<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" specific-use="sps-1.5" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rbz</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">R. Bras. Zootec.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">1516-3598</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">1806-9290</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1806-92902017000200009</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Ruminants</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Carcass characteristics and meat evaluation of Nelore cattle subjected to different antioxidant treatments</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Carmo</surname>
						<given-names>Thiago de Jesus do</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup> </xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Peripolli</surname>
						<given-names>Vanessa</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup> </xref>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1"><sup>*</sup> </xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Costa</surname>
						<given-names>João Batista Gonçalves</given-names>
						<suffix>Jr</suffix>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup> </xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Tanure</surname>
						<given-names>Candice Bergmann</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup> </xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Fioravanti</surname>
						<given-names>Maria Clorinda Soares</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup> </xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Restle</surname>
						<given-names>João</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup> </xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Kindlein</surname>
						<given-names>Liris</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup> </xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>McManus</surname>
						<given-names>Concepta</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup> </xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="original"> Universidade Federal de Goiás, Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade Federal de Goiás</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal de Goiás</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Escola de Veterinária e Zootecnia</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Goiânia</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">GO</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="original"> Instituto Federal Catarinense, Santa Catarina, SC, Brazil.</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Instituto Federal Catarinense</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Santa Catarina</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">SC</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff3">
				<label>3</label>
				<institution content-type="original"> Faculdades Associadas de Uberaba, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Faculdades Associadas de Uberaba</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Faculdades Associadas de Uberaba,</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Uberaba</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">MG</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff4">
				<label>4</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade de Brasília, Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária, Brasília, DF, Brazil.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade de Brasília</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade de Brasília</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Faculdade de Agronomia e Medicina Veterinária</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Brasília</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">DF</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff5">
				<label>5</label>
				<institution content-type="original"> Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Veterinária, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Faculdade de Veterinária</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Porto Alegre,</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">RS</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff6">
				<label>6</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade de Brasília, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Brasília, DF, Brazil.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade de Brasília</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade de Brasília</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Instituto de Ciências Biológicas</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Brasília</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">DF</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c1">*Corresponding author: <email>vanessa.peripolli@hotmail.com</email>
				</corresp>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub">
				<month>02</month>
				<year>2017</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>46</volume>
			<issue>02</issue>
			<fpage>138</fpage>
			<lpage>146</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>18</day>
					<month>11</month>
					<year>2015</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>27</day>
					<month>10</month>
					<year>2016</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p>Forty Nelore cattle were used to evaluate the effects of supplementation with different antioxidants on carcass characteristics and meat quality of feedlot cattle. Animals were fed <italic>Brachiaria brizantha</italic> hay and subjected to five treatments (control and four antioxidants: zinc, selenium, vitamin E, and selenium + vitamin E). After a 105-day feeding period, cattle were slaughtered. Tissue composition, as well as carcass proximate composition, color, tenderness, pH, and fatty acid profile were evaluated. Analysis of variance was carried out and means compared by Tukey test at 0.05 probability. The group fed selenium showed the lowest muscle amount (66.61 g/100 g) compared with the other antioxidants evaluated. There was no difference among treatments for bone, fat, and comestible portion percentages as well as muscle:bone, muscle:fat, and comestible portion:bone ratios, with mean values of 16.85 g/100 g, 14.70 g/100 g, 82.99 g/100 g, 4.06, 4.85, and 4.95, respectively. Neither brightness, red, or yellow contents of the meat nor carcass pH were affected by treatments. For tenderness and losses during thawing and cooking, there were no differences among treatments, with averages of 6.43 kgf cm<sup>2</sup>, 3.22 g/100 g, and 21.15 g/100 g, respectively. Supplementation of Nelore cattle fed <italic>Brachiaria brizantha</italic> hay with antioxidants do not influence carcass characteristics or meat quality. However, vitamin E supplementation reduces the levels of omega 3 fatty acid, whereas supplementation with selenium + vitamin E promotes an increase in linoleic and palmitoleic acids and a decrease in myristoleic acid, making the supplementation feasible due to the beneficial effects provided by these acids.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Key Words:</title>
				<kwd>fatty acid</kwd>
				<kwd>saponin</kwd>
				<kwd>selenium</kwd>
				<kwd>vitamin E</kwd>
				<kwd>zinc</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="0"/>
				<table-count count="5"/>
				<equation-count count="0"/>
				<ref-count count="55"/>
				<page-count count="9"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>Introduction</title>
			<p>Quality beef programs need to guarantee more than safe, nutritious, and tasty products to the costumer. There is a need for sustainable production, the promotion of human and animal well-being, forming a link between customer satisfaction and producer income, without harming the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Costa, 2002</xref>). There is also concern about human health, not only related to the sanitary quality of foods, but mainly in relation to the possible effects (harmful or beneficial) of certain foods or nutrients on the consumer health.</p>
			<p>Beef quality is usually evaluated by sensory characteristics such as color, texture, tenderness, and palatability. However, other aspects are also relevant, such as fat content and fatty acid composition. Ruminant fat has a higher concentration of saturated fatty acid and less polyunsaturated:saturated ratio compared with non-ruminants, mainly due to the rumen biohydrogenation process of unsaturated fatty acids by microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">French et al., 2003</xref>).</p>
			<p>Antioxidants are substances that directly or indirectly protect cellular systems from the toxic effects caused by oxidative radicals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Halliwell, 1999</xref>). Antioxidants represent an alternative in preventing meat oxidation by delaying autoxidation processes, inhibiting free-radical formation during the initial stage of the oxidation reaction, by interrupting the propagation step, protecting the lipids present in the meat, and stabilizing the myoglobin molecules (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">O'Grady et al., 1996</xref>). However, in recent years, pressure by consumers has grown for the industry to adopt the use of natural antioxidants in replacement of synthetic ones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hayes et al., 2009</xref>). Among the nutritional supplements with antioxidant effects, the most often used in cattle feed are zinc, selenium, and vitamin E (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Baldin et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Castilho et al., 2013</xref>).</p>
			<p>Several factors are involved in the low productivity of the pasture-based cattle production system in the Brazilian Midwest. Intoxication of animals consuming this forage is frequently observed due to saponins. Removal of the saponins is not viable; so, the use of antioxidants to neutralize their effect on the animal organism may be a way to minimize their effects, improve animal health, and thus generate more beef with nutritional characteristics suitable for consumer market (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Castilho et al., 2013</xref>). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of supplementation with different antioxidants on carcass characteristics and meat quality of feedlot cattle fed <italic>Brachiaria</italic> hay.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>Material and Methods</title>
			<p>Animal care procedures throughout the study followed protocols approved by the Ethics Committee for Animal Use (CEUA) of the Universidade Federal de Goiás and was registered under case no. 360/2010. </p>
			<p>Forty Nelore cattle aged 24-36 months were used. The animals were identified, dewormed, and distributed into five treatments: control <italic>(Brachiaria brizantha</italic> hay); <italic>Brachiaria brizantha</italic> hay + zinc supplementation with 600 mg animal<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup> (zinc methionine); <italic>Brachiaria brizantha</italic> hay + supplementation with vitamin E, 1000 IU animal<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup> (α-tocopherol acetate); <italic>Brachiaria brizantha</italic> hay + selenium supplementation with 10 mg animal<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup> (sodium selenite); and <italic>Brachiaria brizantha</italic> hay supplementation with 1000 IU of vitamin E and 10 mg of selenium animal<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup> (α-tocopherol acetate and sodium selenite), with eight animals per treatment (each animal representing a repetition). The guaranteed levels of the diets contained 50,000 IU/kg of vitamin E, as well as 120 mg/kg of zinc and 0.405 mg/kg of selenium. The selection of the antioxidant to be offered in each treatment was performed randomly and, thereafter, it was provided daily to the animals via oral administration, diluted in the concentrate.</p>
			<p>The total duration of the study was 129 days, with 24 days for adaptation and 105 for the experiment. The animals were maintained in paddocks with troughs and drinkers. Animals were fed twice daily (08.00 and 15.00 h), with roughage (<italic>Braquiaria brizantha</italic> hay) and concentrate. The concentrate was formulated in accordance with NRC (2001) recommendations to meet an average daily gain of 0.770 kg and contained 340 g/kg crude protein and 710 g/kg total digestible nutrients. The concentrate ingredients were soybean meal, corn bran, and mineral mixture. The proportion used for forage:concentrate ratio was 70:30. The concentrate was offered individually, together with the antioxidant and only after the concentrate plus antioxidant total intake the hay was provided in the trough. </p>
			<p>At the end of the feeding period, cattle were fasted for more than 24 h before slaughter and then were slaughtered at a commercial abattoir under federal inspection. </p>
			<p>Carcasses were graded according to the parameters of the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Supply. After 24 h in a cold room, the right halves of the carcasses were used to obtain the pH values. From the left half of each carcass, one section (HH) was extracted between the 11th and 13th ribs, which was wrapped in plastic bags and frozen for different analyses. The determination of muscle, bone, and fat percentage was performed by incising the <italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle, between the 11th and 12th vertebras. Subsequently, the <italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle was separated from the fat that covers it. Muscle, fat, and the remainder of the HH section were weighed separately. After weighing, the muscle was packed and frozen at -30 ºC for later evaluation.</p>
			<p>The pH determination was performed by incising the <italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle between the 12th and 13th vertebra using a digital pH meter with a penetration probe (Hanna, model HI 8314). The device was calibrated with buffer solutions of pH 4.00 and 6.86. Electrode cleaning was performed with neutral detergent and distilled water after each reading.</p>
			<p>Frozen samples of <italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle and HH were slowly thawed to determine the percentage of bone, muscle, and fat, as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arboitte et al. (2011</xref>).</p>
			<p>The proportion of muscle, fat, and bone of the carcass was estimated based on the proportions of these components in the HH section through the equations developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hankins and Howe (1946</xref>): Muscle = 16.08 + 0.80X; adipose tissue = 3.54 + 0.80X; and bones = 5.52 + 0.57X, in which X is the percentage of the HH section component validated previously for the cattle and production systems used in this study.</p>
			<p><italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle samples, previously minced and homogenized, were used for determination of dry matter, ash, and crude protein as in AOAC (1990), while the fat determinations were performed according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Folch et al. (1957</xref>).</p>
			<p>The determination of the meat color was performed by CIEL*a*b* methodology using a BYK Gardner GmbH colorimeter (Wesel, Germany).</p>
			<p>Losses on thawing and in the cooking process were determined in the same frozen samples of <italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle and were performed consecutively. To determine the meat water retention capacity, 2.5-cm thick steaks were obtained from the cranial portion of <italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle. The steaks were weighed frozen and then placed on racks and thawed under refrigeration at a temperature of 7 °C for 24 h. The steaks were reweighed for determination of water drip loss, expressed as percentage of initial weight as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arboitte et al. (2011</xref>).</p>
			<p>The shear force (tenderness of the meat) was determined in steaks baked for 24 h and then cooled. For determination of cooking loss and shear force (WBS) values, samples were weighed and then cooked in a plastic bag in a water bath until an internal temperature of 71 °C was achieved. After cooling to 7 °C, the samples were taken from the bags, dried with filter paper, and reweighed. The losses were expressed as percentage of initial weight.</p>
			<p>Seven cylinders of 1/2 inch<sup>2</sup> area per steak, cut perpendicularly to the fiber at an angle of 45 °C and a diameter of 2 cm each, were used to determine the tenderness of meat by the shear force (kgf<sup>2)</sup> using Warner-Bratzler Meat Shear equipment (Salter Brecknell(r) 2356X model), fitted with cutting blade with 1.016-mm thickness and a load speed of about 20 cm min<sup>-1</sup> and load capacity of 25 kgf per cm<sup>2</sup>. Average of all readings was considered after discarding the maximum and minimum values according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arboitte et al. (2011</xref>).</p>
			<p>For determination of lipid profile in total intramuscular fat content of <italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle samples, the lipids were first extracted using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bligh and Dyer (1959</xref>) method; then, they were esterified according to Hatman and Lago (1973) and analyzed in a gas chromatograph coupled to a computer with a computer package equipped with a flame ionization detector and capillary polyethylene-glycol column (J&amp;W DB-Wax), 30 m long by 0.25 mm diameter and filled with 0.25 mm, and the sample was injected at a split ratio of 1:10. The temperature of the injector and detector was 250 °C. Temperature gradient used for the separation of fatty acids esters was: 180 to 190 °C at 5 °C min<sup>-1</sup>, 190 °C for 12 min, 190 to 215 °C at 3 °C min<sup>-1</sup>, 215 °C to 240 °C at 5 °C min<sup>-1</sup>, and 240 °C for 10 min. The carrier gas used was nitrogen in 1-mL min<sup>-1</sup> flow. As a chromatographic standard, a mixture of fatty acids known as PUFA 2 (Sigma-Aldrich) was used. Fatty acid identification was carried out by comparing the retention time of the sampling fatty acids with the standard. Fatty acids were grouped as follows: saturated (SFA), monounsaturated (MUFA), polyunsaturated (PUFA), and unsaturated (UFA, including MUFA and PUFA). The following ratios were calculated: SFA:UFA, PUFA:SFA, and n6:n3.</p>
			<p>The experimental design was completely randomized with five treatments and eight replications. The treatments were analyzed using the F test and the parameters with significant effect were compared by Tukey test at 0.05 probability. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS software (Statistical Analysis System, version 9.3). The mathematic model used was: </p>
			<p>Yij = µ + τi + b<sub>1</sub>(IW - IW<sub>m</sub>) + eij,</p>
			<p>in which Yij represents the dependent variables; μ is the overall mean of the observations; τi is the fixed effect of dietary treatment; and eij is the random residual experimental error. The initial body weight (IW) was included in the model as a covariate, in which b<sub>1</sub> is the linear regression coefficient and IW<sub>m</sub> is the mean initial body weight.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>Results</title>
			<p>In general, initial body weight did not affect carcass traits or fatty acid analyses. There was variation in the carcass muscle percentage according to the antioxidant used (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>). Selenium showed the lowest muscle percentage compared with the other antioxidants evaluated. However, there was no difference between treatments for bone, fat, and comestible portion percentages, as well as muscle:bone, muscle:fat, and comestible portion:bone ratios, with mean values of 16.85 g/100 g, 14.70 g/100 g, 82.99 g/100 g, 4.06, 4.85, and 4.95, respectively. </p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t1">
					<label>Table 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Average values of tissue and carcass composition of beef cattle supplemented with different antioxidants</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col span="4"/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col span="2"/>
						</colgroup>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">Trait</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="4">Treatment </td>
								<td align="center">Mean</td>
								<td align="center">SEM</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="2">Pr&gt;F </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Control</td>
								<td align="center">Zinc</td>
								<td align="center">Selenium</td>
								<td align="center">Vitamin E</td>
								<td align="center">Selenium + vitamin E</td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">Treatments</td>
								<td align="center">IBW</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Muscle (g/100 g)</td>
								<td align="center">69.74a</td>
								<td align="center">67.51ab</td>
								<td align="center">66.61b</td>
								<td align="center">69.87a </td>
								<td align="center">67.72ab </td>
								<td align="center">68.29</td>
								<td align="center">0.39</td>
								<td align="center">0.0318</td>
								<td align="center">0.0080</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Bone (g/100 g)</td>
								<td align="center">16.58</td>
								<td align="center">16.81</td>
								<td align="center">17.25</td>
								<td align="center">16.90</td>
								<td align="center">16.73</td>
								<td align="center">16.85</td>
								<td align="center">0.17</td>
								<td align="center">0.8155</td>
								<td align="center">0.5066</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Fat (g/100 g)</td>
								<td align="center">13.61</td>
								<td align="center">15.56</td>
								<td align="center">15.83</td>
								<td align="center">13.05</td>
								<td align="center">15.43</td>
								<td align="center">14.70</td>
								<td align="center">0.45</td>
								<td align="center">0.2614</td>
								<td align="center">0.0795</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Comestible portion (g/100 g)</td>
								<td align="center">83.35</td>
								<td align="center">83.06</td>
								<td align="center">82.46</td>
								<td align="center">82.92</td>
								<td align="center">83.17</td>
								<td align="center">82.99</td>
								<td align="center">0.24</td>
								<td align="center">0.8385</td>
								<td align="center">0.5738</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Muscle:bone</td>
								<td align="center">4.2</td>
								<td align="center">4.01</td>
								<td align="center">3.87</td>
								<td align="center">4.16</td>
								<td align="center">4.06</td>
								<td align="center">4.06</td>
								<td align="center">0.05</td>
								<td align="center">0.3318</td>
								<td align="center">0.0563</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Muscle:fat</td>
								<td align="center">5.48</td>
								<td align="center">4.41</td>
								<td align="center">4.32</td>
								<td align="center">5.45</td>
								<td align="center">4.58</td>
								<td align="center">4.85</td>
								<td align="center">0.18</td>
								<td align="center">0.1361</td>
								<td align="center">0.0348</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Comestible portion:bone</td>
								<td align="center">5.05</td>
								<td align="center">4.96</td>
								<td align="center">4.81</td>
								<td align="center">4.92</td>
								<td align="center">5.01</td>
								<td align="center">4.95</td>
								<td align="center">0.06</td>
								<td align="center">0.8535</td>
								<td align="center">0.4635</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN1">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean; IBW - covariate initial body weight; Pr&gt;F - probability.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN2">
							<p>Different letters in the row differ by Tukey test (P&lt;0.05).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>For meat chemical composition, no differences for the percentages of moisture, dry matter, ash, protein, and lipids were observed among treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>), with mean values of 24.26 g/100 g dry matter, 1.36 g/100 g ash, 1.39 g/100 g fat, and 19.89 g/100 g protein.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t2">
					<label>Table 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Average values for meat proximate composition of beef cattle supplemented with different antioxidants</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col span="3"/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col span="2"/>
						</colgroup>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">Trait (g/100 g)</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="3">Treatment </td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">Mean</td>
								<td align="center">SEM</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="2">Pr&gt;F </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Control</td>
								<td align="center">Zinc</td>
								<td align="center">Selenium</td>
								<td align="center">Vitamim E</td>
								<td align="center">Selenium + vitamin E</td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">Treatments</td>
								<td align="center">IBW</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Moisture </td>
								<td align="center">75.60</td>
								<td align="center">76.08</td>
								<td align="center">75.53</td>
								<td align="center">75.95</td>
								<td align="center">75.51</td>
								<td align="center">75.73</td>
								<td align="center">0.14</td>
								<td align="center">0.6543</td>
								<td align="center">0.8112</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Total dry matter</td>
								<td align="center">24.39</td>
								<td align="center">23.91</td>
								<td align="center">24.46</td>
								<td align="center">24.05</td>
								<td align="center">24.49</td>
								<td align="center">24.26</td>
								<td align="center">0.14</td>
								<td align="center">0.6543</td>
								<td align="center">0.8112</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Mineral matter</td>
								<td align="center">1.25</td>
								<td align="center">1.49</td>
								<td align="center">1.35</td>
								<td align="center">1.50</td>
								<td align="center">1.20</td>
								<td align="center">1.36</td>
								<td align="center">0.07</td>
								<td align="center">0.6059</td>
								<td align="center">0.2828</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Mineral matter (g/100 g DM)</td>
								<td align="center">5.11</td>
								<td align="center">6.24</td>
								<td align="center">5.54</td>
								<td align="center">6.16</td>
								<td align="center">4.94</td>
								<td align="center">5.6</td>
								<td align="center">0.28</td>
								<td align="center">0.4746</td>
								<td align="center">0.2705</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Ether extract</td>
								<td align="center">1.43</td>
								<td align="center">1.24</td>
								<td align="center">1.52</td>
								<td align="center">1.17</td>
								<td align="center">1.59</td>
								<td align="center">1.39</td>
								<td align="center">0.08</td>
								<td align="center">0.4513</td>
								<td align="center">0.2265</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Crude protein</td>
								<td align="center">20.21</td>
								<td align="center">19.44</td>
								<td align="center">20.12</td>
								<td align="center">19.6</td>
								<td align="center">20.07</td>
								<td align="center">19.89</td>
								<td align="center">0.12</td>
								<td align="center">0.1626</td>
								<td align="center">0.1261</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN3">
							<p>MM - mineral matter; DM - dry matter; SEM - standard error of the mean; IBW - covariate initial body weight; Pr&gt;F - probability. </p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Neither the basic color coordinates L*, a*, and b* in the meat (brightness, red, and yellow contents, respectively) nor carcass pH were affected by treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>), with mean values of 29.29 of brightness and 6.31 of pH.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t3">
					<label>Table 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Average values for meat color and carcass pH of beef cattle supplemented with different antioxidants</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col span="4"/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col span="2"/>
						</colgroup>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">Trait</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="4">Treatment </td>
								<td align="center">Mean</td>
								<td align="center">SEM</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="2">Pr&gt;F </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Control</td>
								<td align="center">Zinc</td>
								<td align="center">Selenium</td>
								<td align="center">Vitamin E</td>
								<td align="center">Selenium + vitamin E</td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">Treatments</td>
								<td align="center">IBW</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">L*</td>
								<td align="center">30.51</td>
								<td align="center">29.64</td>
								<td align="center">28.03</td>
								<td align="center">29.02</td>
								<td align="center">29.24</td>
								<td align="center">29.29</td>
								<td align="center">0.58</td>
								<td align="center">0.7483</td>
								<td align="center">0.3052</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">a*</td>
								<td align="center">2.69</td>
								<td align="center">3.32</td>
								<td align="center">3.03</td>
								<td align="center">3.18</td>
								<td align="center">1.56</td>
								<td align="center">2.76</td>
								<td align="center">0.32</td>
								<td align="center">0.4583</td>
								<td align="center">0.3359</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">b*</td>
								<td align="center">3.07</td>
								<td align="center">2.20</td>
								<td align="center">2.68</td>
								<td align="center">2.91</td>
								<td align="center">2.43</td>
								<td align="center">2.66</td>
								<td align="center">0.22</td>
								<td align="center">0.8894</td>
								<td align="center">0.0568</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">pH</td>
								<td align="center">6.38</td>
								<td align="center">6.32</td>
								<td align="center">6.32</td>
								<td align="center">6.22</td>
								<td align="center">6.31</td>
								<td align="center">6.31</td>
								<td align="center">0.04</td>
								<td align="center">0.9015</td>
								<td align="center">0.0682</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN4">
							<p>L* - brightness; a* - red content; b* - yellow content; SEM - standard error of the mean; IBW - covariate initial body weight; Pr&gt;F - probability. </p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>For <italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle tenderness measured by shear force, the ability to retain water during thawing and cooking, there were no differences between treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>), with averages of 6.43 kgf cm<sup>2</sup>, 3.22 g/100 g, and 21.15 g/100 g, respectively.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t4">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Average values for thawing, cooking, and total losses and shear force of meat of beef cattle supplemented with different antioxidants</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col span="4"/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col span="2"/>
						</colgroup>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2"> Trait</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="4">Treatment </td>
								<td align="center">Mean</td>
								<td align="center">SEM</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="2">Pr&gt;F </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Control</td>
								<td align="center">Zinc</td>
								<td align="center">Selenium</td>
								<td align="center">Vitamin E</td>
								<td align="center">Selenium+ vitamin E</td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">Treatments</td>
								<td align="center">IBW</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Thawing loss (g/100 g)</td>
								<td align="center">2.67</td>
								<td align="center">2.66</td>
								<td align="center">3.58</td>
								<td align="center">3.43</td>
								<td align="center">3.8</td>
								<td align="center">3.22</td>
								<td align="center">0.39</td>
								<td align="center">0.8616</td>
								<td align="center">0.9133</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Cooking loss (g/100 g)</td>
								<td align="center">19.59</td>
								<td align="center">23.44</td>
								<td align="center">20.53</td>
								<td align="center">22.19</td>
								<td align="center">19.99</td>
								<td align="center">21.15</td>
								<td align="center">1.34</td>
								<td align="center">0.8725</td>
								<td align="center">0.4464</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Total loss (g/100 g)</td>
								<td align="center">21.61</td>
								<td align="center">25.45</td>
								<td align="center">23.31</td>
								<td align="center">24.85</td>
								<td align="center">23.22</td>
								<td align="center">23.69</td>
								<td align="center">1.35</td>
								<td align="center">0.9021</td>
								<td align="center">0.4634</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Shear (kgf cm<sup>2)</sup></td>
								<td align="center">6.11</td>
								<td align="center">6.81</td>
								<td align="center">6.58</td>
								<td align="center">7.23</td>
								<td align="center">5.43</td>
								<td align="center">6.43</td>
								<td align="center">0.47</td>
								<td align="center">0.8014</td>
								<td align="center">0.1158</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN5">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean; IBW - covariate initial body weight; Pr&gt;F - probability. </p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>In the meat lipid profile of the beef cattle studied, 29 fatty acids were identified, 14 SFA, four MUFA, and 11 PUFA (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>). </p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t5">
					<label>Table 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Average values for composition of fatty acids (g/100 g) in <italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle of beef cattle supplemented with different antioxidants</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col span="4"/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col span="2"/>
						</colgroup>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">Fatty acid</td>
								<td align="center" rowspan="2">Usual nomenclature</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="4">Treatment </td>
								<td align="center">Mean</td>
								<td align="center">SEM</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="2">Pr&gt;F </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Control</td>
								<td align="center">Zinc</td>
								<td align="center">Selenium</td>
								<td align="center">Vitamin E</td>
								<td align="center">Selenium + vitamin E</td>
								<td align="left">
								</td>
								<td align="left">
								</td>
								<td align="center">Treatments</td>
								<td align="left">IBW</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C6:0</td>
								<td align="center">Caproic acid</td>
								<td align="center">0.85</td>
								<td align="center">5.05</td>
								<td align="center">12.02</td>
								<td align="center">1.05</td>
								<td align="center">12.99</td>
								<td align="center">6.38</td>
								<td align="center">2.24</td>
								<td align="center">0.2707</td>
								<td align="center">0.0737</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C10:0</td>
								<td align="center">Capric acid</td>
								<td align="center">11.79</td>
								<td align="center">4.81</td>
								<td align="center">6.06</td>
								<td align="center">7.14</td>
								<td align="center">12.33</td>
								<td align="center">8.43</td>
								<td align="center">2.12</td>
								<td align="center">0.7680</td>
								<td align="center">0.2279</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C11:0 </td>
								<td align="center">Hendecanoic acid</td>
								<td align="center">1.16</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0.62</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">1.93</td>
								<td align="center">0.74</td>
								<td align="center">0.33</td>
								<td align="center">0.3263</td>
								<td align="center">0.6282</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C12:0</td>
								<td align="center">Lauric acid</td>
								<td align="center">8.23</td>
								<td align="center">10.57</td>
								<td align="center">9.41</td>
								<td align="center">4.77</td>
								<td align="center">12.68</td>
								<td align="center">9.13</td>
								<td align="center">1.90</td>
								<td align="center">0.7480</td>
								<td align="center">0.6353</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C13:0</td>
								<td align="center">Tridecanoic acid</td>
								<td align="center">1.01</td>
								<td align="center">0.85</td>
								<td align="center">0.65</td>
								<td align="center">0.65</td>
								<td align="center">1.40</td>
								<td align="center">0.91</td>
								<td align="center">0.29</td>
								<td align="center">0.9234</td>
								<td align="center">0.5514</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C14:0 </td>
								<td align="center">Myristic acid</td>
								<td align="center">15.32</td>
								<td align="center">21.67</td>
								<td align="center">19.49</td>
								<td align="center">6.37</td>
								<td align="center">7.90</td>
								<td align="center">14.15</td>
								<td align="center">2.87</td>
								<td align="center">0.3540</td>
								<td align="center">0.7219</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C14:1</td>
								<td align="center">Myristoleic acid</td>
								<td align="center">8.56a</td>
								<td align="center">7.72a</td>
								<td align="center">6.88ab</td>
								<td align="center">2.01b</td>
								<td align="center">4.07ab</td>
								<td align="center">5.85</td>
								<td align="center">0.85</td>
								<td align="center">0.0478</td>
								<td align="center">0.1106</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C15:0 </td>
								<td align="center">Pentadecylic acid</td>
								<td align="center">0.38</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0.24</td>
								<td align="center">0.08</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0.14</td>
								<td align="center">0.08</td>
								<td align="center">0.6544</td>
								<td align="center">0.5744</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C15:1 </td>
								<td align="center">Pentadecenoic acid</td>
								<td align="center">1.85a</td>
								<td align="center">1.05ab</td>
								<td align="center">0.68ab</td>
								<td align="center">0.52ab</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0.82</td>
								<td align="center">0.24</td>
								<td align="center">0.1824</td>
								<td align="center">0.4256</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C16:0 </td>
								<td align="center">Palmitic acid</td>
								<td align="center">14.25a</td>
								<td align="center">11.79a</td>
								<td align="center">9.66ab</td>
								<td align="center">2.23c</td>
								<td align="center">3.74bc</td>
								<td align="center">8.01</td>
								<td align="center">1.26</td>
								<td align="center">0.0049</td>
								<td align="center">0.5668</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C16:1 </td>
								<td align="center">Palmitoleic acid</td>
								<td align="center">4.71c</td>
								<td align="center">3.43c</td>
								<td align="center">7.62bc</td>
								<td align="center">29.37a</td>
								<td align="center">22.25ab</td>
								<td align="center">13.47</td>
								<td align="center">2.97</td>
								<td align="center">0.0105</td>
								<td align="center">0.8433</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C17:0 </td>
								<td align="center">Margaric acid</td>
								<td align="center">0.82</td>
								<td align="center">0.78</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0.19</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0.35</td>
								<td align="center">0.22</td>
								<td align="center">0.6719</td>
								<td align="center">0.3289</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C17:1</td>
								<td align="center">Heptadecenoic acid</td>
								<td align="center">0c</td>
								<td align="center">0c</td>
								<td align="center">0.39bc</td>
								<td align="center">1.81a</td>
								<td align="center">1.28ab</td>
								<td align="center">0.69</td>
								<td align="center">0.18</td>
								<td align="center">0.0012</td>
								<td align="center">0.8654</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C18:0 </td>
								<td align="center">Stearic acid</td>
								<td align="center">8.34ab</td>
								<td align="center">9.99a</td>
								<td align="center">4.72abc</td>
								<td align="center">0.06c</td>
								<td align="center">1.4bc</td>
								<td align="center">4.90</td>
								<td align="center">1.16</td>
								<td align="center">0.0312</td>
								<td align="center">0.3608</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C18:1 <italic>n-9 cis/</italic>C18:1 <italic>n-9 trans</italic></td>
								<td align="center">Oleic acid</td>
								<td align="center">4.76b</td>
								<td align="center">9.83b</td>
								<td align="center">7.48b</td>
								<td align="center">28.54a</td>
								<td align="center">18.04ab</td>
								<td align="center">13.73</td>
								<td align="center">2.57</td>
								<td align="center">0.0102</td>
								<td align="center">0.1700</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C18:2 <italic>n-6 cis</italic>/C18:2 <italic>n-6 trans 9</italic></td>
								<td align="center">Linoleic acid</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0.32a</td>
								<td align="center">0.19a</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
								<td align="center">0.03</td>
								<td align="center">0.0010</td>
								<td align="center">0.5804</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C18:3 <italic>n-6</italic></td>
								<td align="center">Gamma-linolenic acid</td>
								<td align="center">1.61</td>
								<td align="center">1.17</td>
								<td align="center">3.80</td>
								<td align="center">0.16</td>
								<td align="center">4.10</td>
								<td align="center">2.17</td>
								<td align="center">0.76</td>
								<td align="center">0.4400</td>
								<td align="center">0.3308</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C18:3 <italic>n-3</italic></td>
								<td align="center">Linolenic acid</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">1.37</td>
								<td align="center">0.57</td>
								<td align="center">0.25</td>
								<td align="center">1.42</td>
								<td align="center">0.72</td>
								<td align="center">0.31</td>
								<td align="center">0.4929</td>
								<td align="center">0.7282</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C20:1 <italic>n-9</italic></td>
								<td align="center">Eicosenoic acid</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0.29a</td>
								<td align="center">0.09b</td>
								<td align="center">0.07</td>
								<td align="center">0.02</td>
								<td align="center">0.0001</td>
								<td align="center">0.6126</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C20:2</td>
								<td align="center">Arachidic acid</td>
								<td align="center">3.27a</td>
								<td align="center">1.07b</td>
								<td align="center">0.26b</td>
								<td align="center">0.22b</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0.97</td>
								<td align="center">0.30</td>
								<td align="center">0.0005</td>
								<td align="center">0.0206</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C20:3 <italic>n-6</italic>/C20:3 <italic>n-3</italic></td>
								<td align="center">Homo-linolenic acid</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0.19</td>
								<td align="center">0.17</td>
								<td align="center">0.15</td>
								<td align="center">0.11</td>
								<td align="center">0.04</td>
								<td align="center">0.3658</td>
								<td align="center">0.1466</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C20:4 <italic>n-6</italic></td>
								<td align="center">Arachidonic acid</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0.21</td>
								<td align="center">0.39</td>
								<td align="center">0.80</td>
								<td align="center">0.28</td>
								<td align="center">0.16</td>
								<td align="center">0.5055</td>
								<td align="center">0.4637</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C20:5 <italic>n-3</italic></td>
								<td align="center">Eicosapentaenoic acid</td>
								<td align="center">13.06ab</td>
								<td align="center">8.80ab</td>
								<td align="center">13.95a</td>
								<td align="center">3.16b</td>
								<td align="center">5.55ab</td>
								<td align="center">8.91</td>
								<td align="center">1.57</td>
								<td align="center">0.1203</td>
								<td align="center">0.3673</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C21:0</td>
								<td align="center">Heneicosanoic acid</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0.11a</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0.02</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.0001</td>
								<td align="center">0.0983</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C22:0</td>
								<td align="center">Behenic acid</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0.38</td>
								<td align="center">0.57</td>
								<td align="center">0.45</td>
								<td align="center">0.28</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
								<td align="center">0.1591</td>
								<td align="center">0.1646</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C23:0</td>
								<td align="center">Tricosanoic acid</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0.08</td>
								<td align="center">0.06</td>
								<td align="center">0.03</td>
								<td align="center">0.01</td>
								<td align="center">0.1160</td>
								<td align="center">0.7996</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C24:0</td>
								<td align="center">Lignoceric acid</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">0.67</td>
								<td align="center">1.09</td>
								<td align="center">0.75</td>
								<td align="center">0.50</td>
								<td align="center">0.16</td>
								<td align="center">0.1057</td>
								<td align="center">0.1752</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C22:1 <italic>n-9</italic></td>
								<td align="center">Erucic acid</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0.05a</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0.01</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.0005</td>
								<td align="center">0.4351</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">C22:6 <italic>n-3</italic></td>
								<td align="center">Docosahexaenoic acid</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0b</td>
								<td align="center">0.16a</td>
								<td align="center">0.05ab</td>
								<td align="center">0.05</td>
								<td align="center">0.01</td>
								<td align="center">0.0156</td>
								<td align="center">0.8212</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Saturated</td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">62.16a</td>
								<td align="center">65.53a</td>
								<td align="center">63.92a</td>
								<td align="center">24.5b </td>
								<td align="center">55.64a </td>
								<td align="center">54.35</td>
								<td align="center">4.07</td>
								<td align="center">0.0042</td>
								<td align="center">0.9672</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Unsaturated</td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">37.84ab</td>
								<td align="center">34.47b</td>
								<td align="center">42.07ab</td>
								<td align="center">67.46a </td>
								<td align="center">58.09ab </td>
								<td align="center">47.98</td>
								<td align="center">4.70</td>
								<td align="center">0.1214</td>
								<td align="center">0.7441</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">MUFA</td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">15.12</td>
								<td align="center">12.20</td>
								<td align="center">15.58</td>
								<td align="center">33.72 </td>
								<td align="center">27.60 </td>
								<td align="center">20.84</td>
								<td align="center">2.74</td>
								<td align="center">0.0606</td>
								<td align="center">0.8353</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">PUFA</td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">22.71</td>
								<td align="center">22.27</td>
								<td align="center">26.49</td>
								<td align="center">33.74 </td>
								<td align="center">33.74 </td>
								<td align="center">27.12</td>
								<td align="center">2.60</td>
								<td align="center">0.5449</td>
								<td align="center">0.4495</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Saturated:unsaturated ratio </td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">2.11</td>
								<td align="center">2.02</td>
								<td align="center">2.03</td>
								<td align="center">1.12 </td>
								<td align="center">2.17 </td>
								<td align="center">1.89</td>
								<td align="center">0.27</td>
								<td align="center">0.6844</td>
								<td align="center">0.6554</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">PUFA/SFA ratio</td>
								<td align="center">
								</td>
								<td align="center">0.41b</td>
								<td align="center">0.35b</td>
								<td align="center">0.46b</td>
								<td align="center">5.19a </td>
								<td align="center">1.03b </td>
								<td align="center">1.49</td>
								<td align="center">0.40</td>
								<td align="center">&lt;0.0001</td>
								<td align="center">0.7663</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ω-3</td>
								<td align="center">Omega 3</td>
								<td align="center">13.06ab</td>
								<td align="center">10.17ab</td>
								<td align="center">14.53a</td>
								<td align="center">3.41b </td>
								<td align="center">6.97ab </td>
								<td align="center">9.63</td>
								<td align="center">1.56</td>
								<td align="center">0.1320</td>
								<td align="center">0.3294</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ω-6</td>
								<td align="center">Omega 6</td>
								<td align="center">1.61</td>
								<td align="center">1.17</td>
								<td align="center">4.21</td>
								<td align="center">0.73 </td>
								<td align="center">5.06 </td>
								<td align="center">2.56</td>
								<td align="center">0.92</td>
								<td align="center">0.4960</td>
								<td align="center">0.3156</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ω-6/ω-3 ratio</td>
								<td align="center">Omega 6:Omega 3 ratio</td>
								<td align="center">0.36</td>
								<td align="center">0.02</td>
								<td align="center">0.01</td>
								<td align="center">2.56 </td>
								<td align="center">3.73 </td>
								<td align="center">1.34</td>
								<td align="center">0.76</td>
								<td align="center">0.4591</td>
								<td align="center">0.4128</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN6">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean; IBW - covariate initial body weight; Pr&gt;F - probability; MUFA - monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA - polyunsaturated fatty acids; SFA - saturated fatty acids.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN7">
							<p>Different letters in the row differ by Tukey test (P&lt;0.05).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>The fatty acids with the highest concentrations included myristic (C140, 14.15 g/100 g), oleic (C18:1 n-9 cis/C18:1 n-9 trans, 13.73 g/100 g), palmitoleic (C16:1, 13.47 g/100 g), lauric (C12:0, 9.13 g/100 g), eicosapentaenoic (C20:5 n-3, 8.91 g/100 g), capric (C10:0, 8.43 g/100 g), and palmitic acids (C16:0, 8.01 g/100 g) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
			<p>There was variation in the <italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> fatty acid profile according to the antioxidant used. Control, zinc, and selenium treatments showed the highest levels of palmitic (C16:0) and stearic acids (C18:0) and lower levels of palmitoleic acid (C16:1). Higher amounts of palmitoleic (C16:1), heptadecenoic (C17:1), elaidic (C18:1 n-9 cis/C18:1 n-9 trans), linoleic (C18:2 n-6 cis/C18:2 n-6 trans 9), and DHA acids (C22:6 n-3/C24:1 n-9) and lower levels of palmitic (C16:0) and stearic acids (C18:0) were observed for vitamin E and selenium + vitamin E treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>).</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="discussion">
			<title>Discussion</title>
			<p>The use of additives such as vitamin E, selenium, and Zinc is associated with improvements in meat quality, without an influence of carcass characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Comparin et al., 2013</xref>). However, in this study, selenium supplementation produced carcass with lower muscle percentage compared with the other supplements evaluated. </p>
			<p>As expected, the tissue found in greater proportion was muscle (68.29 g/100 g), followed by bone (16.85 g/100 g) and fat (14.70 g/100 g). These tissue proportions can be explained by the grazing system and were similar to those reported by several authors working with Nelore and their crossbreds fed <italic>Brachiaria sp</italic>., with or without supplementation of corn and wheat bran (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Razook et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Vaz et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Ribeiro et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Freitas et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Souza et al., 2009</xref>).</p>
			<p>According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Müller and Primo (1986</xref>), good nutrition is important in the reduction of the proportion of bone in the carcass. These authors observed that animals receiving better food level had lower bone percentage, justifying lower muscle development in animals that received poorer-quality feed. During animal growth, fat is the tissue that has a later development, but is deposited at all ages, when energy intake exceeds that amount required by the animal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Boggs and Merkel, 1981</xref>).</p>
			<p>According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arboitte et al. (2011</xref>), among the tissues that compose the carcass, muscle is the most important since it is the most desired by the consumer. However, fat tissue exerts functions such as an energy reservoir, space filling between tissues, and thermal insulation (Arboitte et al., 2011); it also influences the taste, flavor, tenderness, and succulence of the meat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Costa et al., 2002</xref>), and so is analyzed by the consumer at the time of purchase. Therefore, carcass must provide maximum amount of muscle, minimum of bone, and an amount of fat that varies depending on consumer preference.</p>
			<p>The proximate composition of the beef was similar between treatments and with values similar to those obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lawler et al. (2004</xref>), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Freitas et al. (2008</xref>), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Razook et al. (2002</xref>), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Rubiano et al. (2009</xref>), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Souza et al. (2009</xref>), and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Sestari et al. (2012</xref>), when working with Nelore cattle. The exception is ether extract content, which was lower, possibly due to the lower energy density of the diets used in this study compared with the aforementioned authors, who aimed at higher weight gain. Therefore, the lack of treatment effect on the chemical composition may be due to the similar energy intake in all the treatments associated with the physiological phase of the animal with similar energy requirements. According to Sestari et al. (2012), in general, the content of ash and crude protein of <italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> has low variation for change in the animal diet, whereas fat (ether extract) shows greater variation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Williams et al., 1983</xref>).</p>
			<p>Supplementation of beef cattle with selenium did not increase the percentage of ether extract in meat, corroborating <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Meirelles (2009</xref>) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lawler et al. (2004</xref>).</p>
			<p>Meat color is an important factor in marketing, with the consumer rejecting darker meat associated with older animals or poor meat preservation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Müller, 1987</xref>). According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Muchenje et al. (2009</xref>), the average brightness (29.29), redness (2.76), and yellowness (2.66) values obtained in this study are typical of dark meat. Also, Muchenje et al. (2009) observed that the ideal range for cattle meat brightness is between 33.2 and 41.0 and the ideals of redness and yellowness values should be between 11.1 and 23.6 and between 6.1 and 11.3, respectively.</p>
			<p>Meat was expected to be less dark for animals of this age; however, factors such as age, physical activity performed by animals, amount of color pigments, fat content, and final pH influence meat brightness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Muchenje et al., 2009</xref>). Yet, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Voisinet et al. (1997</xref>) found darker meat in cattle with more excitable temperament. Moreover, in this work, the animals used were not castrated, which, as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Rodrigues and Andrade (2004</xref>), have meats with lower brightness compared with castrated animals; this is possibly due to the lower content of intramuscular fat and for the fasting period of more than 24 h prior to slaughter, which may have interfered with the pH and color of the meat. Meat brightness, redness, and yellowness levels are also influenced by the amount of water on the surface of the cut, as a consequence of water retention capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Purchas, 1990</xref>), as intracellular water accumulation favors the absorption of light. In this study, water retention was high and the amount of fat and red color pigment were low. </p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Cooke et al. (2004</xref>) reported that animals fed diets with higher concentrate proportions present lighter fat compared with animals receiving diets containing forage, due to the high levels of carotenoids present in the forage. This also explains the low color levels in this study, in which the animals were fed <italic>Braquiaria</italic> hay as a roughage source. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Pinho et al. (2011</xref>), consumers prefer meat with white or cream fat color because the yellow color is associated with meat coming from older animals raised at pasture and so, would be less soft.</p>
			<p>Brightness characteristics and meat color are also directly related to the pH value after carcass cooling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Fernandes et al., 2009</xref>). The darker meat and lower brightness, lower intensities of red, and yellow meats typically account for meats with high final pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Muchenje et al., 2009</xref>) as observed in this study (6.31). High pH values were also obtained by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Sestari et al. (2012</xref>) in Nelore cattle and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Heinemann et al. (2003</xref>) in 60% of Nelore and Nelore × Limousin animals.</p>
			<p>Normally, glycolysis develops slowly; the initial pH (0 h) around 7.0 falls to between 6.4 and 6.8 after 5 h post-mortem and to 5.5 to 5.9 after 24 h (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Roça, 2000</xref>). Final pH values, considered as normal for beef cattle meat, are between 5.4 and 5.6. Intermediate pH values are considered above 5.6 and can result in increased water retention and shorter shelf life of the meat compared with pH values considered as normal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Li et al., 2014</xref>).</p>
			<p>The high pre-slaughter fasting time (18 h) suffered by the animals may have caused stress and physical exhaustion of the animal and contributed to high pH obtained in this study. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Field (1971</xref>) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Vaz and Restle (2000</xref>), non-castrated animals are more susceptible to pre-slaughter stress that affects muscle glycogen deposition and subsequently meat pH. Carcass pH reduction favors proteolytic enzyme release, important for increasing meat tenderness. In addition, the meat acidity significantly increases the shelf life of the product.</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lawrie (2005</xref>) stated that meat water retention capacity is directly linked to the amount of fat present in it, and especially, the speed of pH decrease during post-mortem glycolysis. In this study, as fat levels and pH values did not differ among treatments, the losses by thawing and cooking were also not affected by treatments, corroborating <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Costa et al. (2002</xref>), Lawrie (2005), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Igarasi et al. (2008</xref>), and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Pedreira et al. (2003</xref>). As there is a relationship between muscles with more marbling and higher water retention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Saffle and Bratzler, 1959</xref>), it is important to differentiate the muscles for its ability to retain water, because this factor directly affects consumer acceptance characteristics of the meat before it is cooked, directly influencing succulence during chewing (Lawrie, 2005). </p>
			<p>Shear force is a technique used to assess meat softness. A higher shear force value corresponds to greater force required to break the sample and, therefore, less tenderness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arboitte et al., 2011</xref>), which is attributed to post-mortem proteolysis and increased calpastatin activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Shackelford et al., 1994</xref>). In this study, the average shear force was not affected by treatments, with an average value of 6.43 kgf cm<sup>2</sup>, being classified as tough, similar to that observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Vaz et al. (2002</xref>) of 6.01 kgf cm<sup>2</sup>. Low values of shear force obtained in this study may be linked to animal finishing, in which there is more contact with people, a factor that may minimize pre-slaughter stress, resulting in meat less prone to cold shortening (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Restle et al., 2001</xref>).</p>
			<p>The predominant fatty acids in the lipid profile were myristic (14.15 g/100 g), oleic (13.73 g/100 g), palmitoleic (13.47 g/100 g), and lauric acids (9.13 g/100 g), unlike those found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Menezes et al. (2009</xref>), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Enser et al. (1996</xref>), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Banskalieva et al. (2000</xref>), and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Sanudo et al. (2000</xref>), with predominance of oleic, palmitic, and stearic acids, possibly due to the diet characteristics. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">French et al. (2003</xref>) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Mensink and Katan (1992</xref>), myristic acid may be an undesirable fatty acid because it is responsible for the increase in LDL cholesterol in the blood, since it has the potential to lift the plasma concentration of cholesterol four to six times in comparison with C16:0, when both are derived from natural fats. In the present study, this fatty acid accounted for the largest percentage of total fatty acids present in the meat.</p>
			<p>The fatty acids of most interest to consumers are mainly linolenic (C18:3 n-3) and linoleic (C18:2 n-6), as they are essential in human nutrition and have a positive relationship with human health, e.g., they reduce blood cholesterol, are prostaglandin components (arachidonic acid), and precursors (linolenic acids) for the synthesis of many polyunsaturated fatty acids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bressan et al., 2004</xref>). The higher n-6:n-3 ratio found in this experiment may be due to differences in diet composition between feeding periods, since fats supplied by green forage have a higher content of C18:3 fatty acid, the precursor of essential n-3 PUFA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Elmore et al., 2004</xref>).</p>
			<p>The slaughter season and muscle type for the concentrations of some fatty acids, including C20:4 and C20:5, which could result from modifications of muscle metabolic type caused by adaptations to the different grazing periods, followed by changes in fatty acid composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Alfaia et al., 2007</xref>) can explain the results found in this work.</p>
			<p>The increased content of PUFA in the meat can be achieved by alterations in the animal diets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bressan et al., 2004</xref>). However, the elevation of these fatty acids in large amounts can cause greater meat oxidative rancidity, which reduces its palatability, conservation and, consequently, its commercial value.</p>
			<p>Supplementation with vitamin E reduced the myristoleic acid concentration in the meat, which is desirable because this polyunsaturated fatty acid is less wanted. Furthermore, supplementation with vitamin E and selenium + vitamin E increased concentrations of palmitoleic, heptadecenoic, docosahexaenoic, linoleic, and oleic acids, resulting in a meat with low hypercholesterolemic effect and better sensory quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Melton et al., 1982</xref>).</p>
			<p>Supplementation with vitamin E also decreased the saturated fatty acid and omega 3 concentrations in the meat.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>Conclusions</title>
			<p>Supplementation of Nelore beef cattle fed <italic>Brachiaria brizantha</italic> hay with antioxidants do not influence carcass characteristics or meat quality. However, vitamin E supplementation reduces the omega 3 levels, whereas supplementation with selenium + vitamin E promotes an increase in linoleic and palmitoleic acids and a reduction in myristoleic acid, justifying supplementation use due to the beneficial effects provided by these acids.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p>This study was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq).</p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>Alfaia, C. P. M.; Castro, M. L. F.; Martins, S. I. V.; Portugal, A. P. V.; Alves, S. P. A.; Fontes, C. M. G. A.; Bessa, R. J. B. and Prates, J. A. M. 2007. Influence of slaughter season and muscle type on fatty acid composition, conjugated linoleic acid isomeric distribution and nutritional quality of intramuscular fat in Aroquesa-PDO veal. Meat Science 76:787-795.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Alfaia</surname>
							<given-names>C. P. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Castro</surname>
							<given-names>M. L. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Martins</surname>
							<given-names>S. I. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Portugal</surname>
							<given-names>A. P. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Alves</surname>
							<given-names>S. P. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fontes</surname>
							<given-names>C. M. G. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bessa</surname>
							<given-names>R. J. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Prates</surname>
							<given-names>J. A. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Influence of slaughter season and muscle type on fatty acid composition, conjugated linoleic acid isomeric distribution and nutritional quality of intramuscular fat in Aroquesa-PDO veal</article-title>
					<source>Meat Science</source>
					<volume>76</volume>
					<fpage>787</fpage>
					<lpage>795</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed. AOAC, Washington, DC.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1990</year>
					<source>Official methods of analysis</source>
					<edition>15th</edition>
					<publisher-name>AOAC</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>Arboitte, M. Z.; Brondani, I. L.; Deschamps, F. C.; Bertoldi, F. C.; Alves Filho, D. C. and Segabinazzi, L. R. 2011. Qualidade da carne do músculo<italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic>de novilhos superjovens Aberdeen Angus de biótipo pequeno e médio abatidos com o mesmo estágio de acabamentoActa Scientiarum Animal Sciences 33:191-198.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Arboitte</surname>
							<given-names>M. Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brondani</surname>
							<given-names>I. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Deschamps</surname>
							<given-names>F. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bertoldi</surname>
							<given-names>F. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Alves</surname>
							<given-names>D. C.</given-names>
							<suffix>Filho</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Segabinazzi</surname>
							<given-names>L. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Qualidade da carne do músculo Longissimus dorsi de novilhos superjovens Aberdeen Angus de biótipo pequeno e médio abatidos com o mesmo estágio de acabamento</article-title>
					<source>Acta Scientiarum Animal Sciences</source>
					<volume>33</volume>
					<fpage>191</fpage>
					<lpage>198</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>Baldin, S. R.; Millen, D. D.; Martins, C. L.; Pereira, A. S. C.; Barducci, R. S. and Arrigoti, M. B. 2013. Feedlot performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Nellore and Canchim bulls feed diets supplemented with vitamins D and E. Acta Scientiarium Animal Science 35:403-410.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Baldin</surname>
							<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Millen</surname>
							<given-names>D. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Martins</surname>
							<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pereira</surname>
							<given-names>A. S. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barducci</surname>
							<given-names>R. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Arrigoti</surname>
							<given-names>M. B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Feedlot performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Nellore and Canchim bulls feed diets supplemented with vitamins D and E</article-title>
					<source>Acta Scientiarium Animal Science</source>
					<volume>35</volume>
					<fpage>403</fpage>
					<lpage>410</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Banskalieva, V.; Sahlu, T. and Goetsch, A. L. 2000. Fatty acid composition of goat muscles and fat depots: a review. Small Ruminant Research 37:255-268.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Banskalieva</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sahlu</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Goetsch</surname>
							<given-names>A. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Fatty acid composition of goat muscles and fat depots: a review</article-title>
					<source>Small Ruminant Research</source>
					<volume>37</volume>
					<fpage>255</fpage>
					<lpage>268</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Bligh, E. G. and Dyer, W. J. 1959. A rapid method for total lipid extraction and purification. Candian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology 37:911-917.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bligh</surname>
							<given-names>E. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dyer</surname>
							<given-names>W. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1959</year>
					<article-title>A rapid method for total lipid extraction and purification</article-title>
					<source>Candian Journal of Biochemistry and Physiology</source>
					<volume>37</volume>
					<fpage>911</fpage>
					<lpage>917</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Boggs, D. L. and Merkel, R. A. 1981Live animal: carcass evaluation and selection manual. Michigan State University, Iowa. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Boggs</surname>
							<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Merkel</surname>
							<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1981</year>
					<source>Live animal: carcass evaluation and selection manual</source>
					<publisher-name>Michigan State University</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Iowa</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Bressan, M. C.; Jardim, N. S.; Perez, J. R. O.; Tomazini, M.; Lemos, A. L. S. C.; Oda, S. H. I.; Pisa, A. C. C.; Vieira, J. O.; Faria, P. B. and Freitas, R. T. F. 2004. Influência do sexo e faixas de peso ao abate nas características físico-químicas da carne de capivara. Ciência e Tecnologia dos Alimentos 24:357-362.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bressan</surname>
							<given-names>M. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jardim</surname>
							<given-names>N. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Perez</surname>
							<given-names>J. R. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tomazini</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lemos</surname>
							<given-names>A. L. S. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oda</surname>
							<given-names>S. H. I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pisa</surname>
							<given-names>A. C. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vieira</surname>
							<given-names>J. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Faria</surname>
							<given-names>P. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Freitas</surname>
							<given-names>R. T. F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Influência do sexo e faixas de peso ao abate nas características físico-químicas da carne de capivara</article-title>
					<source>Ciência e Tecnologia dos Alimentos</source>
					<volume>24</volume>
					<fpage>357</fpage>
					<lpage>362</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Castilho, C.; Pereira, V.; Abuelo, A. and Hernández, J. 2013. Effect of Supplementation with Antioxidants on the Quality of Bovine Milk and Meat Production. The Scientific World Journal 2013:1-8.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Castilho</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pereira</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Abuelo</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hernández</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Effect of Supplementation with Antioxidants on the Quality of Bovine Milk and Meat Production</article-title>
					<source>The Scientific World Journal</source>
					<volume>2013</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>8</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Comparin, M. A. S.; Morais, M. G.; Alves, F. V.; Coutinho, M. A. S.; Fernandes, H. J.; Feijó, G. L. D.; Oliveira, L. O. F. and Coelho, R. G. 2013. Desempenho, características qualitativas da carcaça e da carne de novilhas Brangus suplementadas em pastagem recebendo diferentes aditivos nutricionais. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal 14:574-586.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Comparin</surname>
							<given-names>M. A. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Morais</surname>
							<given-names>M. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Alves</surname>
							<given-names>F. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Coutinho</surname>
							<given-names>M. A. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fernandes</surname>
							<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Feijó</surname>
							<given-names>G. L. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>L. O. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Coelho</surname>
							<given-names>R. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Desempenho, características qualitativas da carcaça e da carne de novilhas Brangus suplementadas em pastagem recebendo diferentes aditivos nutricionais</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal</source>
					<volume>14</volume>
					<fpage>574</fpage>
					<lpage>586</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Cooke, D. W. I.; Monahan, F. J.; Brophy, P. O. and Boland, M. P. 2004. Comparison of concentrates or concentrates plus forages in a total mixed ration or discrete ingredient format: effects on beef production parameters and on beef composition, colour, texture and fatty acid profile. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 43:201-216.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Cooke</surname>
							<given-names>D. W. I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Monahan</surname>
							<given-names>F. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brophy</surname>
							<given-names>P. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Boland</surname>
							<given-names>M. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Comparison of concentrates or concentrates plus forages in a total mixed ration or discrete ingredient format: effects on beef production parameters and on beef composition, colour, texture and fatty acid profile</article-title>
					<source>Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research</source>
					<volume>43</volume>
					<fpage>201</fpage>
					<lpage>216</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Costa, E. C.; Restle, J.; Brondani, I. L.; Perottoni, J.; Faturi, C. and Menezes, L. F. G. 2002. Composição física da carcaça, qualidade da carne e conteúdo de colesterol no músculo <italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> de novilhos Red Angus superprecoces, terminados em confinamento e abatidos com diferentes pesosRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia 31:417-428.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Costa</surname>
							<given-names>E. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Restle</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brondani</surname>
							<given-names>I. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Perottoni</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Faturi</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Menezes</surname>
							<given-names>L. F. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2002</year>
					<article-title>Composição física da carcaça, qualidade da carne e conteúdo de colesterol no músculo Longissimus dorsi de novilhos Red Angus superprecoces, terminados em confinamento e abatidos com diferentes pesos</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>31</volume>
					<fpage>417</fpage>
					<lpage>428</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Elmore, J. S.; Warren, H. E.; Mottram, D. S.; Scolan, N.D.; Enser, M.; Richardson, R. I.; Wood, J. D. 2004. A comparison of the aroma volatiles and fatty acid compositions of grilled beef muscle from Aberdeen Angus and Holstein-Friesian steers fed diets based on silage or concentrates. Meat Science 68:27-33.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Elmore</surname>
							<given-names>J. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Warren</surname>
							<given-names>H. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mottram</surname>
							<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Scolan</surname>
							<given-names>N.D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Enser</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Richardson</surname>
							<given-names>R. I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wood</surname>
							<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>A comparison of the aroma volatiles and fatty acid compositions of grilled beef muscle from Aberdeen Angus and Holstein-Friesian steers fed diets based on silage or concentrates</article-title>
					<source>Meat Science</source>
					<volume>68</volume>
					<fpage>27</fpage>
					<lpage>33</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Enser, M.; Hallett, K.; Hewitt, B.; Fursey, G. A. J. and Wood, J. D. 1996. Fatty acid content and composition of English beef, lamb and pork at retail. Meat Science 42:443-456.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Enser</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hallett</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hewitt</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fursey</surname>
							<given-names>G. A. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wood</surname>
							<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1996</year>
					<article-title>Fatty acid content and composition of English beef, lamb and pork at retail</article-title>
					<source>Meat Science</source>
					<volume>42</volume>
					<fpage>443</fpage>
					<lpage>456</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Fernandes, A. R. M.; Sampaio, A. A. M.; Henrique, W.; Oliveira, E. A.; Oliveira, R. V. and Leonel, F. R. 2009. Composição em ácidos graxos e qualidade da carne de tourinhos Nelore e Canchim alimentados com dietas à base de cana-de-açúcar e dois níveis de concentrado. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38:328-337.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Fernandes</surname>
							<given-names>A. R. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sampaio</surname>
							<given-names>A. A. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Henrique</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>E. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>R. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leonel</surname>
							<given-names>F. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Composição em ácidos graxos e qualidade da carne de tourinhos Nelore e Canchim alimentados com dietas à base de cana-de-açúcar e dois níveis de concentrado</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>38</volume>
					<fpage>328</fpage>
					<lpage>337</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Field, R. A. 1971. Effect of castration on meat quality and quantity. Journal of Animal Science 32:849-856.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Field</surname>
							<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1971</year>
					<article-title>Effect of castration on meat quality and quantity</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>32</volume>
					<fpage>849</fpage>
					<lpage>856</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Folch, J.; Lees, M. and Stanley, G. H. S. 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 226:497-509.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Folch</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lees</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stanley</surname>
							<given-names>G. H. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1957</year>
					<article-title>A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues</article-title>
					<source>The Journal of Biological Chemistry</source>
					<volume>226</volume>
					<fpage>497</fpage>
					<lpage>509</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Freitas, A. K.; Restle, J.; Pacheco, P. S.; Padua, J. T.; Lage, M. E.; Miyagi, E. S. and Silva, G. F. R. 2008. Características de carcaças de bovinos Nelore inteiros vs castrados em duas idades, terminados em confinamento. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37:1055-1062.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Freitas</surname>
							<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Restle</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pacheco</surname>
							<given-names>P. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Padua</surname>
							<given-names>J. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lage</surname>
							<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Miyagi</surname>
							<given-names>E. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>G. F. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Características de carcaças de bovinos Nelore inteiros vs castrados em duas idades, terminados em confinamento</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>37</volume>
					<fpage>1055</fpage>
					<lpage>1062</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>French, P.; O´Riordan, E. G.; Monahan, F. J.; Caffrey, P. J. and Moloney, A. P. 2003. Fatty acid composition of intra-muscular triacylglycerols of steers fed autumn grass and concentrates. Livestock Production Science 81:307-317.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>French</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>O´Riordan</surname>
							<given-names>E. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Monahan</surname>
							<given-names>F. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Caffrey</surname>
							<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Moloney</surname>
							<given-names>A. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<article-title>Fatty acid composition of intra-muscular triacylglycerols of steers fed autumn grass and concentrates</article-title>
					<source>Livestock Production Science</source>
					<volume>81</volume>
					<fpage>307</fpage>
					<lpage>317</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Halliwell, B. 1999. Vitamin C: poison, prophylactic or panacea? Trends in Biochemical Science 24:255-257. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Halliwell</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1999</year>
					<article-title>Vitamin C: poison, prophylactic or panacea?</article-title>
					<source>Trends in Biochemical Science</source>
					<volume>24</volume>
					<fpage>255</fpage>
					<lpage>257</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>Hankins, O. G. and Howe, P. E. 1946Estimation of the composition of beef carcasses and cuts. Agriculture Handbook No. 926. ARS-USDA, Washington, D.C., USA.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hankins</surname>
							<given-names>O. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Howe</surname>
							<given-names>P. E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1946</year>
					<source>Estimation of the composition of beef carcasses and cuts. Agriculture Handbook No. 926</source>
					<publisher-name>ARS-USDA</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, D.C., USA</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation>Hartman, L. and Lago, R. C. A. 1973. Rapid preparation of fatty acid methyl esters from lipids. Laboratory Practice 22:475-476.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hartman</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lago</surname>
							<given-names>R. C. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1973</year>
					<article-title>Rapid preparation of fatty acid methyl esters from lipids</article-title>
					<source>Laboratory Practice</source>
					<volume>22</volume>
					<fpage>475</fpage>
					<lpage>476</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation>Hayes, J. E.; Stepanyan, V.; Allen, P.; O'Grady, M. N.; O'Brien, N. M. and Kerry, J. P. 2009. The effect of lutein, sesamol, ellagic acid and olive leaf extract on lipid oxidation and oxymyoglobin oxidation in bovine and porcine muscle model systems. Meat Science 83:201-208.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hayes</surname>
							<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stepanyan</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Allen</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>O'Grady</surname>
							<given-names>M. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>O'Brien</surname>
							<given-names>N. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kerry</surname>
							<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>The effect of lutein, sesamol, ellagic acid and olive leaf extract on lipid oxidation and oxymyoglobin oxidation in bovine and porcine muscle model systems</article-title>
					<source>Meat Science</source>
					<volume>83</volume>
					<fpage>201</fpage>
					<lpage>208</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation>Heinemann, R. J. B.; Pinto M. F. and Romanelli, P. F. 2003. Fatores que influenciam a textura da carne de novilhos Nelore e cruzados Limousin-Nelore. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 38:963-971.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Heinemann</surname>
							<given-names>R. J. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pinto</surname>
							<given-names>M. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Romanelli</surname>
							<given-names>P. F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<article-title>Fatores que influenciam a textura da carne de novilhos Nelore e cruzados Limousin-Nelore</article-title>
					<source>Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira</source>
					<volume>38</volume>
					<fpage>963</fpage>
					<lpage>971</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation>Igarasi, M. S.; Arrigoni, M. B.; Hadlich, J. C.; Silveira, A. C.; Martins, C. L. and Oliveira, H. N. 2008. Características de carcaça e parâmetros de qualidade de carne de bovinos jovens alimentados com grãos úmidos de milho ou sorgo. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 37:520-528. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Igarasi</surname>
							<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Arrigoni</surname>
							<given-names>M. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hadlich</surname>
							<given-names>J. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silveira</surname>
							<given-names>A. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Martins</surname>
							<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oliveira</surname>
							<given-names>H. N.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<article-title>Características de carcaça e parâmetros de qualidade de carne de bovinos jovens alimentados com grãos úmidos de milho ou sorgo</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>37</volume>
					<fpage>520</fpage>
					<lpage>528</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation>Lawler, T. L.; Taylor, J. B.; Finley, J. W. and Caton, J. S. 2004. Effect of supranutritional and organically bond selenium on performance carcass characteristics, and selenium distribution in fishing beff steers. Journal of Animal Science 82:1488-1493.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lawler</surname>
							<given-names>T. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Taylor</surname>
							<given-names>J. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Finley</surname>
							<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Caton</surname>
							<given-names>J. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Effect of supranutritional and organically bond selenium on performance carcass characteristics, and selenium distribution in fishing beff steers</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>82</volume>
					<fpage>1488</fpage>
					<lpage>1493</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation>Lawrie, R. A. 2005. Ciência da carne. 6.ed. Artmed Editora, Porto Alegre. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lawrie</surname>
							<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<source>Ciência da carne</source>
					<edition>6</edition>
					<publisher-name>Artmed Editora</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Porto Alegre</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation>Li, P.; Wang, T.; Mao, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Niu, L.; Liang, R.; Zhu, L. and Luo, X. 2014. Effect of ultimate pH on postmortem myofibrillar protein degradation and meat quality characteristics of Chinese yellow crossbreed cattle. The Scientific World Journal 2014:1-8.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mao</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Niu</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liang</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhu</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Luo</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Effect of ultimate pH on postmortem myofibrillar protein degradation and meat quality characteristics of Chinese yellow crossbreed cattle</article-title>
					<source>The Scientific World Journal</source>
					<volume>2014</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>8</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation>Meirelles, R. L. 2009. Efeitos da suplementação se antioxidantes naturais em tecidos bovinos da raça Brangus. Thesis (D.Sc.). Universidade de São Paulo, Pirassununga.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="thesis">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Meirelles</surname>
							<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<source>Efeitos da suplementação se antioxidantes naturais em tecidos bovinos da raça Brangus</source>
					<comment content-type="degree">Thesis (D.Sc.)</comment>
					<publisher-name>Universidade de São Paulo</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Pirassununga</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<mixed-citation>Melton, S. L.; Amiri, M.; Davis, G. W. and Backus, W. R. 1982. Flavor and chemical characteristics of ground beef from grass, forage-grain, and grain-finished steers. Journal of Animal Science 55:77-87.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Melton</surname>
							<given-names>S. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Amiri</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Davis</surname>
							<given-names>G. W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Backus</surname>
							<given-names>W. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1982</year>
					<article-title>Flavor and chemical characteristics of ground beef from grass, forage-grain, and grain-finished steers</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>55</volume>
					<fpage>77</fpage>
					<lpage>87</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation>Menezes, M. D.; Curi, N.; Marques, J. J.; Mello, C. R. and Araújo, A. R. 2009. Levantamento pedológico e sistema de informações geográficas na avaliação do uso das terras em sub-bacia hidrográfica de minas gerais. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 33:1544-1553. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Menezes</surname>
							<given-names>M. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Curi</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Marques</surname>
							<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mello</surname>
							<given-names>C. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Araújo</surname>
							<given-names>A. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Levantamento pedológico e sistema de informações geográficas na avaliação do uso das terras em sub-bacia hidrográfica de minas gerais</article-title>
					<source>Ciência e Agrotecnologia</source>
					<volume>33</volume>
					<fpage>1544</fpage>
					<lpage>1553</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<mixed-citation>Mensink, R. P. and Katan, M. B. 1992. Effect of dietary fatty acids on serum lipids and lipoproteins. A meta-analysis of 27 trials. Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis 12:911-919.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Mensink</surname>
							<given-names>R. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Katan</surname>
							<given-names>M. B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1992</year>
					<article-title>Effect of dietary fatty acids on serum lipids and lipoproteins. A meta-analysis of 27 trials</article-title>
					<source>Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis</source>
					<volume>12</volume>
					<fpage>911</fpage>
					<lpage>919</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation>Muchenje, V.; Dzama, K.; Chimonyo, M.; Strydom, P. E.; Hugo, A. and Roats, J. G. 2009. Some biochemical aspects pertaining to beef eating quality and consumer health: a review. Food Chemistry 112:270-289.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Muchenje</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dzama</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chimonyo</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Strydom</surname>
							<given-names>P. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hugo</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Roats</surname>
							<given-names>J. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Some biochemical aspects pertaining to beef eating quality and consumer health: a review</article-title>
					<source>Food Chemistry</source>
					<volume>112</volume>
					<fpage>270</fpage>
					<lpage>289</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation>Müller, L. 1987. Normas para avaliação de carcaças e concurso de carcaças de novilhos 2nd ed. Imprensa Universitária, Santa Maria. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Müller</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1987</year>
					<source>Normas para avaliação de carcaças e concurso de carcaças de novilhos</source>
					<edition>2nd</edition>
					<publisher-name>Imprensa Universitária</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Santa Maria</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B35">
				<mixed-citation>Müller, L. and Primo, A. T. 1986. Influência do regime alimentar no crescimento e terminação de bovinos e na qualidade da carcaça. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 21:445-452. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Müller</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Primo</surname>
							<given-names>A. T.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1986</year>
					<article-title>Influência do regime alimentar no crescimento e terminação de bovinos e na qualidade da carcaça</article-title>
					<source>Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira</source>
					<volume>21</volume>
					<fpage>445</fpage>
					<lpage>452</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B36">
				<mixed-citation>NRC - National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. 7th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>NRC - National Research Council</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2001</year>
					<source>Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle</source>
					<edition>7th</edition>
					<publisher-name>National Academy Press</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, D.C</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B37">
				<mixed-citation>O'Grady, M. N.; Monahan, F. J.; Mooney, M. T.; Butler, F.; Buckley, D. J. and Kerry, J. 1996. Inhibition of oxymyoglobin oxidation by vitamin E. p.100-101. In: Proceedings of the 42th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology. Lillehammer, Norway. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>O'Grady</surname>
							<given-names>M. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Monahan</surname>
							<given-names>F. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mooney</surname>
							<given-names>M. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Butler</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Buckley</surname>
							<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kerry</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1996</year>
					<chapter-title>Inhibition of oxymyoglobin oxidation by vitamin E. p.100-101</chapter-title>
					<source>Proceedings of the 42th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology</source>
					<publisher-name>Lillehammer</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Norway</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B38">
				<mixed-citation>Pedreira, A. C. M. S.; Luchiari Filho, A.; Leite, V. B. O. and Carvalho, M. H. 2003. Quality characteristics of <italic>Longissimus dorsi</italic> muscle from <italic>Bos indicus</italic> animals treated with vitamin D3. Scientia Agricola 60:637-642.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pedreira</surname>
							<given-names>A. C. M. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Luchiari</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
							<suffix>Filho</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leite</surname>
							<given-names>V. B. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Carvalho</surname>
							<given-names>M. H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<article-title>Quality characteristics of Longissimus dorsi muscle from Bos indicus animals treated with vitamin D3</article-title>
					<source>Scientia Agricola</source>
					<volume>60</volume>
					<fpage>637</fpage>
					<lpage>642</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B39">
				<mixed-citation>Pinho, A. P. S.; Barcellos, J. O. J.; Peripolli, V.; Kindlein, L.; Araújo, J. R. and Alves Filho, D. C. 2011. Perfil lipídico da gordura intramuscular de cortes e marcas comerciais de carne bovina. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 40:1134-1142. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pinho</surname>
							<given-names>A. P. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barcellos</surname>
							<given-names>J. O. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Peripolli</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kindlein</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Araújo</surname>
							<given-names>J. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Alves</surname>
							<given-names>D. C.</given-names>
							<suffix>Filho</suffix>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Perfil lipídico da gordura intramuscular de cortes e marcas comerciais de carne bovina</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>40</volume>
					<fpage>1134</fpage>
					<lpage>1142</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B40">
				<mixed-citation>Purchas, R. W. 1990. An assessment of the role of pH differences in determining the relative tenderness of meat from bulls and steers. Meat Science 27:129-140.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Purchas</surname>
							<given-names>R. W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1990</year>
					<article-title>An assessment of the role of pH differences in determining the relative tenderness of meat from bulls and steers</article-title>
					<source>Meat Science</source>
					<volume>27</volume>
					<fpage>129</fpage>
					<lpage>140</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B41">
				<mixed-citation>Razook, A. G.; Figueiredo, L. A.; Ruggieri, A. C.; Nardon, R. F. and Cyrillo, J. N. S. G. 2002. Desempenho em pastagens e características de carcaça da 16ª progênie dos rebanhos Nelore, Guzerá e Caracu de Sertãozinho (SP). Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 31:1367-1377. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Razook</surname>
							<given-names>A. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Figueiredo</surname>
							<given-names>L. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ruggieri</surname>
							<given-names>A. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nardon</surname>
							<given-names>R. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cyrillo</surname>
							<given-names>J. N. S. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2002</year>
					<article-title>Desempenho em pastagens e características de carcaça da 16ª progênie dos rebanhos Nelore, Guzerá e Caracu de Sertãozinho (SP)</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>31</volume>
					<fpage>1367</fpage>
					<lpage>1377</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B42">
				<mixed-citation>Restle, J.; Cerdótes, L.; Vaz, F. N. and Brondani, I. L. 2001.Características de Carcaça e da Carne de Novilhas Charolês e 3/4 Charolês 1/4 Nelore, Terminadas em Confinamento. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 30:1065-1075.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Restle</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cerdótes</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vaz</surname>
							<given-names>F. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brondani</surname>
							<given-names>I. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2001</year>
					<article-title>Características de Carcaça e da Carne de Novilhas Charolês e 3/4 Charolês 1/4 Nelore, Terminadas em Confinamento</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>30</volume>
					<fpage>1065</fpage>
					<lpage>1075</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B43">
				<mixed-citation>Ribeiro, E. L. A.; Hernandez, J. A.; Zanella, E. L.; Shimokomaki, M.; Prudêncio-Ferreira, S. H.; Youssef, E.; Ribeiro, H. J.; Bogden, R. and Reeves, J. J. 2004. Growth and carcass characteristics of pasture fed LHRH immunocastrated, castrated and intact <italic>Bos indicus</italic> bulls. Meat Science 68:285-290.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
							<given-names>E. L. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hernandez</surname>
							<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zanella</surname>
							<given-names>E. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Shimokomaki</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Prudêncio-Ferreira</surname>
							<given-names>S. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Youssef</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
							<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bogden</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Reeves</surname>
							<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Growth and carcass characteristics of pasture fed LHRH immunocastrated, castrated and intact Bos indicus bulls</article-title>
					<source>Meat Science</source>
					<volume>68</volume>
					<fpage>285</fpage>
					<lpage>290</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B44">
				<mixed-citation>Roça, R. O. 2000. Tecnologia da carne e produtos derivados. Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, UNESP, Botucatu.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Roça</surname>
							<given-names>R. O.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<source>Tecnologia da carne e produtos derivados</source>
					<publisher-name>Faculdade de Ciências Agronômicas, UNESP</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Botucatu</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B45">
				<mixed-citation>Rodrigues, V. C. and Andrade, I. F. 2004. Qualidade de carne de búfalos e bovinos castrados e inteiros. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 33:1839-1849.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rodrigues</surname>
							<given-names>V. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Andrade</surname>
							<given-names>I. F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Qualidade de carne de búfalos e bovinos castrados e inteiros</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>33</volume>
					<fpage>1839</fpage>
					<lpage>1849</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B46">
				<mixed-citation>Rubiano, G. A. G.; Arrigoni, M. D. B.; Martins, C. L.; Rodrigues, E.; Gonçalves, H. C. and Angerami, C. N. 2009. Desempenho, características de carcaça e qualidade da carne de bovinos superprecoces das raças Canchim, Nelore e seus mestiços. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38:2490-2498.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rubiano</surname>
							<given-names>G. A. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Arrigoni</surname>
							<given-names>M. D. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Martins</surname>
							<given-names>C. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rodrigues</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gonçalves</surname>
							<given-names>H. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Angerami</surname>
							<given-names>C. N.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Desempenho, características de carcaça e qualidade da carne de bovinos superprecoces das raças Canchim, Nelore e seus mestiços</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>38</volume>
					<fpage>2490</fpage>
					<lpage>2498</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B47">
				<mixed-citation>Saffle, R. L. and Bratzler, L. J. 1959. The effect of fatness on some processing and palatability characteristics of pork carcasses. Food Technology 13:236-239.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Saffle</surname>
							<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bratzler</surname>
							<given-names>L. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1959</year>
					<article-title>The effect of fatness on some processing and palatability characteristics of pork carcasses</article-title>
					<source>Food Technology</source>
					<volume>13</volume>
					<fpage>236</fpage>
					<lpage>239</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B48">
				<mixed-citation>Sañudo, C.; Enser, M. E.; Campo, M. M.; Nute, G. R.; María, G.; Sierra, I. and Wood, J. D. 2000. Fatty acid composition and sensory characteristics of lamb carcasses from Britain and Spain. Meat Science 54:339-346.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sañudo</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Enser</surname>
							<given-names>M. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Campo</surname>
							<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nute</surname>
							<given-names>G. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>María</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sierra</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wood</surname>
							<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Fatty acid composition and sensory characteristics of lamb carcasses from Britain and Spain</article-title>
					<source>Meat Science</source>
					<volume>54</volume>
					<fpage>339</fpage>
					<lpage>346</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B49">
				<mixed-citation>Sestari, B. B.; Mizubuti, I. Y.; Ribeiro, E. L. A.; Barbosa, M. A. A. F.; Pereira, E. S.; Pinto, A. P.; Cunha, G. E.; Gomes, R. C.; Massaro Junior, F. L. and Rosolem, C. P. 2012. Carcass characteristics, non-carcass components and meat quality of Nelore cattle in a feedlot and fed with different corn hybrids. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 33:3389-3400.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sestari</surname>
							<given-names>B. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mizubuti</surname>
							<given-names>I. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
							<given-names>E. L. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barbosa</surname>
							<given-names>M. A. A. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pereira</surname>
							<given-names>E. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pinto</surname>
							<given-names>A. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cunha</surname>
							<given-names>G. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gomes</surname>
							<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Massaro</surname>
							<given-names>F. L.</given-names>
							<suffix>Junior</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rosolem</surname>
							<given-names>C. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Carcass characteristics, non-carcass components and meat quality of Nelore cattle in a feedlot and fed with different corn hybrids</article-title>
					<source>Semina: Ciências Agrárias</source>
					<volume>33</volume>
					<fpage>3389</fpage>
					<lpage>3400</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B50">
				<mixed-citation>Shackelford, S. D.; Koohmaraie, M.; Cundiff, L.V.; Gregory, K. E.; Rohrer, G. A. and Savell, J. W. 1994. Heritabilities and phenotypic and genetic correlations for bovine post rigor calpastatin activity, intramuscular fat content, Warner-Bratzler shear force, retail product yield, and growth rate. Journal of Animal Science 72:857-863.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Shackelford</surname>
							<given-names>S. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Koohmaraie</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cundiff</surname>
							<given-names>L.V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gregory</surname>
							<given-names>K. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rohrer</surname>
							<given-names>G. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Savell</surname>
							<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1994</year>
					<article-title>Heritabilities and phenotypic and genetic correlations for bovine post rigor calpastatin activity, intramuscular fat content, Warner-Bratzler shear force, retail product yield, and growth rate</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>72</volume>
					<fpage>857</fpage>
					<lpage>863</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B51">
				<mixed-citation>Souza, A. R. D. L.; Medeiros, S. R.; Morais, M. G.; Oshiro, M. M. and Torres Júnior, R. A. A. 2009. Dieta com alto teor de gordura e desempenho de tourinhos de grupos genéticos diferentes em confinamento. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 44:746-753.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Souza</surname>
							<given-names>A. R. D. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Medeiros</surname>
							<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Morais</surname>
							<given-names>M. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oshiro</surname>
							<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Torres</surname>
							<given-names>R. A. A.</given-names>
							<suffix>Júnior</suffix>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Dieta com alto teor de gordura e desempenho de tourinhos de grupos genéticos diferentes em confinamento</article-title>
					<source>Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira</source>
					<volume>44</volume>
					<fpage>746</fpage>
					<lpage>753</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B52">
				<mixed-citation>Vaz, F. N. and Restle, J. 2000. Aspectos qualitativos da carcaça e da carne de machos Hereford, não-castrados ou castrados, abatidos aos quatorze meses. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 29:1894-1901. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Vaz</surname>
							<given-names>F. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Restle</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Aspectos qualitativos da carcaça e da carne de machos Hereford, não-castrados ou castrados, abatidos aos quatorze meses</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>29</volume>
					<fpage>1894</fpage>
					<lpage>1901</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B53">
				<mixed-citation>Vaz, F. N.; Restle, J.; Quadros, A. R. B.; Pascoal, L. L.; Sanchez, L. M. B.; Rosa, J. R. B. and Menezes, L. F. G. 2002. Características da carcaça e da carne de novilhos e de vacas de descarte Hereford, terminados em confinamentoRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia 31:1501-1510.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Vaz</surname>
							<given-names>F. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Restle</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Quadros</surname>
							<given-names>A. R. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pascoal</surname>
							<given-names>L. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sanchez</surname>
							<given-names>L. M. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rosa</surname>
							<given-names>J. R. B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Menezes</surname>
							<given-names>L. F. G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2002</year>
					<article-title>Características da carcaça e da carne de novilhos e de vacas de descarte Hereford, terminados em confinamento</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>31</volume>
					<fpage>1501</fpage>
					<lpage>1510</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B54">
				<mixed-citation>Voisinet, B. D.; Grandin, T.; O'Connor, S. F.; Tatum, J. D. and Dessing, M. J. 1997. Bos indicus cross feedlot cattle with excitable temperaments have tougher meat and a higher incidence of borderline dark cutters. Meat Science 46:367-377.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Voisinet</surname>
							<given-names>B. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Grandin</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>O'Connor</surname>
							<given-names>S. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tatum</surname>
							<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dessing</surname>
							<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<article-title>Bos indicus cross feedlot cattle with excitable temperaments have tougher meat and a higher incidence of borderline dark cutters</article-title>
					<source>Meat Science</source>
					<volume>46</volume>
					<fpage>367</fpage>
					<lpage>377</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B55">
				<mixed-citation>Williams, J. E.; Wagner, D. J.; Walters, L. E.; Horn, G. W.; Waller, G. R.; Sims, P. L. and Guenther, J. J. 1983. Effect of production systems on performance, body composition and lipid and mineral profiles of soft tissue in cattle. Journal of Animal Science 57:1020-1027.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Williams</surname>
							<given-names>J. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wagner</surname>
							<given-names>D. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Walters</surname>
							<given-names>L. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Horn</surname>
							<given-names>G. W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Waller</surname>
							<given-names>G. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sims</surname>
							<given-names>P. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Guenther</surname>
							<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1983</year>
					<article-title>Effect of production systems on performance, body composition and lipid and mineral profiles of soft tissue in cattle</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Animal Science</source>
					<volume>57</volume>
					<fpage>1020</fpage>
					<lpage>1027</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>