<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" specific-use="sps-1.5" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rbz</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">R. Bras. Zootec.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="epub">1806-9290</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">S1806-92902017000300009</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1806-92902017000300009</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Ruminants</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Additives on <italic>in vitro</italic> ruminal fermentation characteristics of rice straw</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Peripolli</surname>
						<given-names>Vanessa</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c01"><sup>*</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Barcellos</surname>
						<given-names>Júlio Otávio Jardim</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Prates</surname>
						<given-names>Ênio Rosa</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>McManus</surname>
						<given-names>Concepta</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Stella</surname>
						<given-names>Laion Antunes</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Camargo</surname>
						<given-names>Cláudia Medeiros</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Costa</surname>
						<given-names>João Batista Gonçalves</given-names>
						<suffix>Jr</suffix>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Bayer</surname>
						<given-names>Cimélio</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Porto Alegre</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">RS</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Faculdade de Agronomia</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv2">Departamento de Zootecnia</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Porto Alegre</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">RS</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Agronomia, Departamento de Zootecnia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff3">
				<label>3</label>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade de Brasília</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade de Brasília</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Instituto de Ciências Biológicas</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Brasília</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">DF</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Brasília, DF, Brazil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff4">
				<label>4</label>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade Federal de Pelotas</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal de Pelotas</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Pelotas</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">RS</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff5">
				<label>5</label>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Faculdades Associadas de Uberaba</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Faculdades Associadas de Uberaba</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Uberaba</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">MG</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
				<institution content-type="original">Faculdades Associadas de Uberaba, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff6">
				<label>6</label>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Faculdade de Agronomia</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv2">Departamento de Solos</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Porto Alegre</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">RS</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Agronomia, Departamento de Solos, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.</institution>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c01">
					<label>*</label>Corresponding author: <email>vanessa.peripolli@hotmail.com</email>
				</corresp>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub">
				<month>03</month>
				<year>2017</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>46</volume>
			<issue>3</issue>
			<fpage>240</fpage>
			<lpage>250</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>26</day>
					<month>07</month>
					<year>2016</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>6</day>
					<month>11</month>
					<year>2016</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<license-p>
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of mineral and protein-energy (MPES), exogenous fibrolytic enzyme supplements (ES), combination of MPES + ES, and straw without supplement (WS) on digestibility, fermentation kinetic parameters, cumulative gas production, methane, CO<sub>2</sub> production, and volatile fatty acid concentration of rice straw of low and high nutritional value, estimated by <italic>in vitro</italic> techniques. The experimental design was randomized and factorial 2 × 4: two straws (low and high nutritional value) incubated with four supplements (MPES, ES, MPES + ES, and WS) and their interactions. Four experimental periods were used, totaling four replications per treatment over time. Data were analyzed by PROC MIXED of SAS. The <italic>in vitro</italic> dry matter and organic matter digestibilities of the rice straw with high nutritional value was improved by MPES, while the combination of MPES + ES supplements inhibited the digestibility of this straw. Dietary carbohydrate and nitrogen increased through MPES and MPES + ES supplements resulted in an increase in NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration and a decrease in CO<sub>2</sub> production due to the microbial mass formation. However, this increase was not enough to improve organic matter degradability parameters, cummulative gas production, gas production kinetics, and acetate:propionate ratio and reduce methane emissions. The straw with high nutritional value showed greater content of nitrogen fraction a, effective degradability, cummulative gas production, and methane and CO<sub>2</sub> productions comparing with low-nutritional value straw. The use of MPES and MPES + ES supplements can be used as strategy to mitigate CO<sub>2</sub> in ruminant production systems that use rice straw.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<kwd>digestibility</kwd>
				<kwd>digestion kinetics</kwd>
				<kwd>fatty acid</kwd>
				<kwd>gas production</kwd>
				<kwd>methane</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="0"/>
				<table-count count="8"/>
				<equation-count count="0"/>
				<ref-count count="48"/>
				<page-count count="11"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>Introduction</title>
			<p>Rice is the second most cultivated cereal worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">FAO, 2016</xref>). Therefore, for each ton of rice grain harvested, one ton of straw remains in the field (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Doyle et al., 1986</xref>). Despite the low nutritional value of rice straw due to its high silica content, low ruminal degradation of carbohydrates, and low nitrogen content, when stored in bales, it presents significant potential for strategic use in critical periods of food availability or in ruminant production systems with low nutrient requirements.</p>
			<p>Technologies to increase the use of low-quality feeds, such as rice straw, consist in optimizing nutrient availability for the ruminal fermentation, ensuring no deficiency of nutrients to the microorganisms. Increased bacterial growth may result in increased extraction, through fermentation, of the roughage carbohydrate energy and, as a result, microbial cells synthesized in the rumen are available for amino acid digestion and absorption in the intestine (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Leng, 1990</xref>).</p>
			<p>This nutrient availability optimization in cattle fed rice straw may be achieved with mineral and protein-energy supplementation aiming to improve forage digestibility to maximize its intake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Barbosa et al., 2007</xref>), meeting animal requirements for maintenance and moderate weight gain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Lima, 2002</xref>). Furthermore, this supplementation increases the ruminal ammonia nitrogen concentration and meets the requirements of the ruminal microorganisms, allowing maximum fermentation rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Fike et al., 1995</xref>).</p>
			<p>Additionally, the increase in the metabolizable protein availability and the increase in the absorbed protein:energy ratio reduced the metabolic heat production, promoting greater intake and raising the gain rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Leng, 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Poppi and McLennan, 1995</xref>).</p>
			<p>On the other hand, supplementation with feed of low nutritional value, with exogenous fibrolytic enzymes, aims to increase nutrient use and animal production efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Nsereko et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Beauchemin et al., 2003</xref>) and reduce the fecal output. These enzymes potentiate the degradation of fibrous polysaccharides togheter with the enzymes produced by the rumen microorganisms, stimulating total digestion and degradation rate, thus improving the digestibility of fibrous feeds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Newbold, 1997</xref>).</p>
			<p>The hypothesis that the improvement of the rice straw <italic>in vitro</italic> fermentation process may be achieved by using additives was investigated. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate, through <italic>in vitro</italic> techniques, the effects of mineral and protein-energy and exogenous fibrolytic enzyme supplements on digestibility, fermentation parameters and kinetics, maximum gas production, methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) production, and volatile fatty acid concentration in rice straw.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>Material and Methods</title>
			<p>Animal care procedures throughout the study followed protocols approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Use (ECAU) of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, number 18442/2010.</p>
			<p>Two straws (low and high nutritional value) were incubated <italic>in vitro</italic> without supplementation (WS), with mineral and protein-energy supplement (MPES), with exogenous fibrolytic enzymes supplement (ES), and with the combination of the two supplements (MPES + ES) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). Four experimental periods were used, totaling four treatment replications. Duplicate bottles were also included in each run as blanks.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t1">
					<label>Table 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Chemical composition and <italic>in vitro</italic> organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) of rice straw and mineral and protein-energy (MPES) and enzyme (ES) supplements used in the experimental diets</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup width="20%">
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" style="font-weight:normal">Chemical composition (g kg<sup>–1</sup> of dry matter)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">High-nutritional value straw</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Low-nutritional value straw</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">MPES<sup>1</sup></th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">ES</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Dry matter<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">873</td>
								<td align="center">915</td>
								<td align="center">927</td>
								<td align="center">915</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Organic matter<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">831</td>
								<td align="center">828</td>
								<td align="center">400</td>
								<td align="center">955</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Crude protein<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">44.7</td>
								<td align="center">37.4</td>
								<td align="center">398</td>
								<td align="center">240</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Neutral detergent fiber<sup>3</sup></td>
								<td align="center">732</td>
								<td align="center">781</td>
								<td align="center">196</td>
								<td align="center">317</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Acid detergent fiber<sup>4</sup></td>
								<td align="center">424</td>
								<td align="center">469</td>
								<td align="center">69.8</td>
								<td align="center">130</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Cellulose<sup>5</sup></td>
								<td align="center">393</td>
								<td align="center">435</td>
								<td align="center">45.3</td>
								<td align="center">90.7</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Hemicellulose<sup>5</sup></td>
								<td align="center">307</td>
								<td align="center">302</td>
								<td align="center">126</td>
								<td align="center">186</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Lignin<sup>5</sup></td>
								<td align="center">28.0</td>
								<td align="center">34.4</td>
								<td align="center">24.5</td>
								<td align="center">39.6</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Silica<sup>5</sup></td>
								<td align="center">95.9</td>
								<td align="center">126</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>IVOMD</td>
								<td align="center">529</td>
								<td align="center">424</td>
								<td align="center">653</td>
								<td align="center">765</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN1">
							<p><sup>1</sup> Each kg contains: 60 g calcium; 30 g phosphorus; 14 g sulfur; 74 g sodium; 0.21 g manganese; 1.3 g zinc; 0.06 g cobalt; 0.12 g copper; 0.02 g iodine; 0.009 g selenium; 0.28 g fluorine; 330 g non-protein nitrogen; and 220 g total digestible nutrients.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN2">
							<p><sup>2</sup> Determined according to AOAC (1975).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN3">
							<p><sup>3</sup> Not assayed with stable amylase expressed exclusive of residual ash acid.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN4">
							<p><sup>4</sup> Expressed inclusive of residual ash.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN5">
							<p><sup>5</sup> Determined according to Van Soest et al. (1991) but with a modification to determine silica, in which the residue was burned in a muffle furnace at 550 °C overnight.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>The mineral and energy-protein supplement used was commercially available and prepared in compliance with the nutritional standards of the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">NRC (1996)</xref> for beef cattle, whose daily intake recommendation is 50 g 100 kg<sup>–1</sup> body weight, composed of non-protein nitrogen source, macro and micro minerals, cottonseed and soybean meal, and wheat bran. The enzyme supplement was a commercially available source of xylanase, whose daily intake recommendation is 15 g head<sup>–1</sup>, consisting of corn distillers’ dried grains with solubles, plant protein products, <italic>Yucca schidigera</italic> plant extract, and dried <italic>Trichoderma longibrachiatum</italic> fermentation extract (Alltech Inc.).</p>
			<p>The straw rice intake of 100 g kg<sup>–1</sup> of body weight was considered.</p>
			<p>The <italic>in vitro</italic> digestibility was determined by the two-stage digestion technique proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Tilley and Terry (1963)</xref>. Ruminal inoculum was collected from two fasting Texel sheep with an average weight of 60 kg adapted for 10 days to a diet based on alfalfa hay. Two hours after morning feed, rumen fluid and part of the rumen solid material were obtained to collect microorganisms adhered to the substrate. All collected material was homogenized in a blender at a ratio of 1:1 (solid:liquid portion) and filtered through four layers of gauze adding CO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
			<p><italic>In vitro</italic> organic matter digestibility (IVOMD) was calculated by the difference between the incubated and undigested organic matter (OM) present in crucibles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Goering and Van Soest, 1970</xref>).</p>
			<p><italic>In vitro</italic> cumulative gas production was obtained through the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Theodorou et al. (1994)</xref> methodology modified by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mauricio et al. (1999)</xref>, using a pressure transducer data logger (PDL 200 LANA/SCENE USP, Piracicaba/SP, Brazil) connected to a three-output valve. The first output was connected to the pressure transducer, the second to the needle (no. 22) to be inserted into the bottle stopper, and the third to a plastic syringe to measure the volume. Ruminal inoculum was obtained as described previously. The bottles were sealed with rubber stoppers and aluminum rings. In each experimental period, two bottles per treatment and per time were incubated, totaling 224 bottles plus the blank bottles (two blanks per incubation time, totaling 28 bottles). Four experimental periods were used, totaling four replications per treatment over time.</p>
			<p>Pressure and volume of gas were measured at 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 96 h post-incubation. Gas production was expressed in mL of gas produced per gram of organic matter incubated.</p>
			<p>For degradation rate adjustment, gas production data were fitted using a bicompartimental model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Schofield et al., 1994</xref>): V (t) = A / (1 + exp × (2 – 4 × B × (T – C))) – 1 + D / (1 + exp (2 – 4 × E × (T – F))) – 1, in which V (t) = cumulative gas production at time t (mL g<sup>–1</sup> OM); A = maximal gas production of the rapid fermentation fraction (mL); B = fermentation rate of A (h); C = lag time of the fraction A (h); D = maximal gas production of the slow fermentation fraction (mL); E = fermentation rate of D (h); F = lag time of the fraction D (h); and T = incubation time (h). The model parameters were estimated by interactive Marquardt method inserted into the NLIN procedure of SAS (Statistical Analysis System, version 9.3).</p>
			<p>The partition factor (PF) was determined according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Makkar (2004)</xref>: FP = mg OM truly degraded/mL gases. For this calculation, we considered 36 h of incubation (time in which half of the maximal gas production was produced by treatments).</p>
			<p>At 6, 12, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h, the fermentation was stopped and the pH measurements were performed immediately. Subsequently, the contents of the bottles were filtered through a sintered-glass crucible of coarse porosity (100 to 160 µm). Crucible containing residue from the filtration was oven-heated at 105 °C for 12 h, weighed, resulting in a moisture-free residue, and subsequently heated at 450 °C for 5 h. <italic>In vitro</italic> organic matter degradability was calculated by the difference between the incubated and undigested organic matter present in crucibles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Goering and Van Soest, 1970</xref>).</p>
			<p>To study the ruminal degradability kinetics, the degradability obtained at different times was adjusted using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">McDonald (1981)</xref> model: Yt = a + b (1 – exp – c (t – to)), in which Yt = losses for degradation after t hours; a = immediately solubilized substrate; b = insoluble material, but potentially degradable; a + b = potential degradability; c = degradation rate of b; t = incubation time (h); and to = lag time. The effective degradability (ED) was calculated using the equation proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Ørskov and McDonald (1979)</xref>: ED = a + [(b × c) / (c + k)] exp (–(c + k) t), in which a, b, c, and t followed previous definitions and k = ruminal outflow rates of 0.02 or 0.05 h<sup>–1</sup>.</p>
			<p>At these same times, two aliquots of 5 mL of the filtrate were collected, one for volatile fatty acid and another for ammonia nitrogen (NH<sub>3</sub>-N) determination. In the aliquots for NH<sub>3</sub>-N determinations, 1 mL of 0.18 molar sulfuric acid was added to avoid nitrogen losses. Aliquots were frozen until analysis.</p>
			<p>Volatile fatty acid concentrations - acetic (C2), propionic (C3), and butyric acids (C4) - were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, in a chromatograph (Shimadzu model 14-B) equipped with UV detector, pre-column and column (Aminex HPX-87H, BioRad<sup>®</sup>). Sulfuric acid was used as eluent at 0.01 molar concentration, at a 0.6 mL min<sup>–1</sup> flow rate and 50 °C operating temperature. The detection wavelength was set at 210 nm. Volatile fatty acid concentrations were calculated from the calibration curves using standards (Sigma<sup>®</sup>, analytical grade) at 0.1 to 2.5 g L<sup>–1</sup> concentrations.</p>
			<p>Ammonia nitrogen concentrations were determined by magnesium oxide distillation according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">AOAC (1995)</xref>.</p>
			<p>The volume of gas produced during the intervals of 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 h of incubation was collected, measured, and stored in 20-mL vacutainer tubes without additive for the gas analysis.</p>
			<p>Methane and CO<sub>2</sub> gases were analyzed by gas chromatography (Shimadzu<sup>®</sup> “greenhouse” model) equipped with three packed columns operating at 70 °C. Nitrogen as a carrier gas (25 mL min<sup>–1</sup>), injector (250 °C) with direct sampling of 1 mL, and electron capture detector with Ni<sub>63</sub> at 325 °C were used.</p>
			<p>Peak gas areas were determined automatically by integration. Methane volume produced at time x was calculated in accordance with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Tavendale et al. (2005)</xref>: CH<sub>4</sub> production (mL g<sup>–1</sup> dry matter (DM)) at time x = (% CH<sub>4</sub> (x) – % CH<sub>4</sub> (x – 1)) × 40/100 + CH<sub>4</sub>% (x) × GP / 100, in which x time = 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96 fermentation h; x – 1 = previous time; 40 = head space in the fermentation bottle in mL; GP = volume of gas produced in mL. This calculation resulted in the volume of CH<sub>4</sub> gas produced between each time interval. The sum of these volumes resulted in the accumulated volume of CH<sub>4</sub> for 96 h. The same formula was used to calculate CO<sub>2</sub> production.</p>
			<p>Digestibility, degradation parameters, effective degradation of organic matter, maximum gas production from the rapidly and slowly degradable fractions and their respective degradation rates, time of colonization, and partition factor data were analyzed using the PROC MIXED of SAS. The following statistical model was used:</p>
			<p>Yijkl = µ + αi + βj + αβij + γk + eijkl,</p>
			<p>in which Yijkl = dependent variables; µ = overall mean of the observations; αi = fixed effect of the straw (i = 1, 2); βj = fixed effect of the supplement (j = 1, 2, 3, 4); αβij = straw × supplement interaction effect (i = 1, 2, and j = 1, 2, 3, 4); γk = ramdom effect of the period (k = 1, 2, 3, 4); and eijkl = random residual experimental error.</p>
			<p>Gas production, pH, NH<sub>3</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, CO<sub>2</sub>, and VFA data were analyzed as repeated measures over time using the same procedure. The following statistical model was used:</p>
			<p>Yijklm,1 = µ + αi + βj + αβij + εij+ τk + ατik + βτjk + αβτijk + γl + eijklm,</p>
			<p>in which Yijklm,1 = dependent variables; µ = overall mean of the observations; αi = fixed effect of straw (i = 1, 2); βj = fixed effect of the supplement (j = 1, 2, 3, 4); αβij = straw × supplement interaction effect (i = 1, 2, and j = 1, 2, 3, 4); εij = random residual experimental error; τk = fixed effect of the time ((k = 6, 12...96), or k = 12, 24…96)); ατik = straw × time interaction effect; βτjk = supplement × time interaction effect; αβτijk = straw × supplement × time interaction effect; γl = ramdom effect of the period (k = 1, 2, 3, 4); and eijklm = experimental error associated with the observation Yijklm,l level.</p>
			<p>Using Akaike information criterion, the CS structure (symetry compound) was regarded as the best model for the residual covariance structure.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>Results</title>
			<p>There was a significant interaction between the supplement and rice straw nutritional value for <italic>in vitro</italic> dry matter and organic matter digestibilities (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>). The mineral and protein-energy supplement improved the <italic>in vitro</italic> dry matter and organic matter digestibility of the rice straw with high nutritional value, while the rice straw with low nutritional value without supplementation showed lower values for <italic>in vitro</italic> dry matter and organic matter digestibility.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t2">
					<label>Table 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Interaction effect between the supplement and the rice straw nutritional value on the <italic>in vitro</italic> dry matter (IVDMD) and <italic>in vitro</italic> organic matter (IVOMD) digestibility</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup width="20%">
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">Suplement</th>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Rice straw nutritional value</th>
								<th rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">Mean</th>
								<th rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">
									<hr/>
								</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">High</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Low</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>IVDMD (g kg<sup>–1</sup> fresh material)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Without supplement</td>
								<td align="center">473Ba</td>
								<td align="center">392Bb</td>
								<td align="center">432</td>
								<td align="center">0.2190</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Mineral and protein-energy supplement (MPES)</td>
								<td align="center">519Aa</td>
								<td align="center">423Ab</td>
								<td align="center">472</td>
								<td align="center">0.2190</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Exogenous fibrolytic enzyme supplement (ES)</td>
								<td align="center">467Ba</td>
								<td align="center">435Ab</td>
								<td align="center">451</td>
								<td align="center">0.2190</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>MPES + ES</td>
								<td align="center">475Ba</td>
								<td align="center">422Ab</td>
								<td align="center">448</td>
								<td align="center">0.2190</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Mean</td>
								<td align="center">484</td>
								<td align="center">417</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.1548</td>
								<td align="center">0.1548</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Significance (P =)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutritional value × suplement</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>IVOMD (g kg<sup>–1</sup> DM)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Without supplement</td>
								<td align="center">568Ba</td>
								<td align="center">495Bb</td>
								<td align="center">532</td>
								<td align="center">0.2633</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>MPES</td>
								<td align="center">604Aa</td>
								<td align="center">515Ab</td>
								<td align="center">559</td>
								<td align="center">0.2633</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>ES</td>
								<td align="center">561Ba</td>
								<td align="center">529Ab</td>
								<td align="center">545</td>
								<td align="center">0.2633</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>MPES + ES</td>
								<td align="center">551Ba</td>
								<td align="center">519Ab</td>
								<td align="center">535</td>
								<td align="center">0.2633</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Mean</td>
								<td align="center">571</td>
								<td align="center">515</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.1862</td>
								<td align="center">0.1862</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Significance (P =)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutritional value × suplement</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN6">
							<p>DM - dry matter; SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN7">
							<p>Different uppercase letters in the column and different lowercase letters in the row differ statistically (P&lt;0.05) by Tukey test.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Organic matter degradation parameters were influenced only by the rice straw nutritional value (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). Straw with high nutritional value had greater content of readily soluble fraction of OM (a) (P&lt;0.05) compared with the straw with low nutritional value, 188 and 162 g kg<sup>–1</sup> OM, respectively.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t3">
					<label>Table 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effect of the rice straw nutritional value and the supplement on the organic matter degradation parameters (a, b, c, and lag time) and organic matter effective degradability (g kg–1 OM) mesuared at outflow rate k = 0.02 and 0.05 h–1</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup width="14%">
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" style="font-weight:normal">Parameter</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">a (g kg<sup>−1</sup> OM)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">b (g kg<sup>−1</sup> OM)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">c (h)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">lag time (h)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">ED 0.02</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">ED 0.05</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Straw nutritional value</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>High</td>
								<td align="center">188A</td>
								<td align="center">656</td>
								<td align="center">0.017</td>
								<td align="center">9.41</td>
								<td align="center">442A</td>
								<td align="center">297A</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Low</td>
								<td align="center">168B</td>
								<td align="center">645</td>
								<td align="center">0.017</td>
								<td align="center">9.71</td>
								<td align="center">408B</td>
								<td align="center">266B</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.53</td>
								<td align="center">2.32</td>
								<td align="center">0.0012</td>
								<td align="center">0.68</td>
								<td align="center">0.74</td>
								<td align="center">0.65</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Suplement</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Without supplement</td>
								<td align="center">183</td>
								<td align="center">661</td>
								<td align="center">0.016</td>
								<td align="center">10.25</td>
								<td align="center">424</td>
								<td align="center">277</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Mineral and protein-energy supplement (MPES)</td>
								<td align="center">193</td>
								<td align="center">675</td>
								<td align="center">0.016</td>
								<td align="center">9.83</td>
								<td align="center">425</td>
								<td align="center">283</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Exogenous fibrolytic enzyme supplement (ES)</td>
								<td align="center">187</td>
								<td align="center">652</td>
								<td align="center">0.017</td>
								<td align="center">9.30</td>
								<td align="center">420</td>
								<td align="center">276</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>MPES + ES</td>
								<td align="center">192</td>
								<td align="center">617</td>
								<td align="center">0.019</td>
								<td align="center">8.86</td>
								<td align="center">432</td>
								<td align="center">289</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.74</td>
								<td align="center">3.28</td>
								<td align="center">0.0017</td>
								<td align="center">0.96</td>
								<td align="center">1.05</td>
								<td align="center">0.92</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Significance (P =)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutrition value</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
								<td align="center">0.5401</td>
								<td align="center">0.7170</td>
								<td align="center">0.4988</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Suplement</td>
								<td align="center">0.1572</td>
								<td align="center">0.1300</td>
								<td align="center">0.1445</td>
								<td align="center">0.1536</td>
								<td align="center">0.4108</td>
								<td align="center">0.1849</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutritional value × suplement</td>
								<td align="center">0.3115</td>
								<td align="center">0.6349</td>
								<td align="center">0.2517</td>
								<td align="center">0.5617</td>
								<td align="center">0.4301</td>
								<td align="center">0.3154</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN8">
							<p>OM - organic matter; ED - effective degradability; SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN9">
							<p>Different uppercase letters in the column differ statistically (P&lt;0.05) by Tukey test.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Averages of insoluble fraction, but potentially degradable (b), degradation rate of the insoluble fraction, but potentially degradable (c), and lag time of OM were 651 g kg<sup>–1</sup> OM, 0.0017 h<sup>–1</sup>, and 9.56 h, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>), without influence of the straw nutritional value.</p>
			<p>Effective degradability obtained for the solid fraction passage rates (k = 0.02 and 0.05 h<sup>–1</sup>) were influenced by the straw nutritional value (P&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
			<p>There was an interaction effect between the straw nutritional value and the incubation time on the <italic>in vitro</italic> cumulative gas production (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). From 18 h of incubation, the cumulative gas production of high-nutritional value straw was greater than for the low-nutritional value straw and at the end of the 96 h of incubation, this production was 200.22 and 186.13 mL g<sup>–1</sup> OM, respectively, showing better fermentation for the high-nutritional value straw.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t4">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effect of interaction between the rice straw nutritional value and the incubation time on the <italic>in vitro</italic> cumulative gas production (mL g–1 OM)</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup width="20%">
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">Incubation time (hours)</th>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Rice straw nutritional value</th>
								<th rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">Mean</th>
								<th rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">
									<hr/>
								</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">High</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Low</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>1</td>
								<td align="center">0.03K</td>
								<td align="center">0I</td>
								<td align="center">0.01</td>
								<td align="center">1.30</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>3</td>
								<td align="center">0.92K</td>
								<td align="center">0.84I</td>
								<td align="center">0.87</td>
								<td align="center">1.30</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>6</td>
								<td align="center">5.45JK</td>
								<td align="center">2.12I</td>
								<td align="center">3.78</td>
								<td align="center">1.30</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>9</td>
								<td align="center">10.57IJ</td>
								<td align="center">4.58I</td>
								<td align="center">7.66</td>
								<td align="center">1.30</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>12</td>
								<td align="center">15.62I</td>
								<td align="center">7.12I</td>
								<td align="center">11.37</td>
								<td align="center">1.30</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>18</td>
								<td align="center">30.82Ha</td>
								<td align="center">18.63Hb</td>
								<td align="center">24.72</td>
								<td align="center">1.30</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24</td>
								<td align="center">50.82Ga</td>
								<td align="center">36.26Gb</td>
								<td align="center">43.54</td>
								<td align="center">1.30</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>30</td>
								<td align="center">78.74Fa</td>
								<td align="center">60.36Fb</td>
								<td align="center">69.55</td>
								<td align="center">1.30</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>36</td>
								<td align="center">103.69Ea</td>
								<td align="center">83.38Eb</td>
								<td align="center">93.53</td>
								<td align="center">1.30</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>48</td>
								<td align="center">134.97Da</td>
								<td align="center">114.84Db</td>
								<td align="center">124.90</td>
								<td align="center">1.30</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>60</td>
								<td align="center">161.71Ca</td>
								<td align="center">144.86Cb</td>
								<td align="center">153.28</td>
								<td align="center">1.30</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>72</td>
								<td align="center">179.93Ba</td>
								<td align="center">165.40Bb</td>
								<td align="center">172.66</td>
								<td align="center">1.30</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>96</td>
								<td align="center">200.22Aa</td>
								<td align="center">186.13Ab</td>
								<td align="center">193.18</td>
								<td align="center">1.30</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Mean</td>
								<td align="center">69.54</td>
								<td align="center">58.89</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.49</td>
								<td align="center">0.49</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Significance (P =)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutritional value × incubation time</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN10">
							<p>OM - organic matter; SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN11">
							<p>Different uppercase letters in the column and different lowercase letters in the row differ statistically (P&lt;0.05) by Tukey test.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Maximum gas production of the rapidly degradable fraction of organic matter (A) was influenced by the straw nutritional value. High-nutritional value straw produced 113.98 mL, while the low value produced 75.61 mL of gases related to fraction A. However, the maximum gas production of the slowly degradable fraction of organic matter (D) was influenced by straw nutritional value and by the supplement. Low- and high-nutritional value straws produced 113.43 and 89.27 mL, respectively (P&lt;0.05). Supplements contributed to the reduction in the maximum gas production related to fraction D compared with the treatment without supplement (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t5">
					<label>Table 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effect of the rice straw nutritional value and the supplement on the maximum gas production of organic matter of the rapidly (A, mL) and slowly (D, mL) degradable fractions and their respective degradation rates (B and E, h), lag time (C and F, h), and partition factor (mg OM/mL gases, 36 h of incubation)</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup width="13%">
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" style="font-weight:normal">Parameter</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">A (mL)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">B (h)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">C (h)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">D (mL)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">E (h)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">F (h)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">PF (mg mL<sup>−1</sup>)</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Straw nutritional value</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>High</td>
								<td align="center">113.98A</td>
								<td align="center">0.044</td>
								<td align="center">19.74A</td>
								<td align="center">89.27B</td>
								<td align="center">0.022B</td>
								<td align="center">36.34A</td>
								<td align="center">2.68</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Low</td>
								<td align="center">75.61B</td>
								<td align="center">0.038</td>
								<td align="center">13.04B</td>
								<td align="center">113.43A</td>
								<td align="center">0.026A</td>
								<td align="center">30.60B</td>
								<td align="center">2.61</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">5.08</td>
								<td align="center">0.33</td>
								<td align="center">1.60</td>
								<td align="center">5.56</td>
								<td align="center">0.15</td>
								<td align="center">2.12</td>
								<td align="center">0.12</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Suplement</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Without supplement</td>
								<td align="center">94.05</td>
								<td align="center">0.043</td>
								<td align="center">14.92</td>
								<td align="center">110.90A</td>
								<td align="center">0.022</td>
								<td align="center">34.91</td>
								<td align="center">2.37</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Mineral and protein-energy supplement (MPES)</td>
								<td align="center">100.01</td>
								<td align="center">0.041</td>
								<td align="center">14.66</td>
								<td align="center">88.08B</td>
								<td align="center">0.022</td>
								<td align="center">32.17</td>
								<td align="center">2.88</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Exogenous fibrolytic enzyme supplement (ES)</td>
								<td align="center">93.17</td>
								<td align="center">0.041</td>
								<td align="center">18.39</td>
								<td align="center">99.26AB</td>
								<td align="center">0.024</td>
								<td align="center">33.40</td>
								<td align="center">2.73</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>MPES + ES</td>
								<td align="center">91.96</td>
								<td align="center">0.041</td>
								<td align="center">17.58</td>
								<td align="center">107.15AB</td>
								<td align="center">0.024</td>
								<td align="center">33.41</td>
								<td align="center">2.60</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">7.19</td>
								<td align="center">0.47</td>
								<td align="center">2.73</td>
								<td align="center">7.86</td>
								<td align="center">0.22</td>
								<td align="center">3.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.17</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Significance (P =)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutrition value</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
								<td align="center">0.0987</td>
								<td align="center">0.0004</td>
								<td align="center">0.0003</td>
								<td align="center">0.0242</td>
								<td align="center">0.0134</td>
								<td align="center">0.6844</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Suplement</td>
								<td align="center">0.6895</td>
								<td align="center">0.9635</td>
								<td align="center">0.2803</td>
								<td align="center">0.0408</td>
								<td align="center">0.6238</td>
								<td align="center">0.8402</td>
								<td align="center">0.2867</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutritional value × suplement</td>
								<td align="center">0.4071</td>
								<td align="center">0.8900</td>
								<td align="center">0.5968</td>
								<td align="center">0.6769</td>
								<td align="center">0.2910</td>
								<td align="center">0.9407</td>
								<td align="center">0.2298</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN12">
							<p>PF - partition factor; OM - organic matter; SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN13">
							<p>Different uppercase letters in the column differ statistically (P&lt;0.05) by Tukey test.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>The degradation rate of slowly degradable fraction (E) was greater for the low-nutritional value straw than the high nutritional value, 0.026 and 0.022 h<sup>–1</sup>, respectively (P&lt;0.05). The lag times of rapidly (C, h) and slowly degradable (F, h) fractions were greater for the high-nutritional value straw than for the lower value (P&gt;0.05). The partition factor, was not affected by treatments (P&gt;0.05), indicating that the fermentation efficiency was not affected by supplementation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
			<p>The pH decreased, while the NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration increased with the increase in incubation time (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>). The NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentrations were also influenced by the straw nutritional value (P&lt;0.05) and the supplement (P&lt;0.05). Low- and high-nutritional value straw showed NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentrations of 14.05 and 14.38 mg dL<sup>–1</sup>, respectively. The MPES + ES and MPES supplements showed the highest concentrations of NH<sub>3</sub>-N, 14.93 and 14.79 mg dL<sup>–1</sup>, respectively, differing from the supplements ES and WS, whose NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentrations were 13.78 and 13.35 mg dL<sup>–1</sup>, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t6">
					<label>Table 6</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effect of the rice straw nutritional value, the supplement, and the incubation time on the pH, amonical nitrogen (NH3-N), and carbon dioxide (CO2) values</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup width="20%">
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" style="font-weight:normal">Parameter</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">pH</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">NH<sub>3</sub>-N (mg dL<sup>–1</sup>)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Incubation time (h)</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">CO<sub>2</sub> (mL g<sup>–1</sup> DM)</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Straw nutritional value</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>High</td>
								<td align="center">7.10</td>
								<td align="center">14.05B</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">19.03A</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Low</td>
								<td align="center">7.08</td>
								<td align="center">14.38A</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">16.85B</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.028</td>
								<td align="center">0.11</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.1896</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Suplement</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Without supplement</td>
								<td align="center">7.00</td>
								<td align="center">13.35B</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">18.74A</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Mineral and protein-energy supplement (MPES)</td>
								<td align="center">7.12</td>
								<td align="center">14.79A</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">17.40B</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Exogenous fibrolytic enzyme supplement (ES)</td>
								<td align="center">7.11</td>
								<td align="center">13.78B</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">18.07AB</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>MPES + ES</td>
								<td align="center">7.12</td>
								<td align="center">14.93A</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">17.57B</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.040</td>
								<td align="center">0.15</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.2670</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Incubation time (h)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>6</td>
								<td align="center">7.19A</td>
								<td align="center">11.87E</td>
								<td align="center">12</td>
								<td align="center">19.63A</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>12</td>
								<td align="center">7.09AB</td>
								<td align="center">12.54DE</td>
								<td align="center">24</td>
								<td align="center">19.80A</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24</td>
								<td align="center">7.12AB</td>
								<td align="center">13.22D</td>
								<td align="center">36</td>
								<td align="center">19.27A</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>48</td>
								<td align="center">7.10AB</td>
								<td align="center">14.30C</td>
								<td align="center">48</td>
								<td align="center">17.08B</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>72</td>
								<td align="center">7.05AB</td>
								<td align="center">15.84B</td>
								<td align="center">72</td>
								<td align="center">16.00B</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>96</td>
								<td align="center">6.94B</td>
								<td align="center">17.51A</td>
								<td align="center">96</td>
								<td align="center">15.88B</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.050</td>
								<td align="center">0.19</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.4549</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Significance (P =)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutritional value</td>
								<td align="center">0.6949</td>
								<td align="center">0.0399</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Suplement</td>
								<td align="center">0.1095</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.0020</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Incubation time</td>
								<td align="center">0.0042</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutritional value × suplement</td>
								<td align="center">0.8219</td>
								<td align="center">0.9383</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.4105</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nitritional value × incubation time</td>
								<td align="center">0.3318</td>
								<td align="center">0.1139</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.5586</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Suplement × incubation time</td>
								<td align="center">0.7613</td>
								<td align="center">0.5552</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">1.000</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutritional value × supplement × incubation time</td>
								<td align="center">0.4054</td>
								<td align="center">0.8061</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">1.000</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN14">
							<p>DM - dry matter; SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN15">
							<p>Different uppercase letters in the column differ statistically (P&lt;0.05) by Tukey test.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>The volume of CO<sub>2</sub> produced (mL g<sup>–1</sup> DM) was related to the straw nutritional value, the supplement, and the incubation time (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>). Low-nutritional value straw produced 16.85 mL g<sup>–1</sup> DM, while the high value produced 19.03 mL g<sup>–1</sup> DM of CO<sub>2</sub>. The supplements MPES and MPES + ES produced lower volumes of CO<sub>2</sub> (17.40 and 17.57 mL g<sup>–1</sup> DM) compared with supplements WS and ES (18.74; 18.07 mL g<sup>–1</sup> DM), being important for mitigating CO<sub>2</sub>. As the incubation time increased from 12 to 96 h, the CO<sub>2</sub> production decreased from 19.63 to 15.88 mL g<sup>–1</sup> DM, respectively.</p>
			<p>There was an interaction between the straw nutritional value and the incubation time on <italic>in vitro</italic> CH<sub>4</sub> production (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t7">Table 7</xref>). In the first 12 h of fermentation, CH<sub>4</sub> production was similar between straws. Starting from 12 h to the end of the incubation period, there was a linear increase in the CH<sub>4</sub> volumes for both straws; however, greater CH<sub>4</sub> volume was produced by high-nutritional value straw compared with the low-nutritional value straw. Nevertheless, at the end of the 96-h incubation, the CH<sub>4</sub> production rate in the total gas volume was 0.15 for both straws.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t7">
					<label>Table 7</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effect of the interaction between the rice straw nutritional value and the incubation time on the <italic>in vitro</italic> cumulative methane production (mL g–1 DM)</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup width="20%">
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">Incubation time (hours)</th>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Rice straw nutritional value</th>
								<th rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">Mean</th>
								<th rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">
									<hr/>
								</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">High</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Low</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>12</td>
								<td align="center">1.16E</td>
								<td align="center">0.75F</td>
								<td align="center">0.96</td>
								<td align="center">0.53</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24</td>
								<td align="center">7.97Da</td>
								<td align="center">5.64Eb</td>
								<td align="center">6.80</td>
								<td align="center">0.53</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>36</td>
								<td align="center">14.97Ca</td>
								<td align="center">11.66Db</td>
								<td align="center">13.32</td>
								<td align="center">0.53</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>48</td>
								<td align="center">22.32Ba</td>
								<td align="center">18.46Cb</td>
								<td align="center">20.39</td>
								<td align="center">0.53</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>72</td>
								<td align="center">27.43Aa</td>
								<td align="center">23.18Bb</td>
								<td align="center">25.30</td>
								<td align="center">0.53</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>96</td>
								<td align="center">29.39Aa</td>
								<td align="center">27.03Ab</td>
								<td align="center">28.31</td>
								<td align="center">0.53</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Mean</td>
								<td align="center">17.21</td>
								<td align="center">14.45</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.45</td>
								<td align="center">0.45</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Significance (P =)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutritional value × incubation time</td>
								<td align="center">0.0017</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN16">
							<p>DM - dry matter; SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN17">
							<p>Different uppercase letters in the column and different lowercase letters in the row differ statistically (P&lt;0.05) by Tukey test.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Volatile fatty acid concentration and the acetate:propionate ratio were influenced by the interaction between the straw nutritional value and the incubation time (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t8">Table 8</xref>). The greater acetic acid concentration and the lowest propionic acid concentration were observed for the low-nutritional value straw with 6 h of incubation (71.80 and 21.03 mol 100 mol<sup>–1</sup> total volatile fatty acid, respectively). Thus, the greater acetate:propionate ratio was also observed for this straw (3.60 mol 100 mol<sup>−1</sup> total volatile fatty acid) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t8">Table 8</xref>). However, the greater concentration of butyric acid was observed for the high-nutritional value straw with 6 h of incubation (7.61 mol 100 mol<sup>–1</sup> total volatile fatty acid).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t8">
					<label>Table 8</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Effect of interaction between the rice straw nutritional value and the incubation time on the volatile fatty acid concentration (mol 100 mol–1 total volatile fatty acid)</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup width="20%">
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">Incubation time (hours)</th>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">Rice straw nutritional value</th>
								<th rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">Mean</th>
								<th rowspan="3" style="font-weight:normal">SEM</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th colspan="2" style="font-weight:normal">
									<hr/>
								</th>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">High</th>
								<th style="font-weight:normal">Low</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td>Acetate</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>6</td>
								<td align="center">67.58Ab</td>
								<td align="center">71.80Aa</td>
								<td align="center">69.69</td>
								<td align="center">0.54</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>12</td>
								<td align="center">68.55A</td>
								<td align="center">69.86AB</td>
								<td align="center">69.21</td>
								<td align="center">0.54</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24</td>
								<td align="center">66.94A</td>
								<td align="center">67.85B</td>
								<td align="center">67.40</td>
								<td align="center">0.54</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>48</td>
								<td align="center">68.19A</td>
								<td align="center">67.73B</td>
								<td align="center">67.96</td>
								<td align="center">0.54</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>72</td>
								<td align="center">68.34A</td>
								<td align="center">66.84B</td>
								<td align="center">67.59</td>
								<td align="center">0.54</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>96</td>
								<td align="center">69.02A</td>
								<td align="center">68.71AB</td>
								<td align="center">68.86</td>
								<td align="center">0.54</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Mean</td>
								<td align="center">68.10</td>
								<td align="center">68.80</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.31</td>
								<td align="center">0.31</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Significance (P =)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutritional value × incubation time</td>
								<td align="center">0.0057</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Propionate</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>6</td>
								<td align="center">24.79Ba</td>
								<td align="center">21.03Db</td>
								<td align="center">22.91</td>
								<td align="center">0.44</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>12</td>
								<td align="center">25.73AB</td>
								<td align="center">23.20CD</td>
								<td align="center">24.46</td>
								<td align="center">0.44</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24</td>
								<td align="center">27.15AB</td>
								<td align="center">25.96AB</td>
								<td align="center">26.55</td>
								<td align="center">0.44</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>48</td>
								<td align="center">27.81A</td>
								<td align="center">28.89A</td>
								<td align="center">28.35</td>
								<td align="center">0.44</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>72</td>
								<td align="center">26.51AB</td>
								<td align="center">28.17AB</td>
								<td align="center">27.34</td>
								<td align="center">0.44</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>96</td>
								<td align="center">25.79AB</td>
								<td align="center">25.97AB</td>
								<td align="center">25.88</td>
								<td align="center">0.44</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Mean</td>
								<td align="center">26.30</td>
								<td align="center">25.53</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.25</td>
								<td align="center">0.25</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Significance (P =)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutritional value × incubation time</td>
								<td align="center">0.0057</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Butirate</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>6</td>
								<td align="center">7.61Aa</td>
								<td align="center">7.16Ab</td>
								<td align="center">7.39</td>
								<td align="center">0.47</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>12</td>
								<td align="center">5.71AB</td>
								<td align="center">6.93A</td>
								<td align="center">6.32</td>
								<td align="center">0.47</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24</td>
								<td align="center">5.90AB</td>
								<td align="center">6.18A</td>
								<td align="center">6.04</td>
								<td align="center">0.47</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>48</td>
								<td align="center">3.98B</td>
								<td align="center">3.37B</td>
								<td align="center">3.68</td>
								<td align="center">0.47</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>72</td>
								<td align="center">5.13B</td>
								<td align="center">4.98AB</td>
								<td align="center">5.05</td>
								<td align="center">0.47</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>96</td>
								<td align="center">5.18B</td>
								<td align="center">5.31AB</td>
								<td align="center">5.24</td>
								<td align="center">0.47</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Mean</td>
								<td align="center">5.58</td>
								<td align="center">5.56</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.19</td>
								<td align="center">0.19</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Significance (P =)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutritional value × incubation time</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Acetate:propionate ratio</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>6</td>
								<td align="center">3.12Ab</td>
								<td align="center">3.60Aa</td>
								<td align="center">3.36</td>
								<td align="center">0.31</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>12</td>
								<td align="center">2.71AB</td>
								<td align="center">3.08B</td>
								<td align="center">2.90</td>
								<td align="center">0.31</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>24</td>
								<td align="center">2.48B</td>
								<td align="center">2.67BC</td>
								<td align="center">2.58</td>
								<td align="center">0.31</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>48</td>
								<td align="center">2.47B</td>
								<td align="center">2.37C</td>
								<td align="center">2.41</td>
								<td align="center">0.31</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>72</td>
								<td align="center">2.60B</td>
								<td align="center">2.40C</td>
								<td align="center">2.50</td>
								<td align="center">0.31</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>96</td>
								<td align="center">2.73AB</td>
								<td align="center">2.68BC</td>
								<td align="center">2.70</td>
								<td align="center">0.31</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Mean</td>
								<td align="center">2.68</td>
								<td align="center">2.80</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>SEM</td>
								<td align="center">0.30</td>
								<td align="center">0.30</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Significance (P =)</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td>Nutritional value × incubation time</td>
								<td align="center">0.0103</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN18">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN19">
							<p>Different uppercase letters in the column and different lowercase letters in the row differ statistically (P&lt;0.05) by Tukey test.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="discussion">
			<title>Discussion</title>
			<p>In this study, the highest IVDMD and IVOMD were observed for the straw with less lignification and silicified cell wall (high nutritional value) when supplemented with mineral and protein-energy supplement. For the same straw, mineral and protein-energy supplement inhibited the effect of the exogenous fibrolitic enzyme, since the combination of these supplements resulted in a lower <italic>in vitro</italic> digestibility in relation to other supplements. These results suggest that the improvement of IVDMD and IVOMD depends on the forage chemical characteristics and the supplement used, corroborating with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Morgavi et al. (2000)</xref>, who stated that more detailed knowledge of the interaction between the supplement with the forage, the host, and the rumen microorganisms is necessary for the correct application of this technology. Previous research had also identified variation in rice straw digestibility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Vadiveloo, 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Vadiveloo, 1995</xref>) and improvement of forage <italic>in vitro</italic> digestibility with the use of mineral and protein-energy supplement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Barbosa et al., 2007</xref>) and exogenous fibrolytic enzyme (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Beauchemin et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bassiouni et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
			<p>With the use of supplements, an improvement in the parameters of <italic>in vitro</italic> organic matter ruminal degradability of rice straw was expected. However, the supplements did not help carbohydrate release and did not provide enough nitrogen to improve these parameters, probably due to the limiting nitrogen content in the incubated straws.</p>
			<p>Gas production is an indirect measure of substrate degradation, mainly of carbohydrates (Menke, 1979). In the current research, there was interaction between the incubation time and the nutritional value of rice straw on the <italic>in vitro</italic> cumulative gas production. At 9 and 12 h of incubation, there was an increase in gas production due to accumulation of indirect gas products of reaction between the buffer and the propionic acid generated from the fermentation of rapidly degradable carbohydrates and the indirect gas that starts to be produced from the structural carbohydrate degradation. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chai et al. (2004)</xref>, the gases produced in the first 3 h of incubation correspond to the soluble components of the fermentation. To the extent that the incubation time increased, the volume of gas produced was increased by the effect of the structural carbohydrate fermentation of the substrate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Theodorou et al., 1994</xref>) and at the end of 96 h of incubation, greater cumulative gas production was observed for high-nutritional value straw due to greater organic matter degradadability in this straw, corroborating with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Menke et al. (1979)</xref>. However, the fermentation pattern was similar between straws and gas production curves corresponded to the fermentation pattern to a substrate with forage predominance, in which, initially, sugars are fermented and later, the structural components (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Getachew et al., 2005</xref>).</p>
			<p>Supplementation with MPES and MPES + ES did not affect the <italic>in vitro</italic> cumulative gas production. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Liu and Ørskov (2000)</xref> reported that treatment of rice straw with several levels of cellulase did not affect the cumulative gas production over 24 h of incubation. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Eun et al. (2006)</xref> treated Akibali rice straw with six different enzyme products (1.25 mg g<sup>–1</sup> DM) and found that only two (product composed of cellulase and hemicellulase and product containing protease) increased cumulative gas production over 24 h of incubation compared with untreated rice straw. Therefore, the inconsistencies in the responses with enzyme supplements were probably related to supplement characteristics, including the enzyme activities in the conditions of rumen (temperature and pH), as well as the substrate composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Yang et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
			<p>The partition factor is an indicator of fermentation efficiency; thus, high value of partition factor indicates a greater incorporation of degraded organic matter in microbial mass, thereby increasing the microbial synthesis efficiency. The greater the partition factor value, the greater the forage dry matter intake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Makkar, 2004</xref>) and lower the CH<sub>4</sub> production in ruminants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Blümmel et al., 1999</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Makkar (2004)</xref>, partition factor may vary from 2.74 to 4.41 mg of degraded OM mL<sup>–1</sup> of gases produced. In the current research, the partition factor values ranged from 2.37 to 2.88 and were not influenced by the straw nutritional value or the supplement.</p>
			<p>The pH is an important variable to indicate the rumen status (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Gunun et al., 2013</xref>), since it regulates the affinity of microorganisms with the substrate. Thus, values near neutral pH improve the bacteria adhesion to the fiber (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Allen and Mertens, 1988</xref>). In the current study, the pH ranged from 6.94 to 7.19. These values are considered optimal for the normal rumen fermentation, for the synthesis of volatile fatty acid, and microbial protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Wanapat and Pimpa, 1999</xref>; Anantasook et al., 2012), and are also within the range of 6.2 to 7.2, considered appropriate for optimal microbial activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Van Soest, 1994</xref>), as expected for diets based on forage.</p>
			<p><italic>In vitro</italic> NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration works as an indicator of protein degradability because there is no nitrogen absorption or recycling, as in the <italic>in vivo</italic> rumen environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Detmann et al., 2011</xref>). The average NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration of all treatments was 14.21 mL dL<sup>–1</sup> and was within the optimum ruminal NH<sub>3</sub>-N range of 12 and 17 mL dL<sup>–1</sup> for optimal fermentation and rumen microbial growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Anantasook and Wanapat, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lunsin et al., 2012</xref>). As expected, MPES and MPES + ES supplements increased the dietary levels of carbohydrate and nitrogen, resulting in an increase in NH<sub>3</sub>-N concentration levels and decrease in CO<sub>2</sub> production due to the microbial mass formation.</p>
			<p>Within the first 12 h after incubation, there was lower CH<sub>4</sub> production for both straws evaluated, as this period includes the lag-time phase, in which there is no methanogenesis until the sites available for microbial attachment are saturated and these synthesize its structures and enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Franco et al., 2013</xref>). The linear increase in CH<sub>4</sub> volume for high and low straw nutritional value, from 12 h until the end of the incubation period, was associated with the slowly digestible fraction fermentation and, consequently, with acetic and butyric acid production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Getachew et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lee et al., 2011</xref>). The production of CH<sub>4</sub> at 96 h of incubation was greater for high-nutritional value straw compared with low value straw, possibly due to better digestibility of the former, corroborating with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kurihara et al. (1995)</xref>, who observed that CH<sub>4</sub> production in cows fed forage with low digestibility was lower than in cows fed high forage digestibility. However, this disagrees with other studies that observed that CH<sub>4</sub> production tends to decrease with increasing protein concentration and tends to increase with increasing fiber content of the feed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Johnson and Johnson, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Getachew et al., 2005</xref>). Another possibility may be related to the fiber degradability, since forage with greater content of effectively degraded fiber promotes greater CH<sub>4</sub> production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Demarchi et al., 2003</xref>).</p>
			<p>Due to the lack of supplement effect on the degradation parameters, cumulative gas production, gas production kinetics, and CH<sub>4</sub> production, volatile fatty acid concentrations were measured to further explore any potential effect of the supplements on the rumen fermentation. However, the supplements did not affect the volatile fatty acid concentrations, but these concentrations were influenced by the interaction between the straw nutritional value and the incubation time. High levels of volatile fatty acids observed at the beginning of the fermentation can be explained by rumen fluid being obtained from animals fed a diet based on alfalfa hay. The dominance of the acetic acid concentration observed in the current study shows that when the diet had high forage content, ruminal fermentation occurred preferentially in this way and was associated with high CH<sub>4</sub> production, corroborating with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Nussio et al. (2011)</xref>.</p>
			<p>Acetic:propionic acid ratio is an important point in rumen methanogenesis, since greater energy losses in the CH<sub>4</sub> form is related to the greater acetic:propionic acid ratio (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Johnson and Johnson, 1995</xref>). Also, as the propionic acid is the most important fatty acid precursor of the glucose synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Nagajara et al., 1997</xref>), a low acetic:propionic acid ratio reflects an improvement of the food nutritional value. In the current research, there was no influence of the supplement on the acetic:propionic acid ratio and on improvement of the straw nutritional value. The results did not differ from results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Eun et al. (2006)</xref>, who observed reduction in theacetic:propionic acid ratio with EX and PROT enzymatic treatment of rice straw, suggesting that microbial interactions lead to decreased acetate and increased propionate formation from the products of cellulose and hemicellulose hydrolyses when certain types of exogenous enzymes were added to rice straw.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>Conclusions</title>
			<p>The use of mineral and protein-energy supplement and mineral and protein-energy + exogenous fibrolytic enzymes supplements can be used as strategy to mitigate carbon dioxide in ruminant production systems that use rice straws.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p>The authors thank the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS), Alltech Incorporation, and Azevedo Bento S/A for the financial support.</p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>Allen, M. S. and Mertens, D. R. 1988. Evaluating constraints on fiber digestion by rumen microbes. Symposium: rumen productivity. The Journal of Nutrition 118:261-270.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Allen</surname>
							<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mertens</surname>
							<given-names>D. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1988</year>
					<article-title>Evaluating constraints on fiber digestion by rumen microbes. Symposium: rumen productivity</article-title>
					<source>The Journal of Nutrition</source>
					<volume>118</volume>
					<fpage>261</fpage>
					<lpage>270</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>Anantasook, N. and Wanapat, M. 2012. Influence of rain tree pod meal supplementation on rice straw based diets using <italic>in vitro</italic> gas fermentation technique. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 25:325-334.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Anantasook</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wanapat</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Influence of rain tree pod meal supplementation on rice straw based diets using in vitro gas fermentation technique</article-title>
					<source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>25</volume>
					<fpage>325</fpage>
					<lpage>334</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemistry. 1975. Official methods of analysis. 12th ed. AOAC International, Washington, DC.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemistry</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1975</year>
					<source>Official methods of analysis</source>
					<edition>12</edition>
					<publisher-name>AOAC International</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1995. Official methods of analysis. 16th ed. AOAC, Washington, DC.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1995</year>
					<source>Official methods of analysis</source>
					<edition>16</edition>
					<publisher-name>AOAC</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Bassiouni, M. I.; Gaafar, H. M. A.; Saleh, M. S.; Mohi El-Din, A. M. A. and Elshora, M. A. H. 2011. Evaluation of rations supplemented with fibrolytic enzyme on dairy cows performance. In situ ruminal degradability of different feedstuffs. Livestok Research for Rural Development. Available at: &lt;<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/4/bass23081.htm">http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/4/bass23081.htm</ext-link>&gt; Accessed on: Nov. 24, 2015.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bassiouni</surname>
							<given-names>M. I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gaafar</surname>
							<given-names>H. M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Saleh</surname>
							<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mohi El-Din</surname>
							<given-names>A. M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Elshora</surname>
							<given-names>M. A. H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Evaluation of rations supplemented with fibrolytic enzyme on dairy cows performance</article-title>
					<comment>In situ ruminal degradability of different feedstuffs</comment>
					<source>Livestok Research for Rural Development</source>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/4/bass23081.htm">http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/4/bass23081.htm</ext-link>
					</comment>
					<date-in-citation content-type="access-date">Accessed on: Nov. 24, 2015</date-in-citation>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Barbosa, F. A.; Graça, D. S.; Maffei, W. E.; Silva Júnior, F. V. and Souza, G. M. 2007. Desempenho e consumo de matéria seca de bovinos sob suplementação protéico-energética, durante a época de transição água-seca. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veteterinária e Zootecnia 59:160-167.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Barbosa</surname>
							<given-names>F. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Graça</surname>
							<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Maffei</surname>
							<given-names>W. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>F. V.</given-names>
							<suffix>Júnior</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Souza</surname>
							<given-names>G. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Desempenho e consumo de matéria seca de bovinos sob suplementação protéico-energética, durante a época de transição água-seca</article-title>
					<source>Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veteterinária e Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>59</volume>
					<fpage>160</fpage>
					<lpage>167</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Beauchemin, K. A.; Colombatto, D.; Morgavi, D. P. and Yang, W. Z. 2003. Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve feed utilization by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 81:37-47.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Beauchemin</surname>
							<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Colombatto</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Morgavi</surname>
							<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yang</surname>
							<given-names>W. Z.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<article-title>Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve feed utilization by ruminants</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>81</volume>
					<fpage>37</fpage>
					<lpage>47</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Blümmel, M.; Mgomezulu, R.; Chen, X. B.; Makkar, H. P. S.; Becker, K. and Ørskov, E. R. 1999. The modification of an in vitro gas production test to detect roughage related differences in in vivo microbial protein synthesis as estimated by the excretion of purine derivates. Journal of Agricultural Science 133:335-340.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Blümmel</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mgomezulu</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>X. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Makkar</surname>
							<given-names>H. P. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Becker</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ørskov</surname>
							<given-names>E. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1999</year>
					<article-title>The modification of an in vitro gas production test to detect roughage related differences in in vivo microbial protein synthesis as estimated by the excretion of purine derivates</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Agricultural Science</source>
					<volume>133</volume>
					<fpage>335</fpage>
					<lpage>340</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Chai, W. Z.; Gelder, A. H. and Cone, J. W. 2004. Relationship between gas production and starch degradation in feed samples. Animal Feed Science and Technology 114:195-204.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chai</surname>
							<given-names>W. Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gelder</surname>
							<given-names>A. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cone</surname>
							<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Relationship between gas production and starch degradation in feed samples</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>114</volume>
					<fpage>195</fpage>
					<lpage>204</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Demarchi, J. J. A. A.; Manella, M. Q. A.; Lourenço, J.; Alleoni, G. F.; Frigueto, R. S.; Primavesi, O. and Lima, M. A. 2003. Daily methane emission at different seasons of the year by Nelore cattle in Brazil grazing Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu: preliminary results. p.19. In: Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Animal Production. SBZ, WAAP, ALPA, UFRGS, Porto Alegre.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Demarchi</surname>
							<given-names>J. J. A. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Manella</surname>
							<given-names>M. Q. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lourenço</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Alleoni</surname>
							<given-names>G. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Frigueto</surname>
							<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Primavesi</surname>
							<given-names>O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lima</surname>
							<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<source>Daily methane emission at different seasons of the year by Nelore cattle in Brazil grazing Brachiaria brizantha cv. Marandu: preliminary results</source>
					<size units="pages">19</size>
					<conf-name>Proceedings of the 9th World Conference on Animal Production</conf-name>
					<publisher-name>SBZ, WAAP, ALPA, UFRGS</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Porto Alegre</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Detmann, E.; Queiroz, A. C.; Zorzi, K. H.; Mantovani, C.; Bayão, G. F. V. and Gomes M. P. C. 2011. Degradação in vitro da fibra em detergente neutro de forragem tropical de baixa qualidade em função da suplementação com proteína verdadeira e/ou nitrogênio não-protéico. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40:1272-1279.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Detmann</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Queiroz</surname>
							<given-names>A. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zorzi</surname>
							<given-names>K. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mantovani</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bayão</surname>
							<given-names>G. F. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gomes</surname>
							<given-names>M. P. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Degradação in vitro da fibra em detergente neutro de forragem tropical de baixa qualidade em função da suplementação com proteína verdadeira e/ou nitrogênio não-protéico</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>40</volume>
					<fpage>1272</fpage>
					<lpage>1279</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Doyle, P. T.; Devendra, C. and Pearce, G. R. 1986. Rice straw as a feed for ruminants. 1th ed. International Development Program of Australian Universites and Coleges Limited, Canberra, AU.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Doyle</surname>
							<given-names>P. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Devendra</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pearce</surname>
							<given-names>G. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1986</year>
					<source>Rice straw as a feed for ruminants</source>
					<edition>1</edition>
					<publisher-name>International Development Program of Australian Universites and Coleges Limited</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Canberra, AU</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Eun, J.-S.; Beauchemin, K. A.; Hong, S.-H. and Bauer, M. W. 2006. Exogenous enzymes added to untreated or ammoniated rice straw: Effects on in vitro fermentation characteristics and degradability. Animal Feed Science and Technology 131:86-101.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Eun</surname>
							<given-names>J.-S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Beauchemin</surname>
							<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hong</surname>
							<given-names>S.-H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bauer</surname>
							<given-names>M. W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Exogenous enzymes added to untreated or ammoniated rice straw: Effects on in vitro fermentation characteristics and degradability</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>131</volume>
					<fpage>86</fpage>
					<lpage>101</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2016. Rice market monitor. Available at: &lt;<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.fao.org/economic/est/publications/rice-publications/rice-market-monitor-rmm/en/">http://www.fao.org/economic/est/publications/rice-publications/rice-market-monitor-rmm/en/</ext-link> /&gt;. Accessed on: Oct. 29, 2016.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="webpage">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>FAO - Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<source>Rice market monitor</source>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.fao.org/economic/est/publications/rice-publications/rice-market-monitor-rmm/en/">http://www.fao.org/economic/est/publications/rice-publications/rice-market-monitor-rmm/en/</ext-link>
					</comment>
					<date-in-citation content-type="access-date">Accessed on: Oct. 29, 2016</date-in-citation>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Fike, G. D.; Simmis, D. D.; Cochran, R. C.; Vanzant, E. S.; Kutil, G. L. and Brandt Jr, R. T. 1995. Protein supplementation of ammoniated wheat straw: effect on performance and forage utilization of beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73:1595-1601.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Fike</surname>
							<given-names>G. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Simmis</surname>
							<given-names>D. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cochran</surname>
							<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vanzant</surname>
							<given-names>E. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kutil</surname>
							<given-names>G. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brandt</surname>
							<given-names>R. T.</given-names>
							<suffix>Jr</suffix>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1995</year>
					<article-title>Protein supplementation of ammoniated wheat straw: effect on performance and forage utilization of beef cattle</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>73</volume>
					<fpage>1595</fpage>
					<lpage>1601</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Franco, A. L. C.; Mizubuti, I. Y.; Azevêdo, J. A. G.; Ribeiro, E. L. A.; Pereira, E. S. Peixoto, E. L. T.; Ferreira, D. M. F. and Andrade Neto, A. Q. 2013. Fermentação ruminal e produção de metano <italic>in vitro</italic> de dietas contendo torta de algodão. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 34:1955-1966.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Franco</surname>
							<given-names>A. L. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mizubuti</surname>
							<given-names>I. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Azevêdo</surname>
							<given-names>J. A. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
							<given-names>E. L. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pereira</surname>
							<given-names>E. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Peixoto</surname>
							<given-names>E. L. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ferreira</surname>
							<given-names>D. M. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Andrade</surname>
							<given-names>A. Q.</given-names>
							<suffix>Neto</suffix>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Fermentação ruminal e produção de metano in vitro de dietas contendo torta de algodão</article-title>
					<source>Semina: Ciências Agrárias</source>
					<volume>34</volume>
					<fpage>1955</fpage>
					<lpage>1966</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Getachew, G.; DePeters, E. J.; Robinson, P. H. and Fadel, J. G. 2005. Use of an in vitro rumen gas production technique to evaluate microbial fermentation of ruminant feeds and its impact on fermentation products. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123-124:547-559.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Getachew</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>DePeters</surname>
							<given-names>E. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Robinson</surname>
							<given-names>P. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fadel</surname>
							<given-names>J. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Use of an in vitro rumen gas production technique to evaluate microbial fermentation of ruminant feeds and its impact on fermentation products</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>123-124</volume>
					<fpage>547</fpage>
					<lpage>559</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Goering, H. K. and Van Soest, P. J. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications). Agriculture Handbook No. 379. ARS-USDA, Washington, D.C., USA.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Goering</surname>
							<given-names>H. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Van Soest</surname>
							<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1970</year>
					<chapter-title xml:lang="en">Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications)</chapter-title>
					<source>Agriculture Handbook No. 379</source>
					<publisher-name>ARS-USDA</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, D.C., USA</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>Gunun, P.; Wanapat, M. and Anantasook, N. 2013. Effects of physical form and urea treatment of rice straw on runen fermentation, microbial protein synthesis and nutrient digestibility in dairy steers. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 26:1689-1697.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Gunun</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wanapat</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Anantasook</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Effects of physical form and urea treatment of rice straw on runen fermentation, microbial protein synthesis and nutrient digestibility in dairy steers</article-title>
					<source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>26</volume>
					<fpage>1689</fpage>
					<lpage>1697</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Johnson, K. A. and Johnson, D. E. 1995. Methane emissions from cattle. Journal of Animal Science 73:2483-2492.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Johnson</surname>
							<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Johnson</surname>
							<given-names>D. E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1995</year>
					<article-title>Methane emissions from cattle</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>73</volume>
					<fpage>2483</fpage>
					<lpage>2492</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>Kurihara, M.; Kume, S.; Aii, T.; Takahashi, S.; Shibata, M. and Nishida, T. 1995. Feeding method for dairy cattle to cope with global warming. Technical assessment based on energy metabolism. p.21-107. In: The 29th bulletin of the Kyushu National Agricultural Experiment Station. Japan.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kurihara</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kume</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Aii</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Takahashi</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Shibata</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nishida</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1995</year>
					<source>Feeding method for dairy cattle to cope with global warming. Technical assessment based on energy metabolism</source>
					<fpage>21</fpage>
					<lpage>107</lpage>
					<comment>The 29th bulletin of the</comment>
					<conf-name>Kyushu National Agricultural Experiment Station</conf-name>
					<conf-loc>Japan</conf-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation>Lee, S. Y.; Lee, S. M.; Choa, Y. B.; Kam, D. K.; Lee, S. C.; Kim, C. H. and Seo, S. 2011. Glycerol as a feed supplement for ruminants: In vitro fermentation characteristics and methane production. Animal Feed Science and Technololgy 166-167:269-274.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Choa</surname>
							<given-names>Y. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kam</surname>
							<given-names>D. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>C. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Seo</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Glycerol as a feed supplement for ruminants: In vitro fermentation characteristics and methane production</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technololgy</source>
					<volume>166-167</volume>
					<fpage>269</fpage>
					<lpage>274</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation>Leng, R. A. 1990. Factors affecting the utilization of “poor quality” forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutrition Research Reviews 3:277-303.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Leng</surname>
							<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1990</year>
					<article-title>Factors affecting the utilization of “poor quality” forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions</article-title>
					<source>Nutrition Research Reviews</source>
					<volume>3</volume>
					<fpage>277</fpage>
					<lpage>303</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation>Lima, J. O. A. A. 2002. Mistura múltipla para bovinos em pastejo na região dos tabuleiros costeiros. EMBRAPA dos Tabuleiros Costeiros, Aracajú.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lima</surname>
							<given-names>J. O. A. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2002</year>
					<source>Mistura múltipla para bovinos em pastejo na região dos tabuleiros costeiros</source>
					<publisher-name>EMBRAPA dos Tabuleiros Costeiros</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Aracajú</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation>Liu, J. X. and Ørskov, E. R. 2000. Cellulase treatment of untreated and steam pre treated rice straw-effect on in vitro fermentation characteristics. Animal Feed Science and Technology 88:189-200.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>J. X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ørskov</surname>
							<given-names>E. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Cellulase treatment of untreated and steam pre treated rice straw-effect on in vitro fermentation characteristics</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>88</volume>
					<fpage>189</fpage>
					<lpage>200</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation>Lunsin, R.; Wanapat, M. and Rowlinson, P. 2012. Effect of cassava hay and rice bran oil supplementation on rumen fermentation, milk yield and milk composition in lactating dairy cows. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 25:1364-1373.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lunsin</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wanapat</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rowlinson</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Effect of cassava hay and rice bran oil supplementation on rumen fermentation, milk yield and milk composition in lactating dairy cows</article-title>
					<source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>25</volume>
					<fpage>1364</fpage>
					<lpage>1373</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation>Makkar, H. P. S. 2004. Recent advances in the in vitro gas method for evaluation of nutritional quality of feed resources. p.55-88. In: Assessing quality and safety of the animal feeds. FAO Animal Production and Health Series Paper 160. FAO, Roma.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Makkar</surname>
							<given-names>H. P. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<chapter-title xml:lang="en">Recent advances in the in vitro gas method for evaluation of nutritional quality of feed resources</chapter-title>
					<fpage>55</fpage>
					<lpage>88</lpage>
					<source>Assessing quality and safety of the animal feeds</source>
					<comment>FAO Animal Production and Health Series Paper 160</comment>
					<publisher-name>FAO</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Roma</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation>Mauricio, R. M.; Mould, F. L.; Dhanoa, M. S.; Owen, E.; Channa, K. S. and Theodorou, M. K. 1999. A semi-automated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 79:321-330.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Mauricio</surname>
							<given-names>R. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mould</surname>
							<given-names>F. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dhanoa</surname>
							<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Owen</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Channa</surname>
							<given-names>K. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Theodorou</surname>
							<given-names>M. K.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1999</year>
					<article-title>A semi-automated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>79</volume>
					<fpage>321</fpage>
					<lpage>330</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation>McDonald, I. 1981. A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science 96:251-252.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>McDonald</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1981</year>
					<article-title>A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Agricultural Science</source>
					<volume>96</volume>
					<fpage>251</fpage>
					<lpage>252</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<mixed-citation>Menke, K. H.; Raab, L.; Salewski, A.; Steingass, H.; Fritz, D. and Schneider, W. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. Journal of Agricultural Science 93:217-222.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Menke</surname>
							<given-names>K. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Raab</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Salewski</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Steingass</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fritz</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Schneider</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1979</year>
					<article-title>The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminant feedingstuffs from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Agricultural Science</source>
					<volume>93</volume>
					<fpage>217</fpage>
					<lpage>222</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation>Morgavi, D. P.; Beauchemin, K. A.; Nsereko, V. L.; Rode, L. M.; Iwaasa, A. D.; Yang, W. Z.; McAllister, T. A. and Wang, Y. 2000. Synergy between ruminal fibrolytic enzymes and enzymes from Trichoderma longibrachiatum. Journal of Dairy Science 83:1310-1321.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Morgavi</surname>
							<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Beauchemin</surname>
							<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nsereko</surname>
							<given-names>V. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rode</surname>
							<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Iwaasa</surname>
							<given-names>A. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yang</surname>
							<given-names>W. Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McAllister</surname>
							<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Synergy between ruminal fibrolytic enzymes and enzymes from Trichoderma longibrachiatum</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
					<volume>83</volume>
					<fpage>1310</fpage>
					<lpage>1321</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<mixed-citation>Nagajara, T. G.; Newbold, C. J.; Van Nevel, C. J. and Demeyer, D. I. 1997. Manipulation of ruminal fermentation. p.523-632. In: The rumen microbial ecosystem. Hobson, P. N., ed. New York, Blackie.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Nagajara</surname>
							<given-names>T. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Newbold</surname>
							<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Van Nevel</surname>
							<given-names>C. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Demeyer</surname>
							<given-names>D. I.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<chapter-title xml:lang="en">Manipulation of ruminal fermentation</chapter-title>
					<fpage>523</fpage>
					<lpage>632</lpage>
					<source>The rumen microbial ecosystem</source>
					<person-group person-group-type="editor">
						<name>
							<surname>Hobson</surname>
							<given-names>P. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<role>ed</role>
					</person-group>
					<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
					<publisher-name>Blackie</publisher-name>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation>Newbold, J. 1997. Proposed mechanisms for enzymes as modifiers of ruminal fermentation. p.3-7. In: Proceedings of the 16th Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium. Gainesville.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Newbold</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<source>Proposed mechanisms for enzymes as modifiers of ruminal fermentation</source>
					<fpage>3</fpage>
					<lpage>7</lpage>
					<conf-name>Proceedings of the 16th Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium</conf-name>
					<conf-loc>Gainesville</conf-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation>NRC - National Research Council. 1996. Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 7th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>NRC - National Research Council</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1996</year>
					<source>Nutrient requirements of beef cattle</source>
					<edition>7</edition>
					<publisher-name>National Academy Press</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B35">
				<mixed-citation>Nsereko, V. L.; Morgavi, D. P.; Rode, L. M.; Beauchemin, K. A.; McAllister, T. A. 2000. Effects of fungal enzyme preparations on hydrolysis and subsequent degradation of alfalfa hay fiber by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro. Animal Feed Science and Technology 88:153-170.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Nsereko</surname>
							<given-names>V. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Morgavi</surname>
							<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rode</surname>
							<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Beauchemin</surname>
							<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McAllister</surname>
							<given-names>T. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Effects of fungal enzyme preparations on hydrolysis and subsequent degradation of alfalfa hay fiber by mixed rumen microorganisms in vitro</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>88</volume>
					<fpage>153</fpage>
					<lpage>170</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B36">
				<mixed-citation>Nussio, L. G.; Campos, F. P. and Lima, M. L. M. 2011. Metabolismo de carboidratos estruturais. p.193-238. In: Nutrição de ruminantes. Berchielli, T. T.; Pires, A. V.; Oliveira, S. G. Funep, Jaboticabal.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Nussio</surname>
							<given-names>L. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Campos</surname>
							<given-names>F. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lima</surname>
							<given-names>M. L. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<chapter-title xml:lang="pt">Metabolismo de carboidratos estruturais</chapter-title>
					<fpage>193</fpage>
					<lpage>238</lpage>
					<source>Nutrição de ruminantes</source>
					<person-group person-group-type="compiler">
						<name>
							<surname>Berchielli</surname>
							<given-names>T. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pires</surname>
							<given-names>A. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>S. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<publisher-loc>Funep</publisher-loc>
					<publisher-name>Jaboticabal</publisher-name>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B37">
				<mixed-citation>Ørskov, E. R. and McDonald, I. 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agriculture Science 92:499-503.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ørskov</surname>
							<given-names>E. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McDonald</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1979</year>
					<article-title>The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Agriculture Science</source>
					<volume>92</volume>
					<fpage>499</fpage>
					<lpage>503</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B38">
				<mixed-citation>Poppi, D. P. and McLennan, S. R. 1995. Protein and energy utilization by ruminants at pasture. Journal of Animal Science 73:278-290.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Poppi</surname>
							<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McLennan</surname>
							<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1995</year>
					<article-title>Protein and energy utilization by ruminants at pasture</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>73</volume>
					<fpage>278</fpage>
					<lpage>290</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B39">
				<mixed-citation>Schofield, P.; Pitt, R. E. and Pell, A. N. 1994. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production. Journal of Animal Science 72:2980-2991.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Schofield</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pitt</surname>
							<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pell</surname>
							<given-names>A. N.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1994</year>
					<article-title>Kinetics of fiber digestion from in vitro gas production</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>72</volume>
					<fpage>2980</fpage>
					<lpage>2991</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B40">
				<mixed-citation>Tavendale, M. H.; Meagher, L. P.; Pacheco, D.; Walker, N.; Attwood, G. T. and Sivajumaran, S. 2005. Methane production from in vitro rumen incubations with Lotus pedunculatus and Megicago sativa, and effects of extractable condensed tannin fractions on methanogenesis. Animal Feed Science and Technology 123-124:403-419.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Tavendale</surname>
							<given-names>M. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Meagher</surname>
							<given-names>L. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pacheco</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Walker</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Attwood</surname>
							<given-names>G. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sivajumaran</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Methane production from in vitro rumen incubations with Lotus pedunculatus and Megicago sativa, and effects of extractable condensed tannin fractions on methanogenesis</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>123-124</volume>
					<fpage>403</fpage>
					<lpage>419</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B41">
				<mixed-citation>Theodorou, M. K.; Williams, B. A.; Dhanoa, M. S.; McAllan, A. B. and France, J. 1994. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducter to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 48:185-197.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Theodorou</surname>
							<given-names>M. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Williams</surname>
							<given-names>B. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dhanoa</surname>
							<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McAllan</surname>
							<given-names>A. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>France</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1994</year>
					<article-title>A simple gas production method using a pressure transducter to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>48</volume>
					<fpage>185</fpage>
					<lpage>197</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B42">
				<mixed-citation>Tilley, J. M. A. and Terry, R. A. 1963. A two stages technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Grass and Forage Science 18:104-111.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Tilley</surname>
							<given-names>J. M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Terry</surname>
							<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1963</year>
					<article-title>A two stages technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops</article-title>
					<source>Grass and Forage Science</source>
					<volume>18</volume>
					<fpage>104</fpage>
					<lpage>111</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B43">
				<mixed-citation>Vadiveloo, J. 1992. Varietal differences in the chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of rice straw. Journal of Agricultural Science 119:27-33.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Vadiveloo</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1992</year>
					<article-title>Varietal differences in the chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of rice straw</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Agricultural Science</source>
					<volume>119</volume>
					<fpage>27</fpage>
					<lpage>33</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B44">
				<mixed-citation>Vadiveloo, J. 1995. Factors contributing to varietal differences in the nutritive value of rice straw. Animal Feed Science and Technology 54:45-53.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Vadiveloo</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1995</year>
					<article-title>Factors contributing to varietal differences in the nutritive value of rice straw</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>54</volume>
					<fpage>45</fpage>
					<lpage>53</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B45">
				<mixed-citation>Van Soest, P. J. 1994. Nutrition ecology of ruminant. 2nd ed. Comstock Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Van Soest</surname>
							<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1994</year>
					<source>Nutrition ecology of ruminant</source>
					<edition>2</edition>
					<publisher-name>Comstock Cornell University Press</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Ithaca, NY</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B46">
				<mixed-citation>Van Soest, P. J.; Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74:3583-3597.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Van Soest</surname>
							<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Robertson</surname>
							<given-names>J. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lewis</surname>
							<given-names>B. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1991</year>
					<article-title>Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Dairy Science</source>
					<volume>74</volume>
					<fpage>3583</fpage>
					<lpage>3597</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B47">
				<mixed-citation>Wanapat, M. and Pimpa, O. 1999. Effect of ruminal NH<sub>3</sub>-N levels on ruminal fermentation, purine derivatives, digestibility and rice straw intake in swamp buffaloes. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 12:904-907.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wanapat</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pimpa</surname>
							<given-names>O.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1999</year>
					<article-title>Effect of ruminal NH<sub>3</sub>-N levels on ruminal fermentation, purine derivatives, digestibility and rice straw intake in swamp buffaloes</article-title>
					<source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>12</volume>
					<fpage>904</fpage>
					<lpage>907</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B48">
				<mixed-citation>Yang, H. E.; Son, Y. S. and Beauchemin, K. A. 2011. Effects of exogenous enzymes on ruminal fermentation and degradability of alfalfa hay and rice straw. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 24:56-64.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Yang</surname>
							<given-names>H. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Son</surname>
							<given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Beauchemin</surname>
							<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Effects of exogenous enzymes on ruminal fermentation and degradability of alfalfa hay and rice straw</article-title>
					<source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>24</volume>
					<fpage>56</fpage>
					<lpage>64</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>