<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" specific-use="sps-1.5" xml:lang="en"
	xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rbz</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">R. Bras.
					Zootec.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">1516-3598</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">1806-9290</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1806-92902017000200005</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Non-Ruminants</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Effects of carob (<bold>
						<italic>Ceratonia siliqua</italic>
					</bold> ) pod byproduct on quail performance, egg characteristics, fatty acids,
					and cholesterol levels</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Calislar</surname>
						<given-names>Suleyman</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup>
					</xref>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1"><sup>*</sup>
					</xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Kaplan</surname>
						<given-names>Yusuf</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup>
					</xref>
				</contrib>
				<aff id="aff1">
					<label>1</label>
					<institution content-type="original"> Kahramanmaraş Sutcu Imam University,
						Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Animal Science,
						Kahramanmaraş,Turkey.</institution>
					<institution content-type="orgname">Kahramanmaraş Sutcu Imam University</institution>
					<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Faculty of Agriculture</institution>
					<institution content-type="orgdiv2">Department of Animal Science</institution>
					<addr-line>
						<named-content content-type="city">Kahramanmaraş</named-content>
					</addr-line>
					<country country="TR">Turkey</country></aff>
			</contrib-group>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c1">*Corresponding author: <email>scalislar@ksu.edu.tr</email>
				</corresp>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub">
				<month>02</month>
				<year>2017</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>46</volume>
			<issue>02</issue>
			<fpage>113</fpage>
			<lpage>117</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>08</day>
					<month>05</month>
					<year>2016</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>05</day>
					<month>10</month>
					<year>2016</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access"
					xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the
						Creative Commons Attribution License</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p>This study was carried out to determine the effects of a carob (<italic>Ceratonia
						siliqua</italic>) byproduct (CB) supplement in diets for laying Japanese
					quail (<italic>Coturnix coturnix japonica</italic>) on performance and egg
					internal-external quality traits, fatty acid profile, and cholesterol content. A
					total of 225 female quail at 12 weeks of age were distributed into five
					treatment groups with three replications (15 birds in each replication). The
					following treatments were tested: 0% (control, no CB supplementation); 3% CB; 5%
					CB; 10% CB; and 15% CB in the diets. Feed and water were provided <italic>ad
						libitum</italic> to quail. The lighting program was 16 h light and 8 h dark.
					The experiment lasted 60 days. Treatments had no significant effects on final
					weight, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, egg production, and mortality. The
					external egg quality characteristics, shape index, shell weight, shell
					thickness, albumen index, yolk index, yolk weight, yolk fat, yolk color, yolk
					cholesterol, stearic acid, oleic acid, and heptadecanoic acid concentrations
					were not significantly influenced by CB supplementation to quail diets. Haugh
					unit, egg yolk total saturated fatty acids, total mono or polyunsaturated fatty
					acids, linoleic acid, gamma linolenic acid, palmitic, and palmitoleic acid
					contents were significantly influenced by the treatments. Carob byproduct can be
					used up to 15% in laying quail diets without any negative effects on
					performance, mortality, or internal egg quality traits.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Key Words:</title>
				<kwd>egg yolk</kwd>
				<kwd>fatty acid profiles</kwd>
				<kwd>Japanese quail</kwd>
				<kwd>locust bean pod byproduct</kwd>
				<kwd>production parameters</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<funding-group>
				<award-group award-type="contract">
					<funding-source>Kahramanmaraş Sutcu Imam University</funding-source>
					<award-id>2013/2-14YLS</award-id>
				</award-group>
			</funding-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="0"/>
				<table-count count="5"/>
				<equation-count count="0"/>
				<ref-count count="29"/>
				<page-count count="5"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>Introduction</title>
			<p>Carob (<italic>Ceratonia siliqua</italic>) growing has been performed in the
				Mediterranean region for about 4,000 years. The world annual carob production is
				estimated at 310,000 t from approximately 200,000 ha (<xref ref-type="bibr"
					rid="B19">Makris and Kefalas, 2004</xref>). In Turkey, annual carob production
				is approximately 13,500 t, obtained from 354,000 carob trees (<xref ref-type="bibr"
					rid="B5">Biner et al., 2007</xref>).</p>
			<p>The carob seed contains approximately 40.8 mg g<sup>-1</sup> total phenol, 16.2 mg
					g<sup>-1</sup> condensed tannins, and 2.98 mg g<sup>-1</sup> hydrolyzed tannins
					(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Avallone et al., 1997</xref>). The sugar content
				in the carob fruit varies between 48 and 72% and the fruit is an important source of
				phenols, which have significant antioxidant powers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19"
					>Makris and Kefalas, 2004</xref>). Carobs have a gum content of 42 to 46%,
				mostly composed of natural galactomannan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25"
					>Saura-Calixto, 1987</xref>). </p>
			<p>Carob contains phenolic compounds such as gallic, syringic, and sinapic acid, being
				gallic acid the most abundant (1,550 mg g<sup>-1</sup> dry matter) (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ayaz et al., 2007</xref>). Carob is also rich in
				C18:1n-9 and C18:2n-6 fatty acids and contains 0.1041 mg g<sup>-1</sup> vitamin C
					(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gubbuk et al., 2010</xref>). However, carob
				byproducts have a high cellulose content and, therefore, they are restricted to up
				to 20% in poultry diets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Göhl, 1982</xref>).
				Nevertheless, supplementation of 6-9% of this ingredient in poultry diets may cause
				a decrease in protein and fat digestibility (13-30%) and an increase in jejunal
				sticky digesta (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ortiz et al., 2004</xref>). The
				apparent metabolic energy in geese was reported as 6.1 MJ/kg and the actual
				metabolizable energy as 6.6 MJ/kg. In goose diets, supplements up to 20% did not
				influence body weight, although 30% decreased both body weight and feed conversion
				ratio. Increasing carob pod ratios in diets decreased intestine (small, large, and
				caecum) length and gizzard weight in geese (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sahle et
					al., 1992</xref>).</p>
			<p>The present study was conducted to investigate the effects of carob pod supplement in
				quail diets on performance and egg internal-external quality traits, fatty acid
				profile, and cholesterol content.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>Material and Methods</title>
			<p>The experiment was conducted in Kahramanmaraş Province, Turkey. A total of 225
				twelve-week-old female Japanese quail (<italic>Coturnix coturnix japonica</italic>)
				were distributed into five treatment groups with three replications of 15 birds
				each. Treatments were arranged as follows: 0% (control, no carob byproduct (CB)
				supplementation); 3% CB; 5% CB; 10% CB; and 15% CB in the diets. Feed and water were
				provided <italic>ad libitum</italic> to quail. The lighting program was set as 16 h
				light and 8 h dark. The experiment lasted 60 days. </p>
			<p>Individual body weights of quail were determined at the beginning and end of the
				trial. Feed intake and feed conversion ratio of groups were determined weekly. Egg
				mass was calculated for the same week using egg weights and egg production rates
				(%). Daily egg production was recorded. Egg weight, egg internal and external
				quality traits (yolk weight, yolk color, Haugh unit, albumen index, yolk index,
				shape index, shell thickness, and shell weight), and egg yolk cholesterol were
				determined in the last week of the study. Mortality was recorded daily.</p>
			<p>Feed dry matter, crude protein (%) (total N in samples × 6.25), crude fat (%), crude
				ash (%), and crude fiber (%) analyses were carried out according to AOAC (2005).
				Starch content was determined by the polarimetric method, according to <xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Karabulut and Canbolat (2005</xref>). Total sugar
				content was determined through the method described by <xref ref-type="bibr"
					rid="B8">Dubois et al. (1956</xref>). The metabolizable energy value of CB used
				in the diets (kcal/kg) was calculated as follows: ME = 239 × [(0.1551 × crude
				protein) + (0.1669 × starch) + (0.3431 crude fat) + (0.13 × sugar)] (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Hartel, 1986</xref>) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1"
					>Tables 1</xref> and 2).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t1">
					<label>Table 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Analyzed nutrient content of carob pod byproducts </title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Nutrient</td>
								<td align="center">Amount (%)</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Dry matter </td>
								<td align="center">86.5</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Crude protein</td>
								<td align="center">4.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Crude fat</td>
								<td align="center">0.83</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Crude ash</td>
								<td align="center">3.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Starch</td>
								<td align="center">5.7</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Sugar</td>
								<td align="center">37.5</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Crude fiber</td>
								<td align="center">9.66</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Calcium</td>
								<td align="center">0.34</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Total phosphorus</td>
								<td align="center">0.089</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Metabolic energy (MJ/kg)<sup>1</sup></td>
								<td align="center">6.735</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN1">
							<label><sup>1</sup></label>
							<p> Metabolic energy was calculated according to <xref ref-type="bibr"
									rid="B11">Hartel (1986</xref>).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t2">
					<label>Table 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Composition and nutrient content of diets used in the
							experiment</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col span="4"/>
						</colgroup>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify" rowspan="2">Ingredient (%)</td>
								<td align="center" colspan="4">Carob pod byproduct level (%) </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">5</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">15</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Maize</td>
								<td align="center">46.58</td>
								<td align="center">40.76</td>
								<td align="center">37.20</td>
								<td align="center">30.30</td>
								<td align="center">24.14</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Full fat soybean</td>
								<td align="center">11.00</td>
								<td align="center">19.44</td>
								<td align="center">24.30</td>
								<td align="center">25.00</td>
								<td align="center">21.96</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Soybean seed meal</td>
								<td align="center">25.00</td>
								<td align="center">18.38</td>
								<td align="center">15.00</td>
								<td align="center">16.30</td>
								<td align="center">20.36</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Sunflower seed meal</td>
								<td align="center">4.10</td>
								<td align="center">5.00</td>
								<td align="center">5.00</td>
								<td align="center">3.40</td>
								<td align="center">2.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Carob pod byproduct</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">3.00</td>
								<td align="center">5.00</td>
								<td align="center">10.00</td>
								<td align="center">15.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Soybean oil</td>
								<td align="center">4.50</td>
								<td align="center">4.70</td>
								<td align="center">4.83</td>
								<td align="center">6.20</td>
								<td align="center">7.86</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Dicalcium phosphate</td>
								<td align="center">1.18</td>
								<td align="center">1.22</td>
								<td align="center">1.16</td>
								<td align="center">1.28</td>
								<td align="center">1.38</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Limestone</td>
								<td align="center">7.10</td>
								<td align="center">6.96</td>
								<td align="center">6.98</td>
								<td align="center">6.97</td>
								<td align="center">6.74</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Methionine</td>
								<td align="center">0.09</td>
								<td align="center">0.09</td>
								<td align="center">0.08</td>
								<td align="center">0.10</td>
								<td align="center">0.11</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Common salt</td>
								<td align="center">0.20</td>
								<td align="center">0.20</td>
								<td align="center">0.20</td>
								<td align="center">0.20</td>
								<td align="center">0.20</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Vitamin + mineral premix<sup>1</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.25</td>
								<td align="center">0.25</td>
								<td align="center">0.25</td>
								<td align="center">0.25</td>
								<td align="center">0.25</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Total (kg)</td>
								<td align="center">100</td>
								<td align="center">100</td>
								<td align="center">100</td>
								<td align="center">100</td>
								<td align="center">100</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Calculated nutrient composition </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Dry matter (%)</td>
								<td align="center">90.97</td>
								<td align="center">90.80</td>
								<td align="center">90.69</td>
								<td align="center">90.62</td>
								<td align="center">90.60</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Crude protein (%)</td>
								<td align="center">20.5</td>
								<td align="center">20.5</td>
								<td align="center">20.5</td>
								<td align="center">20.5</td>
								<td align="center">20.5</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Crude fat (%)</td>
								<td align="center">8.43</td>
								<td align="center">9.98</td>
								<td align="center">10.87</td>
								<td align="center">12.08</td>
								<td align="center">12.90</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Crude ash (%)</td>
								<td align="center">10.21</td>
								<td align="center">10.11</td>
								<td align="center">10.14</td>
								<td align="center">10.16</td>
								<td align="center">9.98</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Crude fiber (%)</td>
								<td align="center">3.59</td>
								<td align="center">3.93</td>
								<td align="center">4.06</td>
								<td align="center">4.19</td>
								<td align="center">4.37</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Calcium (%)<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">3.02</td>
								<td align="center">2.99</td>
								<td align="center">3.00</td>
								<td align="center">3.04</td>
								<td align="center">2.99</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Total phosphorus (%)<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.60</td>
								<td align="center">0.59</td>
								<td align="center">0.60</td>
								<td align="center">0.60</td>
								<td align="center">0.60</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Available phosphorus (%)<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.34</td>
								<td align="center">0.34</td>
								<td align="center">0.33</td>
								<td align="center">0.32</td>
								<td align="center">0.32</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Lysine (%)<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">1.11</td>
								<td align="center">1.11</td>
								<td align="center">1.11</td>
								<td align="center">1.14</td>
								<td align="center">1.16</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Methionine (%)<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.43</td>
								<td align="center">0.43</td>
								<td align="center">0.43</td>
								<td align="center">0.43</td>
								<td align="center">0.43</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Metabolizable energy (MJ/kg)<sup>3</sup></td>
								<td align="center">11.69</td>
								<td align="center">11.69</td>
								<td align="center">11.69</td>
								<td align="center">11.69</td>
								<td align="center">11.69</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN2">
							<label><sup>1</sup></label>
							<p> Each kg of diet contained: vitamin A, 12.000 IU; vitamin D3, 2000
								IU; vitamin E, 35 mg; vitamin K<sub>3</sub>, 5 IU; vitamin
									B<sub>1</sub>, 3 mg; vitamin B<sub>2</sub>, 6 mg; vitamin
									B<sub>6</sub>, 5 mg; vitamin B<sub>12</sub>, 0.015 mg; vitamin
								C, 50 mg; D-biotin, 0.045 mg; niacin, 20 mg; calcium D pantothenate,
								6 mg; folic acid, 0.75 mg; choline chloride, 12.5 mg; manganese, 80
								mg; iron, 60 mg; zinc, 60 mg; copper, 5 mg; iodine, 1 mg; cobalt,
								0.2 mg; selenium, 0.15 mg. canthaxanthin 15 mg; and
								ß-apo-8'-carotenoic acid ethyl ester, 5 mg.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN3">
							<label><sup>2</sup></label>
							<p> Calculated according to NRC (1994).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN4">
							<label><sup>3</sup></label>
							<p> Calculated according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Hartel
									(1986</xref>).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>In the egg yolk, fatty acid composition was determined according to IUPAC IID19
				(IUPAC, 1987). To determine yolk cholesterol levels, the egg was boiled in water and
				then the yolk was separated and homogenized. From these samples, 0.1 g was placed in
				a glass tube and mixed with 4 mL isopropyl alcohol (99.5% pure) and then read at a
				520-nm wavelength in a spectrophotometer (Spectra Max plus 384); the amount of
				cholesterol in the egg yolks was calculated using a formula proposed by Boehringer
				Mannheim Gmbh Biochemica (1989). </p>
			<p>Data were analyzed by the one-way ANOVA under the general linear model procedure of
				SAS computer software (Statistical Analysis System, version 9.1). The model included
				the CB level of diets. Means were separated using Duncan's multiple range tests. The
				results of statistical analysis were shown as mean values and standard error of the
				mean in the tables. Statistical significance was considered at P&lt;0.05.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results|discussion">
			<title>Results and Discussion</title>
			<p>There were no significant differences among the treatment groups in terms of final
				weight. There were no significant differences among the treated groups with regard
				to feed intake. The carob byproduct contains high levels of tannins (Alumot et al.,
				2006; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Karabulut et al., 2006</xref>), which can
				reduce feed intake and body weight of goat kid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26"
					>Silanikove et al., 2006</xref>). The sweet taste of the CB supplement may
				result in higher feed intake (Silanikove et al., 2006; <xref ref-type="bibr"
					rid="B17">Kotrotsios et al., 2010</xref>). In the current experiment, quail fed
				supplemented diets consumed more feed than the control group and this increased feed
				intake may have been a result of the sweet taste of the CB supplement (<xref
					ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). </p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t3">
					<label>Table 3</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Some performance values and mortality of quail fed diets containing
							different levels of carob pod byproduct</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col span="4"/>
							<col/>
							<col span="2"/>
						</colgroup>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="center" colspan="4">Carob pod byproduct level (%) </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center" colspan="2"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Parameter</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">5</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">15</td>
								<td align="center">SEM</td>
								<td align="center">P-value</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Initial weight (g)</td>
								<td align="center">263.6</td>
								<td align="center">263.4</td>
								<td align="center">265.3</td>
								<td align="center">265.1</td>
								<td align="center">263.6</td>
								<td align="center">16.25</td>
								<td align="center">0.95</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Final weight (g)</td>
								<td align="center">270.3</td>
								<td align="center">268.3</td>
								<td align="center">265.4</td>
								<td align="center">266.5</td>
								<td align="center">265.8</td>
								<td align="center">36.57</td>
								<td align="center">0.84</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Feed intake (g)</td>
								<td align="center">40.47</td>
								<td align="center">42.12</td>
								<td align="center">40.01</td>
								<td align="center">43.15</td>
								<td align="center">41.74</td>
								<td align="center">2.68</td>
								<td align="center">0.20</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Feed conversion ratio </td>
								<td align="center">3.30</td>
								<td align="center">3.28</td>
								<td align="center">3.16</td>
								<td align="center">3.47</td>
								<td align="center">3.20</td>
								<td align="center">0.01</td>
								<td align="center">0.09</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Mortality (%) </td>
								<td align="center">8.89</td>
								<td align="center">8.89</td>
								<td align="center">6.67</td>
								<td align="center">6.67</td>
								<td align="center">6.67</td>
								<td align="center">4.44</td>
								<td align="center">0.58</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN5">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the means.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>No significant differences were observed in feed conversion ratio of the treated
				groups. This result was similar to the report of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29"
					>Yıldırım and Kaya (2011</xref>), in which ground CB supplement in broiler diets
				did not affect feed conversion ratio of broiler at 28 to 35 days of age. The pulp of
				the CB also contains significant amount of tannin. The tannins in CB have a
				detrimental effect on the growth of goat kid; however, they have triglycerides and a
				cholesterol-lowering effect in blood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Silanikove et
					al., 2006</xref>). Yıldırım and Kaya (2011) determined that supplementation of
				0, 5, 10, and 20% CB decreased body weight gain, but increased feed intake and feed
				conversion ratio of broilers. In another experiment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24"
					>Sahle et al., 1992</xref>), despite the increase in feed intake of broiler and
				geese fed diets supplemented with carob, there was no decline in body weight or feed
				conversion ratio. There was no significant difference among treatments in terms of
				mortality rate (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>). </p>
			<p>The treatments did not have significant effects on egg production, cholesterol
				contents, external and internal egg characteristics such as egg weight, eggshell
				weight, thickness, albumen index, yolk index, egg shape index, egg yolk color, egg
				yolk weight, and yolk fat in the overall experimental period (P&gt;0.05). On the
				other hand, Haugh unit values of control and 3% CB-supplemented groups were lower
				than those of the other CB-supplemented groups (P&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="table"
					rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Silanikove et
					al. (2006</xref>) noted that CB contains condensed tannins, which may bind the
				dietary lipids in the gastro intestine and cause a hypocholesterolemic effect on the
				body. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Perez-Olleros et al. (1999</xref>) reported
				that CB is rich in cellulose, which may reduce total cholesterol and low-density
				lipoprotein in laboratory animals. This was not the case in the current experiment. </p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t4">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Some egg quality traits and yolk cholesterol content of quail fed
							different diets containing carob pod byproduct </title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col span="4"/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center" colspan="4">Carob pod byproduct level (%) </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Parameter</td>
								<td align="center">n</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">5</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">15</td>
								<td align="center">SEM</td>
								<td align="center">P-value</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">EP (%)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">73.67</td>
								<td align="center">72.80</td>
								<td align="center">72.13</td>
								<td align="center">74.67</td>
								<td align="center">73.27</td>
								<td align="center">27.29</td>
								<td align="center">0.98</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">EW (g)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">12.27</td>
								<td align="center">12.84</td>
								<td align="center">12.59</td>
								<td align="center">12.46</td>
								<td align="center">13.04</td>
								<td align="center">0.12</td>
								<td align="center"> 0.14</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ESW (g)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">1.84</td>
								<td align="center">1.90</td>
								<td align="center">1.73</td>
								<td align="center">1.68</td>
								<td align="center">1.72</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.09</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ST (mm)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">0.21</td>
								<td align="center">0.21</td>
								<td align="center">0.20</td>
								<td align="center">0.21</td>
								<td align="center">0.21</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.36</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">AI (%)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">3.56</td>
								<td align="center">3.64</td>
								<td align="center">3.42</td>
								<td align="center">3.48</td>
								<td align="center">3.31</td>
								<td align="center">0.02</td>
								<td align="center">0.16</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">YI (%)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">48.52</td>
								<td align="center">49.39</td>
								<td align="center">49.53</td>
								<td align="center">48.76</td>
								<td align="center">49.11</td>
								<td align="center">1.46</td>
								<td align="center">0.82</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ESI (%)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">75.93</td>
								<td align="center">78.19</td>
								<td align="center">78.20</td>
								<td align="center">77.14</td>
								<td align="center">77.48</td>
								<td align="center">1.95</td>
								<td align="center">0.31</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">CFV<sup>1</sup></td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">9.40</td>
								<td align="center">9.07</td>
								<td align="center">9.35</td>
								<td align="center">9.23</td>
								<td align="center">8.75</td>
								<td align="center">0.16</td>
								<td align="center">0.34</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">HU</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">90.13a</td>
								<td align="center">90.00a</td>
								<td align="center">88.17b</td>
								<td align="center">87.93b</td>
								<td align="center">87.90b</td>
								<td align="center">0.83</td>
								<td align="center">0.02</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">EYW (g)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">4.07</td>
								<td align="center">4.22</td>
								<td align="center">4.19</td>
								<td align="center">4.14</td>
								<td align="center">4.22</td>
								<td align="center">0.01</td>
								<td align="center">0.34</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">EYCF (%)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">30.77</td>
								<td align="center">28.72</td>
								<td align="center">29.43</td>
								<td align="center">29.72</td>
								<td align="center">30.35</td>
								<td align="center">1.01</td>
								<td align="center">0.19</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">EYC (mg)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">73.64</td>
								<td align="center">75.15</td>
								<td align="center">65.22</td>
								<td align="center">63.11</td>
								<td align="center">64.41</td>
								<td align="center">50.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.18</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN6">
							<p>EP - egg production; EW - egg weight; ESW - egg shell weight; ST -
								shell thickness; AI - albumen index; YI - yolk index; ESI - egg
								shape index; CFV - color fan value; HU - Haugh unit; EYW - egg yolk
								weight; EYCF - egg yolk crude fat; EYC - egg yolk cholesterol; SEM -
								standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN7">
							<label><sup>1</sup></label>
							<p> DSM Nutritional Products.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN8">
							<p>a,b - values with different letters in a row differ significantly
								(P&lt;0.05). </p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>There were no differences among groups in terms of yolk palmitic acid (C16:0),
				heptadecanoic acid (C17:0), stearic acid (C18:0), oleic acid (C18:1), and total
				unsaturated fatty acid concentrations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table
					5</xref>). Although there was a tendency of decrease in palmitic acid (C16:0),
				stearic acid and oleic acid (C18:1) concentrations in egg yolk with increasing CB
				supplementation, this decrease was not significant. A similar trend was observed in
				total saturated fatty acid and total monounsaturated content of egg yolk
				(P&lt;0.05). In addition, the palmitoleic acid (C16:1) concentration decreased with
				increasing CB supplementation ratios in diets and palmitoleic acid content of
				CB-supplemented groups was significantly lower than that of the control group. </p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t5">
					<label>Table 5</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Fatty acid content of egg yolk of Japanese quail fed diets containing
							different levels of carob pod byproduct</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col span="4"/>
							<col/>
							<col span="2"/>
						</colgroup>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center" colspan="4">Carob pod by-product level (%) </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center" colspan="2"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Parameter</td>
								<td align="center">n</td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">5</td>
								<td align="center">10</td>
								<td align="center">15</td>
								<td align="center">SEM </td>
								<td align="center">P-value</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Palmitic acid (C16:0)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">24.77</td>
								<td align="center">25.17</td>
								<td align="center">24.30</td>
								<td align="center">23.13</td>
								<td align="center">22.73</td>
								<td align="center">1.49</td>
								<td align="center">0.14</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Stearic acid (C18:0)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">8.04</td>
								<td align="center">8.20</td>
								<td align="center">7.55</td>
								<td align="center">8.13</td>
								<td align="center">7.91</td>
								<td align="center">0.53</td>
								<td align="center">0.75</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Oleic acid (C18:1)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">41.32</td>
								<td align="center">39.61</td>
								<td align="center">38.91</td>
								<td align="center">36.49</td>
								<td align="center">36.30</td>
								<td align="center">4.97</td>
								<td align="center">0.08</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Linoleic acid (C18:2)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">17.40c</td>
								<td align="center">20.69bc</td>
								<td align="center">22.81ab</td>
								<td align="center">24.37ab</td>
								<td align="center">26.02a</td>
								<td align="center">7.18</td>
								<td align="center">0.05</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Gamma linolenic acid (C18:3n6)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">0.79c</td>
								<td align="center">1.06bc</td>
								<td align="center">1.29ab</td>
								<td align="center">1.52a</td>
								<td align="center">1.54a</td>
								<td align="center">0.05</td>
								<td align="center">0.01</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Palmitoleic acid (C16:1)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">3.06a</td>
								<td align="center">2.14b</td>
								<td align="center">2.16b</td>
								<td align="center">1.43b</td>
								<td align="center">1.43b</td>
								<td align="center">0.15</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Heptadecanoic acid (C17:0)</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">0.16 </td>
								<td align="center">0.17</td>
								<td align="center">0.19</td>
								<td align="center">0.20</td>
								<td align="center">0.23</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.08</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Total saturated fatty acids</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">33.53ab</td>
								<td align="center">32.84a</td>
								<td align="center">30.68a</td>
								<td align="center">30.03b</td>
								<td align="center">30.27b</td>
								<td align="center">1.78</td>
								<td align="center">0.03</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Monounsaturated fatty acids</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">45.20a</td>
								<td align="center">42.61ab</td>
								<td align="center">42.04ab</td>
								<td align="center">38.79b</td>
								<td align="center">38.60b</td>
								<td align="center">6.17</td>
								<td align="center">0.04</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Polyunsaturated fatty acids</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">18.39c</td>
								<td align="center">22.05bc</td>
								<td align="center">24.45ab</td>
								<td align="center">26.19ab</td>
								<td align="center">27.89a</td>
								<td align="center">8.62</td>
								<td align="center">0.02</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">Total unsaturated fatty acids</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">63.59</td>
								<td align="center">64.66</td>
								<td align="center">66.49</td>
								<td align="center">64.98 </td>
								<td align="center">66.48</td>
								<td align="center">3.68</td>
								<td align="center">0.34</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN9">
							<p>a,b,c - values with different letters in a row differ
								significantly.</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN10">
							<p>SEM - standard error of the mean.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>The treatment had a significant (P&lt;0.05) effect on the linoleic acid content of
				yolk. The increase in linoleic acid of yolk is possibly associated with CB and
				soybean oil, which are very rich in linoleic acid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10"
					>Gubbuk et al., 2010</xref>).</p>
			<p>The gamma linolenic acid (C18:3n6) and total polyunsaturated fatty acid contents of
				egg yolk increased with increasing CB supplementation ratios in the diets
				(P&lt;0.05). The linoleic acid and gamma linolenic acid contents were the lowest in
				control group and the highest in 15% CB-supplemented group (<xref ref-type="table"
					rid="t5">Table 5</xref>). In the 15% CB-supplemented group, total
				polyunsaturated fatty acid contents were higher than in control and in 3%
				CB-supplemented groups.</p>
			<p>The gamma linolenic acid is promptly elongated into dihomo-gamma-linolenic acid,
				necessary for production of series 1 prostaglandins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12"
					>Horrobin, 1992</xref>). The linolenic acid obtained from the feed is initially
				converted into gamma linolenic acid and then to series 1 prostaglandins, which acts
				as an important anti-inflammatory agent in the body (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28"
					>Sprecher et al., 1995</xref>). In addition, the linolenic fatty acid is needed
				in the body for brain, skin, and bone health functions. Carob pod byproduct
				supplementation caused an increase in gamma linolenic fatty acid content of egg yolk
				and, therefore, it may be used to produce functional eggs. </p>
			<p>Moreover, the oleic fatty acid ratio of quail eggs was high because of the soy oil,
				which is a rich source of oleic acid. In a previous study, carob oleic acid
				(C18:1n9) content was reported as 42.92% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gubbuk et
					al., 2010</xref>). It was noted that when soy oil was supplemented in the feed,
				the egg yolk palmitic, stearic, and oleic fatty acid contents decreased (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Sim and Bragg, 1978</xref>). The effects of treatments
				on egg yolk oleic acid content were not significant. Decreasing oleic acid content
				was observed with increasing CB and soy oil supplementation ratios.</p>
			<p>There was a significant decrease in monounsaturated fatty acids of yolk with
				increasing level of CB supplementation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table
					5</xref>), despite the rather rich CB (45.68%) in monounsaturated fatty acids,
				whereas CB supplementation increased the polyunsaturated fatty acid concentration of
				yolk. In the current study, polyunsaturated fatty acid concentration of yolk ranged
				from 18.39 to 27.89%. The concentration of polyunsaturated fatty acid of yolk was
				considerably higher than that reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Choi et al.
					(2001</xref>), who found that the polyunsaturated fatty acid concentration of a
				normal egg was 12%. The differences between the two studies is possibly associated
				with the differences in chemical composition of diets used in the experiments (<xref
					ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>). </p>
			<p>The intake of polyunsaturated fatty acid has been reported to reduce the risk of
				atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lada and
					Rudel, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Jakobsen et al.,
				2009</xref>). It is well known that foods rich in omega 3 have great benefits for
				the human health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Mozaffarian and Wu, 2011</xref>).
				Therefore, the changes in yolk contents due to CB supplementation obtained in the
				present experiment may be important in the nutrition of people with cardiovascular
				disorders. </p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>Conclusions</title>
			<p>Supplementation of carob byproduct in diets has no detrimental effect on body weight,
				feed intake, egg internal and external quality traits, and some yolk fatty acid
				components of laying quail. Therefore, carob byproduct can be used in quail diets up
				to 15% as an inexpensive feed source. Supplementation of carob byproduct to quail
				diets may be an advantage for hyperglycemic poultry. However, the low protein and
				energy content of carob byproduct should be taken into consideration when included
				into quail diets.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ack>
			<title>Acknowledgments</title>
			<p>This study was supported by Directory of Scientific Research Projects, Kahramanmaraş
				Sutcu Imam University (project no. 2013/2-14YLS).</p>
		</ack>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>Alumot, E.; Nachtomi, E. and Bornstein, S. 2006. Low caloric value
					of carobs as the possible cause of growth depression in chicks. Journal of the
					Science of Food and Agriculture 15:259-265.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">Alumot, E.<name>
							<surname>Nachtomi</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bornstein</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Low caloric value of carobs as the possible cause of growth
						depression in chicks</article-title>
					<source>Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture</source>
					<volume>15</volume>
					<fpage>259</fpage>
					<lpage>265</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 2005. Official
					methods of analysis. 18th ed. Association Official Analytical Chemists,
					Gaitherburg, MD, USA.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>AOAC - Association of Official Analytical Chemists</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<source>Official methods of analysis</source>
					<edition>18th</edition>
					<publisher-name>Association Official Analytical Chemists</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Gaitherburg, MD, USA</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>Avallone, R.; Plessi, M.; Baraldi, M. and Monzani, A. 1997.
					Determination of chemical composition of carob (<italic>Ceratonia
						siliqua</italic>): Protein, fat, carbohydrates, and tannins. Journal of Food
					Composition and Analysis 10:166-172.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Avallone</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Plessi</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Baraldi</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Monzani</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<article-title>Determination of chemical composition of carob (Ceratonia
						siliqua): Protein, fat, carbohydrates, and tannins</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Food Composition and Analysis</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<fpage>166</fpage>
					<lpage>172</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>Ayaz, F. A.; Torun, H.; Ayaz, S.; Correia, P. J.; Alaiz, M.; Sanz,
					C.; Grúz, J. and Strnad, M. 2007. Determination of chemical composition of
					anatolian carob pod (<italic>Ceratonia siliqua</italic>): Sugars, amino and
					organic acids, minerals and phenolic compounds. Journal of Food Quality
					30:1040-1055.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ayaz</surname>
							<given-names>F. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Torun</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ayaz</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Correia</surname>
							<given-names>P. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Alaiz</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sanz</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Grúz</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Strnad</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Determination of chemical composition of anatolian carob pod
						(Ceratonia siliqua): Sugars, amino and organic acids, minerals and phenolic
						compounds</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Food Quality</source>
					<volume>30</volume>
					<fpage>1040</fpage>
					<lpage>1055</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Biner, B.; Gubbuk, H.; Karhan, M.; Aksu, M. and Pekmezci, M. 2007.
					Sugar profiles of the pods of cultivated and wild types of carob bean
						(<italic>Ceratonia siliqua</italic> L) in Turkey. Food Chemistry
					100:1453-1455.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Biner</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gubbuk</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Karhan</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Aksu</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pekmezci</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2007</year>
					<article-title>Sugar profiles of the pods of cultivated and wild types of carob
						bean (Ceratonia siliqua L.) in Turkey</article-title>
					<source>Food Chemistry</source>
					<volume>100</volume>
					<fpage>1453</fpage>
					<lpage>1455</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh Biochemica. 1989. Methods of biochemical
					analysis and food analysis. Mannheim, Germany. p.26-28.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>Boehringer Mannheim Gmbh Biochemica</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1989</year>
					<source>Methods of biochemical analysis and food analysis</source>
					<publisher-name>Mannheim</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Germany</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>26</fpage>
					<lpage>28</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Choi, S. H.; Song, K. T. and Oh, H. R. 2001. Cholesterol contents
					and fatty acid composition of chukar, pheasant, guinea fowl and quail egg Yolk.
					Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 14:831-836. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Choi</surname>
							<given-names>S. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Song</surname>
							<given-names>K. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Oh</surname>
							<given-names>H. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2001</year>
					<article-title>Cholesterol contents and fatty acid composition of chukar,
						pheasant, guinea fowl and quail egg Yolk</article-title>
					<source>Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences</source>
					<volume>14</volume>
					<fpage>831</fpage>
					<lpage>836</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Dubois, M.; Gilles, K. A.; Hamilton, J. K.; Rebers, P. A. and Smith,
					F. 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances.
					Analytical Chemistry 28:350-356.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Dubois</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gilles</surname>
							<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hamilton</surname>
							<given-names>J. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rebers</surname>
							<given-names>P. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Smith</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1956</year>
					<article-title>Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related
						substances</article-title>
					<source>Analytical Chemistry</source>
					<volume>28</volume>
					<fpage>350</fpage>
					<lpage>356</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Göhl, B. 1982. Les aliments du bétail sous les tropiques. FAO,
					Division de Production et Santé Animale, Roma, Italy.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Göhl</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1982</year>
					<source>Les aliments du bétail sous les tropiques</source>
					<publisher-name>FAO</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Division de Production et Santé Animale, Roma,
						Italy</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Gubbuk, H.; Kafkas, E.; Guven, D. and Gunes, E. 2010. Physical and
					phytochemical profile of wild and domesticated carob (<italic>Ceratonia
						siliqua</italic> L genotypes. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research
					8:1129-1136. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Gubbuk</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kafkas</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Guven</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gunes</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Physical and phytochemical profile of wild and domesticated carob
						(Ceratonia siliqua L.) genotypes</article-title>
					<source>Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<fpage>1129</fpage>
					<lpage>1136</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Hartel, H. 1986. Influence of food input and procedure of
					determination on metabolizable energy and digestibility of a diet measured with
					young and adult birds. British Poultry Science 27:11-39.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hartel</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1986</year>
					<article-title>Influence of food input and procedure of determination on
						metabolizable energy and digestibility of a diet measured with young and
						adult birds</article-title>
					<source>British Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>27</volume>
					<fpage>11</fpage>
					<lpage>39</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Horrobin, D. F. 1992. Nutritional and medical importance of
					gamma-linolenic acid. Progress in Lipid Research 31:163-194.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Horrobin</surname>
							<given-names>D. F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1992</year>
					<article-title>Nutritional and medical importance of gamma-linolenic
						acid</article-title>
					<source>Progress in Lipid Research</source>
					<volume>31</volume>
					<fpage>163</fpage>
					<lpage>194</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>IUPAC - International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry. 1987.
					IUPAC standard method 2.507. In: Standart methods for the analysis of oils, fats
					and derivatives. 7th ed. IUPAC IID19. The International Union of Pure and
					Applied Chemistry, Blackwell, Oxford.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>IUPAC - International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1987</year>
					<chapter-title>IUPAC standard method 2.507</chapter-title>
					<source>Standart methods for the analysis of oils, fats and derivatives</source>
					<edition>7th</edition>
					<publisher-name>IUPAC IID19. The International Union of Pure and Applied
						Chemistry</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Blackwell, Oxford</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Jakobsen, M. U.; O'Reilly, E. J.; Heitmann, B. L.; Pereira, M. A.;
					Bälter, K.; Fraser, G. E.; Goldbourt, U.; Hallmans, G.; Knekt, P.; Liu, S. and
					Pietinen, P. 2009. Major types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart
					disease: a pooled analysis of 11 cohort studies. The American Journal Clinical
					Nutrition 89:1425-1432.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Jakobsen</surname>
							<given-names>M. U.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>O'Reilly</surname>
							<given-names>E. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Heitmann</surname>
							<given-names>B. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pereira</surname>
							<given-names>M. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bälter</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fraser</surname>
							<given-names>G. E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Goldbourt</surname>
							<given-names>U.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hallmans</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Knekt</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pietinen</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<article-title>Major types of dietary fat and risk of coronary heart disease: a
						pooled analysis of 11 cohort studies</article-title>
					<source>The American Journal Clinical Nutrition</source>
					<volume>89</volume>
					<fpage>1425</fpage>
					<lpage>1432</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Karabulut, A. and Canbolat, Ö. 2005. Yem deðerlendirme ve analiz
					yöntemleri. Uludað Üniversitesi Yayýnlarý. Yayýn No: 2.05.048.0424,
					Bursa.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Karabulut</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Canbolat</surname>
							<given-names>Ö.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<source>Yem deðerlendirme ve analiz yöntemleri</source>
					<publisher-name>Uludað Üniversitesi Yayýnlarý</publisher-name>
					<comment>Yayýn No: 2.05.048.0424, Bursa</comment>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Karabulut, A.; Canbolat, O. and Kamalak, A. 2006. Evaluation of
					carob, <italic>Ceratonia siliqua</italic> pods as a feed for sheep. Livestock
					Research for Rural Development 18(7). </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Karabulut</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Canbolat</surname>
							<given-names>O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kamalak</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Evaluation of carob, Ceratonia siliqua pods as a feed for
						sheep</article-title>
					<source>Livestock Research for Rural Development</source>
					<volume>18</volume>
					<issue>7</issue>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Kotrotsios, N.; Christaki, E. V.; Bonos, E. M. and Florou-Paneri, P.
					C. 2010. The effect of dietary carob pods on nutrient digestibility in weaning,
					growing and fattening periods of pigs. Journal of Food Agriculture and
					Environment 8:779-782.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kotrotsios</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Christaki</surname>
							<given-names>E. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bonos</surname>
							<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Florou-Paneri</surname>
							<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>The effect of dietary carob pods on nutrient digestibility in
						weaning, growing and fattening periods of pigs</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<fpage>779</fpage>
					<lpage>782</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Lada, A. T. and Rudel, L. L. 2003. Dietary monounsaturated versus
					polyunsaturated fatty acids: which is really better for protection from coronary
					heart disease? Current Opinion in Lipidology 14:41-46.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lada</surname>
							<given-names>A. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rudel</surname>
							<given-names>L. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<article-title>Dietary monounsaturated versus polyunsaturated fatty acids: which
						is really better for protection from coronary heart disease?</article-title>
					<source>Current Opinion in Lipidology</source>
					<volume>14</volume>
					<fpage>41</fpage>
					<lpage>46</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>Makris, D. P. and Kefalas, P. 2004. Carob pods (<italic>Ceratonia
						siliqua</italic> L.) as a source of polyphenolic antioxidants. Food
					Technology, Biotechnology 42:105-108.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Makris</surname>
							<given-names>D. P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kefalas</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<article-title>Carob pods (Ceratonia siliqua L.) as a source of polyphenolic
						antioxidants</article-title>
					<source>Food Technology, Biotechnology</source>
					<volume>42</volume>
					<fpage>105</fpage>
					<lpage>108</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Mozaffarian, D. and Wu, J. H. 2011. Omega-3 fatty acids and
					cardiovascular disease: effects on risk factors, molecular pathways, and
					clinical events. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58:2047-2067. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Mozaffarian</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wu</surname>
							<given-names>J. H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Omega-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: effects on risk
						factors, molecular pathways, and clinical events</article-title>
					<source>Journal of the American College of Cardiology</source>
					<volume>58</volume>
					<fpage>2047</fpage>
					<lpage>2067</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>NRC - National Research Council. 1994. Nutrient requirements of
					poultry. 9th ed. The National Academy of Sciences, National Academy Press,
					Washington, D.C.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>NRC - National Research Council</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1994</year>
					<source>Nutrient requirements of poultry</source>
					<edition>9th</edition>
					<publisher-name>The National Academy of Sciences</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>National Academy Press, Washington, D.C</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation>Ortiz, L. T.; Rodriguez, M. L.; Alzueta, C.; Rebole, A.; Centeno, C.
					and Trevino, J. 2004. Effect of carob (<italic>Ceratonia siliqua</italic> L seed
					in broiler chick diets on nutrient digestibility and intestinal viscosity.
					p.239-242. In: Recent advances of research in antinutritional factors in legume
					seeds and oilseeds. Toledo, Spain. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ortiz</surname>
							<given-names>L. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rodriguez</surname>
							<given-names>M. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Alzueta</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rebole</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Centeno</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Trevino</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<chapter-title>Effect of carob (Ceratonia siliqua L.) seed in broiler chick
						diets on nutrient digestibility and intestinal viscosity.
						p.239-242</chapter-title>
					<source>Recent advances of research in antinutritional factors in legume seeds
						and oilseeds</source>
					<publisher-loc>Toledo, Spain</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation>Perez-Olleros, L.; Garcia-Cuevas, M. and Ruiz-Roso, B. 1999. Note.
					Influence of pulp and natural carob fiber on some aspects of nutritional
					utilization and cholesterolemia in rats. Food Science and Technology
					5:425-430.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Perez-Olleros</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Garcia-Cuevas</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ruiz-Roso</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1999</year>
					<article-title>Note. Influence of pulp and natural carob fiber on some aspects
						of nutritional utilization and cholesterolemia in rats</article-title>
					<source>Food Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>5</volume>
					<fpage>425</fpage>
					<lpage>430</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation>Sahle, M.; Coleou, J. and Haas, C. 1992. Carob pod
						(<italic>Ceratonia siliqua</italic>) meal in geese diets. British Poultry
					Science 33:531-541.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sahle</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Coleou</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Haas</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1992</year>
					<article-title>Carob pod (Ceratonia siliqua) meal in geese diets</article-title>
					<source>British Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>33</volume>
					<fpage>531</fpage>
					<lpage>541</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation>Saura-Calixto, F. 1987. Determination of chemical composition of
					carob pods (<italic>Ceratonia siliqua</italic>): sugars, tannins, pectins, and
					amino acids. Anales de Bromatologia 21:81-93. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Saura-Calixto</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1987</year>
					<article-title>Determination of chemical composition of carob pods (Ceratonia
						siliqua): sugars, tannins, pectins, and amino acids</article-title>
					<source>Anales de Bromatologia</source>
					<volume>21</volume>
					<fpage>81</fpage>
					<lpage>93</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation>Silanikove, N.; Landau, S.; Or, D.; Kababya, D.; Bruckental, I. and
					Nitsan, Z. 2006. Analytical approach and effects of condensed tannins in carob
					pods (<italic>Ceratonia siliqua</italic>) on feed intake, digestive and
					metabolic responses of kids. Livestock Science 99:29-38.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silanikove</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Landau</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Or</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kababya</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bruckental</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nitsan</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Analytical approach and effects of condensed tannins in carob
						pods (Ceratonia siliqua) on feed intake, digestive and metabolic responses
						of kids</article-title>
					<source>Livestock Science</source>
					<volume>99</volume>
					<fpage>29</fpage>
					<lpage>38</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation>Sim, J. S. and Bragg, D. B. 1978. Effects of dietary oil,
					cholesterol and soy sterols on the lipid concentration and fatty acid
					composition of egg yolk, liver and serum of laying hens. Poultry Science
					57:466-472.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sim</surname>
							<given-names>J. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bragg</surname>
							<given-names>D. B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1978</year>
					<article-title>Effects of dietary oil, cholesterol and soy sterols on the lipid
						concentration and fatty acid composition of egg yolk, liver and serum of
						laying hens</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>57</volume>
					<fpage>466</fpage>
					<lpage>472</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation>Sprecher, H.; Luthria, D. L.; Mohammed, B. S. and Baykousheva, S. P.
					1995. Reevaluation of the pathways for the biosynthesis of polyunsaturated fatty
					acids. Journal of Lipid Research 36:2471-2477.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sprecher</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Luthria</surname>
							<given-names>D. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mohammed</surname>
							<given-names>B. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Baykousheva</surname>
							<given-names>S. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1995</year>
					<article-title>Reevaluation of the pathways for the biosynthesis of
						polyunsaturated fatty acids</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Lipid Research</source>
					<volume>36</volume>
					<fpage>2471</fpage>
					<lpage>2477</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation>Yıldırım, H. and Kaya, Ş. 2011. Karmayeme farklı oranlarda eklenen
					keçiboynuzu tozunun (<italic>Ceratonia siliqua</italic> L) etlik piliçlerin
					performansına etkisi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
					16:43-50.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Yıldırım</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kaya</surname>
							<given-names>Ş.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Karmayeme farklı oranlarda eklenen keçiboynuzu tozunun (Ceratonia
						siliqua L.) etlik piliçlerin performansına etkisi</article-title>
					<source>Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi</source>
					<volume>16</volume>
					<fpage>43</fpage>
					<lpage>50</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>
