is the vector for the effects of measurement-repeat combinations (assumed as fixed) added to the general mean, g is the vector of genotypic effects (assumed to be random), p is the vector of permanent environment effects (experimental units) (random), and e is the vector of errors or residuals (random). The capital letters (X, Z, and W) represent the incidence matrices for the said effects (m, g, and p, respectively).</p>
<p>The structures of means and variances associated with the model are described by the following:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq3">
<mml:math id="m5" display="block"><mml:mtable columnalign='center'><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x7C;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>,&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x223C;</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy='false'>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mtext>,&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>)</mml:mtext></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>&#x7C;&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>8</mml:mn><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x223C;</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy='false'>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mtext>,</mml:mtext><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>&#x2009;&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>8</mml:mn><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>)</mml:mtext></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>&#x7C;&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x223C;</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy='false'>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mtext>,</mml:mtext><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>&#x2009;&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>)</mml:mtext></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>&#x7C;&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x223C;</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy='false'>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mtext>,</mml:mtext><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>&#x2009;&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>),</mml:mtext></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>in which V is the phenotypic covariance matrix; I is an identity matrix; and <inline-formula>
<mml:math display='inline' id="m45"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display='inline' id="m46"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display='inline' id="m47"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the genotypic, environmental, and residual variances, respectively.</p>
<p>The covariance between all the random effect models was assumed by the following:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq4">
<mml:math id="m6" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Cov&#x2009;(g,&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mtext>p</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mtext>)</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>0;&#x2009;Cov&#x2009;(g,&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mtext>)</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>0;&#x2009;Cov&#x2009;(p,&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mtext>e</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mtext>)</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>0</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>The assumed distributions and mean structures (S) and variance (Var) were:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq5">
<mml:math id="m7" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo> <mml:mrow><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow> <mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo> <mml:mrow><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow> <mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Var&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo> <mml:mrow><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow> <mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo> <mml:mrow><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi>G</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow> <mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>in which</p>
<disp-formula id="eq6">
<mml:math id="m8" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x2009;e:&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Z</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mtext>W</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ZG</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mtext>Z</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>WC</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mtext>W</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>The system of linear equations [mixed model equations (MME)] that were used to obtain the solutions of the model were:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq7">
<mml:math id="m9" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo> <mml:mrow><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>&#x3BB;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x27;</mml:mo><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mtext>&#x3BB;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow> <mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo> <mml:mrow><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow> <mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo> <mml:mrow><mml:mtable><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>X</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2032;</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow> <mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>in which</p>
<disp-formula id="eq8">
<mml:math id="m10" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>&#x3BB;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mtext>&#x3BB;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>The estimates of variances and genetic parameters are given as follows: genotypic variance <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, environmental variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="m12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, residual variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="m13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, phenotypic variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="m14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, broad sense heritability <inline-formula><mml:math id="m15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, genetic variation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="m16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>&#xD7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, residual variation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="m17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>&#xD7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>)</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, relative variation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="m18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mtext>)</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, overall mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="m19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>)</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and genetic accuracy in genotype selection (Acgen) as:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq9">
<mml:math id="m20" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Acgen</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo> <mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xD7;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>(b</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>1)</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#xD7;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow> <mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mn>&#xBD;</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>in which b is number of blocks considering randomized complete block design (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Resende and Duarte, 2007</xref>).</p>
<p>The genotypic values (u + g) of each genotype were obtained by adding each predicted genotypic effect (g) to the overall average of the experiment (u). The genetic gain was the average of the predicted genetic effect vectors for the selected genotypes. The general average (u) added to the genetic gain resulted in the new average of the genotypes <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy='false'>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>new</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
<p>The significance of the random effects was obtained through Deviance Analysis, using the Restricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) method via Likelihood Ratio Test (LRT). The deviances were obtained as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Resende (2016</xref>), using the model with and without the respective effects, subtracting the deviance obtained in the complete model, of the model without the effect, and compared to the value of the Chi-square (&#x3C7;<sup>2</sup>) at 1% probability, with one degree of freedom. The factor block, considered as fixed effect, was tested by the F test of Snedecor. Genetic correlation among traits were processed using model 102 of the SELEGEN software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Resende, 2016</xref>). Cluster analysis based on Ward&#x27;s method using the Mahalanobis distance (D<sup>2</sup><sub>ii</sub>,) was performed using R software, version 3.5.2 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.r-project.org">www.r-project.org</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<p>The deviance analysis (Anadev) revealed significant differences (P&#x3C;0.01) among genotypes for all traits analyzed by the Chi-square test (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). Thus, the respective variance components were significantly different from zero, as were the determination coefficients. The highest values were found in the genotypic effects of NSI, WTS, SY, and RT. The Anadev also showed significant differences through the F test (P&#x3C;0.01) for the block effect in most traits, except for NRI (P&#x3E;0.05), suggesting that the experimental design used in the genotype test was efficient in controlling the environmental heterogeneity between the blocks.</p>
<table-wrap id="t1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<title>Values of verisimilitude (LRT) of deviance analysis (ANADEV) and estimates of genetic parameters (individual REML) for total tillers (TT, number plant<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), reproductive tillers (RT, number plant<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), number of racemes per inflorescence (NRI, number inflorescence<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), number of seeds per inflorescence (NSI, number inflorescence<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), weight of a thousand seeds (WTS, g) and seed yield (SY, g plant<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) in nineteen genotypes of <italic>Paspalum</italic></title></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup width="14%">
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/></colgroup>
<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<th align="left">Parameter<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN1">1</xref></th>
<th align="center">TT</th>
<th align="center">RT</th>
<th align="center">NRI</th>
<th align="center">NSI</th>
<th align="center">WTS</th>
<th align="center">SY</th></tr></thead>
<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<td align="left">LRT<sub>Gen.</sub> (&#x3C7;<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center">216.81<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN2">**</xref></td>
<td align="center">302.94<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN2">**</xref></td>
<td align="center">257.71<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN2">**</xref></td>
<td align="center">423.95<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN2">**</xref></td>
<td align="center">405.21<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN2">**</xref></td>
<td align="center">406.82<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN2">**</xref></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LRT <sub>Plot</sub> (&#x3C7;<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td align="center">0.00</td>
<td align="center">0.01</td>
<td align="center">0.01</td>
<td align="center">0.00</td>
<td align="center">0.02</td>
<td align="center">0.02</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">F <sub>(Block)</sub></td>
<td align="center">11.29<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN3">&#x2020;&#x2020;</xref></td>
<td align="center">20.41<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN3">&#x2020;&#x2020;</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.29</td>
<td align="center">9.01<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN3">&#x2020;&#x2020;</xref></td>
<td align="center">9.03<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN3">&#x2020;&#x2020;</xref></td>
<td align="center">41.28<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN3">&#x2020;&#x2020;</xref></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center">1050.72</td>
<td align="center">1813.74</td>
<td align="center">1.21</td>
<td align="center">2258.48</td>
<td align="center">0.14</td>
<td align="center">467.59</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center">4.35</td>
<td align="center">3.97</td>
<td align="center">3.10<sup>&#x2212;3</sup></td>
<td align="center">3.20</td>
<td align="center">3.10<sup>&#x2212;4</sup></td>
<td align="center">1.07</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center">1856.26</td>
<td align="center">2490.79</td>
<td align="center">1.98</td>
<td align="center">2792.11</td>
<td align="center">0.17</td>
<td align="center">553.05</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center">801.19</td>
<td align="center">673.08</td>
<td align="center">0.77</td>
<td align="center">530.43</td>
<td align="center">0.03</td>
<td align="center">84.39</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center">0.57&#xB1;0.11</td>
<td align="center">0.73&#xB1;0.12</td>
<td align="center">0.61&#xB1;0.11</td>
<td align="center">0.81&#xB1;0.13</td>
<td align="center">0.85&#xB1;0.13</td>
<td align="center">0.85&#xB1;0.13</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CV<sub>g</sub> (%)</td>
<td align="center">17.99</td>
<td align="center">29.36</td>
<td align="center">18.39</td>
<td align="center">27.04</td>
<td align="center">10.91</td>
<td align="center">33.30</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CV<sub>res</sub> (%)</td>
<td align="center">15.71</td>
<td align="center">17.88</td>
<td align="center">14.67</td>
<td align="center">13.10</td>
<td align="center">4.61</td>
<td align="center">14.15</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CV<sub>r</sub></td>
<td align="center">1.15</td>
<td align="center">1.64</td>
<td align="center">1.25</td>
<td align="center">2.06</td>
<td align="center">2.37</td>
<td align="center">2.35</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Acgen</td>
<td align="center">96.43</td>
<td align="center">98.20</td>
<td align="center">96.95</td>
<td align="center">98.85</td>
<td align="center">99.13</td>
<td align="center">99.13</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Min. value</td>
<td align="center">145.15</td>
<td align="center">113.12</td>
<td align="center">4.55</td>
<td align="center">96.39</td>
<td align="center">2.89</td>
<td align="center">20.38</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Max. value</td>
<td align="center">270.28</td>
<td align="center">231.84</td>
<td align="center">8.13</td>
<td align="center">276.65</td>
<td align="center">4.16</td>
<td align="center">107.49</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m27" display="inline"><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></td>
<td align="center">180.20</td>
<td align="center">145.07</td>
<td align="center">5.98</td>
<td align="center">175.77</td>
<td align="center">3.43</td>
<td align="center">64.93</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TFN1">
<label>1</label>
<p>Genotypic variance <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; permanent environment variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="m29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; phenotypic variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="m30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; residual variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="m31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>res</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; individual heritability in the broad sense <inline-formula><mml:math id="m32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; genetic variation coefficient (CV<sub>g</sub>); residual variation coefficient (CV<sub>res</sub>); relative variation coefficient (CV<sub>r</sub>); genetic accuracy in genotype selection (Acgen); overall mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="m33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy='false'>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN2">
<label>**</label>
<p>Significant in the likelihood ratio test, considering 1% probability by the Chi-square test (&#x3C7;<sup>2</sup>) with 1 degree of freedom.</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN3">
<label>&#x2020;&#x2020;</label>
<p>Significant at P&#x3C;0.01, by the Snedecor F test.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<p>The highest estimates of genetic variance <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were for NSI and RT, indicating that this germplasm had favorable conditions for the selection and improvement of these traits (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). All genetic variances <inline-formula><mml:math id="m35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were higher than the environmental variances <inline-formula><mml:math id="m36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, inferring that there was high experimental precision and low interference from the environment on the genotypes. For all traits evaluated in this study, the highest proportion of the phenotypic variance <inline-formula><mml:math id="m37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>&#x3C3;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x5E;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was explained by genotype.</p>
<p>Broad estimates of individual heritability <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ranged from 0.57 to 0.85 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). High values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="m39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were obtained for WTS, SY, NSI, and RT that corresponded with low standard deviations (&#xB1;0.11 to &#xB1;0.13), indicating that individual selection in <italic>Paspalum</italic> genotypes can be successful.</p>
<p>The genetic variation coefficient (CV<sub>g</sub>) among genotypes was higher than 10% for all traits and ranged from 10.91% (WTS) to 33.30% (SY) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). The residual variation coefficient (CV<sub>res</sub>) of the traits was classified as of medium to low magnitude, which indicates that the experiment was conducted properly. The variation ranged from 4.61% (WTS) to 17.88% (RT), which are values accepted as precision coefficients for experimentation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). The relative variation coefficient (CV<sub>r</sub>), or the ratio between CV<sub>g</sub> and CV<sub>res</sub>, presented a genetic component (CV<sub>g</sub>) close to or higher than the environmental component (CV<sub>res</sub>) with values ranging between 1.15 (TT) and 2.37 (WTS) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<p>The selective accuracy (Acgen) ranged from 99.13% (WTS and SY) to 96.43% (TT), which are considered as high-precision values (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). The high experimental rigor of this study shows that the selection of genotypes based on the tested traits will be reliable and safe.</p>
<p>Some traits presented positive and negative correlations regarding SY, which shows that they influenced the expression of this trait (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). The trait that best correlated with SY was NSI (r = 0.794; P&#x3C;0.01), followed by RT (r = 0.769; P&#x3C;0.01). Correlation NSI &#xD7; NRI showed a positive and significant association between the traits (r = 0.598; P&#x3C;0.01), that is, when one increases, so does the other. However, other correlations of interest between WTS &#xD7; NSI and WTS &#xD7; SY had negative values (r = &#x2212;0.561 and r = &#x2212;0.105, respectively), but WTS &#xD7; SY was not significant (P&#x3E;0.05).</p>
<table-wrap id="t2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<title>Estimates of genotypic correlations between number of total tillers (TT), reproductive tillers (RT), number of racemes per inflorescence (NRI), number of seeds per inflorescence (NSI), weight of a thousand seeds (WTS), and seed yield (SY), in nineteen genotypes of <italic>Paspalum</italic></title></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup width="14%">
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/></colgroup>
<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<th align="left"/>
<th align="center">TT</th>
<th align="center">RT</th>
<th align="center">NRI</th>
<th align="center">NSI</th>
<th align="center">WTS</th>
<th align="center">SY</th></tr></thead>
<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<td align="left">TT</td>
<td align="center">&#x336;</td>
<td align="center">0.987<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">**</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.569<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN5">*</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.399</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.362</td>
<td align="center">0.495<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN5">*</xref></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RT</td>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center">&#x336;</td>
<td align="center">0.614<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">**</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.427</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.332</td>
<td align="center">0.769<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">**</xref></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NRI</td>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center">&#x336;</td>
<td align="center">0.598<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">**</xref></td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.351</td>
<td align="center">0.451</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NSI</td>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center">&#x336;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.561<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN5">*</xref></td>
<td align="center">0.794<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN4">**</xref></td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">WTS</td>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center">&#x336;</td>
<td align="center">&#x2212;0.105</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SY</td>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center"/>
<td align="center">&#x336;</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TFN4">
<label>**</label>
<p>Significant at P&#x3C;0.01;</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN5">
<label>*</label>
<p>Significant at P&#x3C;0.05, by the t test.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<p>The cluster analysis using the Ward method, based on the Mahalanobis distance (D<sup>2</sup><sub>ii</sub>,), distributed the nineteen evaluated genotypes into three distinct groups, according to their genetic dissimilarity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). Cluster I (C<sub>I</sub>) was the most abundant and represented 73.7% (14 genetically similar genotypes) of the total genotypes, namely, 10E3061, 10E3084, 10E3016, H12, 10E20104, 10E2058, 10E2084, 10E3020, 10E3077, 10E3031, 10E202, 10E3087, 10E3040, and 10E3093. This group had the lowest values for all the evaluated traits, except WTS (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). Cluster II (C<sub>II</sub>) was made up of four genotypes (H13, H22, Azul&#xE3;o, and Baio) and represented 21.1% of the total genotypes. These genotypes exhibited high values for NRI and NSI (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). Cluster III (C<sub>III</sub>) consisted solely of one genotype (H20) and represented 5.3% of the total genotypes. This genotype showed the highest SY and high tillering (TT), passing these on to the reproductive stage (RT) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<title>Dendrogram obtained by the Ward&#x27;s clustering method based on the Mahalanobis distance (D<sup>2</sup><sub>ii&#x2019;</sub>) among nineteen <italic>Paspalum</italic> genotypes for the quantitative seed yield traits.</title>
<p>C<sub>I</sub> = 10E3061, 10E3084, 10E3016, H12, 10E20104, 10E2058, 10E2084, 10E3020, 10E3077, 10E3031, 10E202, 10E3087, 10E3040, and 10E3093; C<sub>II</sub> = H13, H22, Azul&#xE3;o, and Baio; C<sub>III</sub> = H20.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="1806-9290-rbz-48-e20190075-gf01.tif"/></fig>
<table-wrap id="t3">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<title>Mean for six different seed yield traits of nineteen <italic>Paspalum</italic> genotypes grouped into three clusters</title></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup width="25%">
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/></colgroup>
<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<th align="left" rowspan="2">Trait</th>
<th align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">Mean of clusters<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN7">1</xref></th></tr>
<tr>
<th align="center">C<sub>I</sub></th>
<th align="center">C<sub>II</sub></th>
<th align="center">C<sub>III</sub></th></tr></thead>
<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<td align="left">TT</td>
<td align="center">163.91</td>
<td align="center">213.83</td>
<td align="center">273.75</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">RT</td>
<td align="center">128.86</td>
<td align="center">179.36</td>
<td align="center">234.75</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NRI</td>
<td align="center">5.49</td>
<td align="center">7.54</td>
<td align="center">6.55</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">NSI</td>
<td align="center">153.29</td>
<td align="center">242.16</td>
<td align="center">169.00</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">WTS</td>
<td align="center">3.52</td>
<td align="center">3.11</td>
<td align="center">3.41</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">SY</td>
<td align="center">57.28</td>
<td align="center">85.25</td>
<td align="center">90.69</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TFN6">
<p>TT - total tillers (number plant<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>); RT - reproductive tillers (number plant<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>); NRI - number of racemes per inflorescence (number inflorescence<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>); NSI - number of seeds per inflorescence (number inflorescence<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>); WTS - weight of a thousand seeds (g); SY - seed yield (g plant<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>).</p></fn>
<fn id="TFN7">
<label>1</label>
<p>C<sub>I</sub> = 10E3061, 10E3084, 10E3016, H12, 10E20104, 10E2058, 10E2084, 10E3020, 10E3077, 10E3031, 10E202, 10E3087, 10E3040, and 10E3093; C<sub>II</sub> = H13, H22, Azul&#xE3;o, and Baio; C<sub>III</sub> = H20.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<p>Among the 19 <italic>Paspalum</italic> genotypes, the seven best individuals (36.84% of the total) were classified using the BLUP methodology, identifying those with the highest genetic gain (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). In comparison with the overall average, the predicted genetic gains and the new estimated averages were higher in all the evaluated traits.</p>
<table-wrap id="t4">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<title>Predicted genotypic effect (g), genotypic value (u+g), genetic gains (gain), percentage genetic gains (pgg), and new average <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>new</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mtext>)</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the seven best genotypes of <italic>Paspalum</italic> for seed yield traits</title></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<colgroup width="14%">
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/>
<col/></colgroup>
<thead style="border-top: thin solid; border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<th align="left">Order</th>
<th align="center">Genotype</th>
<th align="center">g</th>
<th align="center">u+g</th>
<th align="center">Gain</th>
<th align="center">pgg (%)<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="TFN8">1</xref></th>
<th align="center"><inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>new</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></th></tr></thead>
<tbody style="border-bottom: thin solid; border-color: #000000">
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center" colspan="6">Total tillers (number plant<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="center">H20</td>
<td align="center">90.08</td>
<td align="center">270.28</td>
<td align="center">90.08</td>
<td align="center">49.99</td>
<td align="center">270.28</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="center">H13</td>
<td align="center">36.35</td>
<td align="center">216.55</td>
<td align="center">63.21</td>
<td align="center">35.08</td>
<td align="center">243.41</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="center">H22</td>
<td align="center">36.01</td>
<td align="center">216.21</td>
<td align="center">54.14</td>
<td align="center">30.04</td>
<td align="center">234.35</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="center">Baio</td>
<td align="center">32.30</td>
<td align="center">212.51</td>
<td align="center">48.68</td>
<td align="center">27.01</td>
<td align="center">228.89</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="center">Azul&#xE3;o</td>
<td align="center">24.84</td>
<td align="center">205.04</td>
<td align="center">43.91</td>
<td align="center">24.37</td>
<td align="center">224.12</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="center">10E3031</td>
<td align="center">5.53</td>
<td align="center">185.74</td>
<td align="center">37.52</td>
<td align="center">20.82</td>
<td align="center">217.72</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="center">10E202</td>
<td align="center">1.97</td>
<td align="center">182.17</td>
<td align="center">32.44</td>
<td align="center">18.00</td>
<td align="center">212.64</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center" colspan="6">Reproductive tillers (number plant<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="center">H20</td>
<td align="center">86.77</td>
<td align="center">231.84</td>
<td align="center">86.77</td>
<td align="center">59.81</td>
<td align="center">231.84</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="center">H13</td>
<td align="center">41.97</td>
<td align="center">187.04</td>
<td align="center">64.37</td>
<td align="center">44.37</td>
<td align="center">209.44</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="center">H22</td>
<td align="center">38.93</td>
<td align="center">183.99</td>
<td align="center">55.89</td>
<td align="center">38.53</td>
<td align="center">200.96</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="center">Azul&#xE3;o</td>
<td align="center">26.59</td>
<td align="center">171.66</td>
<td align="center">48.57</td>
<td align="center">33.48</td>
<td align="center">193.63</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="center">Baio</td>
<td align="center">25.24</td>
<td align="center">170.30</td>
<td align="center">43.90</td>
<td align="center">30.26</td>
<td align="center">188.97</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="center">10E3031</td>
<td align="center">8.26</td>
<td align="center">153.32</td>
<td align="center">37.96</td>
<td align="center">26.17</td>
<td align="center">183.02</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="center">10E202</td>
<td align="center">3.03</td>
<td align="center">148.10</td>
<td align="center">32.97</td>
<td align="center">22.73</td>
<td align="center">178.04</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center" colspan="6">Number of racemes per inflorescence (number inflorescence<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="center">H22</td>
<td align="center">2.15</td>
<td align="center">8.13</td>
<td align="center">2.15</td>
<td align="center">35.95</td>
<td align="center">8.13</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="center">Baio</td>
<td align="center">2.06</td>
<td align="center">8.04</td>
<td align="center">2.11</td>
<td align="center">35.28</td>
<td align="center">8.08</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="center">H13</td>
<td align="center">1.09</td>
<td align="center">7.07</td>
<td align="center">1.77</td>
<td align="center">29.60</td>
<td align="center">7.74</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="center">H12</td>
<td align="center">0.90</td>
<td align="center">6.87</td>
<td align="center">1.55</td>
<td align="center">25.92</td>
<td align="center">7.53</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="center">Azul&#xE3;o</td>
<td align="center">0.75</td>
<td align="center">6.73</td>
<td align="center">1.39</td>
<td align="center">23.24</td>
<td align="center">7.37</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="center">10E3087</td>
<td align="center">0.60</td>
<td align="center">6.58</td>
<td align="center">1.26</td>
<td align="center">21.07</td>
<td align="center">7.23</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="center">H20</td>
<td align="center">0.56</td>
<td align="center">6.53</td>
<td align="center">1.16</td>
<td align="center">19.40</td>
<td align="center">7.13</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center" colspan="6">Number of seeds per inflorescence (number inflorescence<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="center">Azul&#xE3;o</td>
<td align="center">100.88</td>
<td align="center">276.65</td>
<td align="center">100.88</td>
<td align="center">57.39</td>
<td align="center">276.65</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="center">Baio</td>
<td align="center">85.61</td>
<td align="center">261.38</td>
<td align="center">93.24</td>
<td align="center">53.05</td>
<td align="center">269.02</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="center">H22</td>
<td align="center">40.35</td>
<td align="center">216.12</td>
<td align="center">75.61</td>
<td align="center">43.02</td>
<td align="center">251.38</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="center">H13</td>
<td align="center">35.60</td>
<td align="center">211.38</td>
<td align="center">65.61</td>
<td align="center">37.33</td>
<td align="center">241.38</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="center">10E3016</td>
<td align="center">27.25</td>
<td align="center">203.03</td>
<td align="center">57.94</td>
<td align="center">32.96</td>
<td align="center">233.71</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="center">10E3077</td>
<td align="center">23.84</td>
<td align="center">199.62</td>
<td align="center">52.26</td>
<td align="center">29.73</td>
<td align="center">228.03</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="center">10E20104</td>
<td align="center">13.71</td>
<td align="center">189.49</td>
<td align="center">46.75</td>
<td align="center">26.60</td>
<td align="center">222.52</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center" colspan="6">Weight of a thousand seeds (g)</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="center">10E3084</td>
<td align="center">0.73</td>
<td align="center">4.16</td>
<td align="center">0.73</td>
<td align="center">21.28</td>
<td align="center">4.16</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="center">10E2084</td>
<td align="center">0.64</td>
<td align="center">4.06</td>
<td align="center">0.68</td>
<td align="center">19.83</td>
<td align="center">4.11</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="center">10E3077</td>
<td align="center">0.45</td>
<td align="center">3.88</td>
<td align="center">0.61</td>
<td align="center">17.78</td>
<td align="center">4.04</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="center">10E3087</td>
<td align="center">0.35</td>
<td align="center">3.78</td>
<td align="center">0.54</td>
<td align="center">15.74</td>
<td align="center">3.97</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="center">10E3020</td>
<td align="center">0.25</td>
<td align="center">3.68</td>
<td align="center">0.48</td>
<td align="center">13.99</td>
<td align="center">3.91</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="center">10E202</td>
<td align="center">0.23</td>
<td align="center">3.66</td>
<td align="center">0.44</td>
<td align="center">12.83</td>
<td align="center">3.87</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="center">10E3031</td>
<td align="center">0.12</td>
<td align="center">3.55</td>
<td align="center">0.40</td>
<td align="center">11.66</td>
<td align="center">3.82</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"/>
<td align="center" colspan="6">Seed yield (g plant<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="center">Azul&#xE3;o</td>
<td align="center">42.56</td>
<td align="center">107.49</td>
<td align="center">42.56</td>
<td align="center">65.55</td>
<td align="center">107.49</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">2</td>
<td align="center">10E3077</td>
<td align="center">27.55</td>
<td align="center">92.48</td>
<td align="center">35.06</td>
<td align="center">54.00</td>
<td align="center">99.99</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="center">H20</td>
<td align="center">25.52</td>
<td align="center">90.45</td>
<td align="center">31.88</td>
<td align="center">49.10</td>
<td align="center">96.81</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">4</td>
<td align="center">Baio</td>
<td align="center">16.38</td>
<td align="center">81.31</td>
<td align="center">28.00</td>
<td align="center">43.12</td>
<td align="center">92.93</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">5</td>
<td align="center">10E3040</td>
<td align="center">14.73</td>
<td align="center">79.66</td>
<td align="center">25.35</td>
<td align="center">39.04</td>
<td align="center">90.28</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">6</td>
<td align="center">H22</td>
<td align="center">13.42</td>
<td align="center">78.35</td>
<td align="center">23.36</td>
<td align="center">35.98</td>
<td align="center">88.29</td></tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">7</td>
<td align="center">H12</td>
<td align="center">10.10</td>
<td align="center">75.03</td>
<td align="center">21.47</td>
<td align="center">33.07</td>
<td align="center">86.39</td></tr></tbody></table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="TFN8">
<label>1</label>
<p>Percentage genetic gain over overall mean <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(</mml:mtext><mml:mover accent='true'><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#xAF;</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mtext>)</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></fn></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>
<p>The selection based on genetic values for TT presented genetic gains that varied from 32.44 to 90.08, raising the new average by 49.99% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). The best genotype was H20, which increased the new average to 270.28. The lowest value was found in the 10E202 genotype, which showed predicted gains of approximately 32.44.</p>
<p>It was found that the same genotypes previously selected for TT also had the same ordering for RT (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). Genetic correlations between these traits were high (r = 0.987; <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). The genetic gain for RT ranged from 32.97 to 86.77 and raised the new average by 59.81%. The best genotype was H20, which increased the new average to 231.84. The lowest value was found in the 10E202 genotype, which presented predicted gains of 32.97.</p>
<p>For NRI, the seven best genotypes showed variations from 1.16 to 2.15 and raised the new average by 35.95% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). The best genotype was H22, which raised the new average to 8.13. The lowest value was found in the H20 genotype, which presented predicted gains of about 7.13.</p>
<p>The genetic gain for NSI varied from 46.75 to 100.88 and raised the new average by 26.60% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). The best genotype was Azul&#xE3;o, which increased the new average to 276.65. The Baio genotype was the second best and showed a genetic gain of 93.24, raising the new average to 269.02. The lowest value was found in the 10E20104 genotype, which had predicted gains below 50, indicating that this genotype would not be advantageous for significant advances in NSI.</p>
<p>Selection in the WTS character showed genotypes resulting from the crossings between <italic>P. plicatulum</italic> 4c-4x &#xD7; <italic>P. guenoarum</italic> ecotypes Azul&#xE3;o and Baio (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). Genotype 10E3084 had the best performance and showed promise in terms of genetic gains, which ranged from 0.40 to 0.73 g, raising the new average by 21.28%.</p>
<p>The ordering was carried out considering the objective of the program, which is to increase the expression of the SY trait. The genetic gain in this trait varied from 21.47 to 42.56 g of seeds per plant, thereby increasing the new average by 33.07% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). The ecotype Azul&#xE3;o had the best performance in SY (highlighted in the expression of NSI and RT), raising the new average to 107.49 g. The hybrid 10E3077 was the second best in terms of WTS and NRI traits, raising the new average to 99.99 g. The hybrid H20 (with high values of TT and RT) came in third and raised the new average to 96.81 g, followed by the ecotype Baio (highlighted in NSI and NRI), which raised the new average to 92.93 g. These four genotypes were the only ones that increased the new averages above 40% for SY.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In <italic>Paspalum</italic> species, most of the traits related to SY are inflorescence traits (NSI and WTS) and reproductive tillers (RT) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Lopes and Franke 2011a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">b</xref>), which can serve as selection indicators for breeding programs aimed at forage seed production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Biligetu et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Our results showed that the environmental effects did not prevail over nor affect the genetic variability of the genotypes in our experiment. The wide variability among the genotypes studied, combined with good environmental control, resulted in high coefficients of individual broad sense heritability <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>(H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo stretchy='false'>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all traits (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). These results are favorable for selection and are also of great importance for the improvement of the crop, as they guide us towards possibilities of using different selection methods and allow us to estimate the genetic progress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Resende and Duarte, 2007</xref>). In evaluating seed production of <italic>Dactylis glomerata</italic> L. populations, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">&#x15E;eker et al. (2014</xref>) found high heritability values (0.64), which showed strong genetic control of the trait at an individual level, suggesting that environmental factors had a little effect on heredity. However, the selection efficacy depends not only on heritability but also on genetic advancement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Pereira et al., 2017</xref>). The high coefficient of genetic variation in conjunction with high heritability provides more information than other parameters alone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Shabanimofrad et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>The presence of genetic variability can be confirmed and measured by the values obtained in the genetic variation coefficient (CV<sub>g</sub>), indicating that the median fraction of the genetic variances was extracted from the total phenotypic variation. From another perspective, high CV<sub>g</sub> values are desired, as it quantifies the magnitude of the genetic variation available to enable gains from selection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Carvalho et al., 2016</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Sebbenn et al. (1998</xref>), values above 7.0% are considered high and, in this study, all the CV<sub>g</sub> values of the traits considered were higher than 10.91% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). This confirms the potential of the hybrids for selection by means of the genetic gain obtained through the application of adequate selection procedures.</p>
<p>The joint evaluation of CV<sub>g</sub> and CV<sub>res</sub> is extremely relevant for breeding programs based on selection, as it has a direct effect on selective accuracy. The coefficient of relative variation (CV<sub>r</sub>), or the variation index, represents the ratio between CV<sub>g</sub> and CV<sub>res</sub>. Thus, it is not influenced by the trait average. A CV<sub>r</sub> close to or higher than 1.0 is favorable to obtain gains from the selection of a given character (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Resende and Duarte, 2007</xref>). As seed production is a complex process, CV<sub>r</sub> can be used to indicate a trait to be used for selection when many variables are evaluated. Thus, RT, NSI, and WTS could be utilized to carry out selective processes.</p>
<p>Selective accuracy (Acgen) is useful for the simultaneous identification of environmental and genetic variation, and values above 70% are desirable in genotype evaluation experiments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Resende, 2007</xref>). Thus, the accuracy values obtained in this study (above 96.43%) are promising. This shows that the genotypic values obtained in this study were very close to the real genotypic values, making it possible to select the genotypes, with precision and reliability, to be used in breeding programs or to serve as an initial seed source for the crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Resende, 2002</xref>). In these cases, the phenotypic selection method will be the most effective in selecting superior genotypes for SY (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Pimentel et al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Understanding the association of different traits with SY helps in the selection process, with more accuracy and precision. The high and positive correlations between RT &#xD7; SY and NSI &#xD7; SY indicate that better selection of any of these traits may provide favorable changes in SY. These traits are described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Humphreys and Riveros (1986</xref>) as some of the main components of SY of forage grasses. Genetic correlation between these traits denotes the degree of genetic association between them, and this allows the breeder to perform indirect selection when a trait presents a favorable and significant correlation with another trait of interest, and it is easy to evaluate. Thus, due to the high genetic correlation and heritability presented by RT and NSI, both can be used as selection criteria, with genetic gains for SY at the same time. High association between the RT and SY was also confirmed in <italic>Panicum maximum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Canto et al., 2012</xref>), <italic>Paspalum urvillei</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Lopes and Franke, 2011a</xref>), <italic>Paspalum notatum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Lopes and Franke, 2011b</xref>), and <italic>Brachiaria brizantha</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Quadros et al., 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>The WTS and NSI traits were negatively correlated with each other. They showed competitive relationship within the clump (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Nakagawa, 2014</xref>), and the increase of one trait leads to the decrease of the other due to the plasticity or compensatory capacity of the plant in regulating yield components. Furthermore, there is evidence that seed size plays an important role in regulating the genetic control of the number of seeds produced per inflorescence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sadras, 2007</xref>).</p>
<p>The differences in the average values of the traits evaluated in this study shows the genetic dissimilarity and SY performance of <italic>Paspalum</italic> genotypes, resulting in the formation of three different clusters. As can be seen, Cluster I (C<sub>I</sub>) had the highest number of genotypes and was also characterized by the lower values of TT, RT, NRI, NSI, except for WTS, and lower SY. Cluster II (C<sub>II</sub>) brought together genotypes with good SY, with intermediate TT, relatively lower RT, higher NSI, and lower WTS. The classification of hybrid H20 in C<sub>III</sub>, followed by the classification of hybrids H13 and H22 in C<sub>II</sub>, showed that the hybridization between <italic>P. plicatulum</italic> 4c-4x and <italic>P. guenoarum</italic> cv. Rojas can provide genotypes with higher SY. On the other hand, the genotypes in C<sub>I</sub> were formed mainly by the hybrids originated from the crossings between <italic>P. plicatulum</italic> 4c-4x and <italic>P. guenoarum</italic> ecotypes Azul&#xE3;o and Baio. These genotypes showed greater genetic distance compared with the other genotypes, mainly due to traits intrinsic to the population patterns of tillers and components of inflorescence. As for the classification of ecotypes Azul&#xE3;o and Baio in C<sub>II</sub>, this result suggests that SY may not have been transmitted to their progeny, as they were all classified in C<sub>I</sub>.</p>
<p>High genetic gains can be obtained by selecting individuals based on their genotypic values for a desired trait. The use of BLUP to estimate genetic values allowed for the selection of genotypes with higher averages for all traits. Gains resulting from selection can be approximately 60% for the traits that best correlate with SY (RT and NSI), which can be attributed to the fact that the genetic resources evaluated have not yet been fully domesticated. These results indicate the existence of great genetic dissimilarity to be explored in the genetic improvement program of the species. It should be noted that both traits showed high estimates of <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="m44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and heritability can be used to directly predict genetic gain, regardless of the selection method, and, consequently, helps in the decision making for genetic improvement of crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Ramalho et al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>The main SY components of <italic>Paspalum</italic> are TT, RT, NSI, and WTS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Lopes and Franke 2011a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Lopes et al., 2018</xref>). The use of these traits favors the selection of superior performance genotypes, through indirect selection, in traits that are difficult to select and measure, such as SY. The majority of the studies in perennial forage species focuses on forage production rather than SY (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Majidi et al., 2009</xref>). Our results fill this void by providing crucial information related to SY that contributes to the selection process to guide genetic improvement of <italic>Paspalum</italic>. Our results show that the structural characteristics of the plant, the number of vegetative tillers that pass on to the reproductive stage, can theoretically be used to predict SY prior to the beginning of flowering with high accuracy and precision.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>High level of variability exists for seed yield-related traits in the crosses of <italic>P. plicatulum</italic> &#xD7; <italic>P. guenoarum</italic> species. Number of seeds/inflorescence and reproductive tillers/plant showed high correlation with seed yield/plant, and these traits can be used for indirect selection of seed yield. High genetic values for important seed yield-related traits indicate that the hybrids H20, H22, and H13 and ecotypes Azul&#xE3;o and Baio can be used as excellent materials for genetic improvement of <italic>Paspalum sp. Plicatula</italic> group in the future.</p>
</sec></body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>This work was supported by Coordena&#xE7;&#xE3;o de Aperfei&#xE7;oamento de Pessoal de N&#xED;vel Superior (CAPES; process 007488/2011-35). The authors thank Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende (Embrapa Florestas) and Andrei Ca&#xED;que Nunes (UFV) for helping with statistical analysis (SELEGEN-REML/BLUP software).</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Aguilera</surname><given-names>P. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sartor</surname><given-names>M. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Galdeano</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Espinoza</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Quarin</surname><given-names>C. L.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2011</year>
<article-title>Interspecific tetraploid hybrids between two forage grass species: sexual <italic>Paspalum plicatulum</italic> and apomictic <italic>P. guenoarum</italic></article-title>
<source>Crop Science</source>
<volume>51</volume>
<fpage>1544</fpage>
<lpage>1550</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2010.10.0610">https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2010.10.0610</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Aguilera, P. M.; Sartor, M. E.; Galdeano, F.; Espinoza, F. and Quarin, C. L. 2011. Interspecific tetraploid hybrids between two forage grass species: sexual <italic>Paspalum plicatulum</italic> and apomictic <italic>P. guenoarum</italic>. Crop Science 51:1544-1550. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2010.10.0610</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Biligetu</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Schellenberg</surname><given-names>M. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>McLeod</surname><given-names>J. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2013</year>
<article-title>Seed yield variation in plains rough fescue (<italic>Festuca hallii</italic> (Vasey) Piper) populations and its relation with phenotypic characteristics and environmental factors</article-title>
<source>Grass and Forage Science</source>
<volume>68</volume>
<fpage>589</fpage>
<lpage>595</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12012">https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12012</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Biligetu, B.; Schellenberg, M. P.; McLeod, J. G. and Wang, Z. 2013. Seed yield variation in plains rough fescue (<italic>Festuca hallii</italic> (Vasey) Piper) populations and its relation with phenotypic characteristics and environmental factors. Grass and Forage Science 68:589-595. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12012</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Boelt</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Studer</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2010</year>
<chapter-title>Breeding for grass seed yield</chapter-title>
<fpage>161</fpage>
<lpage>174</lpage>
<source>Fodder crops and amenity grasses</source>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name><surname>Boller</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Posselt</surname><given-names>U. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Veronesi</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group>
<publisher-name>Springer Publishing</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>New York City</publisher-loc></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Boelt, B. and Studer, B. 2010. Breeding for grass seed yield. p.161-174. In: Fodder crops and amenity grasses. Boller, B.; Posselt, U. K. and Veronesi, F., eds. Springer Publishing, New York City.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>Brasil</collab></person-group>
<year>2009</year>
<source>Regras para an&#xE1;lise de sementes</source>
<publisher-name>MAPA/ACS</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Bras&#xED;lia, DF</publisher-loc></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Brasil. 2009. Regras para an&#xE1;lise de sementes. MAPA/ACS, Bras&#xED;lia, DF.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Canto</surname><given-names>M. W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Barth</surname><given-names>A.</given-names> <suffix>Neto</suffix></name>
<name><surname>Pancera</surname><given-names>E. J.</given-names> <suffix>J&#xFA;nior</suffix></name>
<name><surname>Gasparino</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Boleta</surname><given-names>V. S.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2012</year>
<article-title>Produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o e qualidade de sementes do capim-momba&#xE7;a em fun&#xE7;&#xE3;o da aduba&#xE7;&#xE3;o nitrogenada</article-title>
<source>Bragantia</source>
<volume>71</volume>
<fpage>430</fpage>
<lpage>437</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052012005000032">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052012005000032</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Canto, M. W.; Barth Neto, A.; Pancera J&#xFA;nior, E. J.; Gasparino, E. and Boleta, V. S. 2012. Produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o e qualidade de sementes do capim-momba&#xE7;a em fun&#xE7;&#xE3;o da aduba&#xE7;&#xE3;o nitrogenada. Bragantia 71:430-437. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0006-87052012005000032</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Carvalho</surname><given-names>L. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Farias</surname><given-names>F. J. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Morello</surname><given-names>C. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Teodoro</surname><given-names>P. E.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2016</year>
<article-title>Uso da metodologia REML/BLUP para sele&#xE7;&#xE3;o de gen&#xF3;tipos de algodoeiro com maior adaptabilidade e estabilidade produtiva</article-title>
<source>Bragantia</source>
<volume>75</volume>
<fpage>314</fpage>
<lpage>321</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.275">https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.275</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Carvalho, L. P.; Farias, F. J. C.; Morello, C. L. and Teodoro, P. E. 2016. Uso da metodologia REML/BLUP para sele&#xE7;&#xE3;o de gen&#xF3;tipos de algodoeiro com maior adaptabilidade e estabilidade produtiva. Bragantia 75:314-321. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.275</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>CQFS-RS/SC - Comiss&#xE3;o de Qu&#xED;mica e Fertilidade do Solo RS/SC, N&#xFA;cleo Regional Sul da Sociedade Brasileira de Ci&#xEA;ncia do Solo</collab></person-group>
<year>2004</year>
<source>Manual de aduba&#xE7;&#xE3;o e de calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina</source>
<publisher-name>CQFS-RS/SC</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Porto Alegre, RS</publisher-loc></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>CQFS-RS/SC - Comiss&#xE3;o de Qu&#xED;mica e Fertilidade do Solo RS/SC, N&#xFA;cleo Regional Sul da Sociedade Brasileira de Ci&#xEA;ncia do Solo. 2004. Manual de aduba&#xE7;&#xE3;o e de calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e Santa Catarina. CQFS-RS/SC, Porto Alegre, RS.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hand</surname><given-names>M. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Koltunow</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2014</year>
<article-title>The genetic control of apomixis: Asexual seed formation</article-title>
<source>Genetics</source>
<volume>197</volume>
<fpage>441</fpage>
<lpage>450</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.163105">https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.163105</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Hand, M. L. and Koltunow, A. M. 2014. The genetic control of apomixis: Asexual seed formation. Genetics 197:441-450. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.163105</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Huber</surname><given-names>K. G. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dall&#x2019;Agnol</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Motta</surname><given-names>E. A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>&#xC1;vila</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Perera</surname><given-names>M. Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>T. N.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2016</year>
<article-title>Variabilidade agron&#xF4;mica e sele&#xE7;&#xE3;o de prog&#xEA;nies F<sub>1</sub> de <italic>Paspalum</italic></article-title>
<source>Revista Brasileira de Ci&#xEA;ncias Agr&#xE1;rias</source>
<volume>11</volume>
<fpage>374</fpage>
<lpage>380</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v11i4a5391">https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v11i4a5391</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Huber, K. G. C.; Dall&#x2019;Agnol, M.; Motta, E. A. M.; Pereira, E. A.; &#xC1;vila, M. R.; Perera, M. Z. and Santos, T. N. 2016. Variabilidade agron&#xF4;mica e sele&#xE7;&#xE3;o de prog&#xEA;nies F<sub>1</sub> de <italic>Paspalum</italic>. Revista Brasileira de Ci&#xEA;ncias Agr&#xE1;rias 11:374-380. https://doi.org/10.5039/agraria.v11i4a5391</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Humphreys</surname><given-names>L. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Riveros</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1986</year>
<source>Tropical pasture seed production. FAO plant production and protection paper</source>
<issue>8</issue>
<publisher-name>FAO</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Roma, Italy</publisher-loc></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Humphreys, L. R. and Riveros, F. 1986. Tropical pasture seed production. FAO plant production and protection paper n. 8. FAO, Roma, Italy.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lopes</surname><given-names>R. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Franke</surname><given-names>L. B.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2011a</year>
<article-title>Produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o de sementes de quatro ec&#xF3;tipos de <italic>Paspalum</italic> nativos do Rio Grande do Sul</article-title>
<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
<volume>40</volume>
<fpage>20</fpage>
<lpage>30</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000100004">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000100004</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Lopes, R. R. and Franke, L. B. 2011a. Produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o de sementes de quatro ec&#xF3;tipos de <italic>Paspalum</italic> nativos do Rio Grande do Sul. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40:20-30. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000100004</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lopes</surname><given-names>R. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Franke</surname><given-names>L. B.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2011b</year>
<article-title>Correla&#xE7;&#xE3;o e an&#xE1;lise do coeficiente de trilha dos componentes do rendimento de sementes de grama-forquilha</article-title>
<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
<volume>40</volume>
<fpage>972</fpage>
<lpage>977</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000500005">http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000500005</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Lopes, R. R. and Franke, L. B. 2011b. Correla&#xE7;&#xE3;o e an&#xE1;lise do coeficiente de trilha dos componentes do rendimento de sementes de grama-forquilha. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40:972-977. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982011000500005</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lopes</surname><given-names>R. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Franke</surname><given-names>L. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Souza</surname><given-names>C. H. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bertoncelli</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Graminho</surname><given-names>L. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2018</year>
<article-title>Genetic parameters and predicted gains with selection of interspecific hybrids of <italic>Paspalum</italic> for seed production</article-title>
<source>Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology</source>
<volume>18</volume>
<fpage>284</fpage>
<lpage>291</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332018v18n3a42">https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332018v18n3a42</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Lopes, R. R.; Franke, L. B.; Souza, C. H. L.; Bertoncelli, P.; Graminho, L. A. and Pereira, E. A. 2018. Genetic parameters and predicted gains with selection of interspecific hybrids of <italic>Paspalum</italic> for seed production. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 18:284-291. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332018v18n3a42</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Majidi</surname><given-names>M. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mirlohi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Amini</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2009</year>
<article-title>Genetic variation, heritability and correlations of agro-morphological traits in tall fescue (<italic>Festuca arundinacea</italic> Schreb.)</article-title>
<source>Euphytica</source>
<volume>167</volume>
<fpage>323</fpage>
<lpage>331</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-9887-6">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-9887-6</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Majidi, M. M.; Mirlohi, A. and Amini, F. 2009. Genetic variation, heritability and correlations of agro-morphological traits in tall fescue (<italic>Festuca arundinacea</italic> Schreb.). Euphytica 167:323-331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-009-9887-6</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Motta</surname><given-names>E. A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dall&#x2019;Agnol</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nascimento</surname><given-names>F. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Machado</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Barbosa</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Simioni</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ferreira</surname><given-names>P. B.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2016</year>
<article-title>Forage performance of <italic>Paspalum</italic> hybrids from an interspecific cross</article-title>
<source>Ci&#xEA;ncia Rural</source>
<volume>46</volume>
<fpage>1025</fpage>
<lpage>1031</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150232">https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150232</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Motta, E. A. M.; Dall&#x2019;Agnol, M.; Nascimento, F. L.; Pereira, E. A.; Machado, J. M.; Barbosa, M. R.; Simioni, C. and Ferreira, P. B. 2016. Forage performance of <italic>Paspalum</italic> hybrids from an interspecific cross. Ci&#xEA;ncia Rural 46:1025-1031. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150232</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Motta</surname><given-names>E. A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dall&#x2019;Agnol</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Machado</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Simioni</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2017</year>
<article-title>Valor forrageiro de h&#xED;bridos interespec&#xED;ficos superiores de <italic>Paspalum</italic></article-title>
<source>Revista Ci&#xEA;ncia Agron&#xF4;mica</source>
<volume>48</volume>
<fpage>191</fpage>
<lpage>198</lpage></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Motta, E. A. M.; Dall&#x2019;Agnol, M.; Pereira, E. A.; Machado, J. M. and Simioni, C. 2017. Valor forrageiro de h&#xED;bridos interespec&#xED;ficos superiores de <italic>Paspalum</italic>. Revista Ci&#xEA;ncia Agron&#xF4;mica 48:191-198.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Nakagawa</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2014</year>
<article-title>Os componentes da produtividade de sementes</article-title>
<source>Informativo Abrates</source>
<volume>24</volume>
<fpage>15</fpage>
<lpage>21</lpage></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Nakagawa, J. 2014. Os componentes da produtividade de sementes. Informativo Abrates 24:15-21.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Novo</surname><given-names>P. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Acu&#xF1;a</surname><given-names>C. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Quarin</surname><given-names>C. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Urbani</surname><given-names>M. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Marc&#xF3;n</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Espinoza</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2017</year>
<article-title>Hybridization and heterosis in the Plicatula group of <italic>Paspalum</italic></article-title>
<source>Euphytica</source>
<volume>213</volume>
<fpage>198</fpage>
<lpage>198</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1983-4">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1983-4</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Novo, P. E.; Acu&#xF1;a, C. A.; Quarin, C. L.; Urbani, M. H.; Marc&#xF3;n, F. and Espinoza, F. 2017. Hybridization and heterosis in the Plicatula group of <italic>Paspalum</italic>. Euphytica 213:198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-017-1983-4</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ortiz</surname><given-names>J. P. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Quarin</surname><given-names>C. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pessino</surname><given-names>S. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Acu&#xF1;a</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mart&#xED;nez</surname><given-names>E. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Espinoza</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hojsgaard</surname><given-names>D. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sartor</surname><given-names>M. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>C&#xE1;ceres</surname><given-names>M. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pupilli</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2013</year>
<article-title>Harnessing apomictic reproduction in grasses: What we have learned from <italic>Paspalum</italic></article-title>
<source>Annals of Botany</source>
<volume>112</volume>
<fpage>767</fpage>
<lpage>787</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct152">https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct152</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Ortiz, J. P. A.; Quarin, C. L.; Pessino, S. C.; Acu&#xF1;a, C.; Mart&#xED;nez, E. J.; Espinoza, F.; Hojsgaard, D. H.; Sartor, M. E.; C&#xE1;ceres, M. E. and Pupilli, F. 2013. Harnessing apomictic reproduction in grasses: What we have learned from <italic>Paspalum</italic>. Annals of Botany 112:767-787. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct152</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<element-citation publication-type="thesis">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2013</year>
<source>Melhoramento gen&#xE9;tico por meio de hibridiza&#xE7;&#xF5;es interespec&#xED;ficas no grupo Plicatula - G&#xEA;nero <italic>Paspalum</italic></source>
<comment>Tese (D.Sc.)</comment>
<publisher-name>Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Porto Alegre</publisher-loc></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Pereira, E. A. 2013. Melhoramento gen&#xE9;tico por meio de hibridiza&#xE7;&#xF5;es interespec&#xED;ficas no grupo Plicatula - G&#xEA;nero <italic>Paspalum</italic>. Tese (D.Sc.). Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Barros</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Volkmann</surname><given-names>G. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Battisti</surname><given-names>G. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>J. A. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Simioni</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dall&#x2019;Agnol</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2012</year>
<article-title>Variabilidade gen&#xE9;tica de caracteres forrageiros em <italic>Paspalum</italic></article-title>
<source>Pesquisa Agropecu&#xE1;ria Brasileira</source>
<volume>47</volume>
<fpage>1533</fpage>
<lpage>1540</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2012001000017">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2012001000017</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Pereira, E. A.; Barros, T.; Volkmann, G. K.; Battisti, G. K.; Silva, J. A. G.; Simioni, C. and Dall&#x2019;Agnol, M. 2012. Variabilidade gen&#xE9;tica de caracteres forrageiros em <italic>Paspalum</italic>. Pesquisa Agropecu&#xE1;ria Brasileira 47:1533-1540. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2012001000017</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dall&#x2019;Agnol</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Saraiva</surname><given-names>K. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Simioni</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Le&#xE3;es</surname><given-names>A. P. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>J. A. G.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2017</year>
<article-title>Genetic gain in apomictic species of the genus <italic>Paspalum</italic></article-title>
<source>Revista Ceres</source>
<volume>64</volume>
<fpage>60</fpage>
<lpage>67</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737x201764010009">https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737x201764010009</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Pereira, E. A.; Dall&#x2019;Agnol, M.; Saraiva, K. M.; Simioni, C.; Le&#xE3;es, A. P. S. and Silva, J. A. G. 2017. Genetic gain in apomictic species of the genus <italic>Paspalum</italic>. Revista Ceres 64:60-67. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-737x201764010009</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dall&#x2019;Agnol</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Simioni</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Machado</surname><given-names>J. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bitencourt</surname><given-names>M. G. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guerra</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Arenhardt</surname><given-names>E. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>J. A. G.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2015</year>
<article-title>Agronomic performance and interspecific hybrids selection of the genus <italic>Paspalum</italic></article-title>
<source>Cient&#xED;fica</source>
<volume>43</volume>
<fpage>388</fpage>
<lpage>395</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2015v43n4p388-395">https://doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2015v43n4p388-395</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Pereira, E. A.; Dall&#x2019;Agnol, M.; Simioni, C.; Machado, J. M.; Bitencourt, M. G. S.; Guerra, D.; Arenhardt, E. G. and Silva, J. A. G. 2015. Agronomic performance and interspecific hybrids selection of the genus <italic>Paspalum</italic>. Cient&#xED;fica 43:388-395. https://doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2015v43n4p388-395</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pimentel</surname><given-names>A. J. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guimar&#xE3;es</surname><given-names>J. F. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Souza</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Resende</surname><given-names>M. D. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Moura</surname><given-names>L. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rocha</surname><given-names>J. R. A. S. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ribeiro</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2014</year>
<article-title>Estima&#xE7;&#xE3;o de par&#xE2;metros gen&#xE9;ticos e predi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de valor gen&#xE9;tico aditivo de trigo utilizando modelos mistos</article-title>
<source>Pesquisa Agropecu&#xE1;ria Brasileira</source>
<volume>49</volume>
<fpage>882</fpage>
<lpage>890</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2014001100007">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2014001100007</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Pimentel, A. J. B.; Guimar&#xE3;es, J. F. R.; Souza, M. A.; Resende, M. D. V.; Moura, L. M.; Rocha, J. R. A. S. C. and Ribeiro, G. 2014. Estima&#xE7;&#xE3;o de par&#xE2;metros gen&#xE9;ticos e predi&#xE7;&#xE3;o de valor gen&#xE9;tico aditivo de trigo utilizando modelos mistos. Pesquisa Agropecu&#xE1;ria Brasileira 49:882-890. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2014001100007</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Quadros</surname><given-names>D. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>G. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>E. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Andrade</surname><given-names>A. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>A. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Stolben</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2010</year>
<article-title>Componentes da produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o de sementes de duas cultivares de <italic>Brachiaria brizantha</italic> (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf nos cerrados da Bahia</article-title>
<source>Revista Cient&#xED;fica de Produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o Animal</source>
<volume>12</volume>
<fpage>19</fpage>
<lpage>22</lpage></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Quadros, D. G.; Oliveira, G. C.; Oliveira, E. P.; Andrade, A. P.; Silva, A. V. and Stolben, E. 2010. Componentes da produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o de sementes de duas cultivares de <italic>Brachiaria brizantha</italic> (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf nos cerrados da Bahia. Revista Cient&#xED;fica de Produ&#xE7;&#xE3;o Animal 12:19-22.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ramalho</surname><given-names>M. A. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Abreu</surname><given-names>A. F. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>J. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nunes</surname><given-names>J. A. R.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2012</year>
<source>Aplica&#xE7;&#xF5;es da gen&#xE9;tica quantitativa no melhoramento de plantas aut&#xF3;gamas</source>
<publisher-name>UFLA</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Lavras</publisher-loc></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Ramalho, M. A. P.; Abreu, A. F. B.; Santos, J. B. and Nunes, J. A. R. 2012. Aplica&#xE7;&#xF5;es da gen&#xE9;tica quantitativa no melhoramento de plantas aut&#xF3;gamas. UFLA, Lavras.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Resende</surname><given-names>M. D. V.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2016</year>
<article-title>Software SELEGEN-REML/BLUP: a useful tool for plant breeding</article-title>
<source>Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology</source>
<volume>16</volume>
<fpage>330</fpage>
<lpage>339</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332016v16n4a49">https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332016v16n4a49</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Resende, M. D. V. 2016. Software SELEGEN-REML/BLUP: a useful tool for plant breeding. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 16:330-339. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-70332016v16n4a49</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Resende</surname><given-names>M. D. V.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2007</year>
<source>Software SELEGEN-REML/BLUP: sistema estat&#xED;stico e sele&#xE7;&#xE3;o gen&#xE9;tica computadorizada via modelos lineares mistos</source>
<publisher-name>Embrapa Florestas</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Colombo</publisher-loc></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Resende, M. D. V. 2007. Software SELEGEN-REML/BLUP: sistema estat&#xED;stico e sele&#xE7;&#xE3;o gen&#xE9;tica computadorizada via modelos lineares mistos. Embrapa Florestas, Colombo.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Resende</surname><given-names>M. D. V.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2002</year>
<source>Gen&#xE9;tica, biom&#xE9;trica e estat&#xED;stica: no melhoramento de plantas perenes</source>
<publisher-name>Embrapa Informa&#xE7;&#xE3;o Tecnol&#xF3;gica</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Bras&#xED;lia</publisher-loc></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Resende, M. D. V. 2002. Gen&#xE9;tica, biom&#xE9;trica e estat&#xED;stica: no melhoramento de plantas perenes. Embrapa Informa&#xE7;&#xE3;o Tecnol&#xF3;gica, Bras&#xED;lia.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Resende</surname><given-names>M. D. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Duarte</surname><given-names>J. B.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2007</year>
<article-title>Precis&#xE3;o e controle de qualidade em experimentos de avalia&#xE7;&#xE3;o de cultivares</article-title>
<source>Pesquisa Agropecu&#xE1;ria Tropical</source>
<volume>37</volume>
<fpage>182</fpage>
<lpage>194</lpage></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Resende, M. D. V. and Duarte, J. B. 2007. Precis&#xE3;o e controle de qualidade em experimentos de avalia&#xE7;&#xE3;o de cultivares. Pesquisa Agropecu&#xE1;ria Tropical 37:182-194.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sadras</surname><given-names>V. O.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2007</year>
<article-title>Evolutionary aspects of the trade-off between seed size and number in crops</article-title>
<source>Field Crops Research</source>
<volume>100</volume>
<fpage>125</fpage>
<lpage>138</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.004</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Sadras, V. O. 2007. Evolutionary aspects of the trade-off between seed size and number in crops. Field Crops Research 100:125-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.07.004</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Santos</surname><given-names>H. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Almeida</surname><given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>J. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lumbreras</surname><given-names>J. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Anjos</surname><given-names>L. H. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Coelho</surname><given-names>M. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jacomine</surname><given-names>P. K. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cunha</surname><given-names>T. J. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>V. A.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2013</year>
<source>Sistema Brasileiro de Classifica&#xE7;&#xE3;o de Solos</source>
<publisher-name>Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecu&#xE1;ria, CNPS</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Rio de Janeiro</publisher-loc></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Santos, H. G.; Almeida, J. A.; Oliveira, J. B.; Lumbreras, J. F.; Anjos, L. H. C.; Coelho, M. R.; Jacomine, P. K. T.; Cunha, T. J. F. and Oliveira, V. A. 2013. Sistema Brasileiro de Classifica&#xE7;&#xE3;o de Solos. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecu&#xE1;ria, CNPS, Rio de Janeiro.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sartor</surname><given-names>M. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Quarin</surname><given-names>C. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Espinoza</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2009</year>
<article-title>Mode of reproduction of colchicine-induced <italic>Paspalum plicatulum</italic> tetraploids</article-title>
<source>Crop Science</source>
<volume>49</volume>
<fpage>1270</fpage>
<lpage>1276</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.05.0270">https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.05.0270</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Sartor, M. E.; Quarin, C. L. and Espinoza, F. 2009. Mode of reproduction of colchicine-induced <italic>Paspalum plicatulum</italic> tetraploids. Crop Science 49:1270-1276. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2008.05.0270</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sebbenn</surname><given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kageyama</surname><given-names>P. Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vencosvky</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>1998</year>
<article-title>Variabilidade gen&#xE9;tica, sistema reprodutivo e estrutura gen&#xE9;tica especial em <italic>Genipa americana</italic> L. atrav&#xE9;s de marcadores isoenzim&#xE1;ticos</article-title>
<source>Scientia Forestalis</source>
<volume>53</volume>
<fpage>15</fpage>
<lpage>30</lpage></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Sebbenn, A. M.; Kageyama, P. Y. and Vencosvky, R. 1998. Variabilidade gen&#xE9;tica, sistema reprodutivo e estrutura gen&#xE9;tica especial em <italic>Genipa americana</italic> L. atrav&#xE9;s de marcadores isoenzim&#xE1;ticos. Scientia Forestalis 53:15-30.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>&#x15E;eker</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yazici</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Uysal</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2014</year>
<article-title>Analysis of variability, heritability, and genetic advance in seed yield and related traits of orchardgrass (<italic>Dactylis glomerata</italic> L.) populations</article-title>
<source>Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry</source>
<volume>38</volume>
<fpage>633</fpage>
<lpage>643</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1312-95">https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1312-95</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>&#x15E;eker, H.; Yazici, A. and Uysal, P. 2014. Analysis of variability, heritability, and genetic advance in seed yield and related traits of orchardgrass (<italic>Dactylis glomerata</italic> L.) populations. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 38:633-643. https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1312-95</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Shabanimofrad</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rafii</surname><given-names>M. Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Megat Wahab</surname><given-names>P. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Biabani</surname><given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Latif</surname><given-names>M. A.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2013</year>
<article-title>Phenotypic, genotypic and genetic divergence found in 48 newly collected Malaysian accessions of <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> L</article-title>
<source>Industrial Crops and Products</source>
<volume>42</volume>
<fpage>543</fpage>
<lpage>551</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.06.023">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.06.023</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Shabanimofrad, M.; Rafii, M. Y.; Megat Wahab, P. E.; Biabani, A. R. and Latif, M. A. 2013. Phenotypic, genotypic and genetic divergence found in 48 newly collected Malaysian accessions of <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> L. Industrial Crops and Products 42:543-551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.06.023</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Steiner</surname><given-names>M. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dall&#x2019;Agnol</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nabinger</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Scheffer-Basso</surname><given-names>S. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Weiler</surname><given-names>R. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Simioni</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Schifino-Wittmann</surname><given-names>M. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Motta</surname><given-names>E. A. M.</given-names></name></person-group>
<year>2017</year>
<article-title>Forage potential of native ecotypes of <italic>Paspalum notatum</italic> and <italic>P. guenoarum</italic></article-title>
<source>Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ci&#xEA;ncias</source>
<volume>89</volume>
<fpage>1753</fpage>
<lpage>1760</lpage>
<comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720160662">https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720160662</ext-link></comment></element-citation>
<mixed-citation>Steiner, M. G.; Dall&#x2019;Agnol, M.; Nabinger, C.; Scheffer-Basso, S. M.; Weiler, R. L.; Simioni, C.; Schifino-Wittmann, M. T. and Motta, E. A. M. 2017. Forage potential of native ecotypes of <italic>Paspalum notatum</italic> and <italic>P. guenoarum</italic>. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ci&#xEA;ncias 89:1753-1760. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720160662</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list>
</back>
</article>
